ifyalways: I don't know about accomodation but check the landmark schools, ikorodu.

http://www.landmark-college.com/

If you get a good offer without an accomodation, another option is to look for a teacher you can squat with.

All the best.

sunjos79: Send ur handwritten application with ur cv,two passports to
The Agape
no 31 jimoh odutola strt,
off eric moore,
surulere.
Send within a week.
Note:4rm mile two,enter orile.ask 4 doyin busstop,then 4 jimoh odutola strt.
Goodluck

musKeeto: I think I've asked this on another thread.. Can anyone give a concise explanation of what a soul is?

Beaf:

I have never seen such schools (except abandoned ones) even in rural areas. I agree though that the matter should not be over politicised.

Why is it that Ogun state is always in the frame though? It points to a systemic failure in my opinion.
Here's a vid on the same issue, the villagers actually use the school as a toilet:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmzS9cPsuOY

aderemi457: It does not mean succession and yet they have a flag??

greateros: POLITICAL AUTONOMY IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM SECESSION

Political autonomy: definition
Political freedom (also known as political autonomy or political agency) is a central concept in Western history and political thought, and one of the most important (real or ideal) features of democratic societies.[1] It has been described as a relationship free of oppression[2] or coercion;[3] the absence of disabling conditions for an individual and the fulfillment of enabling conditions;[4] or the absence of lived conditions of compulsion, e.g. economic compulsion, in a society.[5] Although political freedom is often interpreted negatively as the freedom from unreasonable external constraints on action,[6] it can also refer to the positive exercise of rights, capacities and possibilities for action, and the exercise of social or group rights.[7] The concept can also include freedom from "internal" constraints on political action or speech (e.g. social conformity, consistency, or "inauthentic" behaviour.)[8] The concept of political freedom is closely connected with the concepts of civil liberties and human rights, which in democratic societies are usually afforded legal protection from the state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_freedom

POLITICAL AUTONOMY IN NIGERIAN CONSTITUTION
Between 1959 and January 1966 when the first military government of General Aguiyi-Ironsi came into power, each of the three regions had constitutional powers to regulate its education, trade, agriculture, health care, and judiciary. The 1959 constitution on the basis of which Nigeria was granted independence by Britain allowed each region to develop and modernize its culture and society at its own pace.

The system of government that Nigerians have come to know since 1966 is one created by the military to "homogenize" the diverse economic, political, and religious cultures in the country. The take-over of regional universities by the federal military government in the 1970s, the deployment of soldiers as governors or administrators in states other than their own and with traditions and cultures that differ from those of their states of origin, the surreptitious enrollment of Nigeria in the Organization of Islamic States, indicate, for example, the erosion of social and cultural autonomy for the regions that constitute the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

For instance, no efforts were made to find out if the non-Hausa-Fulani states in Nigeria liked to join the Organization of Islamic States. Even in the days of colonial rule, the Northern region was given a choice to determine if and when it wanted to attain a self-governing status. Its decision not to be self-governing was respected in 1957 while the decision of Eastern and Western regions to become self-governing was also accepted. The enrollment of Nigeria in OIC or the new Islamic counterpart of G8, would have, in the context of a truly federal system in which the states or regions are autonomous, been presented as optional to each region. There are precedents in Nigerian political history for this. Between 1957 and 1959, Eastern and Western Nigeria had special diplomatic reprsentation in London while the North did not. In a genuinely federal system, it would have been proper for the Islamic Hausa-Fulani-Kanuri states in northern Nigeria to have a special relationship with the OIC and the Islamic G7 without necessarily having to push unwilling states along in the name of Nigeria.

Historically, the British colonial thinkers and strategists never imagined a unitary system of government for Nigeria. Nothing in the way and manner in which they administered the country suggested that they would have preferred the total obliteration of the diverse pre-colonial cultural identities they met in Nigeria. The policy of indirect rule, as distinct from the French policy of assimilation, is evidence that the British preferred a system of multiculturalism that federalism nurtures to a system of monoculturalism that the present unitary system of government in Nigeria is designed to promote.

http://www.yoruba.org/Magazine/Summer97/F2.html

Its time to correct this imbalance in the Nigerian constitution. the ogonis has made the first move - lets watch and see the federal governments move.

I don't envy the president of Nigeria now cause the ogonis just put him between the devil and the deep blue sea.

any move from GEJ, be it right or wrong, will attract heavy criticism - if GEJ doesn't react, and the ogonis went ahead to create their own constitution to guide them, the northers will raise alarm citing favourtism from the president[forgetting that they are the first to declare autonomy by initiating sharia in some states in the north]

on the other hand, if GEJ should send soldiers to discourage them, Nigerians will say he is killing his own people and the ogonis will seek protection under UN on grounds of acts of genocide on their people [citing many atrocities meted against them by the Federal Republic of Nigeria] based on the resources they have, the US and other world powers may be compelled to support them to attain full independence from Nigeria. once ogoni peoples succeeds in their quest, that will be the end of Nigeria as we know it!

I Will look for the maps to support my post!


I HOPE AM NOT HIGH ON THAT STUFF MUSIWA USE TO TAKE!

djustice:

I will say it anywhere and anyday. Bola Tinubu was a traitor to NADECO and a double-agent for Abacha, along with his bosom friend, James Ibori, the man who assisted in killing Rewane. Bola worked for Abacha throughout, and quickly moved in to benefit from his eventual death. he is a traitor and will die a useless and disgraced man. Mark my words. Those who know, know.

Beaf: But Tinubu was one of those that sold MKO!