Racoon:

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/03/sack-of-gov-umahi-deputy-lawmakers-what-nigeria-stands-to-gain-from-the-judgment-lawyers/

IfnobeGod20:


Let me quickly add to your point. He also forgot that the same case has also been decided by the same supreme court, that is the case between Atiku vs Attorney General of the Federation. This was established that Atiku cannot be removed just because he defected.
The case of Rotimi is incomparable to Umahi case. The Amaechi own is a pre-election matter but this is a post-election matter where a certificate of return has been issued.
Old age is really worrying Sagah.
The case of Atiku vs Attorney General is more in line than Amaechi vs INEC.

garfield1:

any law that is alien to our laws is illegal,null and void.for instance,the tribunal sacked ikpeazu for tax fraud but the upper courts said you can't sack a governor based on that.the way to remove a governor are clearly spelt out in the constitution.bode george was acquitted because he was charged with crimes unknown to our laws.what is not in the constitution or subsidiary laws is null and void.you can't put something on nothing.by the way, sagay is a human rights lawyer and not a constitutional or electoral lawyer.it is better you listen to the views of seasoned constitutioal lawyers like ozekhome

His areas of professional and teaching experience include but are not limited to Public International Law, Constitutional Law, Law of Contract, Family Law, Law of Succession, Corporate Law, Business Law, Nigerian Customary Law, Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. He has published 18 law books and monographs with over 200 publications in local and international journals and newspapers. He is happily married with children.