₦airaland Forum

Timmi:
A fool said in his heart that there is no God. Why listen to the song of fools. Let them rant, God is still seated on His throne and still loves them for all of us are His creation.

The fact that we do not believe in your imaginary white friend who you believe is sitting on his throne and who is on record for killing and ordering the killing of so many people that do not believe in him does not give you the right to call us fools. We are not fools, and by the way the only person ranting here is YOU.

Kuns:
We are those true Gods of the Earth, You, my brother, You are the descendant of the ancient ones that came to this planet millions of year ago. The woolly hair black skinned beings called the Neteru, the Anu-nnagi Eloheem those who birthed the Orisha.

Before myth of E'zeus (Jesus) was created, we were those Gods (Deities).

Now we must get control of our land and it's resource, we cannot do this if our people are still struck worshipping the invaders, the slave or colonial master, the enslaver ,

See how they used religion to enslave the mind of the Afrokhan ,  when are our people going to stop this niggerly behaviour waiting for a pale abino to come out of the clouds to come and save them, this is the ultimate enslavement.


Free your MINDS,

You need to free your mind from your own mythical Gods. Who are these Gods you are talking about?(Neteru, the Anu-nnagi Eloheem  ) I don't not believe in them.

Troynow:
The God of the old testament manifested Himself in the new testament in Jesus. God created a body in the womb of mary and put all his attributes in that body. That body is called Lord Jesus Christ- a name that belongs to God. So Jesus is God because God dwells inside of Him. col 2:9, 1 Tim 3 :16

Nigerians and quoting? do you know what you are talking about? your post says you obviously do not. Must you keep using words to make sense out of nonsense?

earTHMama:
37 babies delivered in 2 days - At Holy Ghost Congress
Dele Ayeleso, Lagos -
Thursday, December 18, 2008
IN just two days into the on-going annual Holy Ghost Congress of The Redeemed Christian Church of God, 37 babies have been delivered at the venue.


Disclosing this in the early hours of Wednesday, the General Overseer of the church, Pastor E.A. Adeboye, said there were sets of twins among the babies, saying it was an indication that God was set to give the worshipers joy.

Pastor Adeboye added that those that had deliberately kept away from the programme were missing what God had promised to do in the programme, adding that worshipers present should make efforts to invite their friends and relatives.

“I pity those that are not here tonight. God has promised to do great things in this meeting. Now if you have any friend or relative that is not yet here, pick up your phone and phone them, send them text messages that they should not miss tommorow's programme because God has promised to do great things,”he said.

While speaking on the topic "Joy of the Redeemed", Pastor Adeboye said there were three major types of joy available for the redeemed of the Lord: Joy of a new name, joy of new location and joy of a new management.

Commenting on the babies delivered during the programme, Mr. Mepaiyeda Adesina said it was not unusual to see babies delivered safely at the Holy Ghost Congress.

"One peculiar thing about the babies delivered during the programme is that they are always pointer to what God will do during those programmes. Take for example, sometimes ago, the number of boys was greater than the number of girls. You will discover that what God did during those programmes are numerous," he said.

http://odili.net/news/source/2008/dec/18/600.html

He pitys the gullible ones that did not come and drop their hard earned monies to him. Why are nigerians so blind? All these Gods of men need to be arrested and jailed for life because they are worse than some of the theiving politicians we have out there.

Kuns:
The God of the Bible has got blood on his hand , the Jewish, Christian and Islamic Gods are guilty of Murder.

Their God is evil, because he said in the bible to go kill women and children.

Only the Black Gods (Deities) of Afrokhan havent told their people to kill anyone who doesn't accept their teaching.

Every other God tells their followers to kill people who do not accept their follow ,

God should know that the spirit NEVER dies , so why would any God (Bible, Koran or Torah) tell anyone to go kill, knowing fully well that the spirit is eternal and cannot die.

This thing people are calling GOD is the DEVIL.

Afrokhan (Afro "woolly hair" Khan "ruler" people are a peaceful people so their Gods are the real true peace loving Gods (Deities).

Niaraland has been invaded by advocates of the Afro Gods these days.

fayahsoul:
Time is not linear it moves in cycles; positive and negative cycles, depending on the positioning of celestial bodies.

In this current time cycle of lethargy that is controled by false "Gods"(i.e yaweh, allah, jehova, krishna etc), terra/earth is like a human farm; a farm were hue-mans are grown and their negative energies(in the form of physical/emotional/ psychological pain) are harvested by these false "Gods" for food/sustainance. Ever wonder why your biblical or koranic "Gods" did all the cursing and killing and not the so-called "devil'? still wondering why so-called nigerians are very religious yet damn corrupt?

As above so below.

We are corrupt because the "Gods" are corrupt. These same "Gods" become benevolent, and just, in the subsequent time cycle of illumination. These "false Gods" derive pleasure and sustainance in our misery just like we do when we engage in so-called guilty pleasures(i.e drinking alcohol that damages and causes pain to the "living conscious" liver cells or killing animals for food)

Whites/arabs/semites/asians(non-melanites) are the physical manifestation of the negative aspect of "God"; the antithesis of black. In this cycle of lethargy they are used as earthly vessels to physically construct global superstructures(the matrix) that upholds the will of the false "Gods". They either have no soul or their soul is not fully seated in their partly or fully calcified pineal glands and that's why the so-called atheist in the industrialized countries don't experience "demonic" attacks. They are human artificial; that is, zombies. They are already dead.

The nubians on the other hand, are the oldest people who incarnated during the positive cycle, they are the physical manifestation of the positive aspect of "God". Nubia(or africa) is the true holy land and it is the oldest land inhabitated by humans. It does not drift like the other continents. The true meridian is in kemetic not greenwich. Nubia, as the oldest land, has the highest concentration of spirit beings both good and bad that are easily channeled through the heavily melanited bodies of nubians. Demons can steal "God" information or knowledge from their melanited bodies.

In this current time cycle, the demonic beings are dominant but we are also exiting this cycle.

Hey Mr nubain enthusiast.

Chrisbenogor:
I think all protestants like to attack catholics, they see them as the idolators, the ones who cannot pray well, and many other things. In all fairness I think the catholic church is a big and quite positive force in the world of christianity, even though they prefer to stick with tradition I think they do so quite wisely.
Jw's on the other hand, puhleez!
Hopefully like the catholics say,
Agnus dei, qui tollis peccata mundi; dona nobis pacem.

That is a very good observation.

Chrisbenogor:
Madam lady, you are making me do hard work oh , because its you sha I dug up the info free of charge
The Canonical Gospels
Most likely for no other reason than to round out the beasts of the apocalypse, John was chosen to be one of the four Gospels. For the sake of cohesive inerrancy, it would have been more beneficial in its absence. Although the author doesn't venture too far on a tangent from the life of Jesus depicted in the other canon Gospels, there are some distinguished omissions in this account. The most notable absences are the exorcism of devils, the recitation of the Lord's Prayer, Satan tempting Jesus in the wilderness, the transfiguration, the virgin birth from Mary, the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus' proclamations of his return, and every last one of the parables. Scholars agree that the original Gospel of John started at 1:19 and ended at 20:31. Furthermore, they've determined that the remainder of the book seems heavily edited and reworked.
For these reasons, John fails to be an unquestionably reliable and synoptic source of divine inspiration for the story of Jesus.
Scholars unanimously agree that Mark is the most primitive of the four canon Gospels. Its details are relatively less developed, consequently making this biography of Jesus very brief. Interestingly, Jesus' primary biographer was obviously a distant Roman who never knew him. In fact, the original version of Mark doesn't even contain Jesus' appearance following his crucifixion (16:9-19)! This concession is made in the NIV but left out of the KJV. Even though the author was from Rome, he provided enough minor details to have a fair understanding of his subject. Why, then, would he leave out the indispensable element of the world's most important story unless he lived during a period without a resurrection rumor?
Since about 80% of the verses in Mark appear verbatim in Matthew,we can seemingly tell that the author of Matthew used Mark as a template when writing his own account. However, he alters many of Mark's details and adds several stories presumably unknown to its author. The Gospel of Matthew most certainly had a Jewish writer since he strives to correct many of the mistakes arising from Mark's ignorance of local knowledge. Since we have no clear evidence that the author of Matthew was one of Jesus' disciples, we can't rule out the likely possibility of its author simply plagiarizing the Mark account in order to make it more acceptable to residents of the Middle East. It's far too coincidental for the writings to match so well in some passages and contradict in others for there not to have been some minor transcribing taking place. Thus, we'll analyze the contrasting details of the two accounts in order to exemplify the unreliability of the latest God-inspired product.
Mark (1:2) makes an incorrect reference to Hebrew scripture by quoting Malachi 3:1 as being the work of Isaiah. The KJV does not contain this error, although biblical translations concerned more with honesty and accuracy than advancing inerrancy leave the misattribution in the text. Needless to say, the more knowledgeable Matthew author doesn't repeat Mark's mistake. Mark also claims that only God can forgive the sin of another (2:7), but that's a direct contrast to actual Jewish beliefs, which hold that other men can forgive sins as well. Again, Matthew drops this statement from the record (9:3). Mark mentions the region of Gadarenes being near a large body of water, but it's about thirty miles from even a sizable lake (5:1). The Matthew author, realizing that Mark knows next to nothing about local geography, changes Gadarenes to Gergesenes, which is only a few miles from a lake (8:28).
Mark mentions multiple "rulers of the synagogue" even though almost all synagogues only had a single leader (5:22). The Matthew author corrected this phrase so that the reader could ambiguously interpret it as having only one ruler (9:18). Mark records Jesus ridiculing the ancient food laws set by God and Moses (7:18-19), but the author of Matthew, being a Jew, no doubt considered this to be sacrilegious and dropped the passage from his account (15:18-20). Mark also has Jesus misquoting one of the commandments as refraining from defrauding others (10:19). Meanwhile, Matthew strictly adheres to the exact commandments of Moses by omitting this curious deception rule but including the "love one another'' summary commandment (19:18-19). The author of Mark strangely refers to David as "our father" (11:10). This is something no Jew would ever do because all Jews weren't descendents of David.
Seeing as how Abraham and Jacob would be the only individuals referred to in this manner, the desire for accuracy forces the Matthew author to correct another one of Mark's blunders (21:9).
Mark also gets the traditional date for killing the Passover incorrect (14:12), but the Matthew author settles the mistake by omitting the phrase from his own work (26:17). The very next verse in Mark has Jesus ordering two of his disciples to locate a man bearing a pitcher of water (14:13). In Jewish culture, carrying pitchers of water was the work of a woman. Naturally, Matthew must drop this phrase as well (26:18). On the night of the crucifixion, Mark says that it's the time before the Sabbath (15:42). Being a Roman, the author was obviously unaware that the Jewish day begins with the evening. Thus, the evening following the crucifixion wasn't the night before the Sabbath; it was the start of it. Matthew must yet again omit one of Mark's divinely inspired statements in the transcription (27:57).
Unaware that the Sabbath had already arrived, Mark's account has Joseph of Arimathaea buying linen to wrap around Jesus' body (15:46). Because it was a sin to make purchases on the Sabbath, Matthew must consequentially drop that detail as well (27:59). Finally, Mark mentions "the fourth watch of the night" (6:48). The Jews actually divided the night into only three watches, while the Romans made the division into fourths.
The author of Matthew makes a few additional minor corrections from Mark's account, but I trust that you get the point I'm attempting to convey. However uncomfortable it may feel, the divinely inspired author of the earliest Jesus biography, who seemingly invented details out of thin air, knew very little about what he was writing.
The Gospel of Luke begins with a surmised admission that the author didn't personally experience any of the details contained within his account because he alleges the presence of eyewitnesses but fails to notify himself as one.
Like Mark's Gospel, Luke was probably narrated by an individual residing far from Jerusalem because he commits several translational errors when converting Old Testament Hebrew scripture into Greek. Additionally, in a manner similar to the way in which Mark was penned, Luke's author goes into extensive detail on his explanations of local phenomena but not those pertaining to Rome. Following the lead of Matthew's author, Luke's consistent duplication of Mark's verses seemingly indicates that he also relied heavily on that text when making his report. However, researchers soon discovered that they could not find 230 verses common to Matthew and Luke in the more ancient Mark.
I have cut this thing short here because I don tire oh! But I trust you have the idea I am trying to convey, still waiting for achan's story.

Very very interesting. Let me go and look it up in the bible.

davidylan:
You ignored a friend request from God. Report and/or block this person?

Just the same way its not by force to confirm a friend request on facebook, you can equally block God too.

Ok i don't want to be friends with a God that wanted to kill his best friend, incase he decides to kill me too. so, blocked.

davidylan:
You ignored a friend request from God. Report and/or block this person?

Why would he want to be a friend with a God that wanted to kill his best friend? do you want him to get killed too?

An interesting read.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1820685,00.html

huxley:
Is this the same god that was going to kill his best mate Moses?

, no the one that ordered people with leprosy to stay away from his place of worship.

Dios:
I was beginning to think I was the only sane person left on this board. Well written dude.
They won't touch that tower of babel story, all they keep saying is "read your bible".

What do you want them to say? read the koran or hindu writings ?

~Lady~:
Abeg when someone almost dies from an encounter it is not something easily forgotten or mistaken. Scientists once believed that the earth was flat it wasn't just the catholic church. It was people. People that lived at that time believed the earth was flat. So while you are quick to shout that the Church has been wrong therefore they must be wrong, remember that not all were in the church and not all believed in God and they too didn't know. It's called being human and learning about our environment as time progresses.

It's a pity we cannot rationalize due to contempt for one another.

False, the Catholic church made people to believe that the earth was flat, just like they are making people to believe that Jesus is the only way to eternal happiness when a person dies.

~Lady~:
then you don't know your ancestors. stay there thinking your ancestors didn't have a religion, their own was to use humans as sacrifice and to kill twins. stay there deceiving yourself.

The biblical God accepted human scarifice too so what's the difference? or havent you been reading your bible? the biblical god and his "chosen people" the jews killed the children of other people that did not believe in him through misguided wars and other trivialities so how is that different from killing of twins? Women, non jews and people with leprosy were very badly treated by the biblical God and its all written in the bible so what are you saying?

tonye-t:
let me reply your very funny comments my beloved brother DIOS one after the other

quote from dios
Glad you know that, okay. . . . . what exactly are you trying to drive at?

quote from dios

now let me answer that for you,

1st of all, hope you realise that adam's 1st kids were males right?. . . .good. . . . .now do you also realise that females were not usually counted for reasons best known. . . . now have you ever thought that adam must have given birth to females too, even though bible never gave account?, if you succomb. . . then do you also know that sons marry daughters, as in the case of abraham and sarah, havent your small brains pondered that cain must have slept with his sister likewise abel his sisters and therefore procreate more seeds, and mind you. . . . . . . . i hope you also realise that men lived for as long as 800yrs and beyond, now if kids were born at least every two years then they must have given birth to about 300 kids before the death of abel, and this kids must have grown matured enough to start exhibiting evil traits as caused by the fall of man in the garden,  . . . . . . i just pray your mind will be able to carry this one, because i doubt your self acclaimed athiest knowledge


quote from dios
sorry for calling you small minded but you are. . . . now my answer to question 2, sure life is more complex, but not more than what the bible says my friend. because, in the first place the bible (biblos) meaning book from the greek word was just about the greatest set piece ever compiled by man though inspired by God through his spirit(1tim.3:16) and st.john made a comment in his attestation to Jesus' life that even if man were to write every thing ever done by Jesus that not the world itself could contain the books that would be written(John.21:25) search your scriptures if you have any. . . . .i put it this way that not every thing that happened since the days of eden to the apocalyses was written in the bible. . . . john.21:25 again

quote from dios
very childish question my friend. . . . . how do you explain for a family with short parents breeding huge kids that are tall, how do you reckon with the changes of man's face especially we nigerians today, do we still look like ancient like our fathers and forefathers do?, do men still have rampant bald head like before again?, where is the game of genes and its mutation play today, if generational chANGES are true, then i don't need to answer you funny question, because there was every possibility that noah gave birth to a black, white and red, mysteries of God you are yet to comprehend

_{you got me laughing and rolling on the floor} you aint even as tough as i thought you are , ask reasonable questions my friend and i will answer them as God gives me the grace
see you next time

Must you lie to yourself and throw facts away just because you want to defend the bible? I know some christains that accept that the bible is full of historic, scientific and factual errors, yet there are so many that will go to what ever length to show that the bible is completely without error of what ever kind. The greatest mistake the writers of the bible made was the inclusion of the old testament, most especially the pentateuch. No christain can reasonably and scientifically explain the Noah's ark story, neither can any christain explain the tower of babel story scientifically and non can defend the seven day creation story, what about the sun standing still for over 24 hours just because the children of God wanted to kill off all their enemies? can Christains explain to us how the sun can stay without falling for over 24 hours? Infact the old testament is a shame and disgrace to most christains, the God portrayed there is no different from the Allah of the koran that christains love to hate but christains are still forced to believe that he is the same God that came as Jesus to save the entire world when the old testament clearly shows that the God in the old testament is not the same God potrayed in the new testament(the old testament God is a very tribal God that knows nobody but the Jews). All i can say is that the Europeans(Romans) took the Jewish God, added their own mythology and history to his story, made him more inclusive and called him the saviour of the world, just as Mohammed the prophet of Islam did with Allah.

I thought he was a jew following the jewish tradition?

Nice, will look it up

huxley:
God considers circumcision such an important act that he attempts to kill Moses for delaying the circumcision of his son, as per Exodus 4: 24 - 26.

24 At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met {Moses} and was about to kill him. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched {Moses'} feet with it. "Surely you are a bridegroom of blood to me," she said. 26 So the LORD let him alone. (At that time she said "bridegroom of blood," referring to circumcision.)


Is it really conceivable that God would want to kill one of his major prophets over the matter of circumcision? How did Moses's wife know that Gods anger was related to their not having circumcised their son? Did she read the mind of God?

Dios:
Pretty good article, I like the part where the Christian dude said "did he arise or did he just show up" lol

huxley:
Is this really true? How do you know this is true? Does god know people before they are born? Consider this - Between 30% - 70 % of all pregnancies are aborted naturally by the body even before the woman is aware that she is pregnant, a phenonemon called chemical pregnancies.

Compounding this worldwide, this amounts to many millions (if not billions) of people that God knew in their mother's womb, but yet allows them to be washed out naturally and killed. What a loving god!

davidylan:
its a very empty read . . . all about speculation.

What makes you say so?

manmustwac:
There is no God. Period. Or if there is a God {which i very much doubt} You have to admit he must be very good at pretending he dosen't exist. Why didn't stop the genocide in Rwuanda? Why is He doing nothing to help the starving children in Darfur? Why didn't He do something to stop the women and children being raped in the Congo? Can't you Christian militants get it into your head that there is no God for christs sake

What makes you feel they are militants?

OLAADEGBU:
Jehovah the God of Abraham, of Isaac and Jacob is the source of love, He even loves sinners that He gave His only begotten Son for us so that we sinners can have eternal life. On the other hand Allah only loves Muslims and hates unbelievers and will not hesitate to deceive unbelievers and even Muslims into hell.

So who is better? Your guess is as good as mine.

Jehova did all the vices you alluded to in the old testament. Hence he is not different from Allah in that regard.

OgaMadam:
which is why i say it has to be borne of love and sacrifice,

letting go of your flesh and blood, growing in your OWN body, must be hard,

True.

What makes Jehova a better God than Allah?

IDINRETE:

lady lady lady

this your argument is soooooooo weak,
your have just torn the veracity of your bible to shreds

My thoughts exactly.

Chop make I chop.

Arlington:
If that was my case i will gladly pay for someone to help me .and if it is my sister or best friend that has such situations ,i will do it without even thinking about it.

Nice

spikedcylinder:
If I can afford it, I will o. I mean, pay someone else to be sick, heavy, hormoned and bear labour pains on my behalf? Yes na!

But the question is, after the child is born, would I love him/her any less because I didn't suffer hard enough (seeing as thats the reason a lot of mothers give for loving their children) or would this surrogate mother love my child more than me?

Thats another problem on it's own. The child is yours genetically so why should you love him less?

Another interesting read.


http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1694723,00.html

An interesting read.

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1820685,00.html