₦airaland Forum

shymexx: Don't ever underestimate the damage the left-hook can cause. Ricky Hatton took one from Mayweather, and he went to sleep. Coupled with the fact that this guy is a RBs, the most brutal position in the NFL - and you've to be extremely strong, to be able to play that position. Hence they always have the shortest career-span in the NFL, due to all kinds of hits.

Yes, NFL is like my second most favourite sport...after football. Then Basketball and Tennis. It's an interesting sport, and sometimes, I'd rather watch NFL than watch certain/a-lot-of football teams.

Lmao @ dee-jayin' and battle rap. I think he has a degree...so he should be able to hit the job market, if he isn't re-instated. However, that will be difficult for someone who's used to the millionaire lifestyle and celebrity status. Definitely one of the toughest transition to make. He might have to travel to Africa for the motherland cleansing, like Dave Chapelle, and start all over again. With the same chic taking to her heels, when the status is gone lol.

nitlad: No sane person go pack comot from im own house for Banana Island, Ikoyi go dey squat for Ijora Badia. Abi you think say na ordinary eye make CPO d'Etteh for SB ni? Bros forget East London jare. Like the CPO folks, I also don't think we've exhausted all expansion options for SB.

Financial döping kwa?
So what do you call 'fining' Citeh £60M only to hand it over to Bayern, Barça, Madrid et al?
FFP na jibiti!

TheCarefreeOne: It shows u do not understand d issues
Firstly Stamford bridge is owned by the CPO (Chelsea Pitch Owners) which is a group of fans who bought Chelsea in the last century due to real estate sharks when Chelsea had financial issues. There is also an agreement with both the fans and the club that Chelsea must play all competitive first team home games at the bridge or cease to be called Chelsea.
Secondly Abramhovich tried to buy Stamford bridge of them but they rejected him outrightly so that Chelsea could move

chrisley024: Blind is a good passer of the ball.
1 clear chance created and 1 assist.

TheCarefreeOne: I doubt u understand the Chelsea stadium issue with your comment. because u would know London is extremely divided with arsenal and spurs in the north west ham in the east. and the fact that u can't infringe on another club's turf plus the fact that most Chelsea season ticket holders resisiting to move away from Stamford bridge which is counterproductive to expand
Also FFP is bleeped up

nitlad: You sef know say FFP na confam PDP tinz.

Isn't it time CAS tore this nonsense apart?

AirborneLacer: Manure Utd fans' Assertions In The Last Four Days:
- Jagielka, Koscielny is better than Terry

- Jones, Smalling and Evans are better than Terry; Luiz and Cahill

- Blind, Dembele, Felliani are better than Matic

- De Gea is better than Courtois

- Chelsea dont have world class players

- Van Gaal is better than Mourinho

- Man Utd will win the league

With this kinda idiotic assertions, all I have to say is, you lot deserve to be celebrated

captainflash: lmao. .after the tourney u guys can spar while we watch. .hw u see am @geo?

chrisley024: Hiddink playing the 3-5-2 with RVP and Depay upfront.
Blind at the left wingback.

HolyLance: I failed? What are you -a school teacher?

Yay!Well done your trophy is in the mail. Speaks volumes when one goes about trying so desperately to garner some praise.

So I am supposed to answer Yes or No to "who is the better midfielder?" I'd rather go with A or B. Hopefully that works for you. I would say B. If Frank was not assisting ,he was scoring. 'Body of Work' not pick and choose.

nitlad: Just like my man Martin Samuel has always insisted, FFP is a huge fraud!

A charade being championed as a means to bridge the gap between Clubs, but is a actually a conspiratorial agenda to maintain the hegemony of the more established clubs.

This Platini fool is just a puppet in the hands of ECA! The threat of a breakaway superleague is doing the trick on the simplëton, making him do their bidding by creating FFP, using it as a facade to keep the established.

lanrefront1: You are just an obstinate idi.ot without any manners. I'm not answering you after this. Thank God you said she'll make her claim and not that the judge will make her claim for her.

Someone like you casting aspersion at Pastor Chris will be much worse than in a position of leadership. You will always find a way to justify yourself by twisting things.

What you have said in essence is this: Whenever a woman divorces a rich man in UK, whether the wife wants to or not, that even against her wish, the Judge will and always awards the woman fifty percent of the man's money and assets WHAT KIND OF LIE IS THAT?

If that's the case why do some women even bother with expensive high profile lawyers to divorce their husbands? They should just look for any young man or woman who is already practising law. Abi now, since the end of the matter is already set in stone.

Like u said, write what you like, not answering you again. Your type never admit if they made a mistake or if they are wrong; must always prove themselves right.

Then what is it with the cursing?
Must you curse to make tour point?

HolyLance: Jeez. Written by whom? However it is carved in stone that the average man u fan is a deluded specimen. Congratulations you do your fellow fans proud.

HolyLance: So hypothetical shite then? All right I would say Yes. Lampard ran the show at Chelsea.

HolyLance: You keep bringing up this padding of stats? Like I said Scholes was not as good as the others on his team at taking set-pieces so he was not relied on. Just cause Frank took set plays as opposed to Scholes not taking them it pads up Frank's stats? If anything it shows that Scholes was not as good as Giggs at taking set pieces doesn't it and surely not as good as Frank?

HolyLance: I am sure he would . Unfortunately he did NOT take the set pieces . So either he sucked hard in training or was not as good as Giggs so was not called upon.
Yes lets not rely on stats. Let's go by your opinion instead.

HolyLance: Excellent it worked.
Why would the stats be skewed? You think if Scholes had taken as many he would have assisted as much? If he was as good surely they would have had him taking the set opieces front and center. Looks like Giggs was better.

HolyLance: New Chelsea fan here.
how does one post links on this site?
Forgive the ignorance.

lanrefront1: Please my writing argument are very clear, you only wish to twist them the way you like.

Of course the judge can and will award child support and maintenance. And of course if they husband has deep pockets, the amount of money awarded for those things will be high.

And it can be done without the wife collecting 50 percent of the husband net worth if SHE DOESN'T WANT IT. That's what we are trying to say and you just keep on repeating the same thing.

There are divorce cases in America which are not fought over in court because the wife and her lawyers are more than satisfied with the generous offer of the husband which caters both the wife and the children. Meanwhile some women are greedy and in fact that's their reason for marrying the man, to divorce him take half of his money.

Lord, why are people like this.

Geoxpress: Who came 1st? Cooger or Mikuz??

lanrefront1: Why are you lying like this? It's very clear from my writings I'm saying IF IF IF that's what she wants. How can I say that's what she wants? Do her know her mind? Am I confidant. Please stop lying just to win an argument It's plain for anyone to see in my writeup that I never said that.

Then can't you read. There are terms like alimony, child support. There is nothing which stops the court from making sure the children are catered for.

If for instance a wife wants to divorce her husband who is rich and worth 100 million dollars. And the husband through his lawyers offer the wife 10 million dollars. If she's not there greedy type she can say, ten millions dollars is a lot of money.

That's enough for me. In fact its more than I need for a lifetime and she accepts it. Are you saying the judge or lawyer will say it's a lie, no you can't do that. You must collect 50 million dollars. That is just ridiculous; and you're insisting on it.

And do you know most times, alimony/child support are worked out apart from what the wife receives. Stop your cursing and obstinate unreasonableness.

Nihilist: Not only 30+ goals, Fabregas would also die for the sins of Chelsea fans and find the cure to cancer when he plays in the hole.

No Central Midfielder in Europe over the last 10 years has been able to match Lampard's prolific output. Not even the great Xavi.

So according to your immensely idiotic logic, Lampard was a better midfielder than Fabregas...Not so?

lanrefront1: I don't know why people like to twist things. Did I say it's not her right? Did I say she's different from other women?

But of some ABSURD reason she says she doesn't want anything for herself, that's the way it will be. Stop making it seem like she does not have a CHOICE in the matter.

The children is another matter all the together. You making sound like any woman that divorces in UK or US is under compulsion to take her husband for half of what's he's got. IT'S SIMPLY NOT TRUE. But your unreasonableness won't let accept this simple thing just for the sake of winning argument.

The interest of the children can be well taken care of without her insisting of 50 percent if she doesn't want to.

mikuz: You think I'm a Dogoyaro consumer like you abi?

No gree make I use 16 bars destroy your life.

lanrefront1: None of what you've said is equal to: your Law firm can dictate to you the percentage you must claim from your husband. The law is there and it allows any woman to claim up to 50 percent if she so wish. Stop making it seem as if its a requirement in divorce cases. It just so happens most women will definitely take advantage of the law. Who settle for less when you can get more.

Actually lawyers charge firstly according to their reputation although the size of the clients pocket maybe a factor.

But the first factor is their legal reputation. If you go to a first class lawyer, like a SAN, you'll get charged SAN fees. There is a lawyer for everyone.

shymexx: I believe she was intoxicated before the incident. But regardless, that was one hell of a left hook - it looks Mayweather-eqsue especially the one that dropped Ricky Hatton in 2007. I actually feel sorry for her, but she should have known better.

He still has 3-4 more productive years left in him, based on the lifespan of RBs in the NFL. And save for last season that he performed woefully, he's definitely one of the top-10 RBs in the NFL. A lot of convicted felons have been given a second chance in NFL, and the onus is now on the NFLPA to cut a deal with NFL commissioner, Roger Goodell, to get him back in the league. Perhaps, before mid-season. A few teams should need his services. They can't just destroy his life like that...the guy is a good guy.

Honestly, I hate when women get battered by men. But sometimes, when it's a provoked incident, you just can't defend that. Men are also victims of domestic violence, and tons of people's lives have been missed up because of women. These days, you can just get in a verbal argument with a chic - and she makes a phonecall to the feds telling them all kinds of lies. And next thing you know, feds are in your house arresting you with cuffs, for domestic violence without any evidence whatsoever. With that on the rise, with laws being more favourable to women, it's impossible to defend these folks.

lanrefront1: Please stop spewing nonsense. No law firm can't dictate to you how much you must claim from your husband against your wish.

Aren't women that divorce in UK whose husband are worth nothing and are even a liability to them. The lawyers gets paid their fees; where will the commission come from.

If a woman likes, she can say she's divorcing and wants nothing. As long as she's able to afford the fees of the law firm she went to, that's the end of the matter.

Yes, in divorce high net worth husbands, lawyers do defer fees and say they'll get so and so commission of whatever amount they are able to help her obtain from her husband. But this only happens by mutual agreement and its not a must. She can well say she wants nothing and will pay them their legal charges for service rendered.

You're wrong.

Rexsugar1234: Are you a sugar boy that needs some love and care from sugar

mummy? are you good in bed and ready to have fun ? do you need a

rich sugar daddy and single hot ladies ?

shymexx: Anyway, I think the NFLPA should be able to fight for him discreetly (not in public because of these rampaging feminists who control public opinions these day), to get a deal that would re-instate him back. But might have to sit out this year, and lose $4 million for a fatal left hook.

Drag like a sack of rice by Ray Rice - that right is a name that matches an action. But I don't think he wanted to drag her, he obviously couldn't lift her up - and that's quite telling from the way he staggered after trying to lift her the first time. Ol'girl looks like a heavy size-12 looking lady, with a heavy load on her backside. Hollywood is hiring - the shorter version of The Rock. I think he's just 5'8/5'9 - not the tallest guy out there.

lanrefront1: thank God you said "wives of russian billionaires have brought their divorce cases to the UK & they all got handsomely rewarded".

She is not bringing her divorce from somewhere to the UK. UK is her home and she has lived with her two daughters for the past sixteen. So where else will she file it.

She can either file in Nigeria or UK. Why should she come and sit down in Nigeria and leave her daughters.

Then her lawyers can't force her in what she demands or choose to demand. If she says she wants only ten percent if his worth, there is nothing she can do about that. She can even halfway through the divorce says she's not divorcing again that she has decided she still wants to stay with her husband.

So please stop implying things that are wrong. As long the lawyers are paid their fees, that is it.

GLOBALX: Insulting me cos of Chris?....ur father for the background 100 times....Did I insult you while making my submission?.Thunder fire u 1000 times.

pickabeau1: She was a eoman of God a while back forming churches in the UK and beyond
Now she is no more according to his words

Wat changed?

Eruditor: She's been there for more than 15 years both in and out. But on the 50% stake if they were to have a divorce (which is impossible) he will give her 100% of what he has without even going to the court and she knows this.
The man has no life of his own. The fine suits he wears have deceived many.

lanrefront1: don't jump to conclusion of saying the reason she filed there is that she wants to take 50 percent of his wealth.
There maybe a genuine reason like: she's been living in UK for 16 years, its definitely more convenient for her to file over there. Just imagined if she tried to file in Nigeria. She will be eaten alive with the intensity of animosity.
also she will definitely want to be take care of.

I won't want to believe that she'll be demanding for 50 percent of his wealth.
But sha, time will tell.