Amujale's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Amujale's Profile › Amujale's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 (of 151 pages)
The Christian Bible is evil and occultic. The god of the Christian Bible is more evil than the Satan character. Why? Because the god of the Christian Bible commits all the worst attrocities in that fake book. If Satan is described as the pasonification pf evil in the Christian Bible, what does that make the god of the Christian Bible? We would have to invent a new word to describe that crazed imposter. |
Yes, we have been fed BS for thousands of years, but the year is 2020 noone is holding a gun to amyones head anymore; them days are over. These times are the age of the internet, whereby one only needs to use a search engine to check on the things being said. There are over 1,000 errors and contradictions in the Christian Bible and yet people cannot seem to free themselves. Everything about Christianity is fake amd malicious. Everything about our culture is original, awesome and divine. |
etinanguy:No, bud its the people who neglect their ancestry and divine principles and instead choose to believe in fairytales that need to check themselves. As i always say, the elderly have a golden pass because they didnt know any better. Us youth have no excuse. Any youth in the year 2020 that cannot be bothered to research history, pick up a book or follow the lead of our historians and academics are traitors to the entire universe and not merely our continent. |
Jesus is a fictitious character thar never existed, bin all that Hellenist gibberish and concentrate our focus on reality. |
Both Christianity and Islam were introduced to the continent during the Arabian and Atlantic slave trade. The notion that Africans sold each other during slavery is the worst lie in all of human history, it was the joint perpertrators of Christianity and Islam that are solely responsible. As in, the Arabs were the people that fake historians intentionally conflate for the African. During the 2,000 years of slavery, Africans never stopped fighting. We still fighting in Libya to this day. |
Christianity is one of the worst ideologies to reach the shores of our continent, the other being Islam. |
Jesus is a fake god. |
Enrol into the police force. Enrol into the armed forces. Defend our reslm with all our hearts, mind and soul. You get back what you put in. |
budaatum:There's no need to direct your evidence to me, direct it to the thread, I have presented my evidence, and my evidence caters for all the fake claims that are out there, similar to the false claim that multiple people invented email. #12 Direct your contribution to me if you have anything that refutes the 12 points available to the thread. Merely repeating something multiple times doesn't make what your saying true. |
Christianity is one of the worst ideologies ever to reach the shores of Africa. |
Jesus is a fake god. |
Unjustifiable violence has no place in the world. Concentrate on loving our fellow brothers and sisters. Redirect our violent energy in the defence of our realm. |
The African Gods are alive and well. It's you that needs to wake up. |
Someone is executed looking deader than dead and they have you asserting that hes the life!? The fictional character is dead, how can he be alive.? |
Jesus is a fake god. |
Christianity was introduced to us through the sword and through the barrel of a gun. |
MuttleyLaff:That is the definition of Christianity. Anywhere you see the Christian Bible, check history a few hundred years back and it stands for misery, pain, death and slavery. I challenge you to show me anywhere that Christianity has been that isn't accompanied by those horrific atrocities mentioned above. Give me one instance whereby it hasn't been such a case. Can you find one anywhere on planet Earth? |
MuttleyLaff:It's obvious you are poorly read on history. According to history, evil people from Arabia and Europe enslaved their masters of the universe for a period over 2,000 years. The notion that Africans sold other Africans into slavery is the greatest lie in all of human history. Anyone who pushes that narrative needs serious counselling. The people who sold other people were the Christians and Muslims. Similar to as the Libya Slavs trade is occurring today, so did these people engage back in the days. Africans were fighting against those bastards and death spots. Have you ever heard of Queen Idia? Have you ever heard of Queen Zynga? No? I didn't expect you would. The Christian Bible and the Quran are the reason that someone such as yourself can open you stinking mouth to bastardise our glourious history in favour for the very ideology that they used to enslave innocent people. I cannot blame my parents, I never will, it was never their fault, they were forced to accept Christianity and Islam at the tip of the sword or behind the barrel of a gun. They taught us these malicious ideologies because they didn't know any better. What is your excuse? |
MuttleyLaff:I challenge you to show me any proof of those practices by African people prior to the arrival of Christianity and Islam. I put it to you that all those that you listed above all stem from the agents of Christianity and Islam. |
budaatum:That's correct, Gawker settled $750,000 BOSTON, Jan. 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Gawker Media has paid Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai a $750,000 settlement payment and later this month will permanently remove its libelous article about him, which denied Dr. Ayyadurai's invention of email. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gawker-media-pays-dr-shiva-ayyadurai-inventor-of-email-750000-settlement-300385899.html
|
LordReed:BOSTON, Jan. 4, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Gawker Media has paid Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai a $750,000 settlement payment and later this month will permanently remove its libelous article about him, which denied Dr. Ayyadurai's invention of email. Harder Mirell & Abrams LLP There is no reasonable dispute that Dr. Ayyadurai is the inventor of email. The full press kit contains more than 20 testimonials from leading technology experts and numerous Ph.D.s. The press kit also includes two extensive research papers prepared by well-respected academic university professors and scientists explaining why Dr. Ayyadurai is the inventor of email, and how the few doubters are wrong. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gawker-media-pays-dr-shiva-ayyadurai-inventor-of-email-750000-settlement-300385899.html https://www.inventorofemail.com/thefacts/ In the same year, he filed a lawsuit against Techdirt's parent company Floor64 as well as editor Mike Masnick and journalist Leigh Beadon, alleged libel, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. here is the summation: In dismissing the suit, Judge Saylor did not specifically address the issue of who or who didn't invent email, but rather found that there is enough doubt about the origin of the system that Techdirt's criticism of Ayyadurai could not be demonstrated as false and libelous. "The articles at issue do not dispute that plaintiff created an email system. Rather, they dispute whether plaintiff should properly be characterized as the inventor of email based on that creation," Judge Saylor wrote. "Accordingly, it is not clear that the allegations in the complaint are sufficient to show that the statements at issue are false. In any event, even assuming that the allegations of falsity are sufficient, the challenged statements are nonetheless protected under the First Amendment." Additionally, Judge Saylor reasoned, the ambiguity of what exactly email is makes it all the more impossible for Ayyadurai to prove his case, and pushes the articles further into the realm of protected speech. "Whether plaintiff's claim to have invented email is 'fake' depends upon the operative definition of 'email'," the ruling reads. "Because that definition does not have a single, objectively correct answer, the claim is incapable of being proved true or false." Based on all the evidence in front of us. Basically, the interpretation of the judgement is this: We aren’t disputing whether Dr Shiva did or didn’t invent the EMAIL, it is allowed for anyone to say he didn’t under the freedom of speech ACT. Conclusion, noone has been able to refute the validity of the fact that Dr Shiva invented Email, the courts made it clear that they werent going to even go there, rather they threw out the lawsuit under the freedom of speech Act. The unsuccessful lawsuit is not evidence nor does it affect the validity of Dr Shiva's invention, instead it was a victory for Free speech. In order to affect the validity of Dr Shiva's accomplishment, one would have to provide evidence that contradicts the irrefutable facts that proves him as the sole inventor of Email. pronubian:The firms that were being sued, coluded with insiders so as to move the goal post - abusing their influence and power and sought to redefine the inventors own meaning of Email to suit their agenda. |
budaatum:You highlighted the text, eventhough it has no relevance to the discussion✔ The above statement has no relevance to the discussion ✔ budaatum:Since we both agree that the above statement has no relevance to the topic, i have no interest in whether he is/was a Member of MIT. I never once claimed he was or wasnt a member of MIT, it has no relevance. I said he holds multiple degrees from MIT including a PH.d. |
wowcatty:Teach! America needs to drain the swamp of these agents of the 'Deep State'. Once we assist Trump in draining their swamp, we ought to assist the African American community in drainning theirs, and so on and so forth. |
budaatum:That is a blattant lie butum. I took a scrernshot of yout post. Have you even bothered to go back and check your own post? You arent getting my point, that was the reason for the challenge in the first instance. Highlighting a point that has no relevance to the invention of email is misleading and frankly wrong. Its one thing for you to want to argue for the fun of it, its anothher thing to try and play with words so as to insinuate that he didnt attend MIT. Answer these simple questions. Is being a current member of the faculty of MIT a prerequisite for inventing email? Where does 'V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai is not a member of the MIT faculty..." fit into the discussion? Lets assume that you werent trying to pull a fast one, by attempting to misinform the reader, what is the reason to bring that up? I spotted what you did instantly. |
LordReed: Amujale: budaatum: |
No one can represent themselves better than themselves: Here I present to the thread Dr V A Shiva Ayyadurai given a more complete and rounded synopsis of all the evidence presented here. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai holds four degrees from MIT, including a Ph.D, and is a world-renowned systems scientist, inventor and entrepreneur. He is founder and CEO of multiple successful businesses including CytoSolve, Systems Health and EchoMail. He has published in major scientific journals such as IEEE, Nature Neuroscience and CELL's Biophysical Journal, and has authored ten books, including the just-released The Future of Email (General Interactive, LLC, Nov. 2016) which discusses the history of email, its present and its future. The email discussion ends around the 1hr and 9 minute marker of the video and then he goes into talk about his other inventions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtREzhEdmuI |
None of the detractors have been able to successfully refute the evidence. It all boils down to bigotry, discrimination, prejudice and the systematic abuse of influence and power. All the evidence presented here suggest that EMAIL is, Email, is email. They are all the same initial program that Dr Shiva helped to create. Given: A=Email, B = EMAIL For instance A because B cannot be factual unless both A and B are found to be the same thing, In the course of this challenge, I have been able to prove that A and B are the same program. The opposition to the fact that Dr Shiva invented email is based on an "affirmation of disjunct" Whereby, given A = EMAIL, B = Email Affirming a disjunct can take two forms: Accepting the first term and denying the second: P1: A or B is true. P2: A is true. C: B is false. Accepting the second term and denying the first: P1: A or B is true. P2: B is true. C: A is false Neither of the detractors and retractors from The Washington Post and Smithsonian have been unable to show any proof that contradicts: P1: A because of B is true P2: A is true P3: B is true What they 'insiders' have done is redefine the meaning of email to state it as a text message, electronic message. The person who invented email, already defined it during his initial project. Prior to 2012 and the campaign to literally attempt to rewrite history, everyone knows who invented email. As in, as proven here, all the major commentary and professional opinion that existed prior to 2012 and leading to the campaign that attempts to rewrite history has Dr V A Shiva as the person who invented Email. |
budaatum:It is disingenuous butum. I know exactly what you did there, a play of words. If it is irrelevant to the discussion, why is it highlighted? Highlighting something suggest that there's something we ought to be taking from it, or something that we ought not to miss. Anyway, we are waiting for your evidence. |
budaatum:Yet, you still haven't taken down that slanderous quote: budatuum: V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai is not a member of the MIT faculty... |
Butum sparked this challenge. How? I made a contribution to a politics thread concerning some important world health issues, and sought the assistance of other Nlanders in order for us to assist the African American community in the US. What I would deem a noble cause. A never mentioned Dr Shiva in the context of his invention of email. Butum, quoted my contribution and attached to it an article from Wikipedia. Just to be clear, I have so much respect for the great work the general public does in keeping us informed. For me, Wikipedia is one of the most reliable encyclopaedias anywhere on the internet, and these revelations doesn't change that. And the post didn't disappoint, the article expressed precisely how it is meant to read. Taking that into consideration, my response to butums post was measured. Amujale:Here was his response: budaatum:The response in the image below would later transpire into this challenge. Butum made it a point to highlight parts of his response. Especially the one that read: ... budatuum: V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai is not a member of the MIT faculty and did not invent email...
|
...... |
Recollections of a Mentor and Colleague of a 14-Year-Old, Who Invented Email in Newark, NJ - continued. UMDNJ (CMDNJ) in 1978 Dr.Leslie P.Michelson:
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 (of 151 pages)