₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Madam wan lie she don catch herself!

Christ was quoting the scriptures from his own thoughts!

So when he said:

“It is written: ‘Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every word that comes from Jehovah’s mouth.’” Matthew 4:4

He was quoting scriptures of his own volition, not regurgitating selections approved by anybody


Was he quoting his own thoughts or the things WRITTEN in God's word like a parrot repeating what he was told and never deviating from it? Deuteronomy 8:3

Madam this one pass your level!

aswani:
It depends on what you are giving up, you better be snitching on your boss and the big man in your organisation before you get a reduced jail term drugs but you must see federal prison time.

I am sure you've heard of the RICO act.

loffyloffy:
You missed the point, the Newspapers reported the money that was payed out to Alpha-Beta, none was able to show us the contract behind this numbers.

That is what objective journalism would have done, without the contract you cannot prove fraud.

As for the Manager, he is a disgruntled former employee, so unless you have any evidence backing him up ,you just have to ignore him.

Now this is a discussion about the 20 sins or so of your master as stated by your people, how do you answer to that?

FiveFootNinja:
You can start anywhere you like. It won't matter anyway because I already know from a brief look that this response will be mid again. 🤷🏽



For crying out loud you're so full of shít. You literally asked me "Is our everyday life probabilistic?", but now in your typical dishonest fashion of post hoc revisionism, you're now claiming you were talking about scientific probability. Are you always an awful liar, or is it only with regards to academic discussions, because I don't understand how someone can be so repeatedly dishonest over and over again. It's making it really hard for me to respect you or take your comments seriously in this conversation.

Coming to your newly edited question about decimal systems, the answer is still a big fat YES.

2+2 = 4 is already defined axiomatically within a closed number system, so it's disingenuous to think that you can compare or apply it to probability distributions. They're not the same thing.

Also, mathematics deals with numbers and shapes (geometry). Those things are abstract. Our physical world deals with observation, hypothesis, experiments and so on. The physical world and the world of maths don't operate on the same level of certainty.

If two of us are playing ludo, and you roll your dice, you'll probably be betting on getting a 6 or at least a 5, since you want to win. Now tell me, from your own perspective, would you call the outcome of this dice roll a certainty or a probability?



The only thing you've asserted here is that anything that does not conform to your limited imagination is illogical. And it's such a breathtakingly ignorant statement when you consider it in the context of how vast and diverse our universe is and how much we still don't know about it that scientists are still discovering till this very day. So until you put on your big boy (abi big girl) pants and answer my question about which system of logic you're using for your claim, your definition will simply continue to remain worthless, for as many times as you as you want to repeat it. It didn't add up then and it's still not adding up now.



His main concern was the physics behind the whole thing - the non-locality and probabilistic nature of QM. And he was worried because determinism and locality were very fundamental to his work on relativity.



And yet this is exactly what scientists do! 😂

They observe strange phenomena and use the scientific methodologies to get a better understanding behind the occurrences they've observed.

The reason we can understand the science behind stuff like rainfalls, hurricanes, thunder and lightning etc is because scientists didn't just sit on their ass and attribute them to magic.

When Newton discovered gravity, he wasn't just fooling around. He was crafting his theories based on patterns he observed.

If scientists didn't come to the knowledge of electromagnetism and semiconductor physics to be able to design laptops and mobile phones, I probably wouldn't even know of your existence, let alone sit here and read your terrible arguments. 🤧



Need I remind you (again) that YOU were the one who sent us tumbling down this endless rabbit hole of baseless arguments when you started claiming with so much confidence that our thoughts create reality? If you want to believe that thoughts create reality, then na you sabi. It's your world, not mine. But if you're going to try and generalize your belief or present it as an objective truth, then you should be prepared to answer for it to the very last detail.

Now ever since I took you to task for that claim (plus your illogicality claim), you've slowly backpedalled and revised your argument over and over again, until you've now pitifully reached the point of claiming mystery to the inner workings of the universe. If you really don't know, then what the fúck are you still dragging in this conversation?

Meanwhile I'm still waiting for you to tell us according to which system of logic is the universe is illogical. Maybe if you can answer that question, then we'll make some progress instead of having us run around in circles for nothing.



I never said I fully understood QM. But I know enough to know that your knowledge on it is incomplete.



What of other systems of logic where principles of entanglement and superposition may apply? Are you confident that such systems of logic don't exist? Think carefully.

She talk say na "everyday NL (Nairaland) logic". Nothing wey person no go read for this forum. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

MaxInDHouse:
Now you are talking because i quote the scriptures each time i make a statement making you guys feel uncomfortable but when it comes to pure worship i do nothing out of my own initiative! John 5:30

aswani:
Plea deal for a drug dealer that will keep him out of jail and just forfeit monies, I doubt it.

Like you have been told, it wasn't his monies, that is why he agreed to forfeit it.

loffyloffy:
No I don't need to educate the ignorant, and that people can publish, those not make them intelligent.

When a company have performance based income, any intelligent person should know that the income to that company will be varying with performance , so it's quite possible if the company brings more revenue, it will also result in more payout to the company.

This so called journalists need only to show us the existing contracts between Lagos state and Alpha-Beta, and from that show us where the payout to the company deviate from that contract.

But they are fully aware that majority of their readers are more emotional than inquisitive, and will not question the story, that is why they will continue to serve you half cooked stories.

MaxInDHouse:
Has God ever forsaken His only begotten Son?

loffyloffy:
You mean Alpha-Beta that has become the standard that every state in Nigeria, that every state including the federal govt is copying, do you expect them to work for free for the Lagos govt?

As of today, they are the most efficient and robust revenue collection consultant in the whole country, Beyond that, they contributed massively to the exponential growth of Govt revenue that has set Lagos apart from every other state.

I am pretty sure your state governor will be willing to give them double the percentage they are getting in Lagos, if they can bring the same efficiency to your state.

On the 1.5m usd forfeiture , clearly you don't understand how the US judicial system work.

The US attorney avoids going to court unless they are sure they can win. It is true that at that time they found above a million USD in BATs account, but they don't have enough evidence to proof that it is proceed of crime, so they went for the easier option of asking to forfeit some of that money as tax that has not been paid on the amount in his account. BAT have to agree because the legal cost and the attention this will draw to him is not worth the trouble.

How ddoes all this compare to the 20 or 21 so called sins of Lord and master Obi?

FiveFootNinja:
Not as ridiculous as your failed attempts to critique them. 🙄

It's obvious you have nothing more to argue on this topic. Both you and your travesty of a position have been found out long ago, but you would rather go down with the sinking ship that admit the painful truth.



Sadly for you, he's not:


Learn to speak for yourself and stop making up lies about other people. It's embarrassing. 🤦🏽



Absolutely. 💯

When you drive to work in the morning without getting into an accident, you've navigated a probability successfully.

When the doctor listens to your complaints and arrives at a conclusion, he's navigating a probability too.

Weather reports? Probability.

Stock market? Probability.

Do I really need to go on?

Honestly, the fact that you can ask me this type of question and make me have to point out such an obvious banality to you is very saddening.



If by logical you mean "necessarily follows from the premise", then the answer is obviously yes. It's just a mechanical consequence of wave mechanics.



Einstein's problem with QM was from his preference or expectation based on what he knew about interacting objects, not with the logical consistency. There's no way he'd have known the logical framework behind that "spooky action". So this question, like the rest of the jargons you've been posting, is dead on arrival.



You know, I feel sorry for you that you won't be able to put yourself in I and LordReed's shoes, and fully appreciate the hilarious irony of accusing me of being a know-it-all of QM. Madam, I don't know if you forgot, but YOU are the person who brought up QM, brandishing it like the recipe to the ultimate truth of our universe, and making bold claims without any justification. YOU are the one who keeps demanding binary classifications of quantum events, saying they must either be "logical" or "illogical."

Well, fine then.

Since the universe is so "ILLOGICAL" to you that keep shouting it every 3 seconds, then maybe you can tell us according to which system of logic below the universe is illogical? 🤔

1. Aristotelian logic

2. Classical logic
2a. Propositional logic
2b. First-order logic

3. Extended logic
3a. Modal logic
3b. Higher order logic

4. Deviant logic
4a. Intuitionistic logic
4b. Multi-valued logic
4c. Paraconsistent logic

5. Informal logic

Start with these ones first.

So is it wrong according to all the systems of logic I just listed? Remember who has the burden of proof here, and think carefully before your next response.

🚶🏽🚶🏽🚶🏽

jabberjawz:
Hopefully this is April fools eish...but if not.....👇

While I commend your efforts, your app is running obsolete.....needs a major overhaul, do put that into consideration with your new business partner.

INTPCorper:
4. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE

LordReed you might want to see this particular one too. I think this is a direct rebuttal to DaddyCoool's original position.

Brenbentondiaz:
Please bargain for a felony? Oh! You're igbo. I understand now.

OkCornel:
Hi, intelligent questions there.

I’ve got some questions on the state of the nation if you don’t mind my asking?

I’ll create a thread for us to discuss if you don’t mind?

Thanks.

MaxInDHouse:
You're just crying when no one is beating you!

No human sticks to excruciating pains when there is option to release himself or herself if not first suspend the use of his or her brain.
So let anyone else dispute this if they are not hypocrites.

tctrills:
This is JW brain science. I used to wonder why you made baseless statements, but you explained it yesterday. You have suspended the use of your brain cells.

It is funny that you are calling on people to dispute your JW pseudoscience of the brain.Don't you see how foolish your request is?

StillDtruth:
Fallacy!

No one said men were saints.

Come to think of it, men have been recorded in the bible as saints but which woman has been sainted?

Even in the past good old days when we even thought that women were better than us, Solomon did not find one woman is it now in today's world?

Of which it is known that men went into all these things because of woman.

Somkecharles:
And who Dey movitate Dem?
The pussy cartel I guess

Somkecharles:
And who Dey movitate Dem?
The pussy cartel I guess

aswani:
He did not "forfeit the monies for drug dealing", if he had been drug dealing, he would have seen serious jail time.

LordReed:
LoLz. Use placebo effect to turn water to wine.

Gabrielshow24, MaxInDHouse, Newgoodkk, tctrills, delkuf

Seun
HopefulLandlord
Jaephoenix
Knownunknown
TheSourcerer
Busybrain2233
1Sharon.
TakeNigeriaBack
Botragelad
Fourthpredator
Lorrayne
HardMirror
Hahn
SlawG
albreezy4eva
Muslim
Dominique
Mrbroke
EnemyofGod2
kkins25
JessicaRabbit
Wilgrea7
A001
SIXFEETUNDER
OkpaNsukkaisBae
Bacteriologist
FRANCISTOWN(me, myself)

press9jatv:
By the special Grace of Almighty God, Senator Natasha Akpoti will triumph over all his enemies as trump triumph over all his enemies in America 🇺🇸

SmartyPants:
what is guber?

techaboki:
Women should never be in position of power or authority

loffyloffy:
Which one in particular? Feel free to tell us

udejichichi:
[b]21 SINS PETER OBI COMMITTED

FiveFootNinja:
Intuition doesn't always follow logic. In fact most of the time it defies it, and that's because intuition is not based on logical systems, but on our past experiences and cognitive bias as human beings.

I don't know if you're familiar with Carl Jung and his personality theories. Basically, on a surface level they might look similar, but logic and intuition are so dramatically different in the way they function and so trying to define them interchangeably the way you're doing will always be problematic.

So far so good, it sounds like you're slowly coming to realize the outright futility of your position. I mean, I've not read anything from you yet that shows you rejecting the idea that QM clearly operates according to certain math principles or structures, even though they seem counterintuitive in classical physics.

And I never said QM was confined to maths alone. That's just you showing your misunderstanding of my argument.

The only thing that remains to be seen is if you'll finally accept the limitations of your own understanding instead of trying to force your cognitive dissonance into the subject by fire by force. 🤷🏽

And at the end of the day, the laws of physics are not beholden to our subjective opinions, so you can discard that talk about logical perspectives.

FiveFootNinja:
The boundary you're trying to create between "everyday macro logic" and "quantum world logic" simply cannot exist, I'm sorry, because the core principles of logical inference (forming a premise and framework) remain constant under any scale, whether big or small. The only thing that's changing is the physical laws underlying QM. It's really that simple. I'm starting to think this basic concept is far and wide beyond your pay grade. No offense.

FiveFootNinja:
Lol. This is the problem with some of you Nigerians. Stubbornly clinging on to a fundamental mischaracterization is not the flex you think it is. 😂

People who actually care for clarity and accurate representation of thoughts and ideas shouldn't be proud of their own misunderstanding. If counter-intuitive is too much of a tongue twister for you, I can give you 4 alternatives that best describe the nature of QM: Unexpected. Surprising. Strange. Weird.

Although I have a feeling that all the words I just mentioned will not go well with the narrative you've been working on for so long in this topic.

If you can accept the fact that the nature of our reality is not defined by your linguistic preferences, then I'm confident you will find inner peace. 🌚

OriOko88:

Transphobia ke. Mio gbori. That's what you get when a country is too advanced and has nothing to worry about.

They're not talking about electricity or portable water or road network, education or food. Dem get everything. So when they're bored of what next to do, they started transgender. Infact my friend in UK said they don't buy data in over there. Wifi dey yafunyafun everywhere for free.

This transgender of a thing would have worked well in Africa if Africa is also developed and has nothing to worry about. Oyinbo sha