Tallesty1:
He could be lying. People lie

Even if his lying. In the UK ones you pay someone for an organ it becomes a crime.

lawrenzooo:


The mismatch was not because his kidney didn't match that of Sonia! It was rule as mismatch because the boy wasn't aware he is to donate his kidney. It was when the doctors realized that he wasn't aware that they declared him a mismatch.

Mr. Ekweremadu also claim the boy is Sonia cousin which is also a lie.

He ran away after he was asked to prepare to return to Nigeria.

Thanks for the correction.

naturefellow:
na only maladjusted, ignorant people you dey kiss?

Are you saying that Dominique is maladjusted and ignorant?

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

But there's another version of the story that the boy was deceived into the UK.
That is was when he got there he became aware of the reason he was there.

Okoroawusa:

Are you saying that Dominique is maladjusted and ignorant?

the response you seek is in the numerous unfavourable quotes to her dense comment.

She'll wish she never made it. That's the person you want to kiss? Makes you dense as well!

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

Your type will say because a 13 year old agreed to have sex with a old man, it's not rape.

Ekweremadu can't say he didn't know the law in Europe and the UK regarding trafficking and illegally acquiring kidney. The boy was questioned and when he couldn't give a proper answer, everyone was called in for questioning.
How do you know the Ekwerenmadus wouldn't have killed that boy as soon as he stepped foot in Nigeria and asked for his money? What about after care? Who will take care of him? This is why we have laws on saner climes and it's difficult to circumvent them there unlike Nigeria.

You deserve the leaders you get.

lawrenzooo:

Well the law is the law. In UK you aren't allowed to consent to your own detriment. Moreover the boy said he wasn't told he was coming to donate his kidney.

But he admitted he was given 270k. What for? To donate his eyes? Trust that boy at your peril

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

This is such an uneducated take. But not surprising at all. Nigerians love to do the wrong thing.

It doesn’t matter whether or not he was underage. They took advantage of his financial circumstances to coerce him into an illegal deal and trafficked him for organ harvesting. He is 100% a victim.


Your siding with a rich man and failure to understand how power dynamics in Nigeria can lead to people doing things they wouldn’t normally do also makes you a victim of Nigeria’s dysfunctional nature.

lawrenzooo:


The doctor was suppose to pay the boy 4million before he left Nigeria but only 270,000 was given to the boy. Obviously the doctor ate the remaining money.

Even if the boy received 10 billion uk will still jail them

dominique:
But the boy was not kidnapped or coerced to donate his kidney, he offered to. He was the one willing to sell his kidney to highest bidder so why make him a victim? Ekweremadu is a corrupt politician that deserves to be flung in jail for stealing but that boy is no victim! He agreed to it, he's not underaged neither is he mentally unfit to decide on his own. I hope the UK authorities deports his snaky ass.

I don't even care about this! What I care about is the fact that God has used an ant to bring an elephant to his feet.... How God works no one knows

othermen:
Take advantage of the boy?? The boy took advantage of a sane environment. But I think it’s just terrible to cheer the family’s misfortune. The family could have erred, and their inactions or refusal to use their influence in the past, may have cost lives, that they should deserve our utter contempt- but we shouldn’t mock them nonetheless.

Of coz, they are likely to understate the consequences when discussing with him, but let us assume they didn’t and instead, they explained to the boy very well, what the long-term effects could be.

Of coz, there shouldn’t have been any monetary incentive, but I think many would be willing to support such a request, with cash or other supporting incentives. (A crime ??)

Let us assume, the family that needs a donor thought so too.
For the donor, could the monetary or other incentive be more propelling or compelling at the onset? Let us assume it was.

His kidney was going to be yanked, he wouldn’t give that without a promise for exchange of another reward. Let us assume the boy was naïve, and he was underpriced.

If he wasn’t underpriced, and the supposed donor wasn’t short on intelligence. Could the donor experience decisional regret? Of coz he could. In fact, recent studies on decisional regret among donors, indicate that younger age and lower education are predictors of regret.
So regret was an item and when it was time for the procedure, it became more stark. So stark, that the ‘affective’ theatrics couldn’t help; of coz, he knew that it was only because of the transplant, that anyone cared. Such reflection on the expectation of care can be sufficient to create an utter dissonance and complete turnabout.

After this, the Ekweremadu’s probably couldn’t keep him any longer, the promises of reward or the reward given were withdrawn; he is to return to wherever or whatever condition he was from, with his kidney. They were probably others as well, putting pressure on him, invested in all of it, with a rebuke for the boy.

So, what could he have done? Now, we know he is not likely returning to that condition he came from and he’s still got his kidney. In a year or two, his family would be with him in the UK.

Was Ekweremadu naïve and exploitative? Perhaps. Was he an organ trafficker? Then, he must be foolish as well to have decided to have the transplant in a standard hospital in the UK, and not in Iran or some shady place, where the donor’s consent is not required.

you for Kuku go judge the case na since you know better than the judge that judged them. A judge that was presented with all the facts available and you that is basing your nonsense on assumptions