Bonechamberlain's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Bonechamberlain's Profile › Bonechamberlain's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 167 pages)
arabianights:what's hmmmm, or can't u see the kind of evil being perpetrated in southern Kaduna, look at that small girl. ![]() |
arabianights:yes and after that better hide because any evil fulani or supporter of evil fulanis would be the first to meet their maker. |
El rufai would surely die this way. ![]() This is a well thought out plan by the fulanis, including buhari, sultan of sokoto( their hypocritical silence makes them part of the plan) but they would meet their Waterloo one day(very close). I think it's time for CAN to arm Christians in southern Kaduna. Jungle country ![]() |
Proudlyngwa:I won't kill her that's why we should be happy that her maker decided to end her sufferings |
Sandydayziz:Na wa o, the girl was seriously suffering, whatever way thank God she is dead, you should also thank God. |
Sandydayziz:which other way, that girl was suffering, if she was in a developed society, they would have taken proper care of her. |
This people haven't seen anything, you support US in using terrorism to oust governments in the middle east thereby creating massive chaos and suffering, now the people are showing you what terrorism is. |
Ohh thank God, death is better for her. No one would want to live under this condition in a terrible country |
Since the Obama administration wants to blame the Russians (hackers) for their electoral loss. Then they deserve the awards for persons of the year |
Oildichotomy:exactly, those who haven't seen the opportunity to steal consider themselves honest. |
This is a serious problem |
madridguy:well written sarcasm |
Person of the Year 2016: The Russian Hacker Robert Bridge In the past year, the world was introduced to a suspect for all seasons and purposes; an interloper so slippery he has yet to be positively identified. Yet, like Sasquatch, Loch Ness and UFOs, we know he is out there, lurking, and laughing at us all. In dark, smoke-choked rooms across the vast expanse of 11 time-zones that is Putin's Russia are brooding Dostoyevskian characters consumed with one overriding objective: Hacking Hillary Clinton’s email server in a brazen attempt to strike at US democracy and deliver Russia-friendly demagogue Donald J. Trump to power. Yes, Clinton made the task easier by using her personal computer to send classified messages, but this should not lessen our appreciation for these provocateurs. It has been a long and thankless road for the Russian hacker. Whenever he is mentioned, it is in the hushed tones of secret sources behind the closed doors of some windowless government agency, and published in media of dubious repute. But Russians have to take their fame and notoriety where they can get it these days. "It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russia's goal here was to... get Trump elected," an anonymous US official briefed by another anonymous official told the Washington Post. "That's the consensus view." However, a chorus of skeptical voices questioning this “consensus view” was heard not just in Moscow, but in Washington as well, where officials are demanding some props to support the flimsy Russian hacking script. Following news of the electronic eavesdropping, Devin Nunes, House Intelligence Committee Chairman, requested a closed-door briefing with US intelligence agencies - the FBI, CIA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and NSA - to update the lawmakers on their findings. Incredibly, all of the agencies declined his request. The refusal to brief Congress’s most-senior committee with jurisdiction was called “unusual” by Fox. Nunes, flabbergasted by the snub, suggested the failure of the Intel agencies to provide clear and irrefutable evidence of Russian hacking was due to the “manipulation of intelligence” in the quest of particular "political purposes." Now imagine that. US government agencies – and possibly the media as well - working behind the scenes for “political purposes” amid the most hotly contested presidential election in recent memory. Rep. Peter King, another member of the House Intelligence Committee, sounded a bit like a crazed conspiracy theorist when he told Fox News: “It’s almost as if people in the intelligence community are carrying out a disinformation campaign against the president-elect of the United States…” But let’s be fair here. Just because there appears to be a lack of forensic evidence to incriminate the Russian hackers, is that any reason to deny them their 15 minutes of fame? After all, was there any solid proof that Barack Obama was qualified for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, just 11 days after entering office and at the very same time America was bogged down in two wars? No, there wasn’t. But that didn’t stop the Norwegian Committee from bestowing their top prize on America’s first black leader. Nor did it magically turn Obama into a peace-loving president, for that matter. So why should the Russian hackers be denied a trophy due to a tiny technicality called evidence? Instead of splitting hairs over minor details, we should consider the huge service this unwashed gang of provocateurs rendered to the United States in (the latter's) eternal quest to keep the illusion of democracy alive and kicking. Why, had it not been for the sudden emergence of Russian hackers on the US political scene, the American voter would have been needlessly troubled by 20,000 hacked emails from the Democratic National Convention that revealed some rather unsavory things. For example, how the DNC worked behind the scenes to support Hillary Clinton’s nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate over that of Bernie Sanders, the one guy political analysts say could have given The Donald a run for his money on the rocky road to the White House. And it gets worse. In October, yet another batch of freshly leaked emails to Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta showed that interim DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile, who also moonlighted as a CNN contributor, fed debate questions to Clinton that would be asked during a CNN-moderated debate. Here was political intrigue on a scale that made Watergate look like a Saturday afternoon parking ticket by comparison. And it gets worse still. Much worse. On July 10, 2016, Seth Rich, 27, Director of Voter Expansion at the DNC, was shot and killed about a block from his home in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Since Rich worked in the voter database division, he would have been privy to DNC’s data materials – including emails. Coincidence? A robbery gone wrong in a shady part of town, as police suggest? Maybe. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, in an interview to Dutch television, set off conspiracy alarms when he refused to confirm or deny whether Rich was the WikiLeaks’ source. But he did announce a $20,000 reward in the young man’s murder case. Beyond that, the murder of Seth Rich in connection to the leaked/hacked DNC emails has been relegated to the realm of conspiracy theory by the US mainstream media, in favor of their own conspiracy theory that Russian hackers were the real perpetrators. “There was no indication that any insider was involved in this,” an anonymous source told Newsweek. “Every indication is this was a remote attack from a foreign government—the Russians. “This is a very sophisticated actor," the nameless source continued. "This is not some kid coming in and downloading documents and handing them to somebody.” Well, there you have it. Case closed. No possible way that some “kid” with a painful conscience could have been the source of the leaked emails. Much easier to just pin the blame on Russian hackers, who actually had little or nothing to gain from such hijinks. Perhaps Newsweek should have rung up Henry Kissinger, 93, for his view on the Russian hacker story. They may have been surprised. When asked on 'Face the Nation' what he made of allegations that the Russians tried to get involved in the US presidential elections, the Washington warhorse said: "I can't quite understand what their purpose would be because in all of the polls Hillary Clinton was far ahead. They could not have had information on the polls that others did not have. And then to antagonize the president-to-be (Clinton) by getting into open support of the opponent doesn't make any sense to me... " Russian hackers go on European tour Despite working around the clock wreaking havoc on American democracy, the Russian hacker still found time to rattle Europe, where sold-out leaders are attempting to suppress a slew of homemade crises, including the arrival of millions of undocumented migrants from the Middle East (complete with handsome benefit packages provided by EU taxpayers), painful austerity measures amid a devastating economic downturn, and the continuation of a Russian sanctions regime that is hurting European producers far more than Russian consumers. Naturally and predictably, such devastating policies strike like an earthquake at the heart of communities, leading to the spectacular rise of far-right political parties, like the National Front in France, Britain’s UKIP and the AfD in Germany. This is by no means political rocket science. So who to blame for this massive grassroots political movement across Europe? Yes, the usual suspects: the Russians and their amazing computer skills. In fact, some would actually have us believe that Brexit was a Russian hack job. Labour MP Ben Bradshaw appeared to be auditioning for a stand-up comedy job when he told his peers it is "highly probable" that Russia interfered in the UK’s Brexit referendum. "I don’t think we have even begun to wake up to what Russia is doing when it comes to cyber warfare,” Bradshaw said without a hint of irony. "Not only their interference, now proven, in the American presidential campaign, [but] probably in our referendum last year. We don’t have the evidence for that yet. But I think it’s highly probable." Please take a moment to reflect upon that last line one more time, because it’s the same line being called 'proof' across the pond in America: “We don’t have the evidence for that yet. But I think it’s highly probable." Last but not least, Chancellor Angela Merkel added to the insanity, warning in November that Russian hackers may attempt to interfere in Germany’s 2017 general election because, after all, there is no way that Merkel’s politically suicidal decision to allow millions of undocumented migrants into her country could possibly cause her countrymen to lose all faith for this woman. “We are already, even now, having to deal with information out of Russia or with internet attacks that are of Russian origin or with news which sows false information,” Merkel said, as quoted by Agence France-Presse. Amazing, isn’t it? At least with Bigfoot and UFOs we are occasionally treated to some grainy photograph that lends some credence to their legends. And although Western leaders risk severe tensions with Moscow over rumors that Russian hackers are disrupting lily-white Western democracies, not a shred of evidence has been provided thus far to substantiate the claims. So congratulations to the Russian hacker, Person of the Year 2016. Although we never got a chance to formally meet you, or obtain proof that you have done all the incredible things they say you’ve done, that has done nothing to dispel your powerful influence on the world stage. @Robert_Bridge https://www.rt.com/op-edge/371729-person-year-2016-russian-hackers/ |
Russia clearly showed the world the hypocrisy of Obama's America, fighting terrorist with the right hand and supporting them with the left. All the instabilities currently in the middles east is as a result of Obama's policy of supporting terrorist to change government and supporting a very despotic and terrorism financing kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The world has clearly seen what Obama's America stand for, so it should surprise no one if they are ignored. |
There is no cold war or stakes, with that clown Obama out there would be nothing like cold talk more of war, what Obama is doing now is like that of a dying man and it would lead him to nowhere. The world should praise Americans who voted trump, because they prevented a major disaster that would have destroyed the world. All those war mongers and banking cartels who want war with Russia should go hang themselves because Trump is on the side of Putin's Russia. |
Having a nuclear weapon is a big deterrence to any aggressor. Those weapons cannot be in the hands of every country cause of instability of governments and power politics as anyone with such weapons almost have the capacity to influence the policies including foreign policy of governments that don't have the weapons. China can carry out its foreign policy to the core, even at the detriment of a powerful Japan because of nuclear weapons, Britain can still lay claim to falk island today because of nuclear weapons, France can still dictate to every francophone country till today because of nuclear weapons USA can get away with so many atrocities because of nuclear weapons, Russia can continue to annex territories because of nuclear weapons. The smaller countries like India, Pakistan, Israe,l North Korea etc are nothing in the scheme of things as their nuclear weapons are mostly short range and isn't that powerful and cannot threaten the world unlike the big five whose weapons can be delivered anywhere it wants to strike But the truth remains that nuclear weapons are useless because it can't be used and there is an assurance of Mutual assured destruction (MAD), they are just a form of deterrence and "checks and balances" between the big five. Finally international politics is all about interest and dominance, none of the nuclear powers would want each country having nuclear weapons as it would diminish their dominance and their interests and foreign policy might never be achieved. |
God help us |
Nigeria, it's now difficult to buy RICE. Smh All those processes just to buy rice |
After using tax to almost suffocate people |
The mother even looks younger. |
opposition party, where? if not for the doggedness and courage of wike, we all know what would have been the outcome. Prof u don't know what u are saying which shows that you don't even know what is happening in Inec |
So these guy shares the same birthday with buhari. What an irony. Happy birthday to the pope |
Tculest: u guillible Nigerians" u are not a Nigerian abi, pls am not a guillible Nigerian. |
With the stone looks of this guy, one would conclude that he ran away from home ![]() |
Saraki, today he fights for the masses, tomorrow he fights for corruption smh. Very unstable and feeble minded senators ![]() |
shedybaba44:exactly what I Said, enforce what u believe or ur opinions on yourself, not others. When it comes to religion no one is superior Better learn that. |
FuckyourMama:very unstable and useless senators. |
Hmmm op only you two topics on front page at the same time. Well-done |
shedybaba44:mr Bible pay your tithe as u like, if that's what won't bring the wrath of God on you, but you have no right to teach people how to serve their God, you and that lady Should stick to your own opinions, don't generalize it. |
, pls tell the dumb supporters, I wonder how such person was picked to be efcc chairman. A parochialcorrupt man fighting corruption, no one is talking of the dss report that indicted magu. U see hypocrites not mentioning anything about the report by dss they are busy insulting the Senate as if they were the ones that wrote the report, but they are quick to praise the dss on the judges raid. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 167 pages)
opposition party, where? if not for the doggedness and courage of wike, we all know what would have been the outcome. Prof u don't know what u are saying which shows that you don't even know what is happening in Inec