>

---

Please kindly be informed that there is delibrate misconception about the decision of the SUPREME Court on Osun election and BVAS This misinformation is a deliberate attempt to engulf the emotion of the public into believing that BVAS is the only point of decision of all post election cases.. PLEASE DISREGARD THESE FALSE PEDDLERS

The main prayer of Oyitola was centered on over voting and the SC rule that it's only the BVAS that can prove over voting.

The SC did not and was never said that over voting is the only electoral malpractice that must be brought to Court or that all form of electoral malpractice must be called over voting.

The SC only said that for you prove that a particular PU engaged in over voting. The BVAS must be the primary source which is RIGHT.

It didn't say that suppression, cancellation, mutilation of vote or other electoral malpractices that has nothing to do with over voting should be tied to BVAS. Please get this right.

I have seen how some people on nairaland have tried to make it look like all electoral malpractice brought before the court must be tied to BVAS.

As to the best of my knowledge, none among LP, APM or PDP went to court/tribunal for over voting (I stand to be corrected)

Mod over to you

wasiubello:
Please kindly be informed that there is delibrate misconception about the decision of the supreme Court on Osun election and BVAS, just to engulf the emotion of the public into believing that BVAS is the point of decision of all post election cases.. PLEASE DISREGARD THESE FALSE PEDDLERS

The main prayer of Oyitola was centered on over voting and the SC rule that it's only the BVAS that can prove over voting.

The SC did not and was never said that over voting is the only electoral malpractice that must be brought to Court or that all form of electoral malpractice must be called over voting.

The SC only said that for you prove that a particular PU engaged in over voting. The BVAS must be the primary source which is RIGHT.

It didn't say that suppression, cancellation, mutilation of vote or other electoral malpractices that has nothing to do with over voting should be tied to BVAS. Please get this right.

I have seen how some people on nairaland have tried to make it look like all electoral malpractice brought before the court must be tied to BVAS.

As to the best of my knowledge, none among LP, APM or PDP went to court/tribunal for over voting (I stand to be corrected)

Mod over to you

Let me correct you,obi complained of overvoting in ekiti

ok

Thats just one state! The BVAS report for presidential, Senatorial and House of Representatives if thesame and consistent, establishes whats contained in the bvas because its same accreditation. If the figure is different from Form EC8A, then overvoting is established.

garfield1:


Let me correct you,obi complained of overvoting in ekiti

garfield1:


Let me correct you,obi complained of overvoting in ekiti

If that is the case, he will have to apply to bring the BVAS to court or ask the court what could be extracted from the BVAS which serve thesame purpose for BVAS.

DMerciful:
Thats just one state! The BVAS report for presidential, Senatorial and House of Representatives if thesame and consistent, establishes whats contained in the bvas because its same accreditation. If the figure is different from Form EC8A, then overvoting is established.

Not true.thats not how the apex court judge it.for you to establish it,you must produce the machine for the presidential and then voters register and compare with ec8a.reps,senate is totally different

And INEC has reconfigured bvas oo chaiii

yarimo:
And INEC has reconfigured bvas oo chaiii

Everything was backup sir

wasiubello:

Everything was backup sir

and the backup cannot be tampered with?... Technology has its ills

wasiubello:

Everything was backup sir

hehehe back up with exactly what INEC declared TINUBU as winner

They have given Labour Party the certified true copy of the backup

babyfaceafrica:
and the backup cannot be tampered with?... Technology has its ills

Maybe you don't know that inec server was hosted on AWS cloud, which make it almost impossible. to temper

babyfaceafrica:
and the backup cannot be tampered with?... Technology has its ills

Are you implying that the election was actually rigged as alleged and INEC is working earnestly to cover their tracks

They are not robots that do things based on program. Nobody can bring ten of thousands of bvas to court. There will be other ways

garfield1:


Not true.thats not how the apex court judge it.for you to establish it,you must produce the machine for the presidential and then voters register and compare with ec8a.reps,senate is totally different

Bvas machines is the primary source while the server(Irev) is the secondary source . Assignment for APC comrades

DMerciful:
They are not robots that do things based on program. Nobody can bring ten of thousands of bvas to court. There will be other ways

Then,your case will fail

Lets see!

garfield1:


Then,your case will fail

wasiubello:

Maybe you don't know that inec server was hosted on AWS cloud, which make it almost impossible. to temper

Dey play, just dey play

babyfaceafrica:


Dey play, just dey play

Okay, let's watch and see outcome

First a mad man was causing nuisance in a plane shouting Obidient. APC propaganda.

Second, they created phamtom forgery charge against Abure....to no avail.

Third, they hacked Obi's call and doctored it about a religious war....imagine a private conversation.

Fourth..they went to Washington DC to accuse Obi of treason

Fifth, they brought Lamidi Apapa from nowhere to cause confusion ..it failed.

Sixth, they brought a kangaroo judgment from Kano sacking all LP elected officials in Kano and Abia...it failed woefully.

Seven they brought Calistus Okafor since Apapa has failed.

Calistus is not gaining traction so they wanna bring Tinubu funding.

These people know that Obi is coming!