Theory: comprehensive explanation/analysis based on the interpretation of available data/evidence.

Germ theory

Big B.ang theory

Evolution

franklly speaking there r creative intelligences everywhere in nature. it's some of these intelligences dt xtians, muslims n other religionists take as their gods.

proflomo: franklly speaking there r creative intelligences everywhere in nature. it's some of these intelligences dt xtians, muslims n other religionists take as their gods.

most lies ar couched in grand languages. Wat dyu mean by "creatve intelligence in nature" ?
Most christians take this to b their God? - ar u sayng chrstians look 2 nature for knowledge of God? Ar u daft? Other atheists do better thn mistake christianity 4 animism and here u come criss crossg the two? Talkg like u r an authority on religion wen ur woefully ignorant of d basic tenets of d faiths u r tryg to denigrate with ur sweepg quip.

#5 is a strong point that all so called atheist should ponder about.

noetic16:

That was one long and SENSELESS post.

1. The OP referred to an instance whereby for example Mr A goes to bed and has a dream. In that dream, he,
a. walks into a street called "pity street"
b. is approached by a white man named Kevin
c. Kevin is in a blue suit
d. Kevin spoke to Mr A in a SCOTTISH accent.
e. At the end of that conversation Kevin hands over £20 to Mr A.

Mr A wakes up and realises that he has been dreaming. On a sober reflection of the dream, he also acknowledges that
a. He does not know any street called pity street.
b. He has no friend by the name Kevin who has a Scottish accent.
c. He does not know why anyone would hand over £20 to anyone. Hence, Mr A dismisses this dream.

72 hours later, Mr A finds himself stranded on pity street after his bus (mode of public transport) journey is terminated. <a class="inlineAdmedialink" href="#">London</a> bus drivers are on strike from 6pm. There is no way for him to get home. Out of his predicament, one of the fellow bus riders named Kevin with a scottish accent, gets into a conversation with him. Kevin offers to pay for Mr A's taxi ride back home, Mr A is pleased, hence, £20 is offered and received. Only when he got home did he realize that he had dreamt of this incident 72 hours ago.

The point is
A. The human brain is incapable of conjuring future events. Hence your instance of imagination propelling such dreams is rather POINTLESS.
B. People dying in sleep in yoruba land has nothing to do with the potency of dreams coming to pass. are you educated at all?
C. The dream in the above example is a message, that eventually comes to pass. The message could only have come from someone capable of knowing the future. This is an accurate description of God. In lieu of this, the OP submits that dreams serve as a plausible evidence for the existence of God.



You are IGNORANT. For you to say that there is no such thing as Deja vu, you simply killed the argument with your intellectual incapacity. Go do some further reading and then come back.



This is quite MISLEADING and exposes a deep rooted ignorance in you. Abrahamic faiths (Christianity in particular) does not negate science, unless of course you dont know the meaning of science.



You made no SENSE.



Your Dads sperm and mum's egg created you, Fine. What/who created the first living person?

Nice response

Kambo, i'm not at all suprised at ur repulsive response. religionists (esp xtians and muslims) av always bn very repugnant, adamant n destructive 2 universal but simple facts. it's well known hw ur forefathers in xtianity and islam waged serious wars against universally feasible facts n d men/women dt directed our attention to these facts. but then religion has always lookd unto science- d Great Embodiment of verifiable facts, for some sort of verification of the numerous false notions which some1 sitting some....

sittin somewhere just cook up 4 his own or his tribal aggrandziment. it's a matter of time: religion 'll sooner or later lose its falsehood-ridden foundation. though, u d practitioners 'll fight doggedly but then it's a case of a house built on a muddy foundation. no matter how massiv it's n how long it has stood, its collapse is inevitable. but 4 now let religion continue 2 serve its noble purpose of being an arbiter 4 socialisaton n morality advocacy.