₦airaland Forum

xtrorse:
Now that you have brought to the fore your fears on IPOB pursuit it's time you channelled your negative energies towards consolidating your OduaArewanistan republic before you run mental...

likila:
barstard!
i volunteer to do press-up.
let the banza burantaci go and fight boko haram
banza

theDEVILisHERE:
Its obvious you are not ready to get to the truth of the matter
If you do you will be able to give insights to those simple questions I asked
Anyway
As much as ancient history is filled with lots of conquering and land grabbing activities
One thing is certain
Every city or town is and has always been established by a set of people
The people give the cities or towns names based on their indeginous languages which are often based on their understanding and relationship with the area in which this cities or towns are formed
Jerusalem, galilee, judea etc are all cities and town within the land of Isreal established by the various tribes of isreal
Remember Jerusalem is also nicknamed "the city of David"
Who is David
Is he not a one time king of isreal
The Arabs (no matter how closely related to the isrealites they are), the romans, ancient jebusites, philistaines etc did not establish those cities or towns
They have rather being constant invaders into those cities and towns at different periods of ancient history
The isrealites have always been invaded and taken into slavery (which was the order of the day during ancient times) at different points in ancient history
As much as this did happen they always returned to their land from exile
When they return they always rebuild their destroyed land and most of its important structures
Case in point the rebuilding of King solomons (remember king solomon is king Davids son) temple many times after their return
The medivial era was the last time they where invaded and disperse from their land of which many went into exile in europe and other parts of the world with the aim of not returning back
The constant persection in Europe which climaxed with the events of world war 2 made them to resolve to return back to their land with the determination never to be invaded and desparsed again
The process of returning back to their land made them to meet a situation already created by the descendants of the romans (spear headed by the diabolical vartican), the descendants of the philistines (present day palestinians) as well as the evil and demonic British (who had and still have a sinester plan with the situation they created)
With the situation on ground they had no option than to fight their way in back to their land
History is filled with lots of conspiracies and coverups
Are the current isreali's the true Isrealites
We cannot really say
But one thing is certain
The Arabs/Philistians (aka palestianians) have no right, I repeat NO RIGHT to claim that land because it does not belong to them
DON'T BOTHER ABOUT BIAFRA CAUSE NO ONE HAS THE POWER TO STOP IT'S RE-EMERGENCE

theDEVILisHERE:
Mr man
My facts are not based on some nonsensical Roman configured book called bible
My facts are based on real history
Like I asked
Why are those cities/towns not answering their so called original names
If the names where changed
When where the names of those cities/towns changed and by who
Why was the al-aksa mosque built on a site where the already existing temple of solomon was
Arabic as a language originates from present day saudi arabia
Now how did it find it's way to prsent day isreal
Also where were the Isrealites living before they found themselves scarttered all over europe and other parts of the world
These are simple questions you are supposed to be able to answer if your facts are right
As for biafra
Don't bother yourself cause its restoration is already on the way

ShowYourCertificate:
These Boko Haram guys had a field day in the Governor's hometown. They packed foodstuffs and diesel and loaded them unto their trucks. The other day, they had a field day in Buhari's Housing Estate in Damaturu killing scores of innocent Nigerians.

Meanwhile COAS is somewhere busy doing press-up

https://punch.cdn.ng/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Chief-of-Army-Staff-Maj.-Gen-Turkur-Buratai-doing-push-ups-with-soldiers-in-the-North-East-recently-360x225.jpg

TheOnlyWiseMan:
You have comprehension problem.

TheOnlyWiseMan:
Thank you for your endless sermon, with this, I'm convinced that you believe that biafra is not achievable.
I advise you quit this and other similar threads so as to allow us to continue our Wild Goose Chase


THANKS

kenny987:
And to ur mind I didn't respond clearly enough to that post huh? Like I said, read again!

pazienza:
The US engineered nothing. Those ethnic nations USSR were tired of Russia and Moscow domination. They wanted to control their own destinies, they have their own countries.
They were only lucky that the US interest aligned with theirs.

In case of Yugoslavia, those other ethnicities in Yugoslavia we're tired of Serbia and Belgrade control, they wanted their own independent countries, they were only lucky that the foreign power interest aligned with theirs, so they helped them.

In the case of Biafra, the desire of Biafrans for independence was not in alliance with those of the Caucasian super powers, because :

1, the British had interests of exploiting the Eastern region crude oil wealth, it needed docile and subservient rulers to achieve that, Ojukwu and Biafrans are not known for being subservient, the British felt that the Arewa-Oduanistans were their best bet if they must control and exploit the Eastern region oil wealth.

2. Biafra is the Blackman challenge of the convention reached by Caucasian powers in Berlin 1885, if Biafra was allowed to secede, the rest of Africans might start questioning the Caucasian abomination called countries created at Berlin. Biafra would have sent a domino effect throughout Africa that might see the redrawing of the African countries map and see to the emergence of real nations build on mutual consent by component ethnic groups. This obviously didn't suit well into their( Caucasian powers) exploitation plans for Africans.
Real strong African nations wouldn't be so easy to exploit, abominations and aberrations like Nigeria and the rest, are sitting ducks waiting for exploitation.

kenny987:
Did u even grasp d sense n message in my post before quoting me? Read again!

wale6run:
[b]You have reduced the discussion to alternating between whimpering and bigotry, which I will not dignify with further response hereafter.
Do you know how many nationalities or tribes are there in India, Ghana, Senegal, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Angola, South Africa, Kenya, USA, Canada etc? These were under colonial masters besides those previously listed. Either your history is faulty or you don't know your onions!
No body forced you into Nigeria. Indeed, one of your eminent sons, Zik, fought for Nigerian independence. You were happy for Ibos to be at the helm of affairs in Nigeria but as soon as power slipped from your hands, you started churning out outlandish excuses for Ibo-own country!
Power slipped from your hands because of that same tribal bigotry that conspired with Biafra to eliminate all National and regional leaders except of Ibos' extraction. This is the genesis of your mistrust in Nigeria. As for your threat of achieving Biafra come rain come sun shine, only an unhinged general will brag of running away from the war front as a feat.
No matter what unbaked response you care to write, I will not grace it any further but will leave you with this haunting images of what tribal bigotry, egocentricity and mad bragging entailed. Take a look:[/b]

pazienza:
Croatia, Bosnia and Hezegovina etc,all resulted from the people rejection of Serbia and Belgrade dominion.

Are you for real? Biafrans fought a war for three years and lost millions in effort to be free of the Arewa-Oduanistans burden in Nigeria. What other evidence do you want to show that Biafrans desire independent existence?

Another Biafran war?

pazienza:
The aim is the aim of all parasites. To scare the host from trying to fight it off. To force the host into submission.

If only they( the parasites) know that such pictures only inspire Biafrans to never rest until Biafra is actualized.

Those pictures inspire a sense of injustice, a sense of loss that must be regained, a sense of revenge, attrition and more hatred for Nigeria as an entity for Nigeria on Biafrans.

Those pictures only serve to fuel the desire for Biafra, by reminding Biafrans of what our enemies are capable of, and why they must be defeated.

kenny987:
As many tribes and as diverse as the countries u mentioned are, how many are as backward n skewed against a section as Nigeria? Is their development n governance tied to n dependent on one centre that shares money that doesn't come from it?

Bottom line is, we prefer to be alone since this experiment of amalgamation has stunted our growth. Until u can tell me with proof that Biafrans do not have a right to self-determination, all ur postulations are dead on arrival. The truth is what it is, u cannot hide it forever. Posting pictures of Nigeria's treachery against Biafrans only strengthen d resolve to be separate from perpetrators of such evil.

I always tell u, it is not your cause. We did not consent to Nigeria.

hugobuzz:
first part of your post makes sense. second part doesn't make sense. do as which people do? ever heard of diversity? Ibos are ibos and have Ibo DNA. if ibos did like yorubas then they wouldn't be as wealthy as they are now.

which values are you saying the Ibos didn't respect? no no una sell the lands lands the Ibos ve in Lagos? una dash tgem? don't they pay taxes? which values? or should should worship your oba? that one isn't possible nah. you havent made any point as far as I can see in ur post.

4stylz:
You don't own any land, where is your village in lagos? Ikeja or epe?

hugobuzz:
Lagos is for all Nigerians. so says the Constitution. No one has changed that for now. sorry for those who don't know. My people perish for lack of knowledge.

OZAOEKPE:
"Lagos is no man's land". Quote me anywhere.

POWEROFPEACE:
If they had done this during the last administration, millions of Nigerians would have appreciated it. So what kind of show is this then.

princdebola201:
Biafracy system of government can be define as the
Government of the E-citizens by the E-citizens and for
the E-citizens..

Namadi Kanu the online president of Biafra republic
The grand commander in chief of E-Forces

The capital of biafra republic - nairaland.com

madamoringo:
I hope someone will convince these Ibos not to exterminate themselves with war. Lots of countries are forging ahead despite several problems, but Ibos think they need a 100% ibo country to succeed??

c33b33:
Lol...Venoms all for Biafra. It must be very important to you.

I'm still in a celebration mood. Find another Biafra thread and attack.

IPOB Youth

PrinceBundu:
Princebundu- who's talking

Person1- sounds like a rat in the cupboard

Person2- a splashing spit from a nobody

Obiagelli:
I have fought my inner self against the thought that Buhari hates any region, all through his appointments I have remained steadfast in my support for Buhari until he declared his assets.
How can the president declare assets in every region and leave the south east out? Not even one mud house.
Wailer over to you.

dukecharles:
Please think before you speak, you sound so pathetic. GEJ'S Administration was the best, let PMB prove me wrong... NONSENSE

dukecharles:
Please think before you speak, you sound so pathetic. GEJ'S Administration was the best, let PMB prove me wrong... NONSENSE

Kenobus:
you are just a big fool. We shall see the curse u brought upon yourself

veralech:
You speak sense! All the e-warriors boast because they never believed that war will ever come again.

Even if one plays with fire, one will not touch it.

Who in his right biafran sense wants to turn igbo land into a battle field?

The superpowers and other countries will be too eager to supply Nigeria weapons to test on Igbos.

Igbos are better off fighting for their rights inside Nigeria than marginalizing themselves with this foolish talk of war and secession.

fr3do:
This is a tribe seeking a non violent exit from a forced union with other tribes surrounding it, I see nothing that makes the seeking of independence based on tribe inherently violent, the Pakistani breakaway from India was based on tribe.
Being surrounded does not stop a country from being independent, e.g Lesotho.