₦airaland Forum

lol

If he fires the chief of staff, nothing stops PMB from reappointing the man when he returns.

Meanwhile, just so that you know, PYO doesn't need to fire any of PMB's kitchen staff at the moment for two reasons:

1. It will expose PMB's personal effects to ridicule (or better put - it will be like stripping PMB naked in public). Those guys are looking after his back k while he's away and should not be fired.

It's like when your boss goes out and leaves you in charge of the house, you then change all the padlocks of the gates when you k ow he won't have the new spare key...That is betrayal.. it doesn't matter if armed robbers also have that key, you need to get his permission and send him a spare key so that it doesn't seem like you have stripped him.

2. For the time that PYO is acting president, the president's office is totally redundant, so all his Kitchen staff are more or less on vacation, all directions now come from Aguda house. Therefore, Abba Kyari can do nothing against PYO. The only powerful person now is PYO's chief of staff (DCOS) because as it is now, Abba Kyari is more or less on vacation.


The worst that Abba Kyari can do is to back bite and scorn PYO. Any security chief that listens to that has his job on the line because once PYO fires a military officer for example, not even PMB can bring them back into the armed forces...It is irreversible.

On a very sunny day, akpors was found screaming "hey". "Hey"... "Heyyyy"..."hey"""

So everyone began to wonder whom he was screaming at or what trouble he had landed himself into.

Then someone walked up to him.."Akpors, is everything alright? Why are you screaming hey?"

Akpors nodded in great disappointment then spoke in pidgin English...

"Bros, so you no know say e good make person dey make hey when the sun dey shine? ... Abeg comot Jor...Hey!!! Heyyyy!!! Heyyyy!!!!!"

tukdi:
What is MNEMONICS?


Pls answer needed Asap!

lol..its just a way of helping your memory to remember a very long list of boring points you may need in your exam.

for instance, if in your note, it says the advantages of blablabla are:
speed, accuracy, cost-effective, reliable, repairable and easy to use.

In the exam, how can you remember all these points? considering how many other things you need to put in your head for all other courses that you must equally do well in.

Mnemonics means you should creae an abbrevation for them and use simple words to make sense of it, an example will be:

SACRRE - See As Chairman Really Relax Ehn?

This is one method I used in remembering the first 20 elements of the periodic table back in high school.
If you can use this method for your revision, you will find yourself having surplus points in the exams when the question says
"Discuss four advantages of blablabla", you will easily drop 6 advantages.
Also, you can then focus most of your brain power on the mathematical side of things to score higher marks overall

tensazangetsu20:
That was inspiring. I wish I could go ahead an do my masters but my grades are subpar at the moment. I will still give it a shot though.

hmmm

The secret to high grades in the university is "MNEMONICS"

I swear.

Well, it is actually easy I suppose.

There are so many scholarship opportunities

Whoever is interested in scholarships needs to have his/her ear to the ground.

www.studyandscholarships.com does the trick.

That aside, everyone must be aware that in Nigeria, there are a few govt. programs (although PMB has not been forthcoming so far)

The chevening as well as the commonwealth shared scholarship is also very fair. Fair in that everyone gets a fair chance.

If you are looking to go to the USA, there they have many schools that offer no scholarship but studentship. In that case, you first get your admission, then you could get a "job offer" in the school that pays well.

All in all, I can only advice you to stick to the link I just shared as they let you know all available scholarship offers for developing countries.

psycho1:
They might be angels or Jesus... Rich kids with dull brains.l, your son sounds like a 2year baby old. Good job anyway!

Johnson .. what is your problem?

YungMillionaire:
My thoughts exactly. Too many children on this thread this morning. I just PMed Akin. My guess is he is on his way to work. I am leaving soon myself but FK try and liven things up.

dude you are Akin yourself. Stop trying to be clever by half.
I know everyone on NL so watch who you lie to

FisifunKododada:
When are we gonna discuss some fun math ideas. This preoccupation with Akin is not adding any cells to our brains. Someone needs to come into this thread and liven it up intellectually. Akin where art thou? CC: Akinphysicist

you mean akinpsychiatrist

GodIsBiafran:
Bia when did taking squares of both sides become your method? Your are deluded.

hahahha everyone knows what I meant by "my method"

So again my dear, why DOESNT YOU USING akinpsychiatrist method

GodIsBiafran:
x = 775.523 Happy now?

swear that you Didn't use my method.

Swear that you used his "fastest intelligent creative" method.

inschool:
lol see what the so called Nairaland Mathematical genius is saying...

Lol...That pride won't let him agree that his "trial and error" method will take him absolutely no-where in life.

Okay let's even address the chicken and rabbit question...

Replace the word chicken with "a 4.5kg box" and the word rabbit with "a 2.4kg box"

Now let them use that method of carrying legs up and down again.

GodIsBiafran:
Yes - cos I tried it and I figure it out in about one and a half minute.


You still don't get it. Akin's method is the easiest/fastest to find an INTEGER solution IF one exists. Knowing that an INTEGER solution DNE is itself knowledge I did not have before counting. Then you can now use squaring both sides to solve for the solution (s) that exist. That is the genius we are talking about here not mindlessly punching numbers in calculators/taking squares etc. without thinking.

solve this question and stop making noise jorr... Talkative lol

FisifunKododada:
lol how much is this one going for? You people u na no dey tire? Even the Akin that is the seminal subject of discourse has moved on. But come to think of it Cacawa - didn't Akin say (several times) that his quick/fast method will yield an integer solution IF one exists? So, why are you making it sound like he said his method was some 'almighty' formula? I think you are been dishonest here and its very obvious. Many of us are paying close attention to this thread because its fascinating - so trying to fool people with this passive aggressive lies won't work.

Who says this one will not yield an integer answer??

Ahhhhhhhh!!!!

So you want to use my method to find the answer and see if it actually an integer, before knowing whether your "counting" method will work??


And you call that an intelligent less than. One minute solution?

I thought you were gonna just count from 1 to 56, then when you notice that integers won't work, you then use my method.... I thought that was a very "creative" solution.

Lol.

I know you guys agree with me ... I'm just catching my fun replying you guys

GodIsBiafran:
And yet he solved the problem in less that a minute without calculator or pen/paper...lets be honest... I don't even like the guy (because he carries Biafra matter for head too much) but he is an exceptional thinker. If you still think he can't solve the problem using your textbook method, go and look at his prowess on physics threads. One thing I have learnt in this life is to not allow my opinion of people cloud the reality of who they are. My opinion is that Akin is not a very nice person, BUT, I will be a abject liar to doubt his cerebral prowess.

Lol you really believe he solved that in less than a minute?

Okay here you go, solve this in less than one hour, using same method.

√(x) + √(x+17) = 56


Pls do not use the pure mathematical method.

In some people's words "if you know say na your mama born you"

Cc: FisifunKododada (pls use that your "fastest" method)

GodIsBiafran:
My guy you spoke the truth. I also think he is an Afonja - no wonder he has no manners Cowcowa is too rigid in his ways. He is jealous because the other guy, Akin, who is also Afonja, is a more advanced thinker. Jealousy go finish Afonjas

hahahhaha

So if I say

X + 6 = 19, find x

According to you guys, an advanced way of thinking is to say, let's try 1+6, 2+6, 3+6,..............7+6, ....10+6,........

Let's be honest..

Lol...

So why is he (a Yoruba man) , allowed to rule as Oba, and why does he speak Yoruba?

olureignforever:
Check well, think, recall, then ask yourself, who's is frustrated here.

I don't boast, but give time, before my uniqueness come to light.

Sorry, shouldn't have even replied you cos I have more important issues to attend to.
Continue your frustration.
Good day.

hahahahahaha..I swear you are a character. I would be shocked if you are not a female in her period....

olureignforever:
Oni lara leleyi. Accept that this guy is good. Stop jealousy, it will kill and drain you someday. You are just here speaking grammar. Na only you go school?
Everyone is a unique being. If you are good, show it to us and stop trying to bring somebody else down.

If you are Afonja, I think this is one of the reasons Ipobs always come for una head. I shake my head for you Kind.

Leave Akin Alone CACAWA.

LoL

So easy to spot a novice.

I can understand your frustration dear.

Take care

kennyjam:
This is mine


0/0=(X^2 -X^2)/(X^2 -X^2)=X(X-X)/X(X-X)=1*1=1



0/0=(X^2 -X^2)=(X+X)(X-X)/X(X-X)=2X/X=2




0/0=(X^2 -X^2)=X(X-X)/(X+X)(X-X)=X/2X=1/2

Hahhahaha i know it can be solved in a way to have several numbers as the answer...And that is why mathematicians claim that 0/0 = undefined answer.

The only reason I will go for 1 is that every other answer you get, be it 2 or 1/2 or 34 or 8787 is only a multiple of several 0/0 (i.e k * 0/0) which still appears in the question as a 0/0 because k*0 = 0 but appears in the answer as k*1 which could then be any k

inschool:
owk but sincerely I saw this lately but let me post an attempt I have made .
y=(-1/188792.9141)x+19683.00001

check your email

Team "counting" should pls show us a creative method

inschool:
cc.cacawa

Awww you are good, bit you answered a wrong question.

Y is not equal to x squared

Y = x^(x squared)

That means x to the power of x-square

inschool:
any questions for prize tonight.... I need the money sincerely

Solve this in less than 30 minutes

Find the equation of the normal to the curve f(x) = x^(x squared) at the point x = 3

Just #5 k because it is too easy

naturalwaves:
Thank you bro. Since Akinphysicist has decided to dance in circles and not provide a suitable solution to the question nor provide an alternative method that is more acceptable, let me solve it through a way that is devoid of wuruwuru and trial by error like he did for the benefits of secondary school students and others viewing the thread. See solution attached below.
cc:cacawa

Excellent.

This is what maths should look like.

God bless you

inschool:
I didn't show my self...but u need to improve on ur approach to engaging argument/discussions with people...

exactly.

That's what made me challenge him..

AkinPhysicist:
So? If it fails then you employ another method. Ki ni big deal?


Then use iteration if basic/logical counting fails. Again ki ni big deal?


Keep your 'lecture' to yourself, I am fully aware of the connection between iteration and Fibonacci



Using a calculator to solve this particular problem is like using a machete(cutlass) to kill a housefly. Its shows rigidity. A lack of clear thought.



Once again iteration is an overkill for this problem. You needed a calculator - I didn't


Tell me something I don't know.



You can't do basic/logical counting and you think you can give me homework...I laugh in Chinese

FisifunKododada:
So Cacewa - the emboldened is a calculator approach of what Akin did. The difference is you had to use a calculator be he didn't. He found a solution within a minute. This is what I have been trying to convey to you, you take a formal approach to math, Akin is just naturally intelligent.

Remember i first showed you an algebraic solution.

In fact, the ITERATION did not need a calculator...Remember i once asked you to tell me the square root of 74 without a calculator which you guys are yet to reply.

The only reason I have e used a calculator for you is so that you can. Appreciate how much detail is needed if you insist on doing the "counting" method for very difficult question where the number 15 was replaced with 858.6

While you guys are still focused on the immediate problem, I'm showing you the mathematically accepted general approach to all other related but complex questions of this kind.

inschool:
cacawa I want to be like you wen I grow up...

hahahahahha big man like you

inschool:
let me give a little proof....
now..0/0=[100-100]÷[20(10-10)]=(10^2-10^2)/[20(10-10)]=[(10+10)(10-10)]÷[20(10-10)]=(10+10)/20=20/20=1
Note: there are infinitely many solutions..

Ahhhh you would have got my #15k, but you won't.

What you did is absolutely correct, but for mathematical expediency, you need to have use a letter say, "Let Y be any number such that Y€R

So if you had used y Instead of 10, you would still have got that proff correct, but it will be a valid proof, not just for "10" but for all real numbers y. Now, you made that clear in your last sentence, but in maths, it has to be part of the proof.

You are good bro.

I was going to use the method of Limits

naturalwaves:
You are being unnecessarily childish and sentimental on this thread. The Akin guy should have known that such solving methods is archaic and unacceptable in maths. How can he use trial and error method to solve that question? What if the solution is something like 120 or more? Will he keep on counting till he gets there? He knows exactly what CACAWA wants but decides to be clever by half and you are just buttlicking him and trolling cacawa unnecessarily.

Abi o.

CACAWA:
Hellooooooooo!!!!

30 minutes left o.

Atleast just tell us what x is.

Then let your proof come in later.

0 ÷ 0 = x,
Find x


Prize : #15k

x = 1.

PM me for proof

Bye guys