BeansAndBread's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BeansAndBread's Profile › BeansAndBread's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (of 20 pages)
AKBliv010:I think I'll stick with ROG, do you know where i can get it cheaper in Abuja? |
AKBliv010:I saw Asus GL552JX Intel Core i7 ROG CN141H 15.6 inch for 285k. Also Asus X751LJ Intel core i7 T4043T for 226k and Hp pavilion 15 intel i5 touch screen for 206k. |
Lana1:No I cancelled the 4k resolution because I know it's not possible,do you have any system in mind? |
AKBliv010:I just don't, I seriously don't know why! ![]() |
damiosy are these laptops new ones? I need a new one! |
AKBliv010:Around 200k! |
I'm thinking of getting a new laptop, so I decided to seek guidance from "nairaland oracle". I need a good affordable laptop with the following specs: * ![]() *cool for gaming *hardly prone to lags I know its going to be hard in getting such specs on Hp, but please advice on other brands. |
I'm thinking of getting a new laptop, so I decided to seek guidance from "nairaland oracle". I need a good affordable laptop with the following specs: * ![]() *cool for gaming *hardly prone to lags I know its going to be hard in getting such specs on Hp, but please advice on other brands. |
Salam Aleikom, Firstly, I'm not condemning any Sahabah, if you all read the article fully you would have known the position of the writer. He was replying a Shia who tried to say some sahabas thought of Ali(ra) to be better than Abubakar(ra), the brother just merely replied them. I saw that the post makes alot of sense that's why I pasted it here. Secondly, I don't distinguish between the sahabas(ra), but we've to be sincere with ourselves. They all have different virtues, some have higher ranks than others, this is why the Prophet gave glad tidings of paradise to some! That aside, we can clearly see here on Nairaland how some Shias openly vilify some sahabas, many of you here complaining now, do not stop or speak against them, but a post trying to clarify a matter is what you people jump on, May Allaah have mercy! Thirdly, I don't curse the sahabas, but we have people who do it here on Nairaland who even go to the extent of calling Abubakar(ra), Umar(ra) and Uthman(ra) usurpers. You all need to speak against them, wallahi, Allaah is my witness that I don't curse any Sahabah. Brothers be just and speak against evil when you see it! |
^^Salam Alaikum, I'm not judging between them. This post is referred to those who curse and villify the Sheikhains! They are sahabas and their sacrifice to Islam cannot be forgotten! |
I don't even understand how `Ali can be better than Abu Bakr, the man embraced Islam without question while being in his thirties or late twenties, he had a wife and family, he had an important status in society and a lot to lose. `Ali embraced Islam as a boy around seven or eight per my research and per the popular opinion as well (he died at 58 at the year 40, do the math) he was living off of the Prophet (saw) and residing in his house. Abu Bakr spent his wealth on Islam and freed slaves and helped convert many of the major Islamic personalities to Islam. `Ali had nothing to offer at the time and he hid his Islam while Abu Bakr was the first to announce his Islam publicly. Abu Bakr defended the Prophet (saw) when the pagans assaulted him and got beaten up more than once for doing so, he had no weapons nor an army behind him. Abu Bakr risked his own family's life by ordering them to help the Prophet (saw) escape Makkah. `Ali was under the protection of his strong tribe. While Abu Bakr served as the companion and right hand man of the Prophet (saw), `Ali was maturing and became a strong warrior whose main contribution was on the battle fields, Allah even instructed the Prophet (saw) to consult Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr with a known weakness in his body still participated in battle and fought valiantly. The Prophet (saw) appointed Abu Bakr to lead armies, he appointed him as the first man to lead the Muslims to Hajj and teach them the rites and he appointed him to lead the prayer of the Muslims in his final days. When the Prophet (saw) died it was Abu Bakr who addressed the Muslims and handled the situation, it was he who calmed them down, it was he who instructed them on how to pray Janazah and how to bury the Prophet (saw), it was Abu Bakr who stopped the Fitnah that could have happened between the Muhajiroun and the Ansar, while `Ali did nothing except stay with his relatives in Fatimah's house. When he as a Caliph, Abu Bakr was the first man to collect the Qur'an, not `Ali as they falsely claim. Abu Bakr established the religious state officially and defended it from its enemies at a sensitive time when it was weak and the situation was chaotic. Abu Bakr only had three women and died not leaving much wealth, while `Ali had many wives (Fatimah, Khawla, Umamah, Umm al Banin, Layla, Asma', Umm Habib, Mukhbi'ah, Umm Sa`id) and a long list of mothers of children (nineteen female servants who bore him many kids) as well as vast lands (check his Will in Sunni and Shia books). By brother hani |
Salam Aleikom AlBaqir, was Aliyy(ra) name mentioned in the Quran? |
![]() |
ShiaMuslim: This post of yours points to low-self esteem, the age of Aisha(ra) cannot be compared with Mut'ah, the hadiths are Saheeh, so anyone denying this marriage(when she was 9) is ignorant. We don't base our rulings because of the reactions of Kuffars and perhaps young marriages is a common norm for them also, so if they criticize then they are hypocrites who have no shame. We follow the Prophet(saw), his Ahelbayt and Sahabas(in their good not in their errors, because they're fallibles). |
So, obviously you are accusing the Messenger of Allah of allowing prostitution (at least at a certain stage if you believed he later forbade it)!Egbon AlBaqir please can you stop this rhetorics? @underlined, Mut'ah is prohibited, alcohol was once allowed but it later became one of the most hated things. @cancelled, you're yet to prove majority of the sahabas and tabi'un engaged in it. I raised some questions in my previous posts, why didn't the Sahabas object Umar? You've not given any tangible fact as to why, I'm waiting please. # In fact this isn't about Rawafidha at all. It is all about Sunnism. There exist lots of authentic ahadith in your documentations that proved Mut'ah is Halal approved by the Quran and the Prophet. And there is of course conspiracy theory that it has been forbidden. This is what we explore hereYou're the one who's basing your arguments on conspiracy theories, Mut'ah is banned till the day of judgement(till eternity)....shikena! Quran is perfect when it use "Khamr (intoxicant, or anything that blocks senses) rather than being specific. Whoever will rule on alcohol will maintained the ruling based on "Khamr". Gulder beer is less than or equal to 40% ethanol. That makes it "khamr".@bold, I agree that's a nice analysis I must say. @underlined, you're wrong. It was once allowed and then later prohibited to the extent the Prophet(saw) flogged those who engaged in it; Narrated Husain bin Ali: Ali bin Abi Talib said: "I got a she-camel as my share of the war booty on the day (of the battle) of Badr, and Allah's Apostle gave me another she-camel. I let both of them kneel at the door of one of the Ansar, intending to carry Idhkhir on them to sell it and use its price for my wedding banquet on marrying Fatima. A goldsmith from Bam Qainqa' was with me. Hamza bin 'Abdul-Muttalib was in that house drinking wine and a lady singer was reciting: "O Hamza! (Kill) the (two) fat old she camels (and serve them to your guests)." So Hamza took his sword and went towards the two she-camels and cut off their humps and opened their flanks and took a part of their livers." (I said to Ibn Shihab, "Did he take part of the humps?" He replied, "He cut off their humps and carried them away." 'Ali further said, "When I saw that dreadful sight, I went to the Prophet and told him the news. The Prophet came out in the company of Zaid bin Haritha who was with him then, and I too went with them. He went to Hamza and spoke harshly to him. Hamza looked up and said, 'Aren't you only the slaves of my forefathers?' The Prophet retreated and went out. This incident happened before the prohibition of drinking."Al Bukhari Hadith 3:563 |
Ipods plenty for this thread o! See them above! |
^^That Mr. Grant of a guy is a messed up dude, I can't blame him because his rank is uplifted to a Prophet after doing Mut'ah(as per Tashayyu). May Allaah continue to protect us all! Ameen! |
@cancelled, sorry I don't often entertain derailment.Please AlBaqir, I'm begging, when exactly was Ali(ra) made the Imam(successor)? Don't run o, if you criticize the difference of dates even though the narrations are 100% sahih then things would go very bad for you! # I recognized Mu'awiyah to be Sahabi. Prove otherwise. It was your eminence that play the card that "all hypocrites, apostates" who accompanied the Prophet were not "Sahabah" in sharp contrast to clear Mutawattir ahadith where Prophet recognized them as his Sahabah on the day of Judgment when they were shown the door of doom.Gbam!!!! So in essence, Mu'awiyah(may Allaah be pleased with him and may He disgrace those that despise him) is a true sahabi?! Masha'Allaah, this is why Tashayyu is very inconsistent and based on deception, I bet that if it was Umar(ra) that practice or had the opinion that Mut'ah is halal you would have quoted him and used his opinion has yardsticks! Really smh for you gan ni o! Mr interpreter, what does "WE" indicate in that Sahih ahadith? At the time of the Prophet, it meant ALL SAHABAH (except those died before Mut'ah was permitted); at the time of Abu Bakr and Umar, it only exclude the dead. Mehn this has really made you guys babasuwe oYani virtually all the sahabas I mentioned died after the Prophet, so you need to show us from a reliable sahih narration that they performed or partook in Mut'ah. Ammar(ra) was a very close supporter of Ali and if he had supported Mut'ah, Ali(ra) would have challenged him. So AlBaqir, prove that it refers to all sahabas! Good point. However that is one house of Ahlu Sunnah. The other house as I have quoted over and over, says Certain Sahabah and Tabi'in agreed Surah Nisa: 24 was revealed for Mut'ah. So you see there was never ijma among these Salaf concerning the prohibition of Mut'ah. That destroyed the already feeble house of Ahlu Sunnah on Mut'ah being forbidden.Of course there was an Ijma and the majority held the view that it was prohibited till the day of judgment. Even those that held it permissible, deemed it to be Rukhsa(extreme conditions) during wars. This is not what Shia teaches, so you can't use them to justify your points. |
Salam Alaikum, brother sino(may Allaah preserve him) has done perfect justice to this topic, the final note is Mut'ah is banned and forbidden in Islam. AlBaqir criticizes the difference of date but he's okay with the contradictory appointment of his first Imam(Ghadir, Tabuk, etc). May Allaah have mercy on us all and protect us from innovations. The sahabas the Tashayyu hates have suddenly become yardsticks for propagating their misguidance, he even went as far as to mention Mu'awiyah(ra), this was the same man AlBaqir said he's a caller to hellfire, but when the issue of Mut'ah is mentioned, he's suddenly a sahaba. He claimed the "We" used by Jabir ibn Abdullah meant "All Sahabas" this is very laughable because the hadith never meant all the Sahabah, I ask you AlBaqir, since you said it refers to all sahabas, did: Bilal, Umm Ayman, Usamah Ibn Zaid, Zaid Ibn Haritha, Zaid Ibn Khattab, Aqeel, Amr Ibn Al As, Ammar Ibn Yasser do mut’ah?! Imam Al Qurtubi says in his commentary on this verse(Quran 4:24); "the payment in the context is the dowry, it has been called recompense because it is a fee for the enjoyment. This is a support for dowry being a recompense. Alhasan, Mujahid, and others said: The meaning relates to what you have 'enjoy'ed through your union with women in proper marriage, so "give them their recompense" that is, their dowries. Ibn Khuwayz Mindad said: There is no support and it is not permissible to use the verse as a permission for temporary marriage as the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.) has warned against and has forbidden temporary marriage as Allah Most High said: "So marry them with the permission of their families." It is natural for the marriage to take place with the permission of the parents, this is a proper marriage which has a trustee and two witnesses, temporary marriage is not like that. 'A`isha said: "It has been forbidden in the Qur'an in the words of the Most High: "And those who preserve their private parts except with their spouses or what their right hands posses, then they would have no blame." [23:5]. Temporary marriage is not regarded as a proper marriage, and the spouse does not fall into the category of what the right hand possesses. " |
Very funny man. Its a very simple case. You and your likes labeled Mut'a as Adultery/Fornication. Surprisingly you have handful of Sahabah who fully engaged in it throughout their life. If we are to go by your rulings of Mut'ah is Adultery, then those Sahabah have committed it.AlBaqir You don't get do you? Mu'tah was prohibited by the Prophet(saw) and it was narrated by Aliyy(ra), this is a saheeh hadith, the sahabas are not "infallibles", we only follow the Sahabas and the Ahlulbayt in their in GOOD/IHSAN not in their errors # Your prestigious Tafsir Ibn Kathir documented that Ibn Abbas, Ubayy b. Kabb, Sa'id b. Jubayr and al-Suddi even always go further in the Tawil of this verse by adding "for a specified period" to it, after confirming the verse was revealed because of Mut'ah.Did you also forget that my "prestigious" Tafsir Ibn Kathir stated that mu'tah was abrogated and prohibited till the day of judgment? I wonder why you just cut and paste whatever suits you and leave the remaining! Tafsir Ibn Kathir does not support your stance in anyway http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=682&Itemid=59 # Who are "we"? Salafiyah or Wahabiyah? Indeed Ali scolded Ibn Abbas according to your hadith. So why did Ibn Abbas continued to practice Mut'ah?@underlined, do you know how you sound(metaphorically) when say this? I never showed in anyway I'm a salafi or a wahabi, don't be in a haste, when you do that, it exposes your low self-esteem! As to why Ibn Abbas(ra) continued, I don't know! # @bold, Its time you let your ego be dropped. All Sunni ahadith that Ibn Abbas permit Mut'ah in extreme situation or later abandoned it completely are graded Da'eef by your Ulama. It is left for you to accuse Ibn Abbas of "stubborn-head" or "Bid'ah.You're presenting as if Ibn Abbas(ra) view of mu'tah is the same as the Tashayyu, he viewed that it could be done in extreme cases(Rukhsa) just like you're allowed to eat pork whereas you believe performing Mu'tah is a virtuous that increases ones rank to an Imam Here's Ibn Abbas view:Ibn ‘Abbas considered that temporary marriage was permitted. Al-Imam Muhammad bin Isma’il al-Bukhari (d256 AH) narrates in his Sahih: 5116 – حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا غُنْدَرٌ، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ أَبِي جَمْرَةَ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ: سُئِلَ عَنْ مُتْعَةِ النِّسَاءِ «فَرَخَّصَ»، فَقَالَ لَهُ مَوْلًى لَهُ: إِنَّمَا ذَلِكَ فِي الحَالِ الشَّدِيدِ، وَفِي النِّسَاءِ قِلَّةٌ؟ أَوْ نَحْوَهُ، فَقَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: «نَعَمْ» Ibn ‘Abbas was asked regarding temporary marriage with women so he allowed it. On this one of his slaves said, “It is only in harsh condition, when there is lack of women?” or something of that sort. So Ibn ‘Abbas said, “Yes.” Even with this view, many sahabas rebuked him like Aliyy(ra), Abdullah Ibn Zubayr(ra), Ibn Abi ‘Amirah, Ibn Umar(ra), etc This is the view of the Rawafidh: Salih b. `Uqba from his father from Abu Ja`far عليه السلام. He said: I said: Is there reward for the one who does mut`a? He said: If he had intended by that the countenance of Allah تعالى and opposition against the one who denied it, he does not speak a word but that Allah has written ten good deeds for him by it, and he does not extend his hand to it but that Allah has written ten good deeds for him. So when he has approached it, Allah has forgiven him a sin by that, and when he has done ghusl, Allah has forgiven him by the measure of what has passed of water upon his hair. I said: By the number of hairs? He said: By the number of hairs. Was this the belief of Ibn Abbas? Does a RUKHSA (like eating PORK!) make you earn rewards?! As you can see, Mut’ah is one of the greatest form of worship and not just a Rukhsa (as Ibn ‘Abbas believed). Again kindly bring forth the hadith. I pray its hadith that talks about "Mut'ah being forbidden on the day of Khaybar".How old was Ibn Abbas(ra) when the Prophet died? Apart from Ibn Abbas, Countless Sahabah continue to practice Mut'ah after the demise of the Prophet until Umar forbade it during his Khilafah in the case of Amr ibn Hurayth, another Sahabi who impregnated a slave as a result of Mut'ah.Egbon calm down na, countless sahabas you say? Do you know what countless sahabas means? It's an fact that MAJORITY of the sahabas believed Mu'tah is prohibited, so if you say countless, then the remaining who knew it was prohibited by the Prophet(saw), Abubakar, Umar, Aliyy is far greater than the "countless". Ma sha Allah! Sahabah were WRONG engaging in Mut'ah. Jabir ibn Abdullah al-Ansari, Asma bint Abu Bakr, Abdullah ibn Mas'ud, Abdullah ibn Abbas, AMR ibn Hurayth, Abu Sa'id al-Khudri, Salamah ibn Umayyah b. Khalaf and his brother, Ma'bad etc and not to forget Abu Bakr and Umar who allowed Mut'ah to continue during their Khulafau until Umar forbade it for a purpose.The Prophet Muhammad(saw) prohibited Mu'tah in 100% Saheeh Hadiths in which was narrated by Imam Aliyy(ra) himself, the sahabas are not infallible, some might have not heard this prohibition. Are you now a Shia of sahabas or Shia Aliyu(ra)?! Jabir ibn Abdullah reported Mut'ah being practiced by all the Sahabah during the time of the Messenger of Allah and during the time of Abu Bakr and Umar until near the end of the Caliphate of Umar. This hadith is SAHIH 100% but because you are averse to it, you deemed accusing your lofty Sahabah of engaging in "Evil, Bid'ah, Zina?"Umar(ra) was confirming the prohibition of the Prophet Muhammad(saw), if the prohibition wasn't truly said by the Prophet(saw) then the people would have challenged Umar(ra). Concerning Jabir Ibn Abdullah(ra), Ibn Hajar in Fath Al-Bari comments that the last statement by Jabir(then Omar prohibited us from them, and we never returned to them.”) suggests that he sided with the consensus, which is that mutah is prohibited, for if it was permissible, then he would have taught the permissibility of it after the death of Omar. This is correct because Jabir lived for another 5 decades after the death of Umar and never returned to what was supposedly permissible, nor was he known to having preached the permissibility of mutah. This is evidence that he accepted the prohibition of Umar, since the prohibition of Umar has supporting evidence from the traditions of the Prophet. To be continued...... |
AlBaqir:No one is labeling any sahaba an adulterer rather you are. The hadith of Ahl Bayt Imam Aliy(ra) is very clear and it's saheeh, this similar narration is found in your books, so I don't know why you'll prefer to play games and laugh over things which are not funny, you've all suddenly become Shia of Ibn Abbas(ra), while Ahl Sunnah now refute you with Prophet Muhammad(saw) and Aliyy(ra). “Those of them withYa Akhi read the verse from 19 and understand the context, this verse has nothing to do with Mu'tah, in fact it's the other way round. It refers to a right Shariah marriage not Mut'ah. Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you seek (them in marriage) with Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage) from your property, desiring chastity, not committing illegal sexual intercourse, so with those of whom you have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their Mahr as prescribed; but if after a Mahr is prescribed, you agree mutually (to give more), there is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever All-Knowing, All-Wise. (4:24) As we all know this marriage as been prohibited by Aliyy(ra) to the extent he scolded Ibn Abbas(ra), both Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim narrated from no one else than Aliyy(ra) himself that it was the Prophet (not Omar) who prohibited Mu'tah. Ali even called Ibn Abbas a LOST man due to Ibn Abbas previous stance of permitting Mut'ah in EXTREME (Rukhsa) situation. The sahabas who were wrong to have engaged in it probably due to some reasons never portrayed it in the light of Tashayyu. It's a virtuous act and if one does it, his status is raised according to Tashayyu. This was never the positions of the sahabas! |
May Allaah be pleased and happy with Khadeejah, Aishah, Hafsah, Umm Habibah, Fateemah Zahra(his blessed daughter), other wives of the Prophet(saw) and other pious women! May He disgrace the enemies of Islam(those who are vile towards them and the Sahabas in whole) and cut them off wherever they surface, Ameen! |
cckris:Now this is funny No comment on this! It's from the Bible Arabs learnt any relationship with Abraham.The Arabs first had contact with the old testament about 200years after Prophet Muhammad had died, this was about 867AD. And Israelites, the authentic custodians of the testimony of Abraham have no such fables that Abraham visited Arabia.OK This is something about you Christians, you automatically think anything that contradicts your bible is totally wrong. This is a very huge fallacy and if you continue applying it, you'll enter a deep trap. The bible didn't record all the activities of Abraham, Isaac and Ishmael, so you have no right to spill any rubbish Arabia isn't part of the promised land, has no value except that Americans are generously paying for the oil, which the Arabs don't even know how to drill. Everyone knows that if the oil was in America, & the brutal merciless Arabs possessed the technology, the arab jack asses won't pay a dime, but take it by force.What concerns Muslim pilgrimage with crude oil? I can see you're a desperate man, you've proved nothing apart from your empty rants as usual. If you have anything reasonable, alert me! |
jimmynauty:The ritual of circumbulation was done by Abraham and his son Ishmael but when they died the people after them abandoned Allaah and started worshipping idols. This is similar to the case of Moses when he left the children of Israel, they engaged in idol worship! |
![]() |
AlBaqir may Allaah forgive you for misleading Muslims, wallahi, repent before it's too late! |
tsephanyah:Sister continue o, Nda what again? ![]() |
As a Yoruba man, I respect this man. He's a Sheikh, Sheikh Uthman Ibn Foodee(Dan Fodio) - Rahimahullah |


'Ali further said, "When I saw that dreadful sight, I went to the Prophet and told him the news. The Prophet came out in the company of Zaid bin Haritha who was with him then, and I too went with them. He went to Hamza and spoke harshly to him. Hamza looked up and said, 'Aren't you only the slaves of my forefathers?' The Prophet retreated and went out. This incident happened before the prohibition of drinking."