₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
Tell those who went to school to calculate 1/64 vs 1/38 and give you their opinion

Why are you ignoring the losses in ucl considering the quality of Rubin Kazan and the clueless Mourinho that did the flogging on Barcelona that year in Ucl?

Godx:
I will like to know on what basis you proclaiming them the best team in Europe? If it's because they won the champions league last season then they are loopholes to that.

Which team are you tipping as the best?

raumdeuter:
What I posted is Barcelona dropped points in 7 games, Liverpool has dropped points in just 1 game

Now draw your correlation

Stick to this line. You didnt check drawn games here and i didnt.

raumdeuter:
In that same time, since January 2019 in europe they have lost twice to Barca and Napoli playing 13 games

So don't you think the 1 loss in 64 games is due to weaker opponents?

1 loss in 38 games is due to weaker opponents in laliga that season, if Rubin Kazan could beat them at home, and your overrated Mourinho completed the routing in Ucl.

Laliga was weak that season.

lordfalcao:
mumu that’s why you are now watching with a relaxed mind.

Yes while you are not relaxed that Chelsea is in first 4.

Lordfalcao a member of Aparisports and the Frameworkers.

raumdeuter:
WHy dont you stick to what you know?
What we know is Brcelona dropped points in 7 matches that season, compare that to Liverpool this season

What i know is what you first posted, number of losses in local league and ucl. You should stick to it.

Barca lost once and away in laliga but got sodomised at home by fvcking Rubin Kazan. While your useless Mourinhoe completed the banging in Ucl.

Laliga was too weak that year for that to happen bro.

raumdeuter:
BARCELONA drew 6 and lost 1. That shows in 7 contests they met their match
compare that to Liverpool that has drawn just 1

For Liverpool to meet that Barcelona season, out of the last 12 games they will have to lose 1 and draw 5

That means nobody was strong enough to defeat Barcelona at home like Rubin Kazan. The drawn matches might even be when their key players were rested, so you can't just scratch it on the surface.

lordfalcao:
I don’t know why am seeing tears all over this place about bad officiating..

Una don forget karma is a bitch, when una dy laugh Man U and man city when officials go against them nko.

Now is our turn to feel the pain, abeg mk una no disturb us about officiating here

One of those olorigbeskeres that wanted Lampard and Chelsea to slump, because we didn't accept he succeeded earlier with their Sarri's framework.

raumdeuter:
Which 76 games in La liga did Barcelona lose twice?

2008/09 Barcelona played 38 lost 5 games
2009/10 played 38 Lost 1 game
2010/11 played 38 Lost 2 games

Provide us your evidence

I thought i edited it.

They lost once in 2009/2010 in 38 laliga matches and it was an away match. But lost twice in Ucl, one at home to fvcking Rubin Kazan.

Can we say laliga was weak that season?

raumdeuter:
In that same time, since January 2019 in europe they have lost twice to Barca and Napoli playing 13 games

So don't you think the 1 loss in 64 games is due to weaker opponents?

2009/2010 Barca lost twice, one at home to fvcking Rubin Kazan in Ucl. In la liga, they lost just once away in 38 matches. Maybe that was due to weaker opponents in laliga too.

*Edited.

nihilistjnr:
So it's only you that saw the state of the team?

Or do you not see on this thread how we're all shouting that we need a new:

1. Kepa
2. Centre Back
3. Right Back
4. Right Winger
5. Striker

So if we're not optimistic about the playing staff, what is there to caution us about?

Of course, the only thing to caution us about is being optimistic about Lampard.

You even said yourself how that you actually get annoyed that we praise Lampard when we win.

So why are you trying to distance yourself from your own position now?

Bro we all know you've been sucking the ghost of Sarri's pënis hard since Lampard's appointment - stop trying to change mouth now.

Dont mind the mumu, were we not praying for the transfer ban to be lifted on this thread?

airmark:
What happens if transfer ban is lifted and we strengthen in January?

He didnt know how to come out straight, to drive home his Sarri agenda.

nihilistjnr:
This is a dubious angle to come from - We all know what you mean by 'I told you so'

This has ALWAYS been your angle:










Your focus has always been than Lampard is a worse manager than Sarri - That's the 'I told you so'. That's why you're always keen to say you warned us.

Otherwise what else are you warning us about? Our poor attackers? Our wack defenders? Our mumu keeper? Or has there been anybody here that claimed we have to personnel to contest for a title.

The only thing most of us have been optimistic about, is the pattern of play under Lamps....and it irks you because you want to remind us about how great Sarri was

He can only deceive his foolish self, not brilliant minds. I know his type.

nihilistjnr:
I didn't even see this - You nailed him spot on.

He thought he was engaging a dullard.

donjazet:
WTF are you on about You keep rambling on without meaning? I don't know where you saw me blame Lampard for yesterdays loss. I have been solidly behind Lampard for eons because I understand his situation for this season. I am extremely patient with him unlike you that doesn't know where to stand as usual, today you are drumming support for him, tomorrow, you are laying curses on him.
You keep going around in circles, not knowing when or where to stop. Please start using your brain intuitively.

You are an idiot and no hiding place for you as we could see through your asinine agenda.

You first claimed Lampard's early success was down to Sarri's framework and no biggie. When we shot that move down, you came up with that stupid Giroud agenda.

You blamed Lampard for not using Giroud in place of Tammy. When Lampard used him against West ham and he cost us the match, you went mute, later giving foolish excuses. You waited for the slump you prayed for in December, you didnt get it.

When Chelsea couldnt fall out of first 4 as you stupidly predicted in December you went into your shell, only to be dropping posts sparsely here and there.

Yesterday was the day you foolishly decided to come out in your colours to attack my belief in Lampard doing well (making first 4) with this team. Despite knowing all the major factors warring against the team you foolishly took a dive.

The difference between me and you is, i use my brain while you dont. Criticising Lampard for failing to strenghten in January, doesnt mean he is not better than your Sarri, who is now struggling in Italy. Not buying players wasnt even only Lampard's fault, so i will still support him, despite having his own flaws.

Nobody expected Lampard to win the league, some of us believed he could make first 4, while you were expecting a big slump. Even after yesterday's loss, which was obvious to the blind why it happened, Chelsea are still in 4th.

You can go and jump into a river for my supporting Lampard and relegating your Sarri. I won't even call it one spanner lost.

obainojazz:
Well.. I have to give Airmark's fart some credit...
It's been smelling for ten years now..

So you still faulted that expert even while he tried to troll. The kid is an expert in foolishness.

One of donjazet 'i told you so' posts, even when his Giroud missed 3 good scoring chances to bury the match against West ham. He wouldn't blame Giroud. Mofo.

donjazet:
Bikeman, this is the I TOLD YOU SO moment.
When an experienced fan says something, you listen.

I told you to be patient till this festive period and fixtures before assessing the team correctly.

This is not the 1st or 2nd time, the team goes on a winning run before a costly slump.
The teams winning run blinded you to its limitations thus exposing your football analytic ineptitude and inexeperince.

Just forget about any title challenge or UCL run and hope for a top four finish.
It will be a miracle/anomaly for Lampard and these boys to win anything.

nihilistjnr:
Don't mind donjazet

What did he tell us exactly?

Let's be real, Lampard tactics though dubious, did not cost us that match


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnbzhBhEI10

Firstly we had a professional enemy of progress playing up front for us.

Just look at the highlights and see how Batshuayi was able to proved his credentials as a chartered short one last night.

Secondly, the quality of refereeing was abysmal. Maguire should have been sent off by VAR. If bloodclaart ref had done his fücking job, the complexion of the game would have changed.

Thirdly, a quality equaliser was ruled out unjustly. Fred pushed Azpi into Linjollof - Why rule out the goal for a foul, but not give a penalty?

Fourthly, Maguire scored. Person wey suppose dey baff for dressing room at the time.

Fifthly,. Giroud goal disallowed because half his foot was offside in a goal he scored with his head.

Is this what we were warned about? Is Lampard really to blame for incompetent staff and referees? Are we suppose to curb our enthusiasm simply because the bloodclaart ref no know ball?

Yet the moronn came to add my name to his ' i told you ' nonsense. Where was the foolish donjazet when Lampard beat Mou at home?

Leyqute:
It is when they don’t have anything tangible to say dem go Dey yarn dust like this.

Relaxed nonsense and ingredients

They said you never had sense. This is a confirmation.

nihilistjnr:
Have you ever heard anybody in this section accuse Leyqute of having sense?

I think you're safe to do the bolded bro. Leyqute will even clap for you.

donjazet:
Ibime, to me this is not a battle or fight or whatever where there is a winner or not, per say. For once, I am just calling out this individual who does nothing but talk crap most of the time, gives contrasting opinions with more incoherence and people just have to endure it.
For once, his folly has to be pointed out.

Your follies have been pointed out many times. You blamed Lampard for not using Giroud ahead of Tammy. The same Giroud that made us lose at home against West ham. Only a foolish Chelsea fan like you will prefer Giroud to Tammy. Only a foolish fan like you would blame Lampard and leave Giroud after losing that West ham match. Only a foolish fan will blame Lampard alone for yesterday's loss.

Ibime:
Reliable against who? Albanian farmers?

My friend stop that noise.

Giroud has been utter shyte. .

Giroud has had plethora of opportunities to take the first team shirt and failed massively. Conte and Sarri hated Morata yet could not even rely on Giroud.

Giroud was no fücking 2nd striker. He had one foot in the first 11 for a full year and failed.

A true 2nd striker is Batsman who has never had starting shirt unlike Giroud. Batsman only got few minutes here and there unlike Giroud who started many games and failed.

In EPL:

Batsman 668 minutes, 8 goals - that's one goal per 84 minutes

Giroud 1563 minutes, 5 goals - that's one goal per 313 minutes

Can you see the difference between an "okay second striker" and a "failed first striker" who relegated himself to 2nd striker by failing to take his chances. Batsman is a real 2nd striker who never got starts, while Giroud was given shirt and relegated himself.

donjazet:
As usual, another incoherent load of trash from you, not surprised at all.

In order to defend your indefensible craps, you highlighted my former post where I suggested that Lampard gives Giroud better playing time and drop Kepa for being poor. As of the time of that post, Tammy was on a mini drought, he was one of the first to get to 10 goals but stuck there for other peeps to catch up while Kepa kept conceding goal left and right and I logically counseled for a shake up to improve the situation but to you that makes no sense?

Why am I surprised? You seem to have created a world for yourself, one were sound reasoning and logic sounds idiotic and idiotic sounds reasonable, you are indeed a unique individual, one who has a uniqueness of being absolutely stupid while appearing normal.
Take time off and do a little reevaluation of yourself.

Mini drought? Like top strikers never went 5 matches without a goal before. You were so foolish to rely on a useless Giroud on goals, such that the likes of a40 and lordfalcao laughed at your stupidity.

A40:
If you're banking on goals from Olivier Giroud then there is problem oh

Even ibime was forced to spank your dumb head, regarding the useless Giroud agenda you were pushing.

Ibime:
Reliable against who? Albanian farmers?

My friend stop that noise.

Giroud has been utter shyte. .

Giroud has had plethora of opportunities to take the first team shirt and failed massively. Conte and Sarri hated Morata yet could not even rely on Giroud.

Giroud was no fücking 2nd striker. He had one foot in the first 11 for a full year and failed.

A true 2nd striker is Batsman who has never had starting shirt unlike Giroud. Batsman only got few minutes here and there unlike Giroud who started many games and failed.

In EPL:

Batsman 668 minutes, 8 goals - that's one goal per 84 minutes

Giroud 1563 minutes, 5 goals - that's one goal per 313 minutes

Can you see the difference between an "okay second striker" and a "failed first striker" who relegated himself to 2nd striker by failing to take his chances. Batsman is a real 2nd striker who never got starts, while Giroud was given shirt and relegated himself.

When the useless Giroud missed 3 opportunities and we lost against West ham, you didnt come out with your 'i told you' post on Giroud. Instead you blamed Lampard and claimed that you were right about Chelsea dropping points. How senseless and shameless could you be?

eph12:
lana1, after that 4:0 match in the first leg, airmark boasted about the return leg. Abeg epp us dig those unfortunate yarns please

It was unfortunate actually. No thanks to the referee and VAR man, both from Manchester, that ensured you got the win. Congrats VARchester utd.

donjazet:
My friend take a seat at the far corner and chill for once. Your impulsion has always been your undoing. You just type and post the first thing that comes to your mind without objectively thinking. You mostly back yourself into a corner and then spew all sorts of trash trying to wriggle your way out of earlier said trash. All these make me wonder what you do in the real world when you have much time to type in megaloads of trash online.

The only idiot apart from lordfalcao on Chelsea thread, is you.

I remember sometimes in November before Lampard started Giroud in a match, you were here criticising Tammy, saying Giroud was a better striker and Lampard should prefer him. Everybody attacked your foolish thought.

donjazet:
I no know wetin Giroud do Lampard, he should start using Giroud more Abeg.
Abraham is looking like one of those strikers that would require 10 chances to score one. Chelsea are creating lots of chances and scoring few of them. I think Abraham would feature in the list of wasteful strikers.

As for Kepa, we need begin look for replacements. His save percentage is too low for a goalie in an elite club.
A top keeper is supposed to help his defense frequently but with kepa, once you bypass Chelsea defense, na sure goal be dat.

Lampard started your Giroud against West ham at Stamford bridge, he missed 3 good chances and we lost. Instead of you dolt to blame Giriud, you cane to town with your filthy fingers and stinking mouth to blame Lampard and told people here about your initial thoughts on Lampard.

You troglodyte is here again to bare your fang as usual.

The insanity in you cant be cured, even if you live the rest of your life in Aro neuropsychiatric hospital.

Lana1:
Oga no vex but all this one na story. These ur posts were made this January.

U made ur 'relaxed mind' post in November during Lampard's homeymoon phase.
Lampard did initial gra gra for you and you fell in love at first sight. Now wey his true colors don show, u wan dey change mouth.

"i SaW iT CoMiNg"

Even Barca with Suarez, still wanted to get a striker. Whats your point? I had wanted new additions long before January. Your post made no sense.

donjazet:
My friend, stop yarning what you don't know or understand. Clearly, you didn't follow this issue from its onset.

While many were drunk in ecstasy while we were winning the small teams, I committed a crime of going against the herd mentality rampant here, I called for caution in our optimism, I had to remind them of the current weaknesses in the club, some even thought we were in a title race.
I also pointed Chelsea's famed history of going on good winning runs like this before a huge slump, but all my logical dispositions were foolishly seen by airmark and his cohorts as me being negative.

Time and over again, airmark has proven to be foolhardy. He's foolishly impetuous a lot of times and rarely analyses football intelligently except on the odd occasion hence why he is constantly the object of ridicule and it is mind boggling how this individual maintains a following despite his erratic thought processes.

When Lampard was doing well and others were calling you out, i remember you were here trying to defend yourself, no matter how ludicrous it was and i kept mute. Now you are here to attack me, you are showing your true colour, later in the evening i will have your time. You simpleton that always think with his anus.

Na Fenibeso go kill you today.

eph12:
Your useless team won't be disgraced at home if you had busquets on the pitch yesterday

Yes Barca never lost at home when Busquets was on the pitch. Reason, i recommended him for your team looking for the new Carrick.

Lana1:
Is that tears i see??

No, it didnt tear Batshuayi's balls.

I saw it coming, fxxk those who thought i was relaxed after our 'zero signing' during January.

Lampard will definitely be the fall guy.

airmark:
What's the essence of lifting the transfer ban now? Lampard may just go the way of Conte.

airmark:
Bruno Fernandez was one of those i wanted Chelsea to buy last summer because of his contributions to goals. If he hits the ground running, we are in for it, if we continue dropping points here and there.

The idiotic members in our board seem to be after profit and not after trophies. Thats how the board treated Conte and we ended up not playing in the Ucl.

Even the Abraham we are talking about is not yet there. Imagine if he gets injured, we will now rely on Batshuayi or Giroud.

The 150m was audio money.

See trolling below.

airmark:
This Lampard no get sense at the end of the day.

Mapoka:
That's his opinion

This team is a mess
The inconsistency is too much
Who is his right senses plays Batsuayi ahead of Giroud?

Both are useless, we saw Giroud in matches he started in the past this season. Even lordfalcao, with limited football knowledge saw it.

Chelsea were stupid to keep both.

lordfalcao:
omo, this giroud cannot do anything. He has a useless one leg

Leyqute:
Nonsense and ingredient.

When VAR and ref gave Ajax 2 red cards and awarded you a penalty in 10 seconds so you can draw a match everyone knew you were about to lose why didn’t you yarn this nonsense?

Poor defence.

If you are a lawyer, na hunger go kill you.

ChristineC:
we need a Carrick-type DM too, the flexibility will be akin to when we had Carrick to mop and create from deep and Fletcher/Hargreaves to charge down opponents further forward.

Buy Busquets.

Oasis007:


Airmark did watch the Match with relaxed Mind.

Not when Anthony Taylor from Manchester, the new Howard Webb, was the one who handled the match and Chris Kavanagh, VAR, also from Manchester.

Congrats VARchester utd.

Lana1:
Na airmark be that no doubt. You can see his handwriting all over that post and the relaxed manner he used to pass his message across.

Mine would have been to blast him for not pursuing both Giroud and Batshuayi away and get Cavani or Mertens as backup.