Maynmann:


There’s no state laws that determines the type of people you should employ.
You have to be employed first to enjoy “state laws of employment”. This is basic English.

There’s nothing wrong in racism, they just “prefer” their own skin color.

advanceDNA:


Sigh!!

Maynmann:


Look up what “state laws of employments” means.
It’s for WORKERS. This is Basic English bro.

There’s nothing wrong in racism, they just “prefer” their own skin color.

advanceDNA:





Guy...
u keep trying to drag employee/employer into individual prefernce in the dating world

Without tryimg to patronise or sound condescending...what is your point in all of these?? Cos u started with accusing me of changing ...i indulged u with an explanation....

Every time i indulge u...u jump elsewhere....
Whats your point...lets hit it... if we agree, thats great.....if not...thats okay too....

Maynmann:


Boy, It was you that brought “state laws of employment” and you clearly know nothing about it.
Go back and slowly read our conversations.


There’s nothing wrong in racism, they just “prefer” their own skin color.

advanceDNA:


Lol...If you dont want say what your point is...fine then....i'll assume u have no point to discuss...btw... u are the that started with white man employing white as being discrimination.

Maynmann:


Start by learning what “state laws of employment” means.

Stop lying, i said a white man employing only white people is his OWN“preference”.

advanceDNA:



Lying?? Here u go again...

.u dialogue like u have something to gain or prove.... if you have nothing more points to raise....lets call it a day..

Maynmann:


Stop lying, i said a white man employing only white people is his OWN“preference”. And don’t forget to learn what “state laws of employment” means.

advanceDNA:


Lol...this is your comment.

...".If an employer “prefers” to only employ a particular race, then it’s not a problem and NO ONE will question it.
White people too should exercise their “preferences”
this was how u brought emplyer and emplyee into the issue...and u keep saying im lying...lying for what guy??

All i said was that you keep dwelling on the employer/employee issue...that u should make a point...


And uve be sounding like i cheated u or something....it funny.

Maynmann:



And this is your statement liar
“Lol...If you dont want say what your point is...fine then....i'll assume u have no point to discuss...btw... u are the that started with white man employing white as being discrimination”.

Stop lying and learn what “state laws of employment” means

advanceDNA:


Oh that one word is your problem...no vex...

Relayed word dont soumd exactly the same sometimes...

Maynmann:


Didn’t you say there’s a difference between preference and discrimination, liar?

advanceDNA:


Sigh...i did...i never lied about that....

Please make a point

Maynmann:


Don’t lie on me next time to make cheap points.
And don’t forget to learn what “state laws of employment” means, it’s a embarrassing saying some state laws will tell employers who to employ.

“Lol...If you dont want say what your point is...fine then....i'll assume u have no point to discuss...btw... u are the that started with white man employing white as being discrimination”.

advanceDNA:


When did i say state laws tell employers who to employ?? Dialogue with you is very hard

Maynmann:


Why did you bring in “state laws of employment” then?

Comprehension is hard with you.

advanceDNA:


U are the one having a hard time understanding context because u want to insult me.... try to dialogue without all these patronizing.....

So because i mentioned state law u automatically assumed i meant the goverment tell employer who to employ ?? Yet im the ine lying...look oga i give up on you..... if i offended u no vex....

Maynmann:


What does “state laws of employment” got to do with a white man employing only white people as his preference, Answer na omo ise
Comprehension is difficult for you

Beg yourself.

advanceDNA:

U are a very difficult human being...apology is even hard for you...okay i take my apology back..

Can u relax and dialogue in a civil manner?? I no fight with you ..


This dialogue started with individual decisions to date who they want right?? .
..u brought employer/employee into it to make a point?? I.e you wanted to counter my point on preference and discrimination...??

Maynmann:


Who ask for your apology? Is that how you apologize all around?

What does “state laws of employment” got to do with a white man employing only white people as his preference, Answer na

advanceDNA:


I asked u a question just now to know if we get each other to a point so i can know how to explain this time...but u still dont get it...u are always on fight mode... u still want special apology... im not your girlfriend....apologies cant read better than that online .. besides i ddnt offend u...just trying to be civil

Maynmann:

Yawn, Face the discussion and stop being apologetic unnecessary, i no go flog you.

What does “state laws of employment” got to do with a white man employing only white people as his preference, Answer na

advanceDNA:


Sigh!!

Maynmann:


Yawn!!, What does “state laws of employment” got to do with a white man employing only white people as his preference, Answer na

Fuel don finish?

advanceDNA:


Theres no point...explaining to you over and over wont address the this issue... u still wont get because u just want to fight....and i'm not in the mood

Brunosamel:
you think google is the best way to get the answer your need,
Well here is my recommendation
The book of pook
Rational male
Heartiste the game

Ivimmanuel:
She did well, I can't have any thing serious to do with an atheist. You did well to move on too good luck finding a girl you share themsame believe with

JJfrank22:
That same bible says can two walk together except they agree Amos 3:3

Light and darkness has no relationship to add friendship with the world is enemity with God.
Shey I don dey quote bible ni