mystikal: Murray has just invented speed tennis at Wimbledon.

A lot happened while I was away. Nadal. . . what

Sharapova and Williams seems to be on everyone's lips, but I admire how Kvitova is quietly dispatching her opponents with ease. Could just sneak into the final again.

#teamtsonga.

mystikal: Murray has just invented speed tennis at Wimbledon.

A lot happened while I was away. Nadal. . . what

Sharapova and Williams seems to be on everyone's lips, but I admire how Kvitova is quietly dispatching her opponents with ease. Could just sneak into the final again.

#teamtsonga.

Delafruita: had my heart in my mouth during the third set.memories of baghdatis beating murray in 2006 came to mind.i believe this is murray's year and the wait will be worth it.would have loved to meet nadal enroute the final but,its all the same.#teammurray

AndrewFlexx9: Up Andy Murray!!

كلورين: I don't know why you guys are buying into this british media BS! Why? This guy is a bad player, he has never won a grand slam and yet he gets more attention more than people who have won them in double figure!
All because he is british!
Murry is not winning nothing, novak or roger are the players to beat, not some undeserving player!

femzy:

Who are these people ...lmaoffff

fredoooooo:

petra is very good on this surface , i wont be suprise if she win again . watch out for vika too

ddippset: he'd have to assasinate djokovic and federer for him to have his time.

femzy:

Who are these people ...lmaoffff

Delafruita:
people who believe a player as good as andy murray will win wimbledon 2012

كلورين: I don't know why you guys are buying into this british media BS! Why? This guy is a bad player, he has never won a grand slam and yet he gets more attention more than people who have won them in double figure!
All because he is british!
Murry is not winning nothing, novak or roger are the players to beat, not some undeserving player!

Delafruita:
Murray beat federer in indianapolis a few years ago,beat novak a couple of times only he hasn't replicated same in the slams.I know he will this year.watching him against davydenko was thrilling.he made just 8 unforced errors against karlovic compared to 42 for his opponent.baghdatis was a tough opponent but murray showed character to come back to win it.call him the "drama queen" or "undeserving" the fact remains the dude is 4th best in the world and deserves a slam.most of those commenting don't even know murray's game.with nadal out.his path to the final is clear.he plays a similar pattern with novak and only needs to outlast the serb which he failed to do last time.I doubt federer will get to the final but if he does,his long forearm won't work this time

Delafruita:
people who believe a player as good as andy murray will win wimbledon 2012

Delafruita:
i find you people amusing.a player with a career record of 75%victories,22 singles titles,once ranked second in the world,currently ranked 4th,was in semi-final of all slams last year,losing finalist in 3 slam finals,has been in the top 10 since 2007,just 3 years after turning pro in 2004.you now call him a bad player because he has never won a slam.has tsonga won a slam,has david ferrer won a slam,has isner won a slam?you guys dont really know what you're talking about.murray is way up there with the best and will silence his critics this year

karpentar: Murray represents typical British sporting ways. Like the English football team and clubs, its all about defense and hoping to only score by taking advantages of opponent mistakes or from set pieces. No initiative or attacking mentality. Murray its the same. Just returning the balls and defending without initiating any attack for most part of his tennis matches. There's no way he can win any grand slam that way. He can only manage to win few ATP tours once in a while because the other top players don't take these tours as serious as the slams.

British are just noise makers that hardly win anything except in some sports that opponents don't even understand the rules such as sailing, horse racing, snooker, cricket or even rugby. Useless autocratic country where kingship and queenship is left to only one family.

karpentar: Murray represents typical British sporting ways. Like the English football team and clubs, its all about defense and hoping to only score by taking advantages of opponent mistakes or from set pieces. No initiative or attacking mentality. Murray its the same. Just returning the balls and defending without initiating any attack for most part of his tennis matches. There's no way he can win any grand slam that way. He can only manage to win few ATP tours once in a while because the other top players don't take these tours as serious as the slams.

British are just noise makers that hardly win anything except in some sports that opponents don't even understand the rules such as sailing, horse racing, snooker, cricket or even rugby. Useless autocratic country where kingship and queenship is left to only one family.

Delafruita:
Murray beat federer in indianapolis a few years ago,beat novak a couple of times only he hasn't replicated same in the slams.I know he will this year.watching him against davydenko was thrilling.he made just 8 unforced errors against karlovic compared to 42 for his opponent.baghdatis was a tough opponent but murray showed character to come back to win it.call him the "drama queen" or "undeserving" the fact remains the dude is 4th best in the world and deserves a slam.most of those commenting don't even know murray's game.with nadal out.his path to the final is clear.he plays a similar pattern with novak and only needs to outlast the serb which he failed to do last time.I doubt federer will get to the final but if he does,his long forearm won't work this time

Delafruita: your post shows you dont even know what you're talking about.murray demolished davydenko with an all-attack strategy.with karlovic,his priority was to first break the dangerous serves the big man is known for,settle into a rhythm then break into an attack.with baghdatis he had to be defensive.baggy beat him in 2006 with his wide shots.to prevent that murray had to remain on his line most of the time and the strategy worked.

[size=13pt]First all, your posts just got me smiling.
We are talking about 5 setter slams where you need added stamina and you are calling names like beating Bagdahtis,Isner and Karlovic who only serves without backing it up with basic tennis as a feat. I doubt if you know what it takes to win a single GS(please ask the top 3). Next time if you want to bring valid points to us, please talk about the best.
With a record of losing 0-3 in his past GS finals each time in straight sets is enough reasons to tell the whole world he needs something extra. I can forgive his inexperience to lose to Great Fed in the US open finals 08 but losing consistently to my dear Novak in the Aus 10 & 11 finals in straight set tells me or anyone he shows consistency in losing at big moments. I can go on and on why Murray is just a hype but in cusory please just know that Murray is a good ( not great) player playing in a wrong era. I don't and won't type much on this tablet as I won't like to kill your dreams. . [/size]