₦airaland Forum

I'm in

I'm tired of being a Virgin

:

wealthinfos:
@Dake40 this is quite revealing. Thanks for ur valuable input to this thread. Pls we need more of this peeps!

But wait, if the problem solver decides now to put fear away to take risks only, does this qaulify him an Entrerpreneur?

Ephasies: how does the problem solver become an Entrepreneur?

Just like I wrote above, everybody tends to solve problems but not everybody is an entrepreneur! The only gap between them is risk taking and the inclusion of the 4 factors of production! And if someone does this( a problem solver) he's an entrepreneur....

PhockPhockMan:
Did I hear you say vice president?

Lol, you don use all ur brain Bleep toto finish!

I pity ur ballz

My brother received this SMS


YOU ARE ADMITTED TO SNIIT POLYTECHNIC OSUN STATE.VERIFY YOUR NAME IN www.sniitpoly.org.PAY 10000 IN BANK & COME WT RESULTS &TELLER.Call helplines for assistance

wealthinfos:
Thanks for your time. This quite educating bro.

I beg to ask, whats the diffrence between an entrepreneur and a problem solver? Also is the Enterpreneur a problem solver as well?

An Entrepreneur

a person who starts a business and is willing to
"RISK LOSS" in order to "MAKE MONEY"


A problem solver



A thinker
who focuses on the problem
as stated and tries to
synthesize information and
knowledge to achieve a
solution


NEXUS

1,
An entrepreneur takes risk while a problem solver plays on puzzles

2, Entrepreneurship is all about investment,business

While problem solving entails all areas

3,

Entrepreneur is After and only after "profit" while a problem solver is after overcoming challenges/difficulties.

4
important attributes of entrepreneurship are
Capital, labour, land and effort. While problem solving is all about using logic,mathematics, critical thinking, empirical evaluation, rational evaluation, epistemology, thorough scrutiny in solving problems/challenges

5

Entrepreneurship always entails MONEY while problem solving might not

6
Entrepreneurs are fear-free in taking decisions /beginning a business while a problem solver are not

7
, One of the attributes of entrepreneurs is "Problem solving" While all problem solvers might not be entrepreneurs as it belongs to few selected/determined group of individuals/people.

8,

Everybody is born to think, while most reason (even thinking of not going out to a concert due to the predictable chaos which might happen) is a problem solving example.

What is a problem

Its a challenge everyman tends to face, illiteracy is a problem and attaining education is the solution

Hence, almost everybody accept this, therefore almost everybody is a problem solver... Problem solving is all about decision taking. And almost everybody does this

While Entrepreneurs are available to only and only those who are ready to take risk.

9,
Problem solving entails little or no risk at all while entrepreneurship is all about risk takers

10,

You might have the phobia of fearing to fail and still solve problems

No Entrepreneur will make it if he/she has fear installed in his skull

wealthinfos:
And what if ur problem solving potential is monetized, thereby attracting wealth to you? Have you asked why Dangote the Richest man in Africa is still at the top? Simple because he he's got products/solutions to the numerious daily and weekly need/problems of Nigerians.

Pls feel free to prove me otherwise.

What if you are afraid of taking a loan and investing on a business you have pre-solved using your techniques due to the problem of not running bankruptcy.

Let me draw your attention nearer before you mix points

I'm not arguing
Against being a problem solver but that " being a problem solver is the not the only strategy to wealth".

There are differences between

1, An entrepreneur and a problem solver

Perhaps you wanted to include this but you forgot...


Entrepreneurship is all about risk taking while solving problem is a puzzle

entrepreneurs are risk takers


Let me tell you,

If you take risks, then you are

1, not fearful

2,Very confidential

3,Optimistic



You could be a problem solver without using any of these three keys.

Tell me,

What is the gain in being a problem solver without much confidence in building a business on it due to fear of failure.

“The wealthiest places in the world
are not gold mines, oil fields, diamond
mines or banks. The wealthiest place is
the cemetery. There lies companies that
were never started, masterpieces that
were never painted… In the cemetery
there is buried the greatest treasure of
untapped potential. There is a treasure
within you that must come out. Don’t go
to the grave with your treasure still
within YOU.”

wealthinfos:
When you improve and expand your problem solving capacity or capability you automatically attract wealth.
----

Feel free to add your own



#Wealthinfos

Problem solving might not make you rich!, solving problem might only make you intelligent!

You may be good at solving problem but fear to make mistake


Only people who do not fear to make mistakes are wealthy people not people who fear


Solving problem is different from making a step


You could solve people's problem and have no time for yourself.


The only best experience I have ever believed
Is Personal experience.


Knowing yourself is not a problem solving tip, its one of the highway codes to ask you what you have to deliver on earth.....



If problem solving is the only way to making "wealth" then all philosophers/ mathematicians will be wealthy.




Discover yourself!!!! Who are you?

The one and only secret behind wealth is Hard-working......
If you are Hard working you will
1, Have respect for time
2, Be consistent and be truthful with yourself/business/job
3, Be Determined
4, Love what you are doing
5, Love what you have and how to make them become folds.
6, Won't. Give an iota of chance to pseudo friends/relationship
7, Look down on Myths" in disdain
8, Have a target
9, Your mind is your best friend
10, Never fear to Fail.

Toyolad:
first of all, I say welcome on board sir.
I would like you to tell us what it means for an idea or a concept to be objective, how a concept can be universal but not objective.

do actions that are egoistic in nature necessary lead to the happiness of persons involved?...can cting based on self interest ONLY be adopted as a universal law?

just trying to be Socratic in order to understand your points sir.

and...is a subjective thinker a true philosopher and is someone like that supposed to engage in any argument at all?? since he believes in subjectivity of ideas and consequently, relativity?

Thanks for the compliment

""""""""" what does it means for an idea
or a concept to be objective, how a concept can be
universal but not objective"""""""""""


Objectivity is a central philosophical concept,
related to reality and truth, objectivity means the
state or quality of being true even outside of an
"individual"


Universality is, the character or state of
being universal; existence or prevalence everywhere



Could any truth be Objective?

Killing has been condemned by nearly "All" countries(Objectively)
Still, some countries issue out firearm to some individuals legally due to self protection..

Are they not contradicting?


Abortion has been condemned by "nearly all" countries(Objectively)

Still the "pro choice" have backed up Abortion

I still stand to be convinced to believe that there is one objective truth in the universe....

The fact still remains that at least 1% percent will turn down truth. Which makes it odd.


Universality of knowledge,truth,reality backs it that regardless of the rejection or prejudice, truth still remains and its the One.

" That death awaits all mankind is a Universal philosophical concept ( either you accept or not, it will meet you someday).


Do you know two of the major attributes of truth ?

Truth is certain

Truth is 100%

And when at least 1 out of 100 denied it, then It can never be called Objective truth but rather Universal......




""""""""""""do actions that are egoistic in nature necessary lead
to the happiness of persons involved?""""""""""



Rational egoism says "an action is "rational" only and only if it maximises one's "self interest".

"Self interest distinct from "selfishness"

Self-interest is essential for one's "happiness and
well being"

Selfishness
Concerned excessively or exclusively with
oneself orseeking or concentrating on one's own
advantage, pleasure, or well-being "without regard
for others"


""""""""""""""""""can cting
based on self interest ONLY be adopted as a
universal law?"""""""""""""""""



Not clear



"""""""and...is a subjective thinker a true philosopher and
is someone like that supposed to engage in any
argument at all?? since he believes in subjectivity of
ideas and consequently, relativity?
""""""""""

Thanks so much for this question. I'd really love to known the aspect you subscribe to before I answer this question.

Are you a permanent subjective thinker or permanent Objective thinker?

Mind you, you can't belong to the both classes! But one....

My reply awaits your answer!

sorextee:
It seems that politics section is d most sensitive section in nairaland...

I didn't post on politics section. In fact, I do not have a topic under that section

promisechild:
Good and Bad are two objective properties that can not be broken into components meaning what is good is good and what is bad is bad.


I strongly believe that nature does nothing in vain. Have you ever imagined why did nature furnished woman with a Virginia or do you think it just there for decoration and why did nature also furnish man with the long thing under them?



Using the philosophy of the sophist father(Protagoras) "Man is the measure of all things" as a support for homosexuality is absurd because there are things we know that are good and bad which is being guided by what is called the natural law. I don't think there is any society that encourages the killing of ones fellow human simply because we know it is bad to indulge in such act.


Following the philosophy of St Thomas Aquinas he presented 6 inclinations of man that decide or show what is good which are enumerated as follows

1. Educating ones offsprings

2. Living in a society

3.Having the knowledge of God

4. Self Preservation

5. Having Heterosexual activities


6. can't remember it for now

You wrote
"I
don't think there is any society that encourages the
killing of ones fellow human simply because we
know it is bad to indulge in such act"


My response
1,If "no" society encourages killing, then Why is Euthanasia legalised in some country?. Mercy killing or Euthanasia is the process of "putting to death" someone in a vegetable state. it's an "Assisted Murder"

Under the non voluntarily aspect of euthanasia,
the patient is "Not and Never aware of what is going on against him, he receives his Death without 'His own will'. Inshort, the patient may not what to die but was passed on him owing to the legality of euthanasia.

Euthanasia is legalised till date in
1, Belgium
2,Colombia
3,Mexico
4, India etc.......

2.
If 'NO' (universal negative proposition) society encourages killing, then why the legality of personal use of firearm in some giving country?

Don't you think an innocent might die?,

don't you think the user in question might under the iota of freedom giving to him bring down his enemies?

If killing is totally illegal .then issuing of firearm to some individuals via some procedures is illegal
Some countries issue out freedom of firearm usage via some procedures.
Therefore, killing is legal by limitation.



You wrote
"Man is the measure of all things" as a
support for homosexuality is absurd because there
are things we know that are good and bad"

My response
A philosopher will approach this argument Ethically, and ethics is the nomative science of human conduct.
How ever, I will tell you before hand that I'm a subjective philosopher.

Like I wrote in my precious post, human's personality is determined by his culture, environment, religion e.t.c

How about a boy who grew up amidst gays?
Do you think the boy in question will by any chance have logical and quantitative knowledge of Heterosexuality?


Protagoras "man is the measure of all things" has a lot to do with some ethical theories, don't forget the issue of homosexuality is an ethical problem!



You wrote
"there
are things we know that are good and bad which is
being guided by what is called the natural law"

My response
How about a sociopath who has no conscience?

Demmocrats:
Seen is on a banning spree 500 and counting lol

If you think am lying ask those boys that said stuffs about Biafra and the rest

Seun is doing his job bro but he might have a change of heart his a cool guy

Those bans on "politics section" are obvious and the monikers are banned due to racial comments ... There is no evidence to proof I'm the one behind the attack... Nairaland is more than a home to me,

Demmocrats:
Seen is on a banning spree 500 and counting lol

If you think am lying ask those boys that said stuffs about Biafra and the rest

Seun is doing his job bro but he might have a change of heart his a cool guy

The bans on "politics section" are obvious and the monikers are caught right-handed ... There is no evidence to proof I'm the one behind the attack... Nairaland is more than a home to me,

Would be glad if this room is an active one

Toyolad:
#clears throat#...many a times, our feelings,emotions and our culture tend to cloud our way of reasoning.We tend to appeal to our unwritten laws which we feel so closely connected to, this makes us hastily judge issues without critically assessing and analyzing them..one of these issues is the issue about the rightness or better still, the wrongness of homosexuality.

Dear critical thinkers, as reason beckons on us...let's state our positions on this issue that has almost divided citizens of our world into two factions.

Is homosexuality right or wrong ?

cc; fynestboi, Damosky12,freemanan,yusuph1986, arcnomec,yielding....waiting for our contribution(s).

I wouldn't waste time on this


I will argue for homosexuality ( abeg o, I no be gay o)

WHY?
The arguments posted above me are more or less against Homosexuality

How could knowledge be attained with out being
sceptical or double minded?

Epistemology grew up via the influence of the sophists.

When someone doubts your idea, then you are challenged!... It gives you sleepless mind.

I respect opinions and honour truth

I believe that "Truth is universal but not objective"


Ones opinion, ideas, thought, philosophy are influenced by
A, ones environment
B, ones culture,
C biological influence
D, religion
E, the way someone sees,perceives and interpretes things e.t.c

No fact is objective
I will subscribe to egoism syllogistically.

Egoism is an ethical theory of self interest as the foundation of. "ALL" morality

Homosexuality is favoured by Egoism

Therefore homosexuality is moral.



Man is the measure of all things
- Protagoras

I hail from Adekunle ajasin university Akungba Akoka. A 300l student of this noble department




Let's the keep the fun rolling

In fact, I'm very much happy and satisfied with your
answers!...never knew I could meet someone like you online
who will reveal things like this without asking a penny, I'm so
grateful!....base on ur answers, you have moved my ass
from level to levels!
But I have more questions!, and I would be glad if answered
like initials
1
, Would you advice a beginner to use appraisal tool?
I had my finders busy on my phone browsing for good
flippable domains and I got a domain which I think would
yield green!. I registered with freevaluator dot com and it
values the domain 355$, the domain is in this form
"Five............dotcom
If I were to depend on the appraisal, I would register the
name, but pro like you may take it with a somewhat eye and
look down on it in disdain, so I want to know, if a domain
name is gotten, and it has a great appraisal , should it be
registered?
2
I took my self much time on expireddomains dot net and
various domains popped up, I will love to know, are there
any criteria in choosing an expired or deleted names other
than the quality of the names?,
I could see boxes that have "PR, BL, DP, ABY, Alexa Dmoz C
N O D
Do they give much qualities to name(expired names)? If yes
What would you give as the minimum for each??
3
What if I find a word dot org and other different from dot
com, for example, life.org stopwars.org , realestatedot info
or anything other than dot com (I know the listed names
have been registered, just saying)
Would you say they should be bought?
Thank you and remain Blessed

I pray it gets rectified soon

Hello, I'm writting on behalf of a friend of mine( a
nairalander), he couldn't find the username and password
boxes at log in.... he mistakenly logged out from nairaland
last night, and this morning, he tried to log in, and it only
requested for his email, and however, this email had been
blocked some years back due to not being active., pls how
does he get his moniker back on? Thanks so mucch
(Modify) (Quote) (Report) (Share)

is hasn't been fixed o!...pls moderators you need to do something

Hello, I'm writting on behalf of a friend of mine( a nairalander), he couldn't find the username and password boxes at log in.... he mistakenly logged out from nairaland last night, and this morning, he tried to log in, and it only requested for his email, and however, this email had been blocked some years back due to not being active., pls how does he get his moniker back on? Thanks so mucch

am new to liberty reserve.. i was introduced by an uncle who resides in the USA, he sent some money to me on liberty reserve to complete his house here in nigeria...pls the GURUS in the house, i would like to know if i can withdraw liberty reserve via WESTERN UNION, MONEY GRAM or THROUGH DOMICILIARY ACCOUNT. God bless you as you help me

2nd to comment..........that alleged pix is never in resemblance with JAY Z...
[color=#990000][/color]