₦airaland Forum

Toks2008:
Let us even leave emotions out of it and let's talk logic.

I keep saying that if I'm an Atheist, I will believe there is GOD not for any reason perse but the fact that it will cost me nothing.

In fact, out of curiosity i will gladly believe because the bible says we will know him more when we get to paradise so why not for the sake of curiosity just believe and if you die and realize GOD is a scam i bet you have nothing and i mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO LOSE so Wettin be the issue?, its not hat you will be punished if you die believing and realize he does not exist.

This is why I just conclude that Athiest have a vendetta against GOD as a result of a bad experience in their life and not that they have any logical reason for not believing in the existence of GOD.

Toks2008:
No they are not fools but they are only ignorant in their reasoning.

They want to reason out GOD but unfortunately, GOD is too mysterious and he is beyond human comprehension.

So because they could not comprehend him, they say GOD does not exist.

They believe their shoes were made by someone, they believe their clothes were created by someone and they even agree that there is a force that brought this earth to be but they don't believe that force was created by an entity Called GOD.

IAmSabrina:
Cc. Frank317, LordReed, Dantedasz et al

"Possession" only seems to occur within religions that embrace the idea that it can happen. "Possession" also seems to take place among people who are highly susceptible and are overly-pious. It seems that when the mind starts to twist due to other factors, the environment in which the subject is contributes to the phenomenon.

I keep coming back here and haven't seen anything yet in this thread from Shadeyinka thus far that has made me retract the above statement. Rather than bumping the thread repeating the same arguments, this thread should be closed. Really, its a shock how this thread hasn't died already

sinaj:
Ha!

If you dance like this in my area, you will take an oath after the burial to prove that you didnt kill your mother inlaw

sinaj:
the girl spoiling someones business

LordReed:
I am trying to confirm a stunt he pulled were he was crucified with real nails through his hands. If this report is true then Safran is a pretty extreme guy so I don't know how someone can say for sure that he was not just being his extreme self during the exorcism.

LordReed:
The question then is how do you know it got out of hand? Satire has the tendency to use real issues exaggerated for effect so how do we conclude Safran is not exaggerating if he refuses to confirm or deny any speculation?

LordReed:
Its a baffling situation. I look back and ask myself, was I this dumb as a christian?

LordReed:
The thing I found to joke about was the satirical show you brought as evidence, the show that won best comedy series. How am I supposed to take a best comedy series seriously?

elated177:
Dantedasz, are you going to explain to me why Apostle Paul didn't include the virgin birth of the Messiah in any of his letters?

Originakalokalo:
What's your point?

shadeyinka:
I know you don't believe that demons exist but
Are you afraid of asking questions?

You know that love cannot be explained rationally. Does it make it unreal?

shadeyinka:
I just watched your drama.

No Deliverance is like this.
1. A Demonized cannot bilocate ( be in two places at the same time)
2. Doors don't open, shut and things break during deliverance.
3. Demons don't physically appear during deliverance


I could go on. Your view of the demonic is highly skewed and unrealistic: based on Hollywood idea.

Your view is like expecting some humans to be like superman, Spiderman, Hulk and batman! Highly unrealistic!

shadeyinka:
Any evidence that it is an acting?

Or could it be that you are obstinately not considering consistencies and inconsistencies of the poor acting.

If I may ask, why do you consider it a poor acting?

jcross19:
we are missing things here! first bible of today were written a script, a scroll or parchment before it was compiled to be in a single book! in 4 centuries AD when they compiled the bible a decree was made by then ceaser Constantine and many scrolls were examined, more than 1000 scriptures were gathered but only the few were compiled together while others were burnt and the remain were kept in the Vatican archive. in Ethiopian Coptic bible contains more than 88 or 100 books . if you doubt it google is your friend.

CAPSLOCKED:
IT'S NOT JUST A STUPID ANALOGY. ONLY A MAD ADULT HUMAN WILL MAKE UP SOMETHING SO UNREASONABLE JUST TO BACK UP A DEITY THEY BELIEVE WITHOUT EVIDENCE FOR IT'S EXISTENCE.
I HARDLY REPLY SUCH TOPICS CUS I FEEL LIKE A FOOL ENGAGING IN SUCH NONSENSE.
BABIES CAN'T EVEN TALK WITH EACHOTHER IN REAL LIFE NOT TO TALK OF WHILE THEY IN THE WOMB.
THE WHOLE THING WITH THIS STEADILY RIDICULED 1945 ANALOGY IS JUST POINTLESS.

Dantedasz:
Saul/Paul never( in any of his writings and numerous letters) mentioned the virgin birth of Jesus Christ. Why did the authors of the gospels of Mathew and Luke insert virgin birth stories into the Bible?