₦airaland Forum

felixomor:
I never met them

U r the one who spoke about them.
U brought them into this discussion.

So talk about them.

From history we know that before the white people came to Nigeria there were no christians. End of story. If you know of any christian in Nigeria before the whites came name the person.

hahn:
How do you know it is a "he"?

Them tell us say the God na he na.

felixomor:
How many ancestors did u interview?

Name one that was a christian or had visions of Jesus before the white people came to your village.

felixomor:
Those places u mentioned has millions of chrstians living there.
Some of them even met Jesus in their dreams.
What happened to them?

Met which Jesus in their dreams? How come non of our ancestors ever met Jesus in their drams until the white men came?

KingEbukasBlog:
I think spoken words work not written ones

Na today people dey challange me to speak that one?

felixomor:
AMEN

Its over 15 mins and your God is yet to kill me oo. He remains imaginary. Case closed.

DoctorAlien:
Did GOD kill anybody in reality?

If no, how then is He evil?

If yes, how can you say He does not exist?

The same way christians say that Allah is evil. Has Allah ever killed anybody in reality before? The idea is why we are discussing.

felixomor:
Ok, in front of everybody here now.

Tell God to kill you before the end of 2017.
Let me help you put AMEN.

2017 is too far. God of you exist as the christians here want us to beleive plsssssssssssssssss kill me in the next 15 minutes so that christians here will know that you are not imaginary. Plssssssssssss God use me as an example to show that you exist kill me in the next 15 mins to show that you exist for real and not an imaginary entity. Type Amen.

felixomor:
He is imaginary, yet capable of genocide u have been crying fo since yesterday?

If i hear....

Capable of genocode in the place where he exist which is inside the bible. Your God exist only inside the bible and in your head.

We are talking about the stories and if they are justifiable. Stories is the subject here.

felixomor:
Him Sparing your life alone after all these nonsense you spit is enough to know He is merciful.

If I were Him, by now your oxygen supply will be shut down.

Truth be told.

He can't do anything because he is imaginary. Cry as much as you can you can only threaten him with imaginary punishment after death. Your God remains imaginary and can do nothing.

MrPRevailer:
You're not chewing your words. You are swallowing and swallowing big piles of stones you will have to vomit someday.

Imaginary threats.

realmindz:
see

I question ur objectivity, sincerity and most importantly ur level of reasoning.

see your mentor below quoting himself. so tell me, what more proofs do u need? And are u now ashamed of yourself

So naijadeyhia is quoting 4everGod on the same thread as different people?

The clown that never stops giving.

KingEbukasBlog:
Isn't it the same Dalaman that claimed that atheism began with the Indians when according to a credible source it was just 2000 years ago that atheism started in India

You brought your source and I also brought mine. How is yours more credible than mine?

felixomor:
See who dey accuse person o?

Shut up!

KingEbukasBlog:
Atheists are seeking relevance by fixating on the Old Testament - they are fighting to limit God to religion .

William Craig ,as well as most Christian apologists have shown that God is not limited to religion .

How about talking about the New Testament which is centered on Christ's life fully ?

Or isn't Christ God Himself ?

What ever concept of God is only limited to the religious belief that gave birth to that concept of God. There is no Jesus as God without the Christian religion. Jews that practice Judaism do not believe in Jesus even though the believe in the God of the OT.

People like William Craig know that they can't defend the Christian God or the bible God because it was very poorly thought out so they have created a new virtual God concept outside the God of the bible and they try to use modern knowledge to defend the virtual God they have created. For example William Craig will tell you that objective morality exist and they came from God but when you show him where God violates the objective moral values and how it can not come from him because of the violation, he begins to cry and say crazy things like maybe the writers of the bible were not told by God to write down such things and other crazy nonsense or that he doesn't want to talk about it because it is immaterial.

You can't have it both ways. It's either you accept the bible and it's God fully or you discard it and become a deist. Most apologist like Craig and Gary Herbamas are defending a deistic concept of God and not the God of Christian theology. That is the same thing you are doing.

Allah does not exist outside Islam, Brahma does not exist ou side hinduism, Jesus does not exist outside Christianity, just the way that Yahweh does not exist outside Judaism.

KingEbukasBlog:
Read his book to find out

Durrrh !!

He speaks from both sides of his mouth. I one sentence he says archeology doesn't fully support what is inside the bible, in another he claims the events happened even though not as portrayed in the bible so which is it?

KingEbukasBlog:
God's actions are not arbitrary or based on caprice . All in accordance to his nature . He gives life , He takes it .

Are you in God's mind to ascertain if his actions are arbitrary ?

Christianity is not based on Canaan's battles , David's victory or whatever in the Old Testament but on the life of Christianity

All these stories were included for us to see what difference Christ's coming makes

One minute you are defending the actions of the OT God the next minute you are Christ cane and changed everything. If it was so good as you are trying to say then why acknowledging that Christ came and changed it. Even your mentors are running away from such defence. William Craig no matter what has stopped talking about the OT God in his recent debates, because he realive it has made him lose credibility all in trying to defend the character.

KingEbukasBlog:


Lol . Anything that will question the atheist beliefs is waved aside .

And which archaeological evidence was Paul Copan referring too ?

And how did he know that Canaanites outside biblical text were morally decadent people ?

Continue sir . I know you know more than the experts in these fields .

Na you oo

What evidence has he dropped to support the conquest? Where is it? Where is the archaeological evidence? Where is it?

KingEbukasBlog:
Old Testament

Exodus 33:19
19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.

New Testament

Romans 9:15
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

Romans 9:18
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

That means the God character is acts based on randomness? If he feels like having mercy on you he'll have if he feels like killing you he kills. He almost killed Moses his best friend in the bible based on this random act of his. The OT God remains the most vile character ever imagined on all of fiction and.mythology.
No wonder William Craig openly says he doesn't like talking about OT morality.

KingEbukasBlog:
You do realize that there's archaeology to prove these things happened

Sir , biko , have you downloaded Paul Copan's book "So God is a moral monster ?" I asked you too >

There is no archaeology to support anything. The is no arrchaeolgy to support the conquest of Canaan. Most of the things inside the bible are mythological.

felixomor:
Ur comments are the illest

"Instead of"

Its like u even know how to be God more than God.

I hope your life says so sha?

You ascribe attributes to this imaginary character of yours like merciful , loving and forgiving, but when we read the stories starring this imaginary character we see something else. What does a forgiving aND merciful entity do when offended? Kill 70,000 of them?

KingEbukasBlog:
The communists rejected both God and religion

Do you now understand ?

Ebuka where is the morality thread you promised na?

felixomor:
My advise to u is to stop quoting bible out of context.
Do u know what Israel did before this event transpired?

Do u know Israel had already offended God before this?

Please, u can argue with other books.
Make sure u argue with books u have finished reading.

Honestly

So they offended your God instead of forgiveness na to kill 70,000 of them? Merciful God indeed. The OT God remains one of the most vile and cruel characters ever imagine in human fiction and mythology.

KingEbukasBlog:
He just realized his ignorance

And the post has over 4000 views might reach 15000 views by February if Christ tarries. Without hitting front page

He has told you everything.

randomperson:
Lolz... Keep advertising your threads like someone hawking sexual performance drugs.
Rejecting religion is an important step in being an atheist... Most of the atheists on this forum rejected religion

Uppercut of the year. This one had me laughing out real loud.

PAGAN9JA thanks for the update and information.

KingEbukasBlog:
Its called Anthropomorphism

You just keep throwing words you learn like a toddler. When the writer of the bible say God told a prophet with a loud voice go and so so and so. Did it really happen or did the prophet make it up using these elusive anthropomorphism of yours?

KingEbukasBlog:
According to historians , religious wars account for less than 2% of all people killed in warfare. This includes 3 million during the Crusades and 3,000 during the Inquisition

The French war of religion alone is responsible for the deaths of more than 4 million people. So what are you saying?

4everGod:
[s][/s]


I WARNED THAT I DID NOT WANT COPY AND PASTE. I WANT VERIFIABLE LINKS AND FACTS AND FIGURES WITH YEARS AND NOT THIS YOU ARE DOING. if you do not know how to do this then contact Mrmontella offline and let him do it for you

You have the name of the conflict and the year, instead of using Google to find out more you are here crying.

4everGod:
Ebuka stop! We have reached the doorstep of facts now. Lets not keep arguing aimlessly. Let facts speak. Let Mrmontella drop his figures and years and verifiable links.

I will drop mine and let everyone compare and contrast...

Consider the following conflicts where the only differences between the opposing factions were and are religion:

Albigensian Crusade, 1208-49
Algeria, 1992-
Baha'is, 1848-54
Bosnia, 1992-95
Boxer Rebellion, 1899-1901
Christian Romans, 30-313 CE
Croatia, 1991-92
English Civil War, 1642-46
Holocaust, 1938-45
Huguenot Wars, 1562-1598
India, 1992-2002
India: Suttee & Thugs
Indo-Pakistani Partition, 1947
Iran, Islamic Republic, 1979-
Iraq, Shiites, 1991-92
Jews, 1348
Jonestown, 1978
Lebanon 1860 / 1975-92
Molucca Is., 1999-
Mongolia, 1937-39
Northern Ireland, 1974-98
Russian pogroms 1905-06 / 1917-22
St. Bartholemew Massacre, 1572
Shang China, ca. 1300-1050 BCE
Shimabara Revolt, Japan 1637-38
Sikh uprising, India, 1984-91
Spanish Inquisition, 1478-1834
Taiping Rebellion, 1850-64
Thirty Years War, 1618-48
Tudor England
Vietnam, 1800s
Witch Hunts, 1400-1800
Xhosa, 1857
Arab Outbreak, 7th Century CE
Arab-Israeli Wars, 1948-till date
Crusades, 1095-1291
Dutch Revolt, 1566-1609
Nigeria, 1990s, 2000s
War on Islamic terrorism (ISIS, Alqaeade, Alnusra front, etc)

If you add up all of the lives that were lost in the name of one religion or another, you come up with a staggering figure that is in excess of eight-hundred-million. That's eight-hundred-million. An eight, followed by eight zeros. So, even if the believers who are uneducated enough to think that Hitler, Stalin and Pot were psychotic mass murderers because they thought these men were atheists, it is horrifically clear that religious killings are muh more than those of atheism.

felixomor:
Hehehehe.
The 2 mouthed nation.

felixomor:
This is the Zuckerberg effect.



Dalaman, come and hail your people.

Abeg I no dey for this madness. No dey involve me for such nonsense abeg.