₦airaland Forum

Watched episode 9 of Chainsaw Man yesterday.
Has anyone else seen MakimAlluka in action? I almost started feeling sorry for the bad guys.

More importantly though, has anyone else seen GOATbeni in action?

Discountsempai:
Looks like the Blue Lock thing did not work....

Japan out. Try harder in 4 years...

Did they ever do penalty training?

Blueelf:
Unohana Yachiru should've gotten her own arc

An arc dedicated to her backstory, her origins and even her epic battles

I feel we didn't get enough of her. Tite Kubo dedicating her personality to just being a healer for much or the bleach series was unfair to such a strong character

Walahi...

You seem to be operating under the impression that Kubo doesn't just make shxt up as he goes.

nani667:
°°

>Sees thread of people complaining about ecchi content
>Posts ecchi content
>Refuses to elaborate
>Leaves

Blueelf:
I came here expecting to see discussions about the TYBW arc on bleach but I just dey see hentai pics up and down

na wa o

We'll talk about the new episode when we watch it.

Baddestguyp:
Only one person floods this thread with hentai everyday

It actually makes the thread look unserious

Just like how girls flood the Korean series thread with simping for Korean guys and birthday pictures and make it hard for anyone to take the thread seriously

Imagine being on the Kdrama and complaining about women simping for Korean men. What do you expect?

Obrigardo:
Seems like this is the hill you want to die on.
Even faux news have moved on.

This is the summary of the whole issue. Be a good person for once.

Cope and seethe

Baddestguyp:
Animepahe refused to release Jojo stone ocean last part

Where can I get it?

Have you tried AnimeKaizoku?

Obrigardo:
Let's say your wet fever dream is true, in your warped reality, then WHAT IS THE FVCKING CRIME HERE?

Criminal trump is under investigation for real crimes by multiple grand juries. So where do you want to take this your big tech epiphany to?

Drumpf has been finished multiple for the past 7 years according to you lunatics

Obrigardo:
Damn, i'm losing really losing cells reasoning how you come about things.

Can't lose what you never had

saxywale2:
I wasn't talking about the article you posted. Since you called national examiner a rag right wing website because they got caught pants down, it's safe to also call Breitbart rag because they are legendary for posting misinformation.

It is true that they are a rag but they broke the news. They had the full video embedded in the article with time stamps, you can watch for yourself like I did. The article was corroborated by other reputable outlets, you can check field like I did. The article was responded to by Google who took ownership of the video you can check that out too, like I did. So it is safe to say that it was factual.

BraniacX:
understand more slowly this time around, the accusations of censorship and conspiracy you posited that I engaged you over were between the FBI a government agency as you already agreed and Facebook a private company, you introducing twitter and newyork post into the mix was you skipping lanes, I refused to be distracted and ignored it while telling you to focus first on the argument at hand with legal judiciousness, introducing a tangent argument with dissimilar composition is scatterbrained thinking and behaviour, so, I will engage you on twitter and newyork post as soon as you can prove the censorship and conspiracy in the FBI Facebook issue, was my breakdown slow enough for you?

Tends to happen when you are taking to multiple people at a time.

Facebook censored the New York Post by surpressing the distribution of a story that was damaging to Biden, Trump's political opponent. The conspiracy was that this was done in line with the direction of the FBI who told them about potential fake news from foreign actors—which was a lie.

The FBI that has repeatedly shown bias against Trump. They had to remove two agents from a Trump investigation because text messages detailing how much they hated him were leaked. The same FBI illegally spied on Trump's 2016 campaign. The same FBI manufactured incriminating evidence against Trump. The same FBI failed to tell Facebook to be on the look out for fake news when it was damaging to Trump.

saxywale2:
You were quoting Breitbart a few page ago. You think people take Breitbart seriously.

1. Because Breitbart posted the source video. 2. Other outlets corroborated the report.
3. Google released statement admitting the video was from them but disrupting the conclusions drawn in the article.

I think it's fair to say the article was well-sourced.

BraniacX:
Sorry, I missed that part , take a screenshot of you proving censorship and post
Also, my unrelated question pertains to your second accusation which is conspiracy so sorry not sorry to contradict you, it is very, totally related

Read real slow this time around.

Twitter told The New York Post to delete the post with the article or face a ban. The New York Post refused, so the post deleted and they received a ban. Y'know the article that actually completely factual.

BraniacX:
stick to one argument at a time and see it to conclusion, stop skipping from argument to argument, gather your thought process and pretend you're in a court of law, now to our current engagement, I painted a scenario, did it qualify as conspiracy or not from your POV?

>argues with person online
>asks person to prove censorship
>person proves censorship
>"why are changing your argument? answer my completely unrelated question?"

Obrigardo:
Twitter and facebook are private companies, you this ever annoying boy.
Just like criminal trump got his Liessocial so he can censor anything critical of him.
The other stuff you typed is pure conspiracy theory bullshit.

So you agree that they have a left wing bias

Obrigardo:
The inner maga cultist in you won't see anything wrong here, at all.
Because criminal trump can do no harm, according to you.

That's completely messed up but a false equivalence nonetheless.

I've already addressed this previously, the National Enquirer and similar publications have always been known as a right wing rag that people don't really take seriously, similar to Salon magazine on the left. You can simply move to another outlet. You cannot do that with Twitter and Meta because of the control they have over the social media market

BraniacX:
so it is also conspiracy now ehn? you've not proven censorship and you are adding conspiracy, riddle me this, when the US embassy under the aegis of the secretary of state I think gave advisory against travelling to abuja and peradventure foreign airlines immediately cancelled flights to Nigeria, will that qualify as a conspiracy between the embassy and the airlines against Nigeria?

Twitter told The New York Post to delete the post with the article or face a ban. The New York Post refused, so the post deleted and they received a ban. Y'know the article that actually completely factual.

That is the textbook definition of factual.

Obrigardo:
If person no understand you ehn, he go die from exhaustion with this your running round in circles.
Can you link this your take with this doozy of a twiiter files? I don't want to waste time with you arguing baselessly.

Twitter files clearly showed that Twitter, a company with a clear left wing bias had unjustly censored a news organization for publishing an article that was damaging to the left wing presidential candidate. Even going so far as to invoke the 2016 elections, if it couldn't be clearer.

Facebook conspired with the FBI, an organization that had previously manufactured intimidating evidence and had illegally spied on the Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, to censor a posts about a news article that damaging to his political opponent during a presidential campaign.

Social media clearly favoured one party. Can you guess which one?

BraniacX:
you alleged coercion which is what censorship implies, you're yet to prove it

Facebook and the FBI conspired to censor the New York Post article about Hunter Biden's laptop. Which was a true story.

Facebook and the FBI did not censor the NYT story that Trump had ignored briefings about Russia putting bounties on the heads of US soldiers. Which turned out to be unverified.

Obrigardo:
The FBI director is a republican Christopher Wray, not that i'm implying partisan leanings, but letting you know that in America even with criminal trump shitting on himself, there are career prosecutors who actually follow the rule of law, like for instance working on a petition from a Candidate for office, just like any ordinary American citizen.

Is your grouse with the FBI or then Candidate Biden?

So why didn't the FBI follow the law when they lied to FISA courts to spy on the Trump campaign? That was done under the Obama administration and Biden was the VP.

BraniacX:
giving an advisory and private coys making policies on the basis of that advisory is not censorship! Feel free to prove me wrong

Would've been nice if they had done the same about the Russia bounty story.

Kaycee7:
Y'all think Nigerian musicians are noisemakers cos you've never heard metal. Especially death metal. Pure ear ràpe

Nigerian music is actually pretty decent in general. Yes, most mainstream songs are generic and uninspired but that's true for any form of media in any country.

Also, I actually happen to enjoy some metal. Maybe not death metal but there are some good bands that I enjoy and aren't just noise

Obrigardo:
And under whose presidency did that happen? Go slither back into your underground cave.

The FBI has been working against Trump for the longest time. Lying to FISA court with fake evidence from the Steele dossier. It just didn't stop when they worked under him.

Or else, why were they trying to censor negative coverage of his political opponent?

nani667:
Taichou

What are you up to on a Sunday morning like this my guy?

XX

BraniacX:
at this rate stop "thinking " already , like elon you're obviously terrible at it

Secondary school-tier humour

BraniacX:
a government agency under whose presidency? Please just stop already! You obviously haven't thought this through

Does that change the fact that a government agency tried to censor the press?

saxywale2:
Direct your question to the FBI.

I thought you said the FBI didn't instruct them.

IjeBos:
The [b]PRIVATE [/b]company that controls 90% of our search information calls a political party winning, a hiccup to progress and vows to never stop fighting for said progress. Also says they would restrategize to address what led people to make this decision.

Nothing to see here, perfectly fine.


Fixed it for you. Ask yourself why all these top media/information companies are run by "Democrats". It might have something to do with Dems not wanting to control or limit information.

You don't think the people that own the companies that control or limit information want to control or limit information?

Tickles001:
There's nothing more false than this report. Even the dart poison frog would struggle to achieve this feat, considering the dilution from the soup.
Wall geckos are not poisonous and they don't press anybody in their sleep, nor do they have any metaphysical capabilities.

If they're that poisonous, then half of the people in rural areas would have died of by now.
I don't know what killed the family, but I know it's not any wall gecko.

Thank you

brain54:
One wall gecko with enough lethal poison to kill six people…?

Why am I not believing this story?


I doubt if snakes and scorpions are even that poisonous.

Thank you