₦airaland Forum

@Chxta

I do check the sources. the first link mirrored the press reports

http://www.today.az/news/politics/29240.html

As Davidylan mentioned

"Funny enough, ordinary blogs happen to have much more accurate and reliable information than the so-called media organisations."

I don't just limit my research to the main media organisations

even though he seems to have changed his mind

davidylan:
At long last someone else has seen through the thick cloud of ignorance! It is so easy to post "links", verifying the authenticity of such links in itself is another kettle of fish!

the following 2 links are sources from the following

Winning Modern Wars: Iraq, Terrorism, and the American Empire
by Wesley K. Clark(page 130)

Michel Chossudovsky is the author of the international best seller "The Globalization of Poverty " published in eleven languages. He is Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Center for Research on Globalization. His most recent book is America’s "War on Terrorism", Global Research, 2005.



@Davidylan

You need to calm down young man. You write with such venom. Its only information. Whether you want to believe it or not, its is entirely up to you. I am not forcing you to accept it. i just state what i have analysed just like u state what you have analysed.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=IVA20060728&articleId=2847

Oh sorry Russia not involved?

My Bad!

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=A%20C20060723&articleId=2797

this link points out lebanon may have been a target from day one. So i guess im not the only one waiting to outgrow this phase sweetie.

Tag team back again, Whoops there it is!

The war in Iraq was planned well before it started. One thing you may not have not noticed is that countries do not rush into war just like that. They plan it very well. I believe Israel may have been getting ready to target Lebanon before the hizbollah kidnapped the soldiers hence their overreaction.

I pointed out that this war between Lebanon and Israel is more than what meets the eye especially as Iran is the intended target of Israel/US. China and Russia are Iran's allies which makes things more interesting, especially with the war games they showcased previously.

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060824&articleId=3056

and yes war games are relevant in this discussion Davidylan. I never stated Russia was behind Hizbollah so please kindly refrain from making false accusations and stop taking out your frustrations on me.

You wldnt know its a US vs Russia conflict.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4161660.stm

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050817-122515-2218r.htm

As for US not selling to other Arabian countries that is not the case. I posted a link earlier which reported how the US had built a nuclear factory in Iran. As more Arab countries move against US dollars, US's involvement in supplying weapons will be revealed i.e Iraq.

@ mariory

See Big B1 and Kaecy5 understand what is going on. Russia is involved.



Has anyone read any news on Iran testing their missile

http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_truth/2006/08/iran_fires_miss.html

Do you remember that BBC fiasco where a cabbie got mistaken for an editor of company.

Well he was actually there for a job interview for a cleaning job.

It's so funny.

Watch this!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4774429.stm

Golden rules for finding your life partner by Dov Heller, M.A

When it comes to making the decision about choosing a life partner, no one wants to make a mistake.Yet, with a divorce rate of close to 50%, it appears that many are making serious mistakes in their approach to
finding Mr./Miss. Right!

If you ask most couples who are engaged why they're getting married, they'll say: "We're in love"; I believe this is the #1 mistake people make when they date. Choosing a life partner should never be based on love.

Though this may sound "not politically correct",there's a profound truth here. Love is not the basis for getting married. Rather, love is the result of a good marriage. When the other ingredients are right, then the love will come. Let me say it again:
"You can't build a lifetime relationship on love alone"; You need a
lot more!!!

Here are five questions you must ask yourself if you're serious about
finding and keeping a life partner.

QUESTION , 1: Do we share a common life purpose?

Why is this so important? Let me put it this way: If you're married for 20 or 30 years, that's a long time to live with someone. What do you plan to do with each other all that time? Travel, eat and jog together?
You need to share something deeper and more meaningful.You need a common life
purpose.

Two things can happen in a marriage:
(1) You can grow together, or
(2) you can grow apart.

50% of the people out there are growing apart. To make a marriage work,you need to know what you want out of life! Bottom line; and marry someone who wants the same thing.

QUESTION , 2: Do I feel safe expressing my feelings and thoughts with this person?

This question goes to the core of the quality of your relationship. Feeling safe means you can communicate openly with this person. The basis of having good communication is trust -i.e. trust that I won't get"punished"; or hurt for expressing my honest thoughts and feelings. A colleague of mine defines an abusive person as someone with whom you feel afraid to express your thoughts and
feelings.Be honest with yourself on this one. Make sure you feel emotionally safe with the person you plan to marry.

QUESTION , 3: Is he/she a mensch?

A mensch is someone who is a refined and sensitive person. How can you test? Here are some suggestions.

Do they work on personal growth on a regular basis?
Are they serious about improving themselves?


A teacher of mine defines a good person as "someone who is always striving to be good and do the right ";.So ask about your Significant other:What do they do with their time? Is this person materialistic?
Usually a materialistic person is not someone whose top priority is character refinement.

There are essentially two types of people in the world:
(1) People who are dedicated to personal growth and
(2) people who are dedicated to seeking comfort.

Someone whose goal in life is to be comfortable will put personal comfort ahead of doing the right thing.
You need to know that before walking down the aisle.

QUESTION , 4: How does he/she treat other people?

The one most important thing that makes any relationship work is the ability to give. By giving, we mean the ability to give another person
pleasure.
Ask: Is this someone who enjoys giving pleasure to others or are they wrapped up in themselves and self-absorbed? To measure this, think about the following:

How do they treat people whom they do not have to be nice to, such as waiters, bus boys, taxi drivers,etc,

How do they treat their parents and siblings?

Do they have gratitude and appreciation? If they don't have gratitude for the people who have given them everything;

Can you do nearly as much for them? You can be sure that someone who treats others poorly, will eventually treat you poorly as well.


QUESTION , 5: Is there anything I'm hoping to change about this person after we're married?

Too many people make the mistake of marrying someone with the intention of trying to "improve"; them after they're married. As a colleague of mine puts it: "You can probably expect someone to change after marriage for the worse" If you cannot fully accept this person the way they are now, then you are not ready to marry them.

In conclusion, dating doesn't have to be difficult and treacherous. The key is to try leading a little more with your head and less with your heart.

It pays to be as objective as possible when you are dating; to be sure to ask questions that will help you get to the key issues. Falling in love is a great feeling, but when you wake up with a ring on your
finger, you don't want to find yourself in trouble because you didn't do your homework.

Another perspective,

There are some people in your life that need to be loved from a distance,

It's amazing what you can accomplish when you let go of or at least minimize your time with draining,negative,incompatible, not-going anywhere relationships. Observe the relationships around you.

Pay attention,
Which ones lift and which ones lean? Which ones encourage and which ones discourage? Which ones are on a path of growth uphill and which ones are going downhill? When you leave certain people do you feel better or feel worse? Which ones always have drama or don't really understand,know,or appreciate you?

The more you seek quality, respect, growth, peace of mind, love and truth around you, the easier it will become for you to decide who gets to sit in the front row and who should be moved to the balcony of your
life.

An African proverb states, "Before you get married,keep both eyes open,and after you marry, close one eye"; Before you get involved and make a commitment to someone, don't let lust,pity,desperation,
immaturity,ignorance, pressure from others or a low self-esteem make you blind to warning signs. Keep your eyes open,and don't fool yourself that you can change someone or that what you see as faults aren't really that important.


Do you bring out the best in each other?
Do you compliment and compromise with each other, or do you
compete,compare and control?
What do you bring to the relationship?
Do you bring past relationships, past hurt, past mistrust, past pain?


You can't take someone to the altar to alter them.
You can't make someone love you or make someone stay.

If you develop self-esteem, spiritual discernment, and "a life"; you won't find yourself making someone else responsible for your happiness or responsible for your pain. Seeking status, sex, and security are the
wrong reasons to be in a relationship.

WHAT KEEPS A RELATIONSHIP STRONG ARE:

TRUST
COMMUNICATION
INTIMACY
A SENSE OF HUMOR
SHARING TASKS
SOME GETAWAY TIME WITHOUT BUSINESS OR CHILDREN
DAILY EXCHANGES (meal, shared activity, hug, call, touch, notes,
SHARING COMMON GOALS AND INTERESTS
GIVING EACH OTHER SPACE TO GROW WITHOUT FEELING INSECURE
GIVING EACH OTHER A SENSE OF BELONGING AND ASSURANCES OF COMMITMENT

If these qualities are missing, the relationship will erode as resentment withdrawal, abuse, neglect, and dishonesty; and pain will replace it.

Happiness keeps You Sweet,
Trials keeps You Strong,
Sorrows keeps You Human,
Failures keeps You Humble,
Success keeps You Glowing,

But, Only God keeps You Going!

needs more ram

Haven't you got family to check him out for you? If he has no papers then do not marry him especially as you are not feeling him. I think God has spoken to you already by filling your heart with doubt and making you come here to seek advice.

If he was sincere, he wouldn't be rushing for marriage nor would his sister. Most people pay for papers via marriage and they want to skip all that by taking advantage of your vulnerability.

All that Glitters is not Gold

Well 'Israel' and 'US' better start taking a chill pill or something.

I dont mind being questioned about my posts with relevant evidence to back up their challenges but personal attacks - well that is something else.

I dont think Russia and US will fight because of NATO but nothing is impossible.

@Mariory

Well dont you tell me to shut my mouth up and i wont call you a bully.

@Mariory n Davidylan

Are you trying to imitate your mentors Israel and US?

Dont even bother try and intimidate me with your slyly bordering on bullying.

No one looks down on you two for posting such outlandish remarks so i don't see why you two need to take me on for my remarks.

Over here on my pc its a free world.

You hear that? A free world

So go spin on my middle finger and try not to love it too much.

Mariory:
No they blow themselves up because they believe killing non-muslims will grant them automatic entry to their heaven and 40+ virgins.

If they kill themselves as well or if they kill non muslims? The Quran actually supports that?

In the US when American teenagers come into school with a shotgun killing innocent bystanders and then topping themselves off. What will you call that?

Mariory:
Russia isn't backing Iran. They have several billions worth of interest in the country. It's about money for the Russians. Stop bringing them into this.

Well i can't stop bringing them into this when they are already involved.

Look how the US got involved in their politics with Georgia and for what reason? Oil.

Mariory:
That's right. I didn't want to start an argument on Russia vs America.

Oh boy davidylan by responding to Brown-Eyes post about Israel getting a licking, I fear you've opened up another oppurtunity for some folks here to chat absolute nonsense.

I understand though. It is hard to see ignorance being displayed and ignore it.

yeah sure you didn't.

davidylan:
and as for those screaming fair play to enable Iran, Sudan, Somalia, Al-queda, Hamas obtain nuclear weapons, i can only shake my head and marvel at such a display of naivete!

I notice you did not add North Korea to your list of 'warlords'. Please tell me why Israel can have their own nuclear weapons when they have clearly shown they can go overboard when it comes to carrying out simple operations.

davidylan:
Nasrallah just appologised on international media claiming he would not have ordered the capture of the two Isreali soldiers if he knew the magnitude of the Isreali response, bad as it may sound, the Isreali response has done 1 thing: any terror organisation willing to attack Isreal will do so with much more caution and restraint next time. Isreals constant recourse to the "road map to peace" simply emboldened her enemies to keep attacking thinking the worst Isreal would do was report them!

Bush is forever apologising. Public apologies means nada in politics.

davidylan:
NB: I am presently watching a history documentary of archeological evidence proving the reliability of the events that occur in the bible! I am wondering, very little if any archeological evidence links the "palestinians" to the present state of Isreal and yet we are constantly being told by some "knowledgeable" folks here that the palestinians were the original owners of the land. How and when?

History documentary? the same one that told us that ancient Egyptians were Caucasian? Ok since you take the history documentaries as Gospel, the man they knew as Jesus was a Jew and they discovered, based on an Israelite skull, he was more likely to have looked like a dark arab, http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/index.html as opposed to the blue eyed, blond haired jews we see today. This information came from a history documentary.

davidylan:
Some have even gone as far as claim the present day Isreal is peopled by "fake" jews! How naive!

Yes me! I say so. They are imposters claiming to be descendants of Israelites. You are reluctant to read up on their conversion to Judaism yet still have that unrelentless urge to bring up that particular point. Again i ask you, do you know of their history? biblical stories and myths do not apply.


Which scramble for Africa? The one that occured in 1884 or when? Who are those scrambling for Africa and how?

Do you really want to know or u being sarky as usual? obviously the one that is happening now.

How do Africans go about "resisting as the arab world has been doing"?

Everyone's resistance is different. The Arab world resist with violence as that is the only language US knows. Take a look at her history.


a. hijacking aircraft and crashing them into skyscrapers?

That is according to US propoganda and a few misguided individuals

b. hurling stones and katyusha rockets at innocent Europeans and Americans

US calls that collateral damage

c. Suicide bombings

Unlike the US, they cant afford weapons so they use themselves.

d. Hiding in caves and chanting death to America?

Bush hides in the Pentagon and White house and chants death to every country that opposes him


Which war is "really between Russia and the US and their attempt to take over the world", the cold war? How can the war be between the US and Russia when it is obvious the sponsors and backers of hizballah is Iran and Syria?
The level of ignorance here is apalling!


Tell me who is backing Iran? and who is backing Israel? At the moment Russia and US are playing War games and why is that? You really need to look beyond what the US media is spoonfeeding you and start using your own brain to analyse situations.

@ Mariory

I fear you've opened up another oppurtunity for some folks here to chat absolute nonsense.

I understand though. It is hard to see ignorance being displayed and ignore it. Grin

Thought you didnt want to start an argument.

Mariory:
I was going to reply but doing so will start a whole new argument I'm sure. As such I won't.

Mariory:
You know what, if you love countrie like Iran, Russia, or China, why don't you go live there?

Well don't put up petty remarks and expect no retaliation.

tianshie:
@Browneyes
are you a hezbollah apologist?

I have read with horror some people on this thread suggest that a country like Iran be allowed to own nuclear weapons,in the interest of fair play.

What you mean?

How come no one said anything to US when it supplied arms to these so called terrorists when it wanted to get the Soviets out of the race for global power?

What about North Korea? They developed Nuclear weapons against US wishes yet they have not been invaded. _{Maybe it's b/c they have a missile targeted at US}

As for Iran, yes i believe they should develop their own nuclear weapons.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/custom/newsroom/chi-060823iran,0,7581628.story?coll=chi-news-hed

At one point the US agreed they should too.

tianshie:
i have no words to describe such warped logic.

Warped? What makes it that way? Could the reason be religion on your part? Or are you so easily misled by what the West sends your way? It is people like you that will get Africa recolonized. Think man THINK!

Mariory:
You say they kicked Isreal's ass. LMFAO! So this is a victory for hezbolla? Well, it sure would be a sight to see their next victory.

I gave you the link and even the Israelis have admitted it that is why they are looking for a PM that knows more about militant procedures. They got a thorough beating because they underestimated the power of the 'Dark' side.
They assumed their weapons will not be up to scratch only to find out they were more than up to scratch in fact they were more advanced than theirs.

Mariory:
Yeah I can imagine it now, The whole of South lebanon becoming a waste land of sand and stone but hezbolla supporters celebrating victory in Iran and Syria. Yup, the Lebanese would sure appreciate that.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1221306.ece

South lebanon is being rebuilt as we type so no chance of that.

Mariory:
Reminds me of when people mention the US lost in Vietnam, or in Somalia. Absolutely funny stuff.

People as in the whole world including the US? Well the opinion of one does not outweigh the opinions of many in this case.

Mariory:
You mean Russia that is dependent on Western aid, investments, and trade? That Russia? This war has nothing to do with Russia. Russia have their own problems with fundamentalists in Chechna(sp). whole different topic on which it appears you need to be lectured.

http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/06/03/rumsfeldpuzzled.shtml

Russia and China know what they are doing.

And who am i going to be lectured by? Certainly not by you, Mr 'US won the Vietnam war'

Mariory:
You know what, if you love countrie like Iran, Russia, or China, why don't you go live there?

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L26771679.htm

I don't think the hizbollah was ready for war, yet they kicked Israel's ass with a little help from their friends. This war is really between Russia and the US and their attempt to take over the world. In the meantime there is a scramble for Africa, i hope this time around Africans will resist as much as the Arab World have been doing.

Stop calling me ma'am please. it is getting rather tedious.

davidylan:
The most important Oil nations to the US are Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and possibly Iraq (a possible reason that bungling Bush dragged the US to war!).

Good you are finally beginning to realise.

davidylan:
The US has absolutely no interest in whether Syria or Lebanon choose to blow themselves to smithereens!

Duh! That's what we have been saying all along. they are pawns.

davidylan:
Which Kabiyesi's posts? I don't read "cut and paste" posts! More often than not, such posters don't have a mind of their own! You yourself are not even sure of why you think the US might be interested in "overtaking" the middle east!

Same could be said for you. You just soak up everything you hear and read from Fox n CNN then come and expect me to follow suit. In case you didn't know i have a mind of my own and i research before making up my mind. Well none of us know all the reasons the US is interested in overtaking the Middle East. I know one reason is Oil and the rest, i am still making enquiries. I suggest you do the same too. There is a lot to learn on this thread.

davidylan:
Yes ma'am, i am not so with nitwits and misguided individuals today!

I think you need a break from this thread as you seem stressed out.

@ Chxta
Wondered where you went? Did you get banned or something?

@ Davidylan

Plz no need for the Ma'am. Are you part of the military hence your loyalty to Bush?

davidylan:
No ma'am, the US is least interested in "overtaking" the middle east! For what reason are we running after the middle east? For their "rapid development" or "technological breakthroughs"?

er, oil might have a great influence. Didnt you read Kabiyesi's previous posts?

davidylan:
No ma'am, if we have erred in fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is because the US is desperate to protect its borders and people from the mauraders who call themselves slaves to one certain Allah!

All i can say is that every action has a reaction and i mentioned earlier US had her eyes set on the Middle East way before 9/11. You forget the Gulf War. As for errors, US is always guilty of that. Do you recall the Vietnam war? was that not an error too and countless other skirmishes they had in the past? US needs to stop interfering in other countries politics and tend to her own.

davidylan:
No one was thinking of attacking them, not until they hit the WTC in 1993 and 2001 did we suddenly realise we had rogues on our hands!
The US has no business with the mid east, let the rogues leave the US alone!

I swear you are so not with it today.

"Shakes her head at Davidylan"

I thought you had forgotten the topic! I am glad you finally pinched yourself and remembered what this debate was all about. Each time someone dared to speak out against US and her cronies, you leashed a torrent of insults onto them. Bush has taught you well.

Actually this all ties in with US and her goal to overtake the Middle East. It started happening long before the current president but it seems Bush Jnr feels there is a need to rush things along so he created the situation we are discussing now which started with Afganistan via 9/11 then Iraq with 9/11 which then got changed Saddam then to weapons of mass destruction. Now it is Iran via Israel vs Lebanon.

I am surprised the self acclaimed master of all knowledge cannot see what is going on here.

@ Nilla and zebudaya

This was the same guy who was accused by the Senate for receiving funds from Saddam.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrdFFCnYtbk

For those who dont want to see the video, you can get an idea of what he said in the following piece of text.

[b]“Now I know that standards have slipped in the last few years in Washington, but for a lawyer you are remarkably cavalier with any idea of justice. I am here today but last week you already found me guilty.

“I have had two meetings with Saddam Hussein, once in 1994 and once in August of 2002. By no stretch of the English language can that be described as “many meetings” with Saddam Hussein. As a matter of fact, I have met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target those guns.

“You quote Mr Dahar Yassein Ramadan. Well, you have something on me, I’ve never met Mr Dahar Yassein Ramadan. Your sub-committee apparently has. But I do know that he’s your prisoner, I believe he’s in Abu Ghraib prison. I believe he is facing war crimes charges, punishable by death. In these circumstances, knowing what the world knows about how you treat prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison, in Bagram Airbase, in Guantanamo Bay, including I may say, British citizens being held in those places, I’m not sure how much credibility anyone would put on anything you manage to get from a prisoner in those circumstances.

“I told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9/11 2001. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning. Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies.

“Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq’s wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Haliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq’s money, but the money of the American taxpayer. Have a look at the oil that you didn’t even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it.

[/b]

@ Mariory

Far from it. Just trying to stick to the topic. Did you watch it?


@Davidylan - What's with the ma'am?

For your information a Jew is someone who practises Judaism there was nothing absurd in that question.

_{Ashkenazim, who are descendants of Jews from Germany, Poland, Austria and Eastern Europe, have for several generations constituted the bulk of the world's Jewish population. The Ashkenazim alone constitute around 80% of Jews worldwide.}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_ethnic_divisions _{yes i am using this source as you love to talk about it so much and it seems to be the only site you are willing to check}

I believe the main cause of the problem is caused by Europeans coming into the Middle East and proclaiming land to be theirs.

_{Your question makes absolutely no sense. It is as ridiculous as asking me to define who a Nigerian is in your own very words! If you can answer that, i promise to make an attempt at yours!}


Anyway Nigerian is not a religion so i do not know why you posted that question.

@Davidylan & Mariory

Watch this. This is not an unreliable link this is an actual interview that took place. Hopefully you would be able to understand the situation a bit more.
Can i just add the reporter's stance on the war was identical to yours so this is not biased in anyway.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbEv0T2rwgo

@ Nurenga

Go and finish off the other post you started about secrets men wish women knew https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-21030.0.html

My bad i should have used the word observers.


Point is they were not there for war and you cannot deny it, there were frequent requests whixh later turned into pleas for the Israelis to stop the attack which they totally ignored. Is that not the work of terrorists?

If you cannot answer the question then admit it instead of trying to mask your limited knowledge with smutty remarks.

What's with this stew in your ignorance malaky?

Just because i dont believe Hizbollah are the terrorists as you claim them to be, does not make me ignorant , it only shows how narrow minded you are especially as you lap up everything George Bush tells you.

You dont answer a question with a question

davidylan:
Your "beautiful" one liner to Afam is clear evidence you are biased against Isreal and no amount of "evidence" will ever make you see reason. Keep stewing in your ignorance!

Amount of evidence provided by?? You? And you stress i'm the ignorant one?

davidylan:
It's shameful that it took me reminding her that about 4 isreali soldiers were killed when the initial 2 were abducted by hizballah, it is even worse when she claims WITH ALL AUTHORITY that the 4 UN observers killed in Khiam (i doubt she even knew the town) were "people" and not "soldiers/troops"

And i stand by her on that. I even mentioned it earlier.

<sub>#850 on: August 20, 2006, 09:44 PM »

Erm , how sure are you about that? UN contacted those airplanes numerous times over begging them to retreat, stop bombing yet they carried on. We are talking about civilians here not soldiers who are meant to be killed.</sub>

The evidence of UN civilians getting killed was reported on the news. http://uspolitics.about.com/b/a/207819.htm read it from yourself or do you want me to paste it for you since it hurts you to visit websites except Fox or CNN ofcourse hence your tunnel vision

davidylan:
You on the other hand have failed to bring up any point. You just go around opposing posts that do not sign up to your islamic jihadism (ala Isreal and their alleged disputed claim to the land of their ancestors)! It will be insightful to read more than links from unreliable sites that you keep posting to prove to us that the jews we know today are not the historical jews, apart from you and a few misguided individuals, no one else believes in that fairy tale!

I have brought up a point actually - the fairy tale?, Who says those sites were unreliable? did you check the information let alone click on the links. I can see you are still under the control mechanisms of religion and at this point in time you would not be able to comprehend the full picture and as a result, gets peeved off at anyone who dares to oppose Israel.

By the way can you give me the description of a Jew in your own words

@ Mariory

Was that supposed to prove that the Hizbollah are terrorists?
Nilla already confirmed that the US regard them as terrorists.

You need to provide evidence to prove that the rest of the world perceive them as terrorists.

@Afam
That was an enjoyable read although i still dispute the israelis historical claim to the land and feel the nation of Israel should never have been created especially at the expense of people's lives.

davidylan:
It is not an offence to argue, it is only stupid to argue with very little information!

That's more like the pot calling the kettle black