urheme:



JackBizzle, you again.

Perhaps God would have created you as a virus or bacteria...then you will know how they check back to hell when the Holy Spirit arrives that sick body.....henhen... i remember when i received my healing.....come and see them running out ...no i didn't see them

Okay.

Urheme, I will become a Christian when a pastor heals an amputee. When that leg grows back

JackBizzle:



Josh.

If there is so much evidence why haven't you convinced one single atheist here?

And why have Christians turned atheists on this section?

why is Christianity growing rapidly in atheist religious China ?

why did the population of atheists fall massively after the communist governments fell in the 20th century ?

why are people renouncing atheism in their numbers?

at this rate atheists will be below 1 percent of the total world population by 2030

JackBizzle:


Okay.

Urheme, I will become a Christian when a pastor heals an amputee. When that leg grows back

In the same olodo thread you opened questioning miracles and instigating a conflict between science and religion , you still want the limb of an amputee to be restored ? You also questioned the resurrection of Christ claiming that it contravenes science insinuating that it should regarded as a myth , yet you desire what you are against , a miracle ?

Ladies and gentlemen , the devil must be embarrassed by the vacuity shown by modern atheists. The reasoning is just egregious!

Iamanigerianguy what say you?

KingEbukasBlog:


In the same olodo thread you opened questioning miracles and instigating a conflict between science and religion , you still want the limb of an amputee to be restored ? You also questioned the resurrection of Christ claiming that it contravenes science insinuating that it should regarded as a myth , yet you desire what you are against , a miracle ?

Ladies and gentlemen , the devil must be embarrassed by the vacuity shown by modern atheists. The reasoning is just egregious!

That is because clear cut miracles never happen. Just prove that miraxles are real by heling and amputee and restoring his/her amputated limbs back then we will believe. You can't force people to believe your mythology that lack evidence.

KingEbukasBlog:


In the same olodo thread you opened questioning miracles and instigating a conflict between science and religion , you still want the limb of an amputee to be restored ? You also questioned the resurrection of Christ claiming that it contravenes science insinuating that it should regarded as a myth , yet you desire what you are against , a miracle ?

Ladies and gentlemen , the devil must be embarrassed by the vacuity shown by modern atheists. The reasoning is just egregious!

Ebuka! Why?


Do you even reason at all? The reason I ask for the healing of an amputee is that I know it is impossible just like Jesus rising fro. The dead in 3 days.


Receive sense

KingEbukasBlog:


In the same olodo thread you opened questioning miracles and instigating a conflict between science and religion , you still want the limb of an amputee to be restored ? You also questioned the resurrection of Christ claiming that it contravenes science insinuating that it should regarded as a myth , yet you desire what you are against , a miracle ?

Ladies and gentlemen , the devil must be embarrassed by the vacuity shown by modern atheists. The reasoning is just egregious!

I did try to forewarn him about the futility of this piece which he began and appealed that he save himself from embarrassment by first stating his opening arguments which supported his questions but he chose to yell and bicker and thinking he can have his cake and eat it too.

Here he is now making an obviously mutually exclusive comment (having his cake and eating it) which is impossible.

I did say he talks first and thinks later. He keeps confirming it.

KingEbukasBlog:


why is Christianity growing rapidly in atheist religious China ?

why did the population of atheists fall massively after the communist governments fell in the 20th century ?

why are people renouncing atheism in their numbers?

at this rate atheists will be below 1 percent of the total world population by 2030

The same China that churns out more bhuddists and atheists? Oga, what is the percentage of Christians there?

spacetacular:


I did try to forewarn him about the futility of this piece which he began and appealed that he save himself from embarrassment by first stating his opening arguments which supported his questions but he chose to yell and bicker and thinking he can have his cake and eat it too.

Here he is now making an obviously mutually exclusive comment (having his cake and eating it) which is impossible.

I did say he talks first and thinks later. He keeps confirming it.

Hahn, hardmirror, lepasharon


I suspect this to be an alt account. The stoopidity and azzlicking is all too familiar

JackBizzle:




Hahn, hardmirror, lepasharon


I suspect this to be an alt account. The stoopidity and azzlicking is all too familiar

Whose arse am I "licking"? I simply agreed to a post which echoes all I tried telling you and preventing you from doing last night. Stop being scared of me but rather do the right thing so you can have a "credible debate".

Present your evidence and arguments which support your questions. You occupy a side of the debate divide so its only proper we read your opening arguments.

spacetacular:



Whose arse am I "licking"? I simply agreed to a post which echoes all I tried telling you and preventing you from doing last night. Stop being scared of me but rather do the right thing so you can have a "credible debate".

Swerve.

lepasharon:
Iamanigerianguy what say you?

@ lepasharon: I have consciously and intentionally refrained from commenting on this thread

Let me just add that a belief in God should be a personal matter, while science should be public and be used as a tool. When you mix both you can get into sticky situations.
Furthermore, I see a lot of , shall I say, unenlightened positions, taken here by many contributors especially on the side of religion. The atheist/humanist side exhibits much better erudition and sounder arguments (though I am not an atheist).

This debate is very old, dating back at least 500 years to the reformation in Europe and the Age of Enlightenment. It has influenced the course of history, wars, politics and civilization. The positions being rehashed here have already been advanced in writing and debate and developed on.
Many people need to catch up on their reading of Luther, Calvin, Descartes, Bertrand Russel, Dawkins and others.
A very good book you can download online to get an overview of the arguments is A History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russel. It is one of the best books you might ever read.

@lepasharon
@JackBizzle

JackBizzle:



Ebuka! Why?


Do you even reason at all? The reason I ask for the healing of an amputee is that I know it is impossible just like Jesus rising fro. The dead in 3 days.


Receive sense

My brother , that is what I'm trying to say na . The thread is as empty as the person who created it . I'm not surprised you don't understand.

JackBizzle:



Swerve.

I am still here and will be until you do the right thing by FIRST presenting your opening arguments.

KingEbukasBlog:


My brother , that is what I'm trying to say na . The thread is as empty as the person who created it . I'm not surprised you don't understand.

What the heck are you saying?

Can ya pastor heal an amputee or nah?

spacetacular:


I did try to forewarn him about the futility of this piece which he began and appealed that he save himself from embarrassment by first stating his opening arguments which supported his questions but he chose to yell and bicker and thinking he can have his cake and eat it too.

Here he is now making an obviously mutually exclusive comment (having his cake and eating it) which is impossible.

I did say he talks first and thinks later. He keeps confirming it.

My sister that is the JackBizzle we know . Thoughts come eons after he has taken action . He has never failed to disappoint.

KingEbukasBlog:


My sister that is the JackBizzle we know . Thoughts come eons after he has taken action . He has never failed to disappoint.

The Same jackbizzle that destroys your failed arguments consistently?

Mr "Hitler was an atheist"

Mr "Zuckerberg was never an atheist"

IamaNigerianGuy:


@ lepasharon: I have consciously and intentionally refrained from commenting on this thread

spacetacular:


I am still here and will be until you do the right thing by FIRST presenting your opening arguments.

I don't think he understands what you mean . I think you are expecting too much from him while in reality he offers so little or just nothing.

JackBizzle:




Hahn, hardmirror, lepasharon


I suspect this to be an alt account. The stoopidity and azzlicking is all too familiar

not interested in the matters of idi0ts Pls.

dalaman:


That is because clear cut miracles never happen. Just prove that miraxles are real by heling and amputee and restoring his/her amputated limbs back then we will believe. You can't force people to believe your mythology that lack evidence.

Miracles can be performed by both theists and atheists . Atheists in witchcraft are casting spells and muttering incantations to the elements of nature for miracles to happen . Atheists in han folk religion in China are magically casting out evil spirits through exorcism. And you are here trying to be skeptical about miracles like the deists?

Nairaland atheists are bad comedians .

JackBizzle:



The Same jackbizzle that destroys your failed arguments consistently?

Mr "Hitler was an atheist"

Mr "Zuckerberg was never an atheist"

Hitler was an atheist and Zuckerberg was never an atheist . I'm not sure how someone can destroy the truth .

But you are an atheist so ....

JackBizzle:




Hahn, hardmirror, lepasharon


I suspect this to be an alt account. The stoopidity and azzlicking is all too familiar

We will soon know who is behind that account!

KingEbukasBlog:


Hitler was an atheist and Zuckerberg was never an atheist . I'm not sure how someone can destroy the truth .

But you are an atheist so ....

Zuckerberg stated that he was an atheist in his Facebook profile.


Hitler never renounced God.


Ebuka the lyin king

HardMirror:

not interested in the matters of idi0ts Pls.

IamaNigerianGuy:


@ lepasharon: I have consciously and intentionally refrained from commenting on this thread

Let me just add that a belief in God should be a personal matter, while science should be public and be used as a tool. When you mix both you can get into sticky situations.
Furthermore, I see a lot of ignorant positions taken here by many contributors especially on the side of religion. The atheist/humanist side exhibits much better erudition and sounder arguments (though I am not an atheist).
This debate is very old, dating back at least 500 years to the reformation in Europe and the Age of Enlightenment. It has influenced the course of history, wars, politics and civilization. The positions being rehashed here have already been advanced and developed on.
Many people need to catch up on their reading of Luther, Calvin, Descartes, Bertrand Russel, Dawkins and others.
A very good book you can download online to get an overview of the arguments is A History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russel. It is one of the best books you might ever read.
@lepasharon
@JackBizzle

Hey JackBizzle do you remember I quoted from Bertrand Russell and you rubbished it. Here you see him being mentioned again by someone who obviously knows much more than you do.

Read up and stop clowning.

KingEbukasBlog:


I don't think he understands what you mean . I think you are expecting too much from him while in reality he offers so little or just nothing.

Oh my word! How can anyone not understand what it means to have an opening argument when he wishes to have a debate?

He asks questions and does not know that an opening argument is either in support or opposition to the position he wishes to occupy which in this case is atheism.

You cannot call anything a "debate" until you have given us an opening argument. How is this too hard to understand?

spacetacular:


Hey JackBizzle do you remember I quoted from Bertrand Russell and you rubbished it. Here you see him being mentioned again by someone who obviously knows much more than you do.

Read up and stop clowning.

A miracle! First common ground I have found with @spacetacular ;

dalaman:


That is because clear cut miracles never happen. Just prove that miraxles are real by heling and amputee and restoring his/her amputated limbs back then we will believe. You can't force people to believe your mythology that lack evidence.

the way Christians claim God answers prayers, one wld expect at least one amputee being restored even just once in 20years. yet every day thousands of people thank God for miracles. one shld really be curious.

IamaNigerianGuy:


A miracle! First common ground I have found with @spacetacular ;

We have a lot of common grounds sir affinity would show that we do a lot more than we both think. I love Bertrands works and his sound reasoning most times.

I have a few of his books such as Why I Am Not a Christian and Religion & Science plus a few others. I read the history of western philosophy briefly (not completely) and that was about 4years ago and come to think of it I cannot fathom why I didn't finish it.

[quote author=spacetacular post=58213027]

We have a lot of common grounds sir affinity would show that we do a lot more than we both think. I love Bertrands works and his sound reasoning most times.

I have a few of his books such as Why I Am Not a Christian and Religion & Science plus a few others. I read the history of western philosophy briefly (not completely) and that was about 4years ago and come to think of it I cannot fathom why I didn't finish it. [/quote

Hmmm. Interesting. You know he's a leading light of the atheist movement and a vicious critic of Christianity ? Don't you ? He always makes me laugh when he describes the christian position as 'illogicality taking refuge in revelation'

spacetacular:


We have a lot of common grounds sir affinity would show that we do a lot more than we both think. I love Bertrands works and his sound reasoning most times.

I have a few of his books such as Why I Am Not a Christian and Religion & Science plus a few others. I read the history of western philosophy briefly (not completely) and that was about 4years ago and come to think of it I cannot fathom why I didn't finish it.

You read Bertrand Russell and you're still a Christian?
How did that happen?