blueAgent:


And you fail to read were It is written that incases were they refuse to vote or participate the vote of the other 4 and 5other non permanent security Council members would be used.

That's the point. They won't refuse to participate in the vote. Why won't they veto a move against them. They've always vetoed it. why will they now refuse.

Upworkwriter007:
That's the point. They won't refuse to participate in the vote. Why won't they veto a move against them. They've always vetoed it. why will they now refuse.

There are other laws and special treaty and rules governing when a vote against a permanent member of the security Council is involved.

shogsman:

Nope it's not, but you can't help but acknowledge the double standards,you can't lecture people about how stealing is bad and sanction them for stealing when you yourself is a notorious armed robber

but you can’t say Because someone is stealing; so it’s now okay for everybody to steal.