Dalaman's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dalaman's Profile › Dalaman's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 (of 265 pages)
Aaronsrod:A honest christian here. Winner01, you better learn from him. |
Butterflyleo:Ogbeni where did DSM-IV said that atheism is a mental illness as you lied? Shameless akuya. Keep telling lies for Jesus he must be very proud of you. |
Butterflyleo:Your question is totally useless and irrelevant to me. My aim was to show that other christians interprete the verse totally different from you and I've shown that. Go and argue with the holy spirit and them. Now you want to turn God's nature to future and past events abi? Well done. |
Butterflyleo:Will you shut up you shameless LIAR! YOU CLAIMED that DSM-IV said that atheism is a mental illness but nothing like that is said by the DSM-IV. You are a totally shameless liar. From the link on reddit it says that DSM-IV now qualify a mental disease known as oppositional defiant disorder(ODD) From the likes you posted from redit it says: TIL that the latest edition of the DSM (diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders), edited by the American Psychiatric Association added what they now qualify as a new mental disease : ODD, or oppositional defiant disorder. It is characterized by uncooperative, defiant, negativistic, irritable, and annoying behaviors toward parents, peers, teachers, and other authority figures On top of ODD, the DSM added New mental illnesses identified by the DSM-IV include arrogance, narcissism, above-average creativity, cynicism, and antisocial behavior. In the past, these were called “personality traits,” but now they’re diseases. So ODD is now atheism abi? Keep telling lies for Jesus. He must be very proud of you. |
Butterflyleo:Stop giving me your useless opinion. No where did any of them say that God's back means past events and his face future events like you said. Argue with them and the holy spirit, Mr lie lie. |
budaatum:You actually thought there was anything on the DSM-IV that comes close to the lies and nonsense Butterflyleo was talking about? He himself knows that he was lying and no such thing exist else he would have very quickly posted it for all to see. He claims people should always provide evidence for their claims but always fails to do that which he preaches. He is the greatest hypocrite here . |
Butterflyleo:Shut up you liar. None of them talked about God's nature as the past or future events as you stated. If they did then simply show it Mr lie lie. The writer already gave some hint of what he meant by God's nature. Here is what he wrote: "You cannot look Me full in the face [it is impossible for you to know everything about Me], but I will allow you to see my back [I will reveal to you a small portion of My nature so as not to overwhelm you].” God's nature is so overwhelming and it is impossible to know everything about it. Only a little partof it will be revealed so as not to overwhelm Noses according to the writer. Nothing like back parts of God meaning the past and God's face meaning future events. His explanations are totally different from yours. You can try to spin it but you remain a liar. Go and argue with the holy spirit Ogbeni. |
Butterflyleo:Ogbeni go and argue with the holy spirit that allowed your fellow christians to interpret the verse totally different from the way you did. None of them talked about God's nature or his back parts as the events that happened in the past and his face as the events that will happen in the future like you did. Go argue with the holy spirit and ask it questions. |
Butterflyleo:Stop making nonsense up. There is no context there apart from the nonsense you just made up out of thin air. As I said I can show you pages upon pages from other christians that have explained this verse that is totally different from the nonsense you are spewing here. The bible said God showed Moses his back parts, ,you lie lie says God showed Moses the past and showed John his face which is the future. Continue. When Isaiah said he saw the lord in Isaiah 6:1 did he say he saw the literal face of God? Context is all there is. One place talks of his goodness and the other talks of a literal figure on a throne but not his face.He said he saw God sitting on his throne, Jacob clearly said he SAW God face to face. If you say there are so many other explanations that is used to explain away those verses kindly list them here Mr ignorant liar. Drop the SO MANY other explanations here let's seeOk let's go. Just a simple google search but I'll just drop a few here. 1. On this particular occasion when Moses witnessed God’s glory, God chose to exhibit such a glorious light that it would have caused death if seen directly. It was for Moses’s benefit that he received the vision, but it is not a literal description of God. http://bibleq.net/answer/5346/ 2. THE PASSAGE MEANS WHAT IT SAYS! IT IS A STRAIGHT PASSAGE! THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE GROUNDS FOR SPIRITUALIZING, ALLEGORISING, OR INTERPRETING NON-LITERALLY. BUT, SO CALLED BIBLE "EXPERTS" ROUTINELY DO EXACTLY THIS - THEY INTERPRET IT NON-LITERALLY. I AM CONVINCED THE REAL REASON FOR THIS IS THEIR COWARDESS AND/OR WICKEDNESS. SORRY TO BE SO NASTY ABOUT IT - THEY WILL NOT BRING THEMSELVES TO FACE UP TO GOD'S STARK, REAL, ACTUAL, REALITY. Exodus 31 reminds us God wrote the Ten Commandments with his finger! God has fingers. http://www.creationoutreach.com/id472.html 3. Therefore, to protect Moses, God was only going to reveal that portion of His majesty and power that was humanly possible to absorb. God communicated this plan to Moses in a way we can all understand: “You cannot look Me full in the face [it is impossible for you to know everything about Me], but I will allow you to see my back [I will reveal to you a small portion of My nature so as not to overwhelm you].” https://www.google.com.ng/amp/s/www.gotquestions.org/amp/God-Moses-face-to-face.html 4. Therefore, we can see that whenever God is seen in the Old Testament, it is the pre-incarnate Christ. Moses was seeing the Word before it was made flesh or became flesh in the Old Testament. https://carm.org/who-did-moses-see-in-exodus As you can see all of them are totally different from the nonsense you had up there. You are such an ignorant dummy for sure.You want me to explain your made up nonsense for you? Keep waiting. |
frank317:The believers do NOT RESPECT your right to disbelief so why should any one respect their right to believe when they don't offer the same to others? Christians and Muslims are the worst when it comes to this they feel they are special and they alone know what they are doing. They will happily rub their beliefs on your faces while insulting and mocking you, but when you give them a tate of their own medicine na wahala. Bunch of shameless hypocrites. |
Butterflyleo:Ogbeni, stop making things up. There are so many explanations used to explain away these verse but I've never come across your own type of nonsense. Back parts means past and face means future abi? Stop talking about spiritual discernment because nothing like that exist in reality. All you guys do is give your own personal interpretation and opinion and say it is from this elusive holy spirit. I can simply google and give you totally different explanations of this verse from other christians who claim they got it from the holy spirit but their explanations are totally different from yours. Stop yapping nonsense. From Genesis you've ran to Isaiah but you've forgotten that even Isaiah himself has claimed to have seen God. Another contradiction to the statement that o man can see God and live. In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord, sitting on a throne, high and lifted up, and the train of His robe filled the temple (Isaiah 6:1). So God said nobody will see the future and live , yet you said John saw the future. Stop displaying you madness for all to see pls. |
superhumanist:Seriously I haven't as well. Making things up as you go is the name of the game. |
Butterflyleo:Too many words but no meaning at all. The bible said Jacob said he SAW God face to face. Go and argue with the writers of the bible. And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved (Genesis 32:30). Where did God in the verse say that he will NOT show Moses his goodness? According to the verse Yahweh only said Moses will not see hos face. No where in the verse did it say Yahweh said Moses will not see his goodness. In fact it says that hos goodness will pass before thee. Saying that his back parts are the past and his face the future is your own making. Remember you said Moses saw hos back parts which you claim to be his past and that John saw his face whichyou claim to be the future but the same verse said no one can see his face and live so how did John see his face and live if we are to go by your lie lie that his face means the future? If his face means the future then John can not see it and live as stated clearly in the verse. You remain a shameless liar. Now you want to turn your God to a liar just like you are. Weldone. |
Butterflyleo:The problem is you are a liar. Moses asked to see God's glory according to the verse and God told him he will show him his goodness. 18 And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory. 19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy. Then Yahweh according to the verse now said that no man can see his face and live. 20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live. 21 And the Lord said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock: 22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: 23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen God showed Moses his back parts but refused to show him his face according to the story. It is your own opinion and making that says God's back parts are the past. You also forgot that you said John saw his face which you claim is the future. Now you are shamelesslying lying thathis face here means hos real face. You are shameless as always. But other parts of the bible say Moses saw God face to face. So the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend (Exodus 33:11). Jacob also saw God's face. And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved (Genesis 32:30). |
CuteMadridista:They don't think through the nonsense they post. So there is this great place called heaven yet we are told that the angels who are supposed to live there rebelled against God abi? Some even ran down to earth to cone and mate with women according to the bible. You guys should keep propagating your ridiculous Jewish mythology and fiction. |
Butterflyleo:BUT your God said no man can see his face na. Now you are saying John saw his face. Well done. |
superhumanist:He is a usless remixer. His God's back parts are now the past while his face is now the future. Despite his God saying that no man cam see his face and live he still said John daw his face. See how he is remixing things uselessly. ![]() |
Butterflyleo:Your evidence to show that Moses wrote the book of Genesis is WHAT? The name of Moses was ONLY attached to the book according to tradition . There is NO evidence to show that Moses wrote the book. The fact is that Moses did NOT write the book. This is why I keep telling you that you need his spirit to understand anything about God. You read scripture as a novel but forgetting that the inspirer of those words was spiritual.So your God's back parts are the past and his face is the future abi? So John saw God's face when the verse very clearly said that no man can see God's face and live abi? Can you see how foolish you are? Or have you now turned your God to a liar like yourself? |
Butterflyleo:Ogbeni, simple explanation. How do you interact with this God of yours without sight, smell, touch and hearing? I am not interested in your meaningless and empty talk. You stated by throwing biblical verses that have nothing to do with how you interact with your God outside those means. Now you are hear yapping nonsense because you know it's nonsense. How many times have you told me and other atheist that they should bring bible verse on so that you'll explain it to them? You've even bragged that atheist should bring on the verses they feel are contradictory so that you'll explain to them that they are not. Now that you know you are talking nonsense you want to run away with your silly excuses. |
Butterflyleo:We are on a thread talking about the rise of christianity in China. You even lied that the number of christians in China is 3 times the number of christians in Nigeria. Remember that many Chinese people are atheist. How were the christians there able to convince them? Did the people that turned to christiabity have the spirit of your God first? Nope they didn't. Just admit that you can not clearly explain your point because they are nonsense and you can not make me see sense in them instead of all this mumbo jumbo you are talking about. |
superhumanist: ![]() This butterflyliar is very hilarious. He is lying and he KNOWS it which makes it worse for him. He dropped verses that do NOT show in any way how he observes or interacts with his God personally in anyway without sight, smell, touch and hearing yet he is still yapping total nonsense. |
Butterflyleo:You are a very empty barrel. 1. What is God? 2. It will make sense to me if you can demonstrate it clearly. People all over the world have been convinced to accept things they formerly did not believe in through proper explanation/ demonstration. Isn't that what you are always trying to do here when you engage me? Let's assume I don't believe in the existence of gravity and someone comes to explain what it is and how it functions. My disbelief has nothing to do with his explanations. What matters is his ability to clearly explana/ demonstrate his position so that I'll understand and be convinced. 3. All I did was ask you to explain how you interact with this God of yours without hearing, smelling, touching, seeing and feeling it and you threw a verse that does NOT show how you personally interact with the God of yoursoutside those means. A lot of times people who say nonsense never realise it and you are a very good example of that.You just gave a perfect description of yourself honestly speaking. |
Butterflyleo:You are talking nonsense and you know it. You claim that you interact with your God through other means outside feeling, touch, hearibg, sight and smell . I asked you to explain and you threw some verses that DO NOT show how YOU personally interact with your God outside those means and you are hear yapping nonsense. |
bloodofthelamb:Believing what? You can not believe in a vacuum? You can't believe without sight, smell, feeling and touch. |
Butterflyleo: ![]() I always knew you have no sense at all. What is this? I asked you how you interact with this God of yours and you are throwing mythical biblical verses at me. Let's have a look at the nonsense you posted. Romans 8:16 16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. 2) John 15: 26-27 26 “When the Advocate comes, whom I will send to you from the Father—the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father—he will testify about me. 27 And you also must testify, for you have been with me from the beginning. How do these passages show that YOU personally interact with this God of yours? |
budaatum:He has no evidence to show at all, all he has are lies? |
Butterflyleo:How do you interact with this God of yours outside smell, touch, sight and hearing? |
Butterflyleo:Lair. Nothing like what you said exist anywhere. You are to just prove your case instead of lying like a shameless akuya. |
Butterflyleo:Liar. It still remains a lie. That is why you are unable to tell me the page or just out up a simple photo shot of the document and post it here.You can't post what doesn't exist. Nothing like that exist anywhere. Mr lie lie. |
Butterflyleo:What's the tittle of the edition and which edition? On which page of the publication did they make the claim? |
Butterflyleo:You are the one making the claim na. Where is the manual? Where is it? |
Butterflyleo:Where is the report from DSM-IV that says that atheism is a mental illness? I searched online and did not see anything like that. Where is it Ogbeni? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 (of 265 pages)

