₦airaland Forum

proudafrogal:
the danish cartoon riots had nothing to do with Islam.

child marriage has nothing to do with Islam.

apostasy law and blasphemy killings has nothing to do with Islam

jihad has nothing to do with Islam

the 2002 miss world contest riots has nothing to do with Islam

the fatwa placed on salam Rushdie and isioma Daniel had nothing to do with Islam.

senator yerimas wives were all underage when he married them and justified it with Islam yet it had nothing to do with Islam

in fact Islam has nothing to do with Islam.

Maximus85:
OK. Thanks. You are free to your own opinion. In the end, we will know who is satanic or not.

odehaj:
I know that JW understand the Bible upside down & are confused but..the maker of this video should plssss retract it,don't make a fool of yourself just because you want to prove a point.

Maximus85:
On behalf of the other Jw calling you names, pls don't be offended. See, we are not all the same. We are all imperfect but trying to do things perfect. We have different temper as well.

Now to the Goliath issue. Jehovah's Witnesses study the Bible intently. What if we say there were more than one Goliath? The two Goliaths were both Giants and wicked. What if Goliath wasn't their real name but a nickname given to people of their marmot sizes?
Do I have proof? Yes! What of Pharaoh? How many Pharaoh was mentioned in the Bible? Is Pharaoh a name or a title? So, the Goliaths are definitely not the same. David killed one, Elhanan killed the other. There's no contradiction.

nevilbot:
the maker of this video and whoever blivs him and shares it are just dumb. u just showed that u dont even read or know wat is in ur bible and went rushing to make a video thereby showing ur level of ignorance to people who actually study the bible. instead of rushing to make a stupid video thinking u av hit jackpot, U should av checked and compared other bible translations to ur so called Jw bible to see if that verse was made up by Jw as u claim. since u are so lazy to make a research, Let me help u with other bible translations

New World Translation (ur so called jw bible)
2Sa 21:19 And war broke out again with the Phi·lisʹtines at Gob, and El·haʹnan the son of Jaʹa·re-orʹe·gim the Bethʹle·hem·ite struck down Go·liʹath the Gitʹtite, whose spear had a shaft like the beam of loom workers

ChetaNwaeze:
Charles Oputa aka Charley Boy, an Igbo man, has opposed the agitation for a Biafra. Instead of we Igbos to engage Charley Boy and other Igbos like him who have all denied Biafra, we are busy insulting the great Yoruba race. Does it mean Charley Boy is now an Afonja?


What has the Yoruba's even got to do with Biafra? Why cant we Igbo's leave Yorubaland alone and come back to Igboland if we truely want a Biafra country. The way some of we Igbos use to behave make me concur with BBC World News when they say Biafrans are criminals

Afam4eva:
You mean southern Nigeria, though the SE and SS triumph more in sporting activities. I'll like to recognize Imo and Delta states for being at the forefront of producing great talent for this nation.

codemaniacs:
99% of southern Nigerians are extremely hardworking, independent, resilient and work towards been successful... So there is a very high possibility in the "constituent units" been better off and very successful as long as rebel groups are not sponsored by foreigners to cause mayhem like the case of Ojukwu and Ironsi been used to destroy regionalism(I believe the civil war was orchestrated by foreigners because the north wanted to separate during that time and the "foreigners" knew if the resources was left with southern Nigeria there was a possibility of there been a very powerful African country)..

Unlike 1966/1967 where the SE leaders wanted to rule SW(even Biafran army targeted the SW)... Present day Igbos(not igbo politicians) are more concerned about developing the SE. If Ojukwu had focused on developing the SE and not on trying to conquer other tribes then there would have never been a civil war (that's why I suspect that some northern leaders, Ojukwu and other SE leaders were cajoled into starting a war with the same north by foreigners then try to drag the SW into the war).

Flashh:
Guy, chillax okay? Lol

lightblazingnow:
Source: http://chrisngwodo..com/2012/01/why-nigeria-cant-break-up.html?m=1


No bad idea is repeated as constantly as the notion that the solution to chronic violence in Nigeria is for her to "break up." The case for Nigeria's disintegration surfaces routinely after tragic episodes of violence and has emerged following the recent increase in sectarian terrorism. Some perspective is necessary. Since the days before the Civil War, beating the drums of separatism has become a sort of pre-programmed response to national calamity. Rumours of our impending divorce attended the 1964 elections, the June 12 1993 crisis, the death of Moshood Abiola in 1998 and the Sharia controversy in 2001. In 1990, a gang of over-ambitious soldiers attempting to oust the Babangida regime even purported to evict five northern states from the federation. Thus, current debates about the durability of Nigeria are nothing new.

bantudra:
hardcore!.....they dont want to stop...i made up my mind..i dont want anything to do with igbos no more....

Tflex01:
You are not the first person they will call Yoruba on this thread. Anybody that challenge their dominating tendency of the SS minorities is a Yoruba to them.

I live in the SS and I know all the noise they make on NL about how SS want their alliance is a figment of their imagination

vantage001:
Don't let them south-south folks hear that.
It is the igbo man that is their problem. It is not the fact that all the HQs of the extractive firms operating in the delta is in lagos as well as the revenue.
It is even the igbo race that is always looking to correct these abnormalities. Why do we even care? Why are we even defending a south-south president in the face of bullies?
Why not just join the rest of the big two and suck off everything suckable in the SS while enforcing the status quo.? It is certainly easier

gurnam:
No, the SE without the SS will be the most useless in the eventual case of a breakaway without the SS.
That is why the idea of a Biafra without the SS is a nightmare that you Ibos cannot fathom or imagine, it's just not an option palatable to you.

gurnam:
Absolute thrash.

gurnam:
Even on this thread, we can see those that are super excited over this development, it is those that want a port closer home.

gurnam:
You are apparently missing the point. My point is you are sounding like a junior partner that has more to benefit from the arrangement than the SS.You are practically begging for their cooperation, and looking more like the weaker partner, even with your superior number.

gurnam:
I don't have a problem with that one bit, it's only disgusting when you guys try to sound like and force it down like the SS and the SE are conjoined twins.

rottennaija:
Actually, I know that something is seriously wrong with the organisation of JW. I know and can mention as many doctrine as possible that are errors.

In the case of 2 sa 21:19, I only checked only one translation, (Godsword) and it said basically the same thing. That's was were I drew my conclusion from.

Some of the other translation reads: