Fahvvy:


What is discriminatory here sir? ...

A male police officer who gets a woman pregnant can still go about and effectively carry out his duties as a police officer, but can a pregnant police officer do that? ... - The answer is NO!!!!!

Let's be real here...
Men and women aren't the same, and so we don't play by the same rules so trying to put us all into one box is BS! ...

The whole principle of "what is good for the goose is good for the gander" doesn't always apply in all cases ...

And besides, since you and other people think that this is discriminatory, why didn't y'all also wail like this during the Russia- Ukrainian war? ...

Why didn't females sue the court for "discriminating" against them during the war? ...

Why wasn't the whole, "good for the goose, good for the gander" propaganda pushed as vehemently as this? ...

See eh ...
One thing I've noticed is that women only complain about "unfairness" and "double standards" when it appears to not favour them ...

But once it's in their best interest, they're all cool with it ...

Well I'm not surprised, na their way be that ...

Lemme end by saying this...
We should stop looking at people as male and female or seek to go the path of inclusion in the work force ...

But rather we should focus on efficiency and effectiveness in dispensing our duties. ..

And once anyone, be it male or female shows any sign of inefficiency, they should be dropped like hot coal ...

Utter RUBBISH!

sharone21:



Utter RUBBISH!

Yeahhhh ...
I agree with you ...
Who am I to disregard your opinion of yourself ...

Bluffly:

The earlier we understand that no two side are the same the better for the society.

This is difficult o, as the cry for equality as overshadowed everywhere. Personally, it's something I consider to be good as it's supposed to be a levelling ground for both gender. Unfortunately, deep down some of these so called feminists want things to always be in the favour of the females and not really equality. They often use the slogan that "man has always been in charge, it's time for the females to take over". There's even one idiot that's always fond of shouting "the future is female". So does that mean that the males have no place in the future?? Without the males will there be a future to start with??

Dybala11:

This is difficult o, as the cry for equality as overshadowed everywhere. Personally, it's something I consider to be good as it's supposed to be a levelling ground for both gender. Unfortunately, deep down some of these so called feminists want things to always be in the favour of the females and not really equality. They often use the slogan that "man has always been in charge, it's time for the females to take over". There's even one idiot that's always fond of shouting "the future is female". So does that mean that the males have no place in the future?? Without the males will there be a future to start with??

There cannot be equality but there can be equity(economical opportunities). Women were supposed to see equity as a privilege by men but no they rather became arrogant. The Christian scripture inspired by God Almighty told women not to be deceived by favour. Proverbs 31:30 King James Version (KJV).