When it comes to matters of love, women are more logical than men in their selection process. She can only love you if you serve a purpose to her.

Her love always comes with a condition: It may be financial security, your potential, brilliance etc. A condition must be met.

This is why it's a white lie when women say they stayed with a man when he had nothing.

There's a condition the man met that made her stay, a condition that bested the advances of other men. She didn't stay out of pity. Women can't love men honourably.

If you don't fulfill a condition in her life, she wouldn't think twice to unleash her ruthlessness & dump your sorry ass.

As I said earlier, the condition isn't necessarily money. The reason women are wont to use the line "when he had nothing" is because relationships have become heavily monetized, all thanks to simps.

So she's telling you she could have accepted the advances of those simps who can't possibly satisfy her emotional needs which is what your "broke ass" was unrivalled at.

You see?

That was self-seeking, not an act of selflessness. If she got a rich dude who could satisfy her emotional needs, then gone would've been your love & that's not debatable.

Women only love you if you serve a purpose to them. Their loyalty is not to your love, but to their interests.

Women only love you if you serve a purpose to them. Their loyalty is not to your love, but to their interests.

But that won't stop y'all from marrying one.

Interesting.

You concede women are logical in relationships matters. But in every other areas, they're emotional beings.


Una matter dey really taya person sef.

ImmanuelMyron:
But that won't stop y'all from marrying one.

Abi? I wonder.

'Cause it'll do them a whole lot of good if they left women alone to wither away and die of loneliness.