₦airaland Forum

Yoruba are the Best! We just don't like fighting.

There is no real picture of the earth or any planet or stars or galaxies or black holes, it is all CGI computer generated Imagery. No man or any spacecraft has ever been out of earth's atmosphere. If they argue, ask about van Allen radiation belt. Even NASA agents admit they can't pass through it. How did they get signal from the so called Juno on Jupiter? Is there another camera there capturing Juno?

NASA keeps lying to you guys! When will you wake up? show me 25 thousand satellites nasa claimed orbiting the earth. We hear everything, yet, No real photo! All we see is CGI.

Teempakguy, What triggered The Earth's spin?

Tinubu's teeth are now white!

Evolutionists, please answer this question.

God created the Heavens and the Earth. evolution is only a theory ,the only thing evolution has ever created is stupid atheist there are such big holes in this stupid theory you can park a bus in it - it takes more faith to believe in this nonsense ,atheist are religious about evolution - it is a religion for the feeble minded

johnydon22:
Sorry for the delay my brother, work isn't giving me much NL time



Yes, means this universe is almost certainly not the first to have existed or the last to



Our existence is no more than a mere blink in the cosmic duration, so we almkst certainly will be long gone from the cosmic field before these events happen.

I will invite you and HCpaul to my thread 'Songs of the worlds' Come and enjoy the orchestra.

Sadly, evolutionists use the fallacy that, you don’t need any intellect, design, information and purpose to produce anything and everything that exists.
The magic ingredient is time, just wait long enough and it will happen. If it doesn’t happen just give it more time.
I call that blind faith.

This is not the universe and its wonder. These are computer generated Images by Nasa. NASA= National Association of Space Animation. Even no real photo of earth, all we have been shown is CGI. We are tired already.

Nice!

davien:
DNA

How?

Where is evolutions source? Where does evolution get its power? How does evolution hold itself together? What stimulates evolution? What gives evolution the position and the authority to determine the future? What gives evolution the desire to pick the colors? What gives evolution the authority to pick sound? What gives Evolution the authority to determine law? Or where does evolution get its Authority and power to determine length and width and height? Where does evolution get its Authority and its power to determine shapes? or where does evolution determine how something should or shouldn't be? If evolution is the thing that gave you your life too. then please answer that for me.

Sefiu, I pity you, you are the one cutting it.

sinaj:
Dawdy I just wnt thru urz nd ur

No 7 nd 9 kinda convinced me tho

Nd ur 21 got me laughing



Ok Dawdy how u gonna xplain d different time zone to me.

Watch this youtube video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFv-1C4pMn4 to know how time zone works in flat earth model.

Teempakguy:
Dawdy, come and debunk these.

I've already provided 200 proofs against the spinning ball earth. Read more here http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html?m=1

See

tartar9:
You can't feel the effect of the earths rotation or movement because its gravity carries you along,so the relative velocity here is zero.How many times would you be told

And what is gravity if I may ask? Isn't the unproven lie? Sorry, it's called theory?

Teempakguy:
I like it when people try to assume that the millions of scientists in the world that are desperately working to unravel the mystery that the universe holds are a bunch of idiots. while they themselves do little to educate them on what has already been found.

this your question is pointless. let me ask you a better question.


Archeological findings shows that Chimpanzees and humans share similar characteristics. and that they share basic physical and behavioral traits. now, why aren't humans evolving into chimpanzees anymore? does this mean the school of thought was just a fallacy? why aren't humans becoming chimpanzees? after all, they share the same heritage. humans HAVE to become chimpanzees. or the theory of evolution is wrong.


the fact is, you have nothing more to do with a chimpanzee than you have anything to do with your cousin in the village. your bloodlines have diverged. what you share is ancestral traits. not a magical tendency to morph into one another. you and chimpanzees are cousins. incredibly distant cousins. and in fact, the difference between chimpanzees and humans will only increase into the future. because we're going our own way, and they're going their own way.



please avoid dawdy as much as you can. for the most part, he doesn't even know what he's talking about.

Just look at the bolded above. a gross misunderstanding of BASIC scientific principles.
dawdy, i propose an experiment for you. have yourself drugged and transported into a huge luxury ship. when you wake up, the ship will either be moving at constant speed or standing still. I challenge you to conduct an experiment that will determine if the ship is moving or not. and that will work every time. if you succeed, call me a goat. if you don't, we can all continue to ridicule you for being one.

Teempakguy, before you avoid me, one question I have with your so called experiment why we don't feel the Earth spin and your comparison with ship or driving in a car is that when in a ship or car we are traveling in a straight line direction, however on the spinning Earth we are going in a circular direction. And when you are in a car and you go around a corner or curve in the highway for example, you will feel some centripetal force which is the acceleration towards the center point of the radius of the curve or turn. We can feel this at very low speeds too. Shouldn't we feel this on the Earth which is spinning at 1000 miles per hour at the equator? In Calgary we are spinning (supposedly) at 600 mph. Yet there is no feeling of spin at all. If I was on a carousel I would definitely feel it spinning even at low speeds!

A Nigerian engineer who has created what he describes as a 100% Nigerian tractor is looking for more investment to expand production
Timothy Addigi Terfa has called the tractor Ijodo, meaning labour in A Nigerian engineer who has created what he describes as a 100% Nigerian tractor is looking for more investment to expand production
Timothy Addigi Terfa has called the tractor Ijodo, meaning labour in the Tiv language.
He says: "My greatest desire is that someone out there will be encouraged and motivated to do something with the ideas they have to make Nigeria better."
See more on BBC Africa Live -> http://bbc.in/297QZ0E

Aregbesola is trying to christianize osun state.

johnydon22:
Waste of time bro, waste of time... this is someone who still cling to medieval astrology : flat earth, aether, geocentric universe, static earth.

Complete waste of time, dont bother

Is it my fault if I refuse to accept bullshit? The only proof you have to support heliocentric model is gravity. Then I challenged you to prove gravity. You couldn't. Electromagnetism and other forces can be proven and practicalized. How come gravity can't be? Besides, let us be realistic, do you know how these things work? Have you done researched yourself? Can you observe them yourself? You don't own a telescope! Do you? Or you rely on people's speculations and theories to judge realities?

How can you be so sure that cartoon photos and videos you have been shown are the reality happens out there? With the so called thousands of satellite orbiting the earth, there is no time lapse video to prove it. Just Nasa cartoons have been shown all this while. How can any in his right sense
think we live on a spinning ball shooting through the universe at 490,000 miles an hour where the Milky Way galaxy moves with us and the sun? yet it doesn't tear apart, neither do we feel anything.

Prove big Bang theory. Tell us how something came from nothing. IF energy and mass can't be created or destroyed, then how/where did the Big Bang get its start?

Here is a link to read more about it http://humansarefree.com/2013/12/9-scienctific-facts-prove-theory-of.html?m=0 evolution is hoax.

The "Living Fossil" Fish Proves Evolution is Wrong

The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land. This myth was exploded in December, 1938 when a live Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman's net off the eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and eating the fish for years.


It did not have half-formed legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that people thought was extinct. Evolutionist claimed the 350 million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs, feet, and lungs.

This not the case. We now see that the fish recently caught is exactly like the 350 million-year-old fossil. It did not evolve at all.

The Coelacanth is a star witness against the false theory of evolution. After 350 million years, the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on.

Scientific Fact No. 2 - Species Without a Link Prove Evolution Theory is Wrong

The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic, and scientific proof.

Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking species and claim they evolved one from another. The human "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes.

Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture.

This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. (...)

The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.

Close to the Missing Link -- Oldest Human Ancestor Discovered






A monkey species that has become extinct. Lots of species have become extinct. Millions of species have become extinct.

It is obviously not similar to a human. Look at the feet with the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee, not like people.

A newly discovered extinct species does not prove a "missing link" has been found.

Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution." Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species.

Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong.

The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals, and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species.

All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect, and plant would be different.

The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.

9 Scientific Facts Prove the "Theory of Evolution" is False

Scientific Fact No. 1 - Birds Prove Natural Selection is Naturally Wrong

The body and soul of Darwin's Theory of Evolution was the idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations.

Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates between the old species and the new.

The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many flaws.

One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly.

Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment.

Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless? The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection.

According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly.

We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed.

Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution: the natural selection.

Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another. Take fish for example.

We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times.

Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story.

The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water.

One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard.

Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.

Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not reach.

One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of them. The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie.

The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an undergrowth eater. The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of Natural Selection.

Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of the river. This is typical logic of an evolutionist.

Evolution is Scientifically Impossible

Evolution is a theory developed one hundred and forty years ago by Charles Darwin (N/A actually, by his grandfather in 1794 - before Charles was even born), before science had the evidence available to prove the theory false.

His famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, has a title that is now known to be scientifically false. New species cannot evolve by natural selection. Modern scientific discoveries are proving evolution to be impossible. No new scientific discoveries have been found to support the Theory of Evolution.

Life did not start with a bolt of lightning striking a pond of water as claimed by the main stream scientists.

Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough time. This is a false statement without any scientific support.

They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys at random and eventually type President's Abraham Lincoln Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense.

Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly.

What are the odds that a simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places? Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible. (...)

The Indoctrination System Called "Education"

The educational system teaches children not to think. Any student who uses logic and solid scientific evidence to question the Theory of Evolution is ridiculed and insulted into submission. The students who submit become non-thinking robots who dare not question the dogma presented.

A forth-grade elementary school class was observed at the park playing a three-legged race game, where adjacent legs of the two kids were placed into a bag. The kids must cooperate with each step in order to run. The kids thought it was great fun. The teacher told them they were being trained to cooperate.

Actually, it was brainwashing kids into conforming to a system in which they are not allowed to have individual thoughts or opinions. They must become a "team player" and submit to peer pressure. Communist countries have used this same brainwashing technique for decades.

The brainwashing of school children continues by teaching them there is no absolute right or wrong, and the teacher is absolutely positive about it.

Whatever the children think is right for them is OK. That is of course until they question evolution. They are then told they are wrong. This brainwashing results in children who are unable to think logically, scientifically, and accurately. (...)

[Darwinian Evolution cannot be observed and replicated in order to be scientifically validated and also there is not one single known case of a change of kinds]

visijo:
please what is the meaning of OP? I have been seeing it on any thread.

Original poster

cooljude:
I think with people like you the future is gloomy for this country. you would rather believe that aeroplane is the white man witchcraft instead of understanding the underlining principle.

People like me want to know the fact. We don't want speculations to replace fact. Besides, the wonder and the might of God shouldn't denied due the wrong observations.

cooljude:
I think with people like you the future is gloomy for this country. you would rather believe that aeroplane is the white man witchcraft instead of understanding the underlining principle.

.

Poster is a liar, they all depend on theory to explain what is unexplainable. That is how the big bang theory (the biggest hoax) became what people think as fact. Imagine to think "something came from nothing" yet people accepted it without questioning.

@op, are the driver for the kids's father? they look like Ajebutter while you look like Ajepakko

@op, are the driver for the kids's father? they look like Ajebutter while you look like Ajepakko