₦airaland Forum

lepasharon:
Interesting. So 4evergod now chooses to claim to be a half-british female doctor/traumatologist/paramedic in the UK?

lepasharon:
Lol I don't think it's him

frank317:
Ya right... Everyone can see how free ur mind has ran. U have succeeded in letting it run out of ur dear Bible.


So? And who is arguing this with u. We are still waiting for u to answer if u think there is a possibility Christ could come this month or not.


No one is asking u this... Answer the question


So while man is indirectly working for God. We can say that since God is waiting for man to pave the way for him, Christ cannot come before the end of this year. Should we quote u?


I just got it wise one! They are building the technology for everyone to see Jesus coming from the sky. So with this,do u still think he can possibly come tomorrow?


Continue ur irrelevant sermons pastor.


Ya whenever man acheived something good it's God's fault, but when the same technology results in something bad, it's man's fault.
But I will not let u distract me on the main issue. So with technology being God's purpose, do u think Christ can possibly come Tomorrow?



I agree... Just answer the question with a yes or no. Let me help u... You can say yes but...., Or no but....

hopefulLandlord:
ssssshhhhhh!!!!

don't let the garri out of the cup

spacetacular:
Jesus said HE WOULD BE SEEN coming from the clouds right? HOW?

The writers of the Bible do not need to know anything about the invention of electricity in the future BECAUSE THAT RECORDED EVEN IS MEANT FOR THE FUTURE!

Why is this so hard to understand for you?

Carefully think then try to make meaningful comments sir. You guys say the most shallow things and it makes me wonder indeed.

spacetacular:
You are the one not seeing the bigger picture. The whole world simply meant THE WHOLD WORLD regardless of present or future locations or populations. It was simply documenting a FUTURE EVENT which would fit into the PEOPLE WHO WOULD BE IN THE TIME IT DOES HAPPEN.

you are so myopic to say the least. Can you deny the involvement of television in global viewing of symbolic events? Why do you think everyone is clamouring for an identity on cable television these days? It is all leading to a singular event and in time those who would witness it would make sense of it all.

spacetacular:
Did you even bother imagining the way technological advancement would contribute to this?

You assume this means everyone would look up and see him in the sky? Satellite technology has linked the whole world together and if the whole world can have access to CNN or BBC etc you assume that such an event would not be immediately televised worldwide so ALL CAN SEE HIM?

Did you actually think this had to do with the shape of the earth? Gosh how do you guys even think? Rationality is lost on you.

KingEbukasBlog:
And I heard that you were his accomplice .

Shame on you bro

smh

KingEbukasBlog:
Nice one bro

hopefulLandlord:
the logic is even stupid, asking if the OP is clean, like the OP ever claimed to be the 4 omnis like they claim their imaginary friend is

True but they need to do that because *cough* eternal fire *cough* *cough*

hopefulLandlord:
I have asked Christians the question, "If an all-powerful, loving God exists why does he allow children to starve?" I usually get one of two responses. Either they tell me that God's ways are "mysterious" and that children starving are all a part of his greater plan that we won't know about until after we die. Or they smugly turn it around to say, "Why are YOU letting kids starve to death? God works through human hands."
The first answer is a total cop-out and basically says they have no friggin' clue as to why he does things but he MUST have some good reason for it. It's just that we are not privy to that reason.

When they say the second answer I respond by giving the following example. Say I am a father and have a 10 yr old son. The son wants a dog for his birthday. So I buy him a puppy and say that it is his responsibility to feed it. He agrees. After awhile the son ignores the puppy and isn't feeding it. The puppy is starving. I have the power to feed the puppy. All I have to do it put food in its bowl. But I don't because feeding the puppy is my son's responsibility. So I watch the puppy starve to death. Now what do you think of me? Would you think I was a heartless monster? Or would you say it was not my fault the puppy starved since it was my son's duty to feed it?
They usually don't have an answer for that one.

Christianity is vapid, full of nonsense, garbage and empty promises with NOTHING objectively logical and sensible backing it

JackBizzle:
One of his arguments for the ressurection of Christ is that there were witnesses and they could not have been mass hallucinating when they saw him.


As if magicians don't have audiences to fool with illusions

spacetacular:
Again you are right based on your perception. Your perception does not permit sensible communication.

spacetacular:
Yes you are right but that is you are right within your fleshly perception. You can argue all day if you wish but you will always be right because that is what you perceive and I wouldn't blame you for that. I would simply blame your handicap.

Not all perceptions are evidence based and I already showed this to Jack.

Anyone who is of a higher scope of perception beyond the physical shouldn't blame you and neither should you blame them for your limitation.

They cannot communicate sensibly with you due to your handicap. You alone can help yourself.

spacetacular:
Oh yes you are right! God is abstract to those who try to physically look for his evidence yet would not believe any evidence they already see.

To the fleshly God can never be an external reality. But to the spiritual he is as real as I kiss my daughter goodnight every night.

You can term God as abstract if you wish especially since that fits your perception of him.

KingEbukasBlog:
There is no exception here . The premise only focuses on things that came into existence

There is a big difference between Whatever begins to exist has cause and Everything has cause . Assuming I had said 'everything has a cause' and made the creator an exception then it becomes special pleading

I gave examples of other things that are uncreated Eg abstract objects .

hopefulLandlord:
I once challenged Kingebukasblog to tell us those "evidence" that he claims Craig has and he went on a rant, I rebutted his rants and he replied later only for me to realise his post is hidden and he's been banned, I couldn't see the post

maybe he can rephrase the post and repost it

KingEbukasBlog:
Leave these ignorant atheists .

Most arguments for God's existence were created by theists . The cosmological argument , teleological argument , ontological and moral arguments were all arguments for God's existence in theism .

Craig also talks about evidence for the resurrection of Christ . He can also teach Christian philosophy in his podcasts on youtube channel .

malvisguy212:
you are very good In repeating questions.....we know you say No...now, back up your claim.

bennyann:
So what do you have to say about this thread cos it seems it accuses you also?

bennyann:
You mean the op is trash? And where did you get the 'never' from?

OLAADEGBU:
It doesn't work like that. The onus is on you to tell us why you say "it doesn't."

OLAADEGBU:
Are you a bible student?

felixomor:
Hehehe
Are you pained?

felixomor:
Honestly.

HardMirror:
the way Christians claim God answers prayers, one wld expect at least one amputee being restored even just once in 20years. yet every day thousands of people thank God for miracles. one shld really be curious.

KingEbukasBlog:
Miracles can be performed by both theists and atheists . Atheists in witchcraft are casting spells and muttering incantations to the elements of nature for miracles to happen . Atheists in han folk religion in China are magically casting out evil spirits through exorcism. And you are here trying to be skeptical about miracles like the deists?

Nairaland atheists are bad comedians .

KingEbukasBlog:
In the same olodo thread you opened questioning miracles and instigating a conflict between science and religion , you still want the limb of an amputee to be restored ? You also questioned the resurrection of Christ claiming that it contravenes science insinuating that it should regarded as a myth , yet you desire what you are against , a miracle ?

Ladies and gentlemen , the devil must be embarrassed by the vacuity shown by modern atheists. The reasoning is just egregious!