ba7man:
This isn't Anambra, your "OKWUTE" has been relegated back to being the local champion he is.

IamV2:


Q. You are not here on the authority of Amazon.

A. I'm here as an expert witness, not on Amazon

Q. You're here as a Labour Party activist.

A. That's incorrect

[ First respondent [INEC] cross examiner is done with cross examining the witness ]

IamV2:


Q. You are not here on the authority of Amazon.

A. I'm here as an expert witness, not on Amazon

Q. You're here as a Labour Party activist.

A. That's incorrect

[ First respondent [INEC] cross examiner is done with cross examining the witness ]

telleyway:


That's where you got it wrong. No one has that except inec. AWS has the overall security infrastructure while inec has access to it's own infrastructure. Apart from inec, it's only by hacking that one can have access to their to their infrastructure. That's the direction the lawyer was pushing her to.

HIGHESTPOPORI:
By winning tinubu in Lagos and stopping tinubu from getting 25%?

IamV2:


Q. You are not here on the authority of Amazon.

A. I'm here as an expert witness, not on Amazon

Q. You're here as a Labour Party activist.

A. That's incorrect

[ First respondent [INEC] cross examiner is done with cross examining the witness ]

IamV2:


[ 2nd & 3rd respondent [ Tinubu & shettima] cross examiner is about to cross examine the witness]

2nd and 3rd Respondents Cross-examination:

Q. Look at your letter tendered before the court. It has no author, no name.

A. There is, Employee Resource Center is the name of the author.

Q. May I suggest to you that Employee Resource Center is a person ?

A. It's a department that handles employment verification.

Q. The letter is not signed.

A. It's signed by employee resource center.

Q. There is a signature there?

A. This is the verification letter given to all employees within Amazon.

Q. You didn't attach iD cards

A. AWS does not issue identity cards.

Q. There is no appointment letter given to you

A. The appointment verification letter states my appointment date.

Q. This is not your first time in court.

A. I've been here a few times

Q. You have a Twitter handle ?

A. Yes

Q. This is your Twitter handle @*** ?[ not stated for some reasons ]

A. That's right

YourMrBoo:


This is so low of the counsel, is like going for a punch below the belt

I can see the frustration already....

The onus is on INEC to provide the cloud trail of the application they used. Let the whole world see that the glitch was INEC shutting down their presidential server and leaving the rest.... How miraculous...

sreamsense:


Did I tell some of you guys that Amazon can never release her staff to speak against their client? I said the so called LP staff Amy just be one that did one certification on AWS or Aba made certification. Now, I am vindicated! She has no access to INEC server trails or activity logs. She is not standing for AWS Amazon because she did not receive

They insulted me in my thread where i did say all this.

Obedients are so dull and dumb. Always masturbating on unnecessary issues.

We are following authority from AWS to represent her, she is more representing LP because she had contested on that platform already. LP has no case, nothing to prove here with this rubbish statement

telleyway:


That's where you got it wrong. No one has that except inec. AWS has the overall security infrastructure while inec has access to it's own infrastructure. Apart from inec, it's only by hacking that one can have access to their to their infrastructure. That's the direction the lawyer was pushing her to.

SangoOlukosoOba:


Serious work 🤣🤣🤣🤣


Work that won’t materialize to anything!

Better invest that time in watching porn instead of hoping and deliberating on impossibilities

IamV2:


Q. You are not here on the authority of Amazon.

A. I'm here as an expert witness, not on Amazon

Q. You're here as a Labour Party activist.

A. That's incorrect

[ First respondent [INEC] cross examiner is done with cross examining the witness ]

Confirmedzombie:


I told them she is not a staff of Amazon. Now she has confirmed it.

She came as an expert not for Amazon. Courts do mot accept evidence of third party.

Where the obi is coming gang.

Where are the Inec is in big trouble gang.

Where are the Tinubu is finished gang.

Where are the Obi na man you be gang.

Your purported AWS staff is just an expert and did appear in court for Amazon.

senatordave1:


First of all,lp should have served the subpoena to AWS and then they will delegate someone to testify

SangoOlukosoOba:


🤣🤣🤣🤣

You are very funny!

Scared that Peter will become president 🤣🤣🤣

Imagine you telling me Arsenal would win the Champions League 🤣🤣🤣

senatordave1:


Her testimony is already dead.shes there on a frolic of her own

senatordave1:

And how did he fare up north

Ruskov:

Agbaya.

You just told over 3 million people you watch Porn. I strongly believe you can do this in private and still keep quiet.
mxm

IamV2:


Q. You have put what you've watched on your Twitter handle.

A. That's incorrect.

Q. I suggest to you that you downloaded the reports from AWS site.

A. The reports are public information posted by Amazon.

Q. The reports are not your product.

A. They are, because I brought them to court.

Q. You contested election to House of Reps in the Labour Party ?

A. Yes

Q. What's your feeling about that, are you happy?

A. I'm Indifferent

Q. The authorship of this report is not yours

A. I brought them to court, so they are mine

senatordave1:


Her testimony is already dead.shes there on a frolic of her own

senatordave1:


She's not the maker of the document and therefore not competent to testify

senatordave1:


They don't need to.her evidence is doubtful and untenable

tinsel:
The greatest mistake Obi's lawyers are doing is to give these SANS one whole day to come back from cross-examination.

drsibz66:


That's why you are myopic and impaired. Why do you think arsenal can't win the champions league. All those that have won it had a first time.

Bro there is more to what you senses can perceive.

00FFT00:


Have you heard of the term "witness impeachment" before?. How do you do that without presenting rebutting evidence?.

HIGHESTPOPORI:
You mean where the results was manipulated

senatordave1:


Her partisanship taints her