₦airaland Forum

Hmnnn is walimah not a marriage rite ?? My islamic studies is rusty sha

As Aisha don go AWOL, wetin make baba do? make baba dey dance soapy abi ?? congrat Baba jare

We will all die one day wether you support Buhari or u are against him..... Orun maa yo mi gbogbo lan lo

may his soul rest in peace,, my favorite Twitter guy even though i am not on twitter, his tweets are entertaining u know where he stands on issues. Great Loss

why all this “perambulation“ the guy don talk say make dem carry am go court

i am imagining the guy saying it in yoruba so the VP can understand...beeni emi ni mo sobe carry me go court lobatan

Abio...they will argue it in court, wasting taxpayer money on a futile case . Anyway this is Nigeria

Bolustical:
Argue with the Cybercrime Act 2015 (signed by GEJ and passedPDP-led NASS), the Court and the DSS.

Ok?

U cannot cyber bully a public Figur...

Bolustical:
Goodluck Jonathan, in 2015, signed the “CYBERCRIME Act 2015” It was passed by a PDP-led NASS. This covers the Cyber-bullying charge that Sowore is being charged with.

The fact that you are not aware of its existence does not mean it doesn't exist.

The DSS has its legal department and it took them 45 days to come up with such charges, they are not daft.

One thing I have always said about young 'activists' is our impulsive nature and our inability to think things through before doing them.

I am sure Sowore sef isn't aware that this law exists and it would be used to nail him.

It's until you offend the government that you'd know that some laws and charges you can never imagine exist.

Bu some amala buka in.bodija make more than 500k a day..

So they deserve to be butchered for that abi ?? ....

So why did he lie that his Certificates are with military Board if he is not rquired to provide them

senatordave1:
Buhari chose part b and c sir according to the petitions before the tribunal

Buhari chose path A..according to what u posted he must produce his certificate (
a) above requires a candidate relying on same to produce a Certificate evidencing that he has passed the Secondary School Examination, a candidate relying on

senatordave1:
From that post,it is crystal clear that buhari is qualified to contest as president even more than atiku

This case is different...has nothing to do with Atiku

Flyingngel:
I don't knw why Atiku will decide to pursue this case bearing in mind that the outcome of all these is as plain as the morning sky.
As far as the last presidential election is concern, there is no independent Supreme court; though there is no different between Atiku and this present administration.

Yinmu , ugly guy like u ...even if am gay i wont touch with 2 m pole

Youthleader22:
Can someone pls tell the gay guy deji68 to stop quoting me? I feel irritated by your quotes

Well like i said...it is wrong for big man to deal with any Nigerian... u are happy now, when one big guy deal with u na karma...for me i pray for a Nigeria where everybody have equal right l

lexy2014:
Since he said his mind that d big man is too small 4 him, y u come de complain? As he said his mind that its d big mans bosses that he rolls with, y did he run? Y didn't he call d big man's bosses 4d police men?

NB: do u no 4 sure if it is d big man that is responsible 4 bobriskys present predicament

i know u are ignorant...my message was not for you, it is for the people you are trying to mislead , no one should not be ashamed of his or her sexuality or are you ashamed of your skin colour sexuality and skin colour are inborn you cant change it......

Youthleader22:
Please if you know you are a gay or gay don’t ever quote me here again or else I will call the police on you. Una no dey shame?

What is against the law ? his sexuality is never against the law . right to sexuality is fundamental human right

The right to sexuality incorporates the right to express one's sexuality and to be free from discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. In specific, it relates to the human rights of people of diverse sexual orientations, including lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people, and the protection of those rights, although it is equally applicable to heterosexuality. The right to sexuality and freedom from discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is based on the universality of human rights and the inalienable nature of rights belonging to every person by virtue of being human.

Youthleader22:
It’s against the law. It’s 14 years imprisonment according to the law. EFCC has to also check how he makes his money.

So it is Ok for a Nigerian like you and me, to be harassed by a Big man for saying his mind ..... SMH

lexy2014:
Y u de worry 4d guy/lady? I thought he said he rolls with d big bosses? Wetin make am run?

www.vanguardngr.com/2019/08/bobrisky-blasts-dg-arts-and-culture-otunba-segun-runsewe/amp/

Well, i hope they have something criminal against him. If not harassing him because of his sexuality is wrong.

kikake:
From the too many uncovered lies and contradictions coming from INEC and PMB's lawyers, it can take only judges from war-torn Yemen to not annul PMB's victory.

e be like say dem give baba one Geisha one Najeriya

I got your point, what i meant was that the ND budget is only to augment the state effort .There other FG intervention projects in ND,Like amnesty, various project sponsored by ministries e,g Works, housing, Health, even constituency projects, In light of this and i think the Budget is enough if managed properly. Like i said there various uncompleted projects embarked upon by ND ministry , if Akpabio can complete some them in the next 3,5 years for me that is a job well done

obailala:
Niger Delta states all have allocations but that's not the point here, the point is that as the ND minister, Akpabio with a budget less than 10% of what he played with as governor, will now be saddled with the responsibility of distributing projects across 9 states, as opposed to just one.

I agree with you on states like Delta, Bayelsa and even Lagos; Lagos might claim to have a large urban space and population, but I still think that excuse doesnt sell when one considers the massive revenue.

Well. all the states in the the Niger Delta have their own allocation. i dont think he is going to administer all these states. There are lot of uncompleted project in the Niger Delta abandoned by this same ministy. like u said let wait an see how he goes about the JOb. Big allocation no mean nothing ooo there are some state that cannot account for their big allocation or revenue , Delta, even Lagos

obailala:
Akpabio was able to do some beautiful things in Akwa Ibom because of the sheer size of money that state had. Akwa Ibom can easily be said to be the richest state by far in Nigeria and when you consider the massive allocation the state gets vs what Akpabio actually did, you will realise he was that wonderful.

Meanwhile, the allocation of the ND ministry is nothing to write home about (less than 10%) compared to the funds which were at his disposal as governor. To compound matters, Niger delta covers 9 states. It would be interesting to see what he can do with little or no funds to play with.

Love Holland...,, beautiful country, i like the countryside

I like the guy , he will do a great job...but he is corrupt sha, like all of them

Well i find this case compelling too that why APC want the server issue, 11 contested state and CF001 palavar expunged ... Adeleke was robbed it has nothing to do with justice, may the justice prevailthis time if not Baba has only 3,5 years left

Dansuqi:
I agree.thats what you should have said originally.whoever wins will not affect me much.but on a personal level,i feel atiku has no case if you compare it to the osun polls.adeleke actually won the main polls,he had a strong case but due to his team's laxity,judges and maybe fate he lost at the courts.atiku case is nowhere near.but if we wins,so be it

Well, win or lose doesnt affect me . hope justice is done even if not...life goes on

Dansuqi:
My anger is that when atiku loses finallyyou will disappear as usual.

abio Baba is still young enough to contest in 2023, he should file his form CF001 properly in 2023 with original certi

Dansuqi:
Yes.oga,that petition is worthless.forget about aso rock,look at 2023

ok ooo the APC lawyers should have requested for it... at least put up a defence using the line of thought. they didnt but Dansuqi want to do their work for them

Dansuqi:
Give us a specimen of an error prone result sheet

ok... so result sheets are not concrete evidence abi ?

Dansuqi:
There is no concrete evidence of such manipulations

How ?

JosEast:
P.D.P! P.D.P! be careful...Do not cause harm to this nation

The candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the February 23 presidential election, Atiku Abubakar and his party, PDP, have called upon the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal to grant all reliefs, including declaring the opposition standard bearer winner of the election as prayed in their petition.

The petitioners, in their final address filed on August 14, through their lead counsel, Dr. Levy Uzoukwu (SAN), also said they had proved their claim that President Muhammadu Buhari did not possess the minimum academic qualification of a secondary school certificate to contest for the presidency.



INEC had declared Buhari and his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), winner of the election, having scored majority of the lawful votes cast at the poll.

But Atiku and PDP challenged the declaration, saying Buhari did not win the election.

Atiku and PDP in their petition filed at the tribunal on March 18, 2019, also alleged electoral irregularities allegedly perpetrated by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in support of Buhari and APC by the agents of the federal government, including the military.

The tribunal had on August 1 adjourned till August 21 for the adoption of final addresses by parties shortly after the respondents closed their defence against the petition of Atiku and PDP.

The petitioners had called in 62 witnesses and tendered plethora of documents, including video evidence to prove their claims.

While Buhari called in only seven witnesses and tendered few documents in defence of his victory at the poll, INEC and the APC said they would be relying on the testimonies made by the petitioners’ witnesses during their cross-examination.

However, Atiku and the PDP in the final address, asked the tribunal to nullify the election of Buhari since they have been able to adduce evidence to the fact that he was not qualified to run in the first place.

Besides, they said they had proved all allegations contained in their petition against the conduct of the presidential election by the INEC.

According to them, five major issues for determination by the five-member tribunal, headed by Justice Mohammed Garba, include whether Buhari at the time of the election was qualified to contest the election.

“Whether Buhari submitted to INEC affidavit containing false information of fundamental nature in aid of his qualification for the said election.

“Whether from the pleadings and evidence led it was established that Buhari was duly elected by majority of lawful votes cast at the election.

“Whether the presidential election conducted by INEC on February 23 was invalid by reason of corrupt practices; and

“Whether the presidential election conducted by INEC on February 23 was invalid by reason of non-compliance with the Electoral Act, 2010 as amended, the Electoral Guidelines 2019 and manuals issued for the conduct of the election,” they said.

In their 43-page final address, Atiku and PDP claimed to have established the fact that Buhari does not possess the requisite academic qualification for the position of president.

The petitioners said even Buhari’s own witnesses under cross-examination admitted to the fact that Buhari did not possess a school certificate, being the basic requirements for contesting for the office of the president.

“We, therefore, submit that all the purported evidence led by the second respondent (Buhari) to prove that he attended a secondary school or a primary school or that he attended some courses is irrelevant because he did not rely on any of those purported qualifications in exhibit P1, he relied on primary school certificate, WASC and Officer Cadet.

“Equally futile is his attempt to prove that he can speak and write in the English language. That is all irrelevant to his inability to produce his primary school certificate, secondary school certificate or WASC and his Officer Cadet qualification, whatever that means. Officer Cadet is not a qualification or certificate under the constitution and Electoral Act; nor is it known to any law,” they said.

On the purported Cambridge University certificate tendered by Buhari before the tribunal, the petitioners asked why “it was easier for Buhari to go all the way to Cambridge in the United Kingdom to obtain a bogus documents that his own witnesses said was not a certificate, instead of just driving down the street in Abuja to the Army Headquarters or placing a phone call to the Secretary of the Military Board in Abuja to hurry over with his certificate or certificates.”

Still on the Cambridge University documents, the petitioners submitted that, “a comparison of the purported Cambridge Assessment International Education Certifying Statement of the purported West African Examination Council (WAEC) certificate and a certified true copy of the purported confidential result sheet of the University of Cambridge West African School Certificate of 1961 for the Provincial Secondary School, Katsina reveals many discrepancies in the supposed result.

“One listed eight subjects that the candidate therein mentioned one ‘Mohammed Buhari’ allegedly sat for, the other six subjects; both documents are therefore unreliable as both cannot be correct. The contradiction must count against the second respondent.

Another false claim by Buhari, according to the petitioners, is that he attended “Elementary School, Daura and Mai Aduwa 1948-52.”

“Elementary School Daura is totally different from Mai Aduwa – their locations are totally different,” the petitioners said.

He also claimed he entered Middle School, Katsina in 1953.

However, the petitioners said by 1953, the Middle School system had been abolished in the Northern Region of Nigeria.

On the claim that his certificates were with the military, the petitioners said Buhari failed woefully to prove the claim, “rather the petitioners’ evidence to the contrary was not contested nor challenged.”

The petitioners also argued that they have successfully proved that the Nigerian Army had denied being in possession of Buhari’s alleged certificates.

“One of the strongest evidence on the issue was given by the second respondent’s own witness, RW1, General Paul Tarfa (rtd), who under cross-examination by the first respondent (INEC), told the court firmly and unequivocally that the Army did not collect the certificates of military officers and added, ‘there was no such thing”.

On the issue of rigging and non-compliance with the Electoral Act, the petitioners said with the plethora of evidence tendered and witnesses called, they had been able to show to the tribunal that Buhari’s election was invalid.

They added that analysis of results from 11 states showed how INEC in connivance with Buhari and the APC wrongly and unlawfully credited Buhari with votes not valid or lawful.

According to them, documents tendered before the tribunal showed huge discrepancies between collated results as contained in the tendered Certified True Copies of forms EC8A and polling units.

They further alleged that a total of 2, 906,384 votes were cancelled across the country, while 2, 698,773 Nigerians were disenfranchised.

They said the two figures when added exceeded the 3, 928,869 differential between the votes as stated in INEC form EC8E.

In addition, they said they had led evidence to show that INEC violated its own regulations and guidelines with respect to mandatory use of the smart card reader in the process of accreditation, which according to them occasioned over voting thereby rendering the election null and void.

They therefore prayed the tribunal to grant all the reliefs sought for in their petition.

https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2019/08/16/declare-us-winner-of-presidential-election-atiku-pdp-tell-tribunal/