Roland17:


I see wetiin you do there oh.

raumdeuter:


4th all time CL top scorer. Where do your Torres and Giroud rank

No wonder Lewandowski dey face Chelsea and he scored and assisted 7 goals in 180mins

Griffon:


The standard metric to adjudge a player has always been consistency. Consistency in goal scoring, assists and overall performance.

I cringe when I read craps like "He isn't a top player b'cos he doesn't perform in big games". That criterion alone doesn't make one a top player, rather how consistent they've been with other metrics I.e goals, assists etc.

Fabregas is among the best midfielders in the world, however, he loses his guile at the most crucial part of the season. February-June is the festive period of the Champions League; the knock-outs. And he almost always fails to deliver when it is needed the most. Should we now say he's a fraud cos of that alone?

Ibrahimovic has won almost everything there is to win at club level – except for the holiest trophies of them all: the Champions League. Should we now adjudge him by that failure?

Don't read those craps Dayo and some scummies post about UCL this, World Cup that. The only metric that count most is CONSISTENCY. Let's stick to that.

DExponential:

He also scored 4 in 90 against Madrid. Your own Lewanflopski couldn't
Beast a UCL final
Score a goal in the World Cup. They came fourth ffs
Get a shot on target in 3 matches at Euro 2016
Maybe we should give him an award for being the 4th all time CL top scorer. We should also give Ansu Fati an award too

BlueAngel444:
is it because of Penandez

BlueAngel444:
how about we used a standard site rating to adjudge the players. A site like who scored that isn't bais

Roland17:


I see wetiin you do there oh.

raumdeuter:


When your striker is top 5 all time CL scorer we can have a conversation
Behind only Messi Ronaldo and Raul

I understand that a Chelsea fan will be bitter that 1 player scored and assisted 7 goals in 2 matches vs your team

4th all time CL scorer Robert Lewandowski slayer of Chelsea

Griffon:


We'll still be suggesting the same thing. At the end of the day, our judgement will be influenced by how consistent the player kept scoring, assisting etc which all come in the form of stats.

No standard site uses a metric like how many UCL or World Cup won to adjudge who's a top player, we only see that on Nairaland.

ennyjay72:
trey is about to cry

Unlimited22:
Ampadu leaving on loan means we are almost certainly signing the very overrated Rice. Na wa o

BlueMann:
Anyways I like Jorginho's one touch instincts

Ibime:


That would be a foolish move. I don't trust that Wilder not to bench him

BlueAngel444:
Our next signing is going to be a GK, perhaps Mendy. Rennes are asking for north of £30m, if Marina pulls off another 30% reduction that would be Chelsea paying less than £20m.

abeg we need a new GK, whether she sells squad players and fringes for half their price, even selling Kepa for scraps (if ATM are willing to sell Lemar for £20m and take a loss, we better cut the dead weights out) buy Oblak for £120m.

raumdeuter:


When your striker is top 5 all time CL scorer we can have a conversation
Behind only Messi Ronaldo and Raul

I understand that a Chelsea fan will be bitter that 1 player scored and assisted 7 goals in 2 matches vs your team

4th all time CL scorer Robert Lewandowski slayer of Chelsea

Top scorer UCL 2019/20

thorrvik55:
If we miraculously end up not signing Declan Rice then I would rate this transfer window 10/10.

If Rice comes then it's 6/10 for me

Ibime:


That would be a foolish move. I don't trust that Wilder not to bench him

donjazet:
Chelsea is on fire mehn. Once we upgrade on Kepa, we are set for the season.

donjazet:
Chelsea is on fire mehn. Once we upgrade on Kepa, we are set for the season.

airmark:


He will displace anybody in the team, if he hits the ground running as expected. I like the way he likes to boss the middle. I don't want to call him the new Zidane yet though.

DExponential:
I see a Scummy trying to console Prof. Raum

eddie7:


I read part of the Rule somewhere and a portion specified on the word "INTENTIONALLY".... but obviously and clearly, this wasn't anywhere near intentional. Global politics and undue personal interest playing out here. My malnourished opinion