With the evidences laid before the tribunal, it is safe to conclude that Oyetola is coming back to govern Osun State yet again. As at Sunday, 17th of July when Adeleke was declared Governor elect, the number of votes counted out numbered accredited voters for the election, meaning PDP bypassed the BVAS machines and over voting took place in over 700 polling units.

olabamijisamson:
With the evidences laid before the tribunal, it is safe to conclude that Oyetola is coming back to govern Osun State yet again. As at Sunday, 17th of July when Adeleke was declared Governor elect, the number of votes counted out numbered accredited voters for the election, meaning PDP bypassed the BVAS machines and over voting took place in over 700 polling units.

Gbam

olabamijisamson:
With the evidences laid before the tribunal, it is safe to conclude that Oyetola is coming back to govern Osun State yet again. As at Sunday, 17th of July when Adeleke was declared Governor elect, the number of votes counted out numbered accredited voters for the election, meaning PDP bypassed the BVAS machines and over voting took place in over 700 polling units.

But it affects both parties. If the election in those units is cancelled it will affect both parties. We are watching anyway.

senatordave1:


Gbam

Have you ever heard of information as at the time of Request.

Go and understand that about What Oyetola is carrying about and the complete synchronized BVAS Data

engineerboat:


Have you ever heard of information as at the time of Request.

Go and understand that about What Oyetola is carrying about and the complete synchronized BVAS Data

The apc has discharged the burden of proof while pdp has not rebutted it

JAMO84:
Adeleke have been solid on the job so far, I won't mind if he wins at the Tribunal. Whatever the outcome, I know my State will be greater with Asiwaju in Aso Rock Villa.

Can you tell us what he has done so far.

All we want is for Justice to be done in Osun state. A party that compromised BVAS should not be allowed to enjoy the reward of such criminal misadventure.

senatordave1:


The apc has discharged the burden of proof while pdp has not rebutted it

They did not discharge any burden


1. It was clearly written on their alleged BVAS data (available as at the time of request)

2. WAEC Is the sole owner and the one that can ascertain which result is correct or not. APC only dump result for the trinunal

3. APC acclaimed statistician was only contradicting itself

seunmsg:
All we want is for Justice to be done in Osun state. A party that compromised BVAS should not be allowed to enjoy the reward of such criminal misadventure.

How was BVAS Compromised

Its better you give credence to your claim as how was BVAS Compromised

engineerboat:


They did not discharge any burden


1. It was clearly written on their alleged BVAS data (available as at the time of request)

2. WAEC Is the sole owner and the one that can ascertain which result is correct or not. APC only dump result for the trinunal

3. APC acclaimed statistician was only contradicting itself

1) inec has failed to rubbish the claim of apc over the bvas report.
2) waec was never called by pdp to verify the results and pdp never rebutted any proof.documentary proofs shows that it was forged.
3) apc did not call any statistician,it was pdp that called and he admitted overvoting

tk4radi:
..



I am following this Osun Election Tribunal Bumper-to-Bumper.


This particular process is going to be one huge step that would form a strong concrete-base to all future Election Tribunals that are based on the Electoral Act of 2022.


.

. I agree with you! I am interested in the BVAS on trial. If BVAS generates two different results for petitioner and defendant what will happen? If BVAS is not syncronised before election can we accept result generated from it? The outcome of this case to the SC level will define our 2023 election.

seunmsg:


Can you tell us what he has done so far.

Nothing spectacular, but he's showing some signs of good leadership.

ejimatic:
. I agree with you! I am interested in the BVAS on trial. If BVAS generates two different results for petitioner and defendant what will happen? If BVAS is not syncronised before election can we accept result generated from it? The outcome of this case to the SC level will define our 2023 election.

Remember BVAS Is a backup in case where there are Issue, It doesn't mean that Result will not be announced when Sychronization is not yet completed.

APC case is a a case of running to meet Your class teacher to give you the Exam Scripts and score even is still not completed with Your C.A


Remember that No PU Agent complaints of any Over-Voting, No PU agents was called as witness, this are issue APC failed to do, hence You can't just dump loads of materials on the Tribunal and expects them to perform magics

senatordave1:


1) inec has failed to rubbish the claim of apc over the bvas report.
2) waec was never called by pdp to verify the results and pdp never rebutted any proof.documentary proofs shows that it was forged.
3) apc did not call any statistician,it was pdp that called and he admitted overvoting

I will advice that You

1. Read the INEC rules regarding BVAS usage and Electronic transmission of result and Synchronization in Inec Guidelines and Electoral Act of 2022 signed into law

2. APC star witness is who Please. and Why did APC stop calling any more witnesses when there star witness failed to proved His Written PW1 Statements

3.

engineerboat:


Remember BVAS Is a backup in case where there are Issue, It doesn't mean that Result will not be announced when Sychronization is not yet completed.

APC case is a a case of running to meet Your class teacher to give you the Exam Scripts and score even is still not completed with Your C.A


Remember that No PU Agent complaints of any Over-Voting, No PU agents was called as witness, this are issue APC failed to do, hence You can't just dump loads of materials on the Tribunal and expects them to perform magics

. . I love your conclusion.When CAs are not ready can we distribute result cards?

engineerboat:


I will advice that You

1. Read the INEC rules regarding BVAS usage and Electronic transmission of result and Synchronization in Inec Guidelines and Electoral Act of 2022 signed into law

2. APC star witness is who Please. and Why did APC stop calling any more witnesses when there star witness failed to proved His Written PW1 Statements

3.

Why did pdp and inec closed their cases after one witness? Apc case is predicated on documentary evidences

senatordave1:


Why did pdp and inec closed their cases after one witness? Apc case is predicated on documentary evidences

Because they are enough

And now Why did APC closed his case after listing so many witnesses

Between primary complete data and Secondary incomplete data which is more genuine

Adeleke out, Oyetola in.
"Case closed "

engineerboat:


Remember BVAS Is a backup in case where there are Issue, It doesn't mean that Result will not be announced when Sychronization is not yet completed.

APC case is a a case of running to meet Your class teacher to give you the Exam Scripts and score even is still not completed with Your C.A


Remember that No PU Agent complaints of any Over-Voting, No PU agents was called as witness, this are issue APC failed to do, hence You can't just dump loads of materials on the Tribunal and expects them to perform magics

The bolded part,, they blamed Atiku of this in 2019.
In 2019, Atiku and Co.. made INEC to come and dump loads of Certified True Copies of Election Results Sheets without trying to cross-examine INEC in order to establish some facts they were trying to establish.
To cap it all, the analyst who they called upon to handle their data was not a certified statistician, but a chemical engineer, thus they wouldn't accept his analysis of data as a statement from an authority in statistics