₦airaland Forum

ipobbigot7:
[s]BishopMagic if at your age you still engaged in childish games, i wonder when you will grow to allow your children take over from you.

But in response to your stupidity. You just lay credence to the claims that the Yorubas leads your tribe in civilization, they set the pace for your primitive people. It's always the Igbos picking up what the Yorubas has left.

It's not wrong to ever do something wrong and you stopped, but stupidity is when you picked up what someone abandoned because it's evil and you are now priding in it.

This is the reason your tribe lacks honour, because you pride yourself in crime.

And do you know what we feeds with left over? Dogs and pigs [/s]

Chances are that your mammy was a drug mule

Lucifer descedant

Growing up in the 80's in Lagos we heard of places like Cocaine Avenue which was Allen Avenue. There was also another Cocaine Avenue in Festac.

The likes of Adebowale are known drug barons. And there are a dime a dozen Adebowales today who made their money from drug peddling. Even the current political front man of a particular tribe in the south is a convicted drug peddler.

There were also the Akpongbo Thai lace drug mules who came back from Thailand stinking rich after trafficking heroine into Nigeria for onward shipment to both the US and UK via drug mules. This racket was mainly controlled by middle aged women who fronted lace fabric business to cover their thriving illicit drug business. It is no wonder then that Nigeria was classified as a way point of drug shipments from both South America and Asia.

Also, these same set of people have had their celebrities and top musicians arrested for drug trafficking whenever they claim to be going on an overseas tour.

There also exist a long list of Nigerians of southern extraction who were executed in Saudi Arabia after they were caught trying to smuggle drugs under the pretext of performing the Islamic hajj pilgrimage. Your guess on which part of Nigeria they came from is as good as mine.

The Tokunbo baby immigration scam plus the credit card fraud is a hallmark of these same people and they just added the organ trade as one of their innovative vice.

So sometimes I wonder why they are quick to forget their drug past but rather focus on small time igbo couriers?

jarkbauer:
I think Nigeria should restructure into regions but let the Ibos secede. However after this secession ibos should be given 2 months to park all their belongings from Nigeria and banned from Nigeria.

Lol.

Has it now come down to an exodus?

I thought you guys swore to oppose any inch of Nigeria seceding?

IamaNigerianGuy:
[s]You are one of those half-baked people on NL without knowledge of history. Let me school you.

The UK had a coup detat under Cromwell to reset the system. France had military rule under De'Gaulle. Many coups have occured in Spain up till 1975. Despite appearances, the military has a big say in America. Thailand frequently resets the polity with coup detats. South Korea was put on the path of development by a military junta. Ghadaffi was a military ruler; he led Libya to unprecedented development. Rwanda is the fastest growing economy in Africa- Kagame entered power via military action.
Democracy in Nigeria is a sham. If you think what we practice in Nigeria is close to democracy you need therapy.

I will not read or respond to any of your comments anymore.
Goodbye[/s]

Talk is cheap.

Go and start you armed insurgency and replace the bigot resting in a hospice in London

Earlier this month, the U.S. State Department issued a new travel warning for Americans, cautioning them about travel to Europe this summer. The extent of that warning was remarkable: not just a single country has been deemed dangerous, but an entire continent.

And with good reason: terror attacks are becoming more frequent Europe-wide, from Paris to Berlin, from Stockholm to Brussels.ISIS was quick to claim responsibility for last week's suicide bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England.

What's more, British intelligence recently warned that as many as 350 British nationals may soon return from Syria, where they have been fighting alongside ISIS, many of them prepared to continue their violent jihad at home. They'll have ample support: England's MI5 suspects there up to 3,000 "violent Islamic extremists" in Britain, according to the London Times.

Accordingly, civilians and military, police and politicians across the Western world prepare for the terrorism we have come to know, be it attacks in our own cities or the gruesome images of beheadings we've seen on the internet and TV – and even our streets.

But a newly released United Nations Security Council report exposes the one weapon for which the West is wholly unprepared, and it may be the most powerful: women.

According to the report, women captured and enslaved by ISIS, Boko Haram, and other Islamist terror groups are not only being raped: they are frequently forced to convert to Islam; used as revenue streams via, prostitution, sex trafficking or demands for ransom from their families; or "treated as the wages of war, being gifted as a form of in-kind compensation or payment to fighters who are then entitled to resell or exploit them as they wish." They are offered up as enticements in recruitment efforts, which often come with promises of wives or private sex slaves. And they are often forced to act as human shields or suicide bombers.

In short, women have become the ultimate terror tool, used to recruit new terrorists, create a new jihadist generation (through forced pregnancy), and to kill.

Sexual violence is not new in warfare. But Islamic terror groups have taken it to new and horrifying extremes, from the 2014 kidnapping of 276 girls forced into sex slavery by Boko Haram, to the ethnic cleansing of Yazidis by ISIS terrorists, who took thousands of Yazidi women and girls as their slaves.

But even more shocking, as Baku Center for Strategic Studies fellow Najiba Mustafayeva wrote in Modern Diplomacy, "social media has converted [this] brutality into a form of propaganda to incite, radicalize, and attack recruits."

And it has done this with particular success in Europe, where some 6,000 Muslim men and women have made the trip to Syria to join in the jihad and the formation of the Islamic State.

Put another way: young men raised in a European culture that decries violence against women, where the rape of young girls is viewed not just as criminal but pathological, are being seduced by the thousands to leave their homes and families by the hope of enslaving and raping women and young girls.

And Europe has only itself to blame.

Although these young men were raised in a secular, Western culture, many Muslim youth have never fully accepted it as their own. From the time immigrant workers, largely from Turkey, Morocco, and Algeria, first arrived in Europe in the 1960s, Europeans kept them at arms length. They were guest workers, not immigrants. They were not expected to do the things immigrants might be, like learning the local language. They formed their own communities, and over the years, brought their families to join them, or married women from their home villages – women who, like them, were largely uneducated, religiously conservative, and naïve about the values of the countries they now lived in. They often wore headscarves. Their marriages were arranged. They were expected, and expected themselves, to follow the rules and values they'd grown up with.

And Europe, still guilt-ridden over the religious persecution that became the Holocaust, simply looked away.

In fairness, most Europeans, even politicians, were as ignorant of the cultural and religious traditions of conservative Muslims as the Muslims had been of Europe's. But even as they came to understand the immigrants, the European officials stood awkwardly silent in the face of domestic battery, honor killings, and child marriages taking place in the Muslim communities.

Not that these things were rampant, or taking place in open view. But until the arrival of the Somali-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who in 2003 brought these issues public as a member of the Dutch parliament, even when they did happen, no one said a word. Even honor killings went ignored, registered as "suicides" or "accidents."

Nor had anyone previously observed, as Hirsi Ali did, that more than 60 percent of the women in domestic violence shelters in the Netherlands were Muslim, while Muslims accounted for just 6 percent of the population. Similar situations soon also emerged in other countries.

Laws since have changed. Immigration rules have tightened, and this, alongside a greater awareness of forced marriages, has made it more difficult to arrange so-called "import brides" – girls brought to Europe from a family's village of origin in an arranged marriage. France and Belgium have banned the burqa, that dehumanizing garment that not only underscores the notion of woman as sexual object, but removes her face, her human-ness.

But it has taken decades.

The young European Muslim men enticed by promises of a sex slave of their very own have grown up in this changing environment. Their mothers may have been import brides themselves, women raised in a world that does not recognize Western views of women's rights, and who similarly instilled those values in their sons – as did their husbands.

Indeed, in a recent International Men And Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES), conducted in Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, and inside the Palestinian territories, 71 percent of Egyptian women and almost 50 percent of Moroccan women agreed with the statement that "wives should tolerate violence to keep the family together." Seventy-nine percent of Moroccan women also claimed that their husbands expect them to have sex whenever the husband wants it, which may explain also why 71 percent of Moroccan women versus 48 percent of men support criminalizing marital rape. Similarly, 33 percent of Egyptian and 36 percent of Moroccan women agreed that "if a husband provides financially, his wife is obliged to have sex with him whenever he wants." These figures also correspond with a 2013 Pew study of Muslims in 23 countries. That study found that 90 percent of Moroccans, 65 percent of Turks, and 85 percent of Egyptians agreed that "a wife must always obey her husband."

But the sons have a harder time now bringing girls like their mothers to Europe. And anyway, they know, treating women this way in Europe is against the law. Even if, as they believe, it's what they're entitled to.

Clearly, the pursuit of female slaves is not the only motivation for young men to join the Islamic State and other terror groups. Ideology, a belief in the creation of a pure Islamic culture, and the hope of martyrdom have all played a role. But for many young men, so, too, have the promises of (sex) slaves and life in a culture that reflects their own views of male and female roles.

And so they go to Syria. Or Libya. Or Iraq.

And they learn the art of terrorism.

Many of those men will be among the 350 who return to England, and the hundreds, if not thousands, of others whom European officials expect will also try to return home as the caliphate collapses. They will bring with them the sons who were born there, children of rape, of sex slaves, of mothers who have been traded away. The psychological impact of these backgrounds, coupled with their lives in a war zone and the indoctrination of ISIS training camps, is as unfathomable as it is unpredictable; but it does not bode well for the European communities that will become their new homes.

And what will happen to the women?

Nonetheless, there is some hope.

Education, the IMAGES authors maintain, can make a significant difference. "Men with higher education scored notably higher on the [gender equality] scale, and women even more so," they write. Consequently, they offer several recommendations for change within the region. Among them:

"Challenge and eliminate gender stereotypes about the social political, and economic roles of men and women in school texts and curricula, and implement school-based gender-transformative education for boys and girls."
"Build on existing literature, art, and cultural expressions that already include messages of positive masculinities, and partner with mass media, social media, children and youth media producers and other artistic producers, to include messages about changing norms related to masculinity."
"Mainstream courses in secondary schools and universities that focus on students' abilities to think critically about transforming inequitable gender norms and practices."
Some of these ideas are already in play in Norway. Other Western countries would be wise to follow suit, not just for the sake of Muslim women, but as a crucial weapon again Islamist terror now, and for the future.

With just a startup capital of 20 pounds

Not bad if you ask me.

IamaNigerianGuy:
[s]You have committed two logical fallacies in your submission slippery slope argument and straw man. I leave it as an exercise to you to find them in your post.
In any case, in principle, I do not have anything against violent overthrow of corrupt regimes. If a government messes up badly enough, it should be removed. All the western nations urging us to practice democracy would destroy their systems by force if they had the results we do. Under a sane system should Bubu or Saraki be anywhere near government at this stage of their failures ?[/s]

Wether you like it or not we remain a democracy and we will not bend to the caprices and whimps of a fiat military dictatorship anymore.
If your lot find the democratic process and the judicial system to slow for your liking then you can start an armed insurgency to carve out a North Korea for yourself.

I have suggested an armed insurgency for you since you see nothing wrong with violent overthrow of an elected govt.

Good luck in establishing your north korea

Some Muslim apologists attempting to divert the growing series of Jihadist inspired terror attacks in Europe and the west carried out by Muslims, have laid the blame on the US and the western world's wars and diplomatic policies in the middle east.

I wonder if the series of sectarian riots instigated and carried out by the majority Muslims in the north has any link to the disastrous US war policies in the remote middle east?

I wonder if the Coptic Christians in Egypt who have been on the receiving end of Muslim aggression have any link with the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

The blowback theory does not explain the unending wave of terror in Muslim countries. From sufi shrines to Shia processions and Coptic churches to Hindu temples, suicide bombers have aimed at targets that they consider to be un-Islamic or deviant.

Secondly, this blowback theory does not explain why only youth with fundamentalist persuasions explode in the Western metropolitans. I have not heard of a single suicide mission by a Marxist or a liberal youth of Muslim origin who is angry about the US invasion of Iraq.

Thirdly, Muslim countries are not uniquely on the receiving-end of imperial wars. Latin American, East Asian and African countries have been targets of overt and covert imperial wars. I am not aware of any Castroists arriving in the land of Big Satan to massacre children.

At the heart of the series of carnage and violence is Islam and nothing more.

IamaNigerianGuy:
Buhari is no doubt a failure but the Shagari regime was as corrupt as any you can find in Nigeria.

The same excuse used by succesive coup plotters was the corruption argument.

The military regimes of Obasanjo, Buhari,IBB, Abacha and Abdullsalami were the most corrupt era in Nigeria. And that is a fact.

Obasanjo military regime - missing NNPC money, ITT scandal and a host of others

Buhari military regime - emptying of Nigerian treasury on the day of the coup which was meant as both a pension fund for the coup plotters if the coup failed and as pay off to western politicians to back the coup plot.

IBB - missing Gulf oil windfall amounting to over 10 billion dollars

Abacha - serial kleptomaniac who turned Nigeria to his private estate. His loot is still being recovered till this day and nobody is sure about the extent of his loot

Abdullsalami regime emptied the treasury to a tune of over 15 billion dollars before handing to civilian regime.

Thats not a butterfly but a moth

The growing divide among Muslims as seen with the different sects has led to a brutal history of Islamic civil wars.

This invalidates the claim that Boko Haram are not Muslims because they kill other Muslims.

Muslims have no problem killing each other back then and now

Non-Sunni Minorities

Syria’s dictator, Bashar Assad, is a member of the small Alawite subsect of Shia Islam. Alawites only make up about ten percent of Syria’s population, but the Assad regime, under both Bashar and his father Hafez, consolidated power by appointing Alawites to high government positions. The vast majority of the Syrian population is not Alawite, or even Shiite, but Sunni. Bashar Assad frequently responds to criticism of his brutality by pointing to his history of protecting Syrian religious minorities, including Christians, and noting he belongs to a minority himself.

What is the difference between an Alawite and a Shiite? There are many minor differences in custom and tradition, but the major difference concerns Imam Ali. Recall that Shiites revere Ali as the rightful leader of Islam who should have succeeded Mohammed, and was divinely martyred in death, while Sunnis regard him as a traitor. The Alawites believe he was God incarnate. Some Sunni religious leaders consider them “worse infidels than Christians and Jews,” as one prominent cleric of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood put it in 2013 when calling for a Sunni jihad against them.

Another branch of Islam that often suffers discrimination and violence from other Muslims is the Sufi sect. The Sufis are neither Sunni nor Shiite — or they might say they are both, since both Sunni and Shiite Islam have Sufi chapters. This makes them an abused minority in both Shiite nations like Iran and Sunni countries like Egypt.

Sufism is more defined by its approach than specific doctrines, unlike the way Sunni and Shia or Shia and Alawite are distinguished. Modern Sufi have a reputation for gentleness and moderation, although they were a formidable military force in the past. The famed “whirling dervish” swordsmen of antiquity were a Sufi invention. Dervishes still whirl, but now the practice is seen as performance art or a form of moving meditation, like tai chi.

Sufi are generally less interested in strict interpretations of the Koran and Islamic sharia law, which makes them despised by hardcore Islamist sects. They are sometimes accused of diluting pure Islam with mystical mumbo-jumbo, or serving as agents for Western powers, seeking to subvert and “tame” true Islam as part of a Western imperialist agenda.

None of these branches of Islam are themselves homogeneous. There are dozens of different Sufi orders, for instance. Some of them are militant or political in nature, contrary to the general impression of Sufis as peaceable mystics.

Sunni Minorities

A school of Sunni Islam that has become increasingly important to American and European politics is Hizmet, a highly organized group founded and led by an imam named Fethullah Gulen. The government of Turkey sees Hizmet as far too organized, prosecuting it (literally) as a vast criminal conspiracy that attempted to overthrow President Recep Tayyip Erdogan last year. The Turkish government refers to Hizmet as “FETO,” an acronym for “Fethullah Terrorist Organization.” Turkey’s diplomatic relations with both Europe and the United States have been rocked by its pursuit of Hizmet and Gulen, who lives in Pennsylvania.

Sunni Islam also includes a movement known as the Salafi, the Islamic fundamentalists. Salafists believe Mohammed, and to a lesser extent his first two generations of descendants, were perfect human beings who should be emulated in every way, including dress and personal hygiene. Salafism includes its own, even more primitive and regressive sub-sects, including the Wahabbi Islam promoted by Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State’s apocalyptic belief system.

“Primitive” is not a pejorative term – Wahabbi Muslims literally embrace the primitive lifestyle of the 7th Century, when Mohammed lived. Their hostility to modernity is one of their defining attributes. Another is their hostility to all other variations of Islam, most definitely including Shiites.

The rapid spread of Salafist beliefs through well-financed overt and covert networks — Salafist madrassas, and agents of influence sent to infiltrate more moderate Islamic schools — is one of the major security concerns of our age, for those analysts and officers who have not been intimidated out of discussing it.

The Sunni-Shiite Divide

Few non-Muslims know the first thing about the Sunni-Shiite rift, which flows from a doctrinal dispute that might seem trivial to modern outsiders. When Mohammed died in the 7th Century, there was a profound disagreement among the early followers of Islam about who should succeed him as leader.

The heart of the Sunni-Shiite conflict is that the Sunnis thought the new leader or “caliph” should be elected and chose Mohammed’s close friend Abu Bakr. The leader of the Islamic State, who styles himself as “caliph” or ruler of all true Muslims, calls himself “Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi” in homage to the first caliph. His real name is Ibrahim Awwad Ibrahim al-Badri.

The dissident group we now know as Shiites insisted that only a blood relative of Mohammed was fit to lead, rallying behind Ali bin Abu Talib, who was both Mohammed’s cousin and son-in-law. Ali actually took a turn as caliph after Abu Bakr died, so it would be more precise to say the enduring rift within Islam was caused by Ali’s assumption of leadership and the argument over his successor.

A great deal of 7th-century tribal politics swirled around this conflict, making it more complex than any brief summary could capture. Among other factors, there was Islam’s development into a warrior religion, leading to clan rivalries and vicious arguments over plunder. Personal loyalties to Ali or his rivals played a role as well.

But this is a religious schism, not a matter of stimulating debate between historians. Shiites believe stealing leadership away from the lineal descendants of Mohammed was apostasy, a sin against the true faith.

Ali was assassinated, stabbed in the forehead with a poison sword while praying. Modern Shiites still make a pilgrimage to the mosque where they believe he died and is entombed, located in what is now Iraq. The city where it is located, Najaf, has been the scene of much sectarian bloodshed. The Sunni government of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein enraged a generation of Shiites by abusing the Imam Ali mosque.

Ali did not win the title of “caliph” in an election, either. Abu Bakr only reigned for a few years before he died. Ali got the job after Abu Bakr’s second successor, Caliph Uthman, was killed by his own troops in the Muslim holy city of Medina. One reason the Sunni-Shiite divide is so bitter is that Sunnis of the time were furious at Ali for accepting the title of caliph instead of punishing Uthman’s killers.

Followers of Uthman thought Ali committed acts of blasphemy and arrogance against true Islam, and Ali’s followers felt the same way about the Sunni elite. A major point of contention was, and remains, whether Ali swore and broke a binding oath of loyalty to the Sunni hierarchy and the caliphs that came before him.

This is not a minor dispute over the life and times of a long-dead historical personage, but a profound question of religious legitimacy.

Iran still believes its theocracy has rightful authority over Islam under the Shiite model of descent from Mohammed, for example. One of the candidates in the recent Iranian presidential election, cleric Ebrahim Raisi, wears a black turban to signify he is a sayed, a descendant of Mohammed. Raisi choose green as his campaign color because he wanted to take the color back from the secular “Green Movement” demonstrators and restore its “real meaning” as the color of “the revolutionary grandsons of the Prophet.” Those grandsons attempted a revolution against the early Sunni caliphs. They did not die of old age.

Sunni and Shia share many essential beliefs, but even their shared beliefs can be sources of tension. Both Sunnis and Shiites make pilgrimages to the holy cities in Saudi Arabia. Iran frequently castigates the Sunni Saudis over their management of the hajj pilgrimage, alleging discrimination against Shiites along with poor event management. The Saudis supply plenty of poor event management to complain about.

The royal family of Jordan is seen by some analysts as key to bridging the Sunni-Shiite divide, because the Hashemite ruling dynasty of Sunni Jordan claims direct descent from Mohammed’s family, satisfying the Shiite criteria for authentic leadership of Islam. Unfortunately, this also means the Jordanian regime gets to enjoy the violent hatred of both Sunni and Shiite extremists. The Sunni Islamic State infamously burned a captured Jordanian pilot alive in a cage and spread the image across the Internet as one of its favorite propaganda videos. Jordanian officials have nevertheless said they regard the Islamic Republic of Iran as a greater threat to their security than ISIS or other Sunni extremists.

Ironically, the Sunni House of Saud invalidates the core Sunni belief system which forbids a monarchical styled leadership among Muslims. The Fulani ruling class in Nigeria also invalidates the Sunni doctrine of doing away with Islamic blood line monarchies. EL Zackzacky, the self styled leader of Shia movement in Nigeria was a serial critic of the monarchical emirate system which so happens is restricted to the Fulani ethnic group. The Shia leader had had series of longstanding confrontation with the Emir of Zazau over his legitimacy as ruler and leader of the Muslims withing the Zaria emirate. It was then no surprise that the Sunni establishment will clampdown viciously on the Shiia sect. Apparently, the Sunni establishment is ever ready to clampdown on any group which opposes its legitimacy to rule over Islam. The Maitasine sect - a mahdist movement- is another good example of how the Sunni establishment will do the needful to sustain their power and positions. With Boko Haram, a Sunni wahabist movement, the Emirates and Amirs where not threatened but rather their legitimacy and authority strengthened by the terrorist group which replicated models of the Emirate system over conquered Kafuri lands.

The greatest misconception of non-Muslims especially Christians on Islam, is the notion that Islam and Muslims remain a wholly homogeneous group religion. This is far from the truth. The aim of this thread is to present the various differing sect and branches of Islam and how the violent history and political upheavals (both now and in earliest Islamic times ) have influenced the carving out of differing Islamic sects which hold on to differing political and global outlooks.

It is in this regard I have chosen to open this thread here on this section and not in the Religion section.

The ongoing Sunni persecution of minority Shiias in Nigeria should be a pointer that Islamic variations usually spring up and the violent suppression that arise is as a result of differing Political outlooks and views held by the varying sects.

The question to ask is do we even have a constitution?

What is being considered as a constitution is nothing but a collection of decreed laws compiled and plagiarized from outdated colonial laws which was dusted up and re-compiled and published with the considerations of the military aristocracy for the benefit and protection of the interests of Fulani feudal class.

Buhari will go down infamously in Hausa-Fulani history as the bigot who destroyed their market with his hatred.

According to the zombies, Buhari did not participate in the coup plot but he had no qualms bennefiting from an act of criminality.

Buhari is a criminal traitor

Great Man he was.

Nasman:
One thing am very sure of is that Aisha Buhari will never ever side with the South to disgrace the North. You guys are very funny, everything time there is a small confusion you jump in to support someone thinking at the end of the day, that will side with you and put his hatred campaign on the Northern way of life. You have failed in #ChildnotBride, Rahama Sadau, Shia Muslims, and now Aisha Buhari. The last thing this people need is southern support. Give your support to Leader of iPod in your so called zoo prison.

Is there any confusion bigger than this coming from Aso Rock?

Even that staunch northern hawk Junaid Mohammed raised the issue of the cabal months back.

So why did your goat fcker of an imam not beret Junaid but chose to tackle a woman?

****

Lol.

The buharis are meme generators comparable only to the Donald himself.

Leaking mouth Amaechi nko?

Meanwhile, where is that useless professor, Soyinka?

Why hasn't he told buhari to control his wife just as he told Jonathan?

When insecure cave men design your clothes...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Shalim.JPG/140px-Shalim.JPG

This would have made for a better joke rather than the nonsense buhari spewed in Germany :

"You know women, we can't seem to satisfy them. I will be facing serious probe on my part when I get home. Pls pray for me."

Shikena!

Merkel will truly laugh and buhari will transform to a living meme over the liberal internetz.

Captain Cave man of Northern Nigeria


[img]http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/hanna-barbera/images/c/cd/Captain_Caveman.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20130624190610[/img]

The manlet commands no respect.

Only Alpha males can order a woman to strip and make herself wet in the "other room" 2 hrs before arriving home and demand for dinner to be served first.

Osinbanjo looks every way like a cunninl1ngus pro who has been made to eat punna all his life.

#Grab-em-by-thePussy-2-d-other-room Team representing!

TonyeBarcanista:
In that case Osinbajo should go alongside him with ALL members of both Executive and Legislative arms.

You can spew trash no be small.

See as you balance like monkey for laptop dey yarn nonsense.

If you have nothing sensible to contribute other than to stroke osinbanjo's tripod stands then quit posting here.

ojun50:
I will never vote for an hausa man again

Afonja?

Give it time.

In the next 10 - 15yrs you will vote Buhari again if he is still alive

When will this happen knowing anybody critical of the block head's stupid policies gets hounded by these dogs?

He did not in anyway disgrace Nigeria as he does not represent the entire nation but just a segment of his own corner of the country.

They only people he disgraced are the ones who voted him in to represent them in Congress.

TonyeBarcanista:
I'm talking about "family virtues" not his professional conduct.

Anything family should be kept in the home front, spouse has NO BUSINESS to publicly interfere in the professional conduct of partner irrespective of the position. The traditional role of public officers, Kings, religious leaders, business professionals' spouses is to SUPPORT their partners but not interfere in their business.

PS: Queen Elizabeth has her husband but have you heard him openly criticise or interfere in her business?

Are you critical of aisha for airing her views on her husband's mismanagement of his electoral victory?

Rather than critisize Aisha why not see buhari as the man who can't seem to satisfy national, intra-party and his personal home affairs?

The fact is buhari belongs within a very narrow band of sectional Northern bigots.

Aisha just happens to be a reasonable voice telling him his new found enclave of sycophants are not there in anyway to help move his administration, party and nation forward but to help themselves only.

Use brain for once