₦airaland Forum

Evil Brain:
If and when the federal government deregulates the downstream sector and removes the subsidy, here's what will happen:
1.  The price of fuel will shoot up dramatically
2.  All of us will suffer for a few years while the private sector rushes to build new refineries and take advantage of the high prices.
3.  Everything will eventually settle down and Nigeria will become a saner, less corrupt and less wasteful place.

This also applies to electricity, and we are still going through the same process in telecoms (we should be coming out of phase 2 any moment from now).

The fact is that we need new refineries and the government doesn't have the money (and is too corrupt and incompetent) to build them. The private sector is the the only way forwards and they won't take the risk as long as there is a subsidy.

I'm sure there's no one here who thinks the phone companies will be spending all this money on masts and fibreoptics and transatlantic cables if they weren't sure they could make their money back. And say what you will about MTN and co but nobody wants to go back to the days when it was just Nitel

High Profit Margins + Competition => High Investment which is what Nigeria needs right now. And only the private sector can do it. GLJ and Aganga know this, even Obasanjo knew. The problem is that the people in government aren't willing to do what must be done. Because they don't have the guts, or because they are making too much money from the status quo.

Long story short, they should remove the gaddem subsidy. Let all of us suffer together.

For a better future, sacrifices have to be made.

showreals:
me I dont know Again oo

you do 1 thing people shout another they complain, how else do u proof FX is real? is it by teaching Trendline, adx bla bla bla, show figures show what people have made show moneyyyyy!

honeric01:
Bro, this is more than just dropping your opinion, you are actually trying to make even the admin to stop members from sharing signals, that's no opinion, that's like attacking those who actually feel like hearing.

Mind you, when those who dropped signal did, they never told anyone to follow, they only said that's what they are to catch and what they expect, if anyone feels their signal is good, they can as well follow it or just ignore it totally.

so bro, just don't make it sound as if you're competing with those dropping signals they feel they want to take or did you take any of these signals and ended up burnt? (from this thread)

martog:
As soon as I see any signal I try to post them. my email is available on my posts. Check thru, my previous posts.
Have a nice weekend.

honeric01:
How's this your problem? those who want the signals aren't complaining that they took a wrong trade so why are you crying more than the bereaved? EVERYONE KNOWS THAT TAKING A TRADE BASED ON A FREE SIGNAL GOTTEN FROM HERE IS LIABLE TO THE RISK ASSOCIATED.

What a good trader does is to compare signals gotten elsewhere with the his or her own, so please cut the crap and stop sounding bitter or do you make money from selling yours that it pains you to see someone give it out for free?

Sagamite:
Stop taking drugs.

[flash=400,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmnpMXOpaM4&p=F21D83891EFA2C9B&playnext=1&index=1[/flash]

[flash=400,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7_LfghKTrk[/flash]

[flash=400,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxzvLpAbxTc&p=46D2E76051A7DC94&playnext=1&index=32[/flash]

bily:
the last time i checked, interbankfx do not accept nigerians, how did u open an account with them?
alpari uk and russia is ok, i use both.
i have not tried dukascopy though, waiting for them to have thier banking license.
what is your general experience with duka especially as per slippage?

jahnnelly:
this is good @s.oloyede. this shows true professionalism.

mistakay:
Good night Frosbel  Block head Remember how ever after you finish your oyinbo back side washing and toilet cleaning tomorrow get some answers ready before you come here and start blabbing posers all over again which after you get people to respond you then choose to ignore.For instance you dared a christian gentleman Buffox above to quote you a verse that encourages killing from the bible instead of one he gave you twelve of them including verse to kill arrogant people and witches instead of you to thank him for enlightening you and denounce your bigotry as i strongly believe your bible sojourn has not yet encroached that wisdom you shamelessly try to bluff your way out and shift the goal post in the middle of the game to ask an entirely diffrent question as to where is that being practiced?? How is that related to the proof of verses he provided.

You have been acting this way consistently since the beginning of this thread even before you ran away for 2 days when i use facts pursue you like chicken   before you come back to save face after you see the thread on front page.

1.You first claimed on page one certain ideologies (islam) permits murder while others (including xristianity) prohibits any such thing

quote:
Certain ideologies permit murder in the name of forceful or peaceful coercions while others prohibit any such thing end quote.
pls if i may ask how do you reconcile the statement above in relation to the verses kindly supplied by a fellow christian above quote:

Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed. (Exodus 22:19 NAB)

They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman. (2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB)

and several other verses advocating death for fornication and even sorcery etc.Pls tell us how?

2.To buttress your point that islam is a violent religion you pointed out that the prophet fought multitude wars and committed uncountable murders and enjoined us to do the same.Quote:

Muhammad fought multitudes of wars, committed uncountable murders and encouraged his followers to do the same

How ever when you are confronted with incontrovertible evidence of the sheer savagery and brutality of the Holy inquisition under the pope who tortured and burned people alive for 700 years you quickly pointed out that was over a thousand years ago which is stone age.see quote:

The inquisitions occurred about a thousand years ago, sometime in the stone age.

We are now in the 21st century in case you have forgotten

So if i may ask you the uncountable murders you claimed the prophet committed was it in the sand age??
The time of the prophet was around 700A.D and the christian atrocities officially started around 1200A.D so which one is more relevant age wise?? pls answer

3.As i waited for your answer on that you ignored me and jumped to another question as to who is doing the more killings currently (not historically) quote:


And the thousands of murders today on a yearly basis are committed by who ?


To which i pointed out to you that since you are in the U.K you should have directed the question to former P.M Tony Blair who along with president Bush have the greatest Blood in theeir hands in the most recent history as conservative estimates puts at 800,000 innocent civilians mostly market women and little kids have been killed by the guns,bombs and tanks of their soldiers.Did you choose not to answer me because you think those murdered are not white and that may be their lives is not that much important to you and the media?? Pls answer

4. Then you deny the inquisition.Quote:
And don't start coming at me with lies and the catholics did this or that, the bible was never and has never and cannot be used to Justify violence.


Pls if i may ask what is it you are referring to as lies that the catholics did?Pls simple and direct answer thank you.

Pls do you still stand by the second bolded statement above regarding the justification of violence in the bible considering that a user Buffox above has furnished us with those verses from the bible that recommends the killing of arrogant people,fornicators,idol worshippers,love peddling,fortune telling,sorcery checkDeuteronomy 17:12 NLT),(Exodus 22:17 NAB),(Leviticus 20:13 NAB),(Leviticus 20:27 NAB),(Leviticus 20:10 NLT)(Leviticus 21:9 NAB),(Exodus 22:19 NAB),(2 Chronicles 15:12-13 NAB),(Deuteronomy 13:13-19 NLT),(Deuteronomy 13:7-12 NAB)

Do you still believe no where the bible justifies violence and can you now see  how the inquisitor generals got their idea of burning people to death. A priest's daughter who loses her honor by committing fornication and thereby dishonors her father also, shall be burned to death.(Leviticus 21:9 NAB).Do you still stand by your aforementioned statement above?

5.
Do you not know that the majority of those killed during the inquisition period were those who took the bible LITERALLY and vowed to practise its teachings in totality?

What is this gibberish?? i bolded the statement and asked on page 3 what you mean,cos it does not make sense.did you mean to say majority of those doing the killings??

6.You mentioned that the majority of the murders of this world nowadays are in the name of religion specifically by militant islam.Quote:

However that does not negate the fact that the majority of bloodshed and murders around the world today are committed in the name of religion , specifically by Militant Islam

Dont you see how pathetic that statement sounds.Is it not obvious that the illegal wars led by the anglo americans and the jews is the biggest blood shed going on today. conservatives estimate is at 800,000 innocent lives iraq alone.Dont you agree the lives lost in iraq is a thousand times higher than the attacks by few arab individuals.Pls short answer if you can.

7.You were debating the inquisition with a user OYB when suddenly trying to defend the inquisition (which you termed a blatant lie initially) you burst quote:

Firstly the battles in biblical times where not some crazy Jihad to convert the whole world to Judaism, these battles were fought to overcome the enemies of God who had oppressed , hated his people and sometimes tried to subvert God's will in ancient times.

Do you know what you are talking about.Do you know the meaning of biblical times,do you perhaps think that the inquisition period is same as biblical times.if not then what battles christ fought that you are talking about ??

If indeed Jesus fought these wars in some portions of the middle east like you said quote:

Firstly the battles in biblical times where not some crazy Jihad to convert the whole world to Judaism, these battles were fought to overcome the enemies of God who had oppressed , hated his people and sometimes tried to subvert God's will in ancient times.

If so then dont you see you are contradicting your self here see quote:

Jesus never once asked Christians to go on a Jihad until the whole world converts to Christianity.

He was a man of peace and preached and lived the message.

8.On page 3 you mentioned you seem to have accepted the inquisition took place and went further to condemn it as despicable but yet still you argued quote:

Again the despicable inquisitions where not conducted based on Christian scriptural text, absolutely not.

From Gregory IX to Leo XII 74 Popes reigned for approximately 600 years who approved the inquisitions in the name of the Lord.Do you think they dont know the bible well? After all majority of the charges is sorcery.Dont you think they are right considering (Exodus 22:17 NAB)
You should not let a sorceress live.Thanks to the user above.Iwould like to hear you opinion of them.
[size=14pt]
Please can you shed more light on the above.I will appreciate straight answers pls and not beating around the bush with blabing all over the place.Thank you.[/size]