₦airaland Forum

abbey621:
NATO is not just one country and if the nutcase called Russia didn't go imperial on their neighbors, nobody would want to join NATO in the past 30 years. Take Putin for example, he thought he was crushing Ukraine but all he has successfully shown the world is that joining NATO is a much needed step instead of staying neutral. If Russia could do this to its brother Ukraine, who be Finland wey dem no fit destroy.


They have been joining NATO before the invasion and Russia simply won't allow NATO in Ukraine same way America won't allow Russia in Cuba. Do me I do you. It's all about Russias national interest and NATO should have respected that
Like it or not, NATO is bound to get stronger not because of its morality/goodness but because of the way Russia represents an inherent threat to European countries. USA was thinking of reducing funding to NATO but Russia successfully showed the importance of a strong NATO. It's a complete irony

Toktee:
How?
In eastern Europe Russia cannot flyover any NATO member airspace.

Cannot even do business with them.



Russia is isolated.



In the event of war NATO will just roll in from Sweden, Finland, Poland etc.


Russia is now faced with what she fear must.

Toktee:
How?
In eastern Europe Russia cannot flyover any NATO member airspace.

Cannot even do business with them.



Russia is isolated.






In the event of war NATO will just roll in from Sweden, Finland, Poland etc.


Russia is now faced with what she fear must.


Isolated my left yansh

abbey621:
Who told you they were the good guys? I simply stated with so much power, other countries would have caused much more devastation. There's no way Russia or China can have that much power(Physically and economically) and they would sit back rather than go on the offensive. Japan, China etc can have all the nukes they want but father na still father, nukes pass nukes, I told you before, there's a reason North Korea has not fired nukes at the USA even tho it has perfected the technology......The reason is DEFENSE! By the time they launch one, four hundred is already heading their way with full force and fury.

There's a reason the U.S has satellite launchsite positioned strategically all over the world, if you think it is just by having nukes alone then you're on on a long thing my friend, apart from Russia and China, there's no country on Earth that can survive nuclear onsalught from the USA....KNOW THIS AND KNOW PEACE!

abbey621:
Always think about context, with so much power they can take almost any country on the planet but rather than continuing to build nuclear weapons and going on the offensive, they've actually scaled back, focus more on defensive technoilogies and are now giving monetary compensation to countries rather than full scale conflicts. If people like you knew how much the USA spends yearly on peace keeping initiatives, preventing wars in the middle east and other high conflict areas, una go bow!

Like I told the other Russian bot, read man, READ!

abbey621:
What you wrote is comical! Japan was not nuked out of frenzy or for fun, the leader refused to give up after several warnings, U.S spent over 2 weeks for the government to surrender but it kept attacking and refused to surrender. The war was already 4 years long at this point and it wasn't just the U.S that decided it was time for nukes, the U.K and other signees to the Quebec agreement gave their consent as well, you talk big about bias but the bias in your writeup stinks so high!

If nukes were easy to make, North Korea would have fired on the USA by now but alas dem never born their papa well, it is one thing to have nukes, it is another thing to be able to defend against nukes. U.S is not only feared for its offense, it is admired for its defense as well. If you wanted to speak about world security, remove the USA from the equation, do you actually believe the Soviet Union or China would have been so generously meek with so much power?

You said it yourself, US does not invade its neighbors but guess what the others have and will do so again and again if there were no USA and NATO. How about that for world security.....lol.

Opolopoopolonio:
Only US had the nuclear bomb in 1945. They should not have allowed the Russians to develop one.

Once the Russians had gotten it, US could not stop any other country.

That's the mistake they made.

NairaMaster1:
To also worsen it, what if America deploy their nukes? What I see is that the west is civilised and value their people if not nuke is not monopolised in Russia. The US has the most effect nukes and Army till tomorrow. Why is it taking Russia this long to capture Ukraine?

Nazgul:
US would not use nukes on Russia cities because of their civilian population, USA has a high respect for human lives, but Putin wouldn't blink twice if the opinion of nuking New York, Texas or California presents Itself regardless of it's high civilian population.

That's the difference between both of them, and that's why the US are threading softly and cautiously. They're more concerned about human lives.

MaxInDHouse:
The highlighted said it all!

Jesus was invited to participate in politics by the overall master in politics, but there's one thing he demanded from Jesus {Luke 4:6-7} do you notice what Satan (the ruler of the world) asked in return? John 14:30; 1John 5:19
Well the Bible is not just a story book Sir, it's meant to enlighten us about sacred secrets of things that befell unwise people in ancient times! 1Corinthians 10:6, 11
Whoever participate in politics anywhere on this planet is serving Satan, that's why Jesus said he came to expose all the secret of the devil for his own disciples, politicians themselves often confess that politics is a dirty game which means it's not meant for sheep but goats.
So it's not for Jesus' disciples to participate in the works of the devil: POLITICS!

Baloranking:
Fa cup is the last trophy for you this season. All thanks to Chelsea for the gift.

Know this, know peace

Baloranking:
Still man city for league na gra gra una dey do

BigDawsNet:
Mo 22
Son 21

Son need 2 goals to get it
Next spurs game is Norwich... Son can definitely score two

Salah just need a single goal...against Southampton
One goal for MO will be an extra job for Son...

I hope he get a goal or even penalty

BigDawsNet:
City draw means...

We can't rest player anymore

All full squad

But I will like origibtobreplace salah

BigDawsNet:
You want to play with Southampton without a Leader to coordinate them even if its just 45min?

Shebi Aston villa flog una 7

Southampton own go reach 15

BigDawsNet:
Wonderful victory

Good job boys

We did it.

We can handle the rest...

This set of player should rest against Southampton

Vandijk
Mane
Salah
Diaz
Allison
Tiago

Replacement
Miller
Jones
Gomez
Origi
Mamino
Keller

Got high hope on Championship league...we can do it!!

Liverpool for Life

HardMirror:
you are dodging the question. I asked, what are the russians looking for in ukraine?

HardMirror:
can you also read what you are saying? What are russian soldiers doing in Ukraine? Why should the ukrainian army not shoot at them?

HardMirror:
what is wrong with you? Are they not in their country? Why is Russia concerned where Ukraine army choose to stay in their own country