DieVluit's Posts

Nairaland Forum › DieVluit's Profile › DieVluit's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 87 pages)

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:46pm On Mar 28, 2015

EVarn:
what is this xenophobic piece of red poop talking about?.send the SANDF to where?
you better cage that wild beast you call an opposition leader first before dreaming of "saving" us from an imaginary post election crisis.

Is the "good luck" also xenophobic?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:28pm On Mar 28, 2015

Good luck on the vote count, Nigerians. Don't fark this one up. We don't wanna have to send the SANDF to save you.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 9:57pm On Mar 24, 2015

As of today.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 10:10am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
under the Nigerian earth crust.

You have an atomic bomb under the "Nigerian earth crust"?

Wow.

A new one is born everyday.

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 10:10am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
we have the later under our earth crust,waiting to be harvested for the greater doom of our enemies.

That's like saying crude = diesel.

You clearly have no clue what you are talking about.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 9:52am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
we have the means.

As demonstrated where?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 7:50am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
Perhaps you do not understand the dynamics of nuclear proliferation.

What does this even mean. Explain it. What is "the dynamics of nuclear proliferation.

I can bet my last dollar that you don't even know what those words mean.

EVarn:
Iran isnt in any trouble,infact iran may be given legal liberty under international laws to have nuclear weapons if the US is reckless enough to sign the new nuclear resolution between them.

If Iran has not been allowed to complete its programme - and has not completed its programme, how do you know that they have the means to complete it? You don't. You are just saying that they can without any evidence.

Iran has to date been founds to be proceeding along a programme of uranium enrichment, but has so far been deemed to be far from a bomb.

http://thediplomat.com/2014/05/is-iran-ten-years-away-from-a-nuclear-bomb/

The former head of Israel’s nuclear agency says that Iran is at least a decade away from acquiring an operational nuclear weapon.

According to Israeli media outlets, Brigadier General (res.) Uzi Eilam, who served for ten years as the head of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, said that it would take Iran a decade to acquire a nuclear deterrent, and it might not even be seeking one.

“The Iranian nuclear program will only be operational in another 10 years,” Eilam said Ynet News reported. “Even so, I am not sure that Iran wants the bomb.”

EVarn:
South africa has enriched uranium,enough to make a few bombs.but we have high caliber uranium enough to sink this planet.

What on earth is high-calibre uranium? You don't even know.

You have raw uranium like you have crude. In the end, it means nothing when it comes to making atomic bombs. You are nowhere.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 7:43am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
Your antagonistic stance is indeed amusing.tell me what is untrue about anything i said.

You do not have the ability or the means to produce a nuclear bomb.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 7:33am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
33 pound of weapon grade uranium will build a nuclear bomb effective enough to wipe out a cluster of towns,dont agrandize your meagre nuclear materials,you talk as if 200kg of uranium is enough to sink a galaxy.
How many kilograms of enriched uranium did the first atomic bomb contain?.hiroshima is barely the size of maiduguri.
We also have high caliber uranium,even if it isnt enriched,it is still highly radioactive; if oscillated at a supersonic speed,at a very high temperature in a supercharged atmosphere,the resulting detonation will be very devastating.

Actually, South Africa has enough to power up to six bombs.

That's a lot of bombs by any measure.

Again, Nigeria has nothing - and will continue to have nothing. Your insistence that you also have uranium (which is raw uranium) only serves to show that you dont know what you are talking about. That's like insisting that you have crude when the topic is diesel - which you can't produce to meet your needs.

3 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 7:18am On Mar 24, 2015

EVarn:
Iran has the skills and equippments needed to discover a nuclear weapon,it doesnt matter if they dont yet have nuclear bombs,they will soon.
Yes,North Korea will offer us nuclear training and capacity,infact,they could even sell dozens of nuclear warheads to us,afterall they once offered us missile technology.if we had taken up their offer,we would have been able to pound saudi arabia,morocco,south africa and even the US from the comfort of our parlours.

Iran is in trouble because it has been trying to enrich uranium for years. A process which todate is not complete. South Africa already has weapons grade nuclear fuel. Enough to make at least three nuclear bombs the size of the one that dropped in Hiroshima. At least.

Look at the South African circle - it is dark red in the middle. That means South Africa has bomb grade uranium already - and is the only country in the red category that has that.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 8:34pm On Mar 23, 2015

agaugust:
You are asking me to start a new argument on US Army recruitment policy on an African military thread, does that make sense to you? I said @Patches is simply copy pasting free internet information from websites available on simply google search done inside his Soweto bedroom.
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/enlistedjobs/a/11b.htm
http://www.usarec.army.mil/
Invest your time on US Army recruitment policy if you have nothing else to debate on. Mumu
.

You already are in the argument. It was fine until you were asked for more than your word, wasn't it?

Nowhere do these links support anything you said.

A joke.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 7:41pm On Mar 23, 2015

agaugust:
I am not copy pasting procedure, I am educating your ANC imprisoned minds to know that US Army does not discriminate in recruitment of combat soldiers based on their BSc degree course of study. There are accountants, school teachers, sociologists, lawyers, and people who have never been to university all in the US Army as combatants, that's what they want, chose to be and passed the relevant tests, exams, training, etc.

US Army don't force people into a corps or department they don't want to service, it's voluntary service NOT conscription.

Olodos
.

In short, you are telling us that we should take your word for it.

What that means, simply, is that you can't back up what you are saying.

No surprises there.

The question is whether an accountant's MOS is 11B or 36B. This entire post of yours is irrelevant; and designed to make it look like you are addressing the question - when you really aren't.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:46pm On Mar 23, 2015

agaugust:
Are you sick?

You sit down inside South Africa using google search to copy and paste US Army recruitment information that is freely available to every human being that has internet at home and you are saying other people don't know it, are you sick? You ever joined US Army before?

You are a clueless internet addict scooping free public information from Google
.

Beats your "it is so cause I say so" argument. If what you say is the proper procedure, then it should be published. But it isn't.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:44pm On Mar 23, 2015

Henry120:
You are delusional.

Doesn't change the fact that enriching uranium is not something that Nigeria is capable of doing. Nigeria is even struggling to refine crude to produce sufficient diesel for its needs. And you think that having raw uranium means you can enrich it?

Again ----->

Koeberg nuclear power station is a nuclear power station in South Africa. It is currently the only commercial one in the country, and the sole commercial one in the entire African continent. It is located 30 km north of Cape Town, near Melkbosstrand on the west coast of South Africa. Koeberg is owned and operated by the country's only national electricity supplier, Eskom. The two reactors at the station form the cornerstone of the South African nuclear program.

You don't have it.

Nigerians should stop dreaming.

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 11:24am On Mar 23, 2015

Msauza:
THAT IS FOR NIGERIYOOO, ONLY ONE OF IT AT THE CENTER OF ABUJA WILL BRING THE WHOLE OF NIGERIA TO A STAND STILL AND RUN TO WASHINGTON FOR HELP.

LOL they claim to be a power of sorts, yet...

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 11:22am On Mar 23, 2015

MikeCZAR:
It seems you're the illiterate one here, cause you can't comprehend what I'm telling you.
Your fighter jets stay on the ground at night and during bad weather.
All your jets would intercepted from behind and from the flanks all will be shot, cause thee Gripen will always have a upper hands.
They won't even know what shot them down.

He'd have a much easier time being honest. Like he is on Beegeagle.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:12pm On Mar 22, 2015

agaugust:
DieVluit is it true that you are female ?
.

What are you on about?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 4:19pm On Mar 22, 2015

Why SA’s nuclear stash worries US

March 17 2015 at 10:32am
By Douglas Birch and R Jeffrey Smith
The US is concerned about the security of a quarter-ton of uranium stored near Pretoria, which it fears could fall into the wrong hands, write Douglas Birch and R Jeffrey Smith.

Washington - Enough nuclear explosive to fuel half a dozen bombs, each powerful enough to obliterate central Washington or most of Lower Manhattan, is locked in a former silver vault at Pelindaba, the nuclear research centre near Pretoria.

Technicians extracted the highly enriched uranium from the apartheid regime’s nuclear weapons in 1990, then melted the fuel down and cast it into ingots.

Over the years, some of the cache has been used to make medical isotopes, but roughly 220kg remains, and South Africa is keeping a tight grip on it.

That gives this country – which has insisted that the US and other world powers destroy their nuclear arsenals – a theoretical ability to regain its former status as a nuclear-weapons state.

But what really worries the US is that the nuclear explosives could be stolen and used by militants to commit a catastrophic terrorist attack.

Senior current and former US officials say they have reason to be concerned.

On a cold night in November 2007, two teams of raiders breached the fences at Pelindaba, which is set in the rolling scrubland half an hour’s drive west of Pretoria.

One group penetrated deep into the site unchallenged and broke into the site’s central alarm station. They were stopped only when a substitute watch officer summoned help.

The episode remains a source of contention between Pretoria and Washington because no suspects were ever charged with the raid, and South African officials dismissed it as a minor, bungled burglary. US officials and experts – backed up by a confidential South African security report – say to the contrary that the assailants appeared to know what they were doing and what they wanted: the bomb-grade uranium. They also say the raid came perilously close to succeeding.

The episode still spooks Washington, which as a result has waged a discreet diplomatic campaign to persuade South Africa to get rid of its large and, by US reckoning, highly vulnerable stock of nuclear-weapons fuel.

But President Jacob Zuma, like his predecessors, has resisted the White House’s persistent entreaties and generous incentives to do so, for reasons that have baffled and enormously frustrated the Americans.

President Barack Obama, in a previously undisclosed private letter sent to Zuma in August 2011, went so far as to propose that South Africa transform its nuclear explosives into benign reactor fuel, with US help.

Zuma was allegedly unmoved, however, and in a letter of his own, is said to have insisted that South Africa needed its nuclear materials and was capable of keeping them secure.

He did not accept a related appeal from Obama two years later, current and former senior US officials said.

Over nine years ending in 1965, Washington helped South Africa build its first nuclear reactor under the Atoms for Peace programme and then trained scientists to run it with US-supplied, weapons-grade uranium fuel. Washington finally cut off the fuel supply in 1976, after becoming convinced the apartheid regime had used nuclear research to create a clandestine bomb programme, fuelled by its own highly enriched uranium.

By the end of the Cold War, apartheid leaders ordered the weapons destroyed and the production facilities dismantled, while holding on to the explosive fuel.

Raising the threat of nuclear terror, South African officials say, is an excuse to restrict the spread of peaceful and profitable nuclear technology to the developing world, and to South Africa in particular. But this demand for enrichment rights – which Tehran, too, wants enshrined in an agreement with six great powers – is hardly South Africa’s alone. Although the Obama administration has tried to discourage uranium enrichment everywhere, leaders in Brazil, Argentina, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Jordan and South Korea say they see nuclear power, along with the ability to enrich uranium, as their right.

Unlike Iran, however, South Africa already possesses highly enriched uranium – nearly a quarter-ton of it. That’s why current and former US officials say South Africa is now the world’s largest unco-operative holder of nuclear explosives, outside the nine existing nuclear powers.

Few outside the weapons states possess such a large stockpile of prime weapons material, and none has been as defiant of US pressure to give it up.

In response last week, the South African government reaffirmed its view that the November 2007 break-in was a run-of-the-mill burglary and asserted that the weapons uranium was safe.

“We are aware that there has been a concerted campaign to undermine us by turning the reported burglary into a major risk,” said Clayson Monyela, spokesman for the Department of International Relations and Co-operation.

He said the International Atomic Energy Agency had raised no concerns, and that “attempts by anyone to manufacture rumours … are rejected with the contempt they deserve”.

Highly enriched uranium is the terrorists’ nuclear explosive of choice. A bomb’s worth could fit in a five-pound sack and emit so little radiation that it could be carried around in a backpack with little hazard to the wearer.

Physicists say a sizeable nuclear blast could be readily achieved by slamming two shaped chunks of it together at high speed.

Just nine non-nuclear weapon states besides South Africa still have enough enriched uranium to build a nuclear weapon, although mostly not in a readily usable form.

For South Africa, though, maintaining a grip on its bomb fuel is tangled up with national pride, its suspicion of big power motivations and its anger over Washington’s past half-measures in opposing apartheid.

“It’s a technical issue with an emotional overhang,” said Donald Gips, the US ambassador to South Africa from 2009 to 2013.

Other South Africans have said that by refusing to let go of its uranium, the country retains the higher political and scientific stature of a country such as Japan, which is considered “nuclear weapons-capable” while possessing none.

Obama raised the nuclear issue again during a trip to Pretoria in June 2013. This time, he privately asked Zuma to relinquish the uranium trove in exchange for a free shipment of 350kg of fresh, non-weapons-usable reactor fuel, valued at $5 million (R60m).

Obama followed up with a three-page letter in December 2013, two days after he spoke to Zuma at Nelson Mandela’s memorial service in Soweto. According to a copy of the letter, he urged Zuma to seal this new deal at a March 2014 nuclear summit in the Netherlands. Although technical experts held preliminary talks, Zuma never accepted the swop.

South Africa has used some of the former bomb fuel to make medical and industrial isotopes – generating more than R1 billion in income a year. But about six years ago, it started making the isotopes with low-enriched uranium that poses little proliferation risk – a development that removed its long-standing rationale for keeping the materials.

South Africa says it is retaining the weapons uranium partly because some day someone may find a new, as-yet-undiscovered, commercial application. If and when one was found, a senior South African diplomat said in an interview, “it’ll be like Opec to the power of 10” – states without the material would be at the mercy of a cartel of foreign suppliers.

Abdul Minty, who served for most of the past two decades as South Africa’s top nuclear policymaker and who is now South Africa's ambassador to UN agencies headquartered in Geneva, said rather it was the US that was recalcitrant.

Even as it campaigned to halt the spread of nuclear weapons, he said, it refused to part with its own.

Stocks of fissile materials held by countries outside the small club of nuclear-weapons states, he said, were just “not that important” a threat, compared with the thousands of nuclear weapons held by the bigger powers. “People who smoke can’t tell someone else not to smoke,” Minty said.

Waldo Stumpf, a long-time atomic energy official in South Africa who presided over the dismantling of the apartheid-era bomb programme, said in an interview that handing over the highly enriched uranium “was never part of the thinking here”.

“Not within Mr de Klerk’s government. Not afterwards, when the ANC took over,” he said.

“Why would we give away a commercially valuable material that has earned a lot of foreign exchange? Why would we do that?”

* This article comes from the Centre for Public Integrity, a non-partisan, non-profit investigative news organisation.

** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Media.

Washington Post

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 3:33pm On Mar 22, 2015

agaugust:
Fool School drop out

See the red portion in your above post, it's your dictionary definition of surveillance and NOWHERE does it say it is a synonym of spy

.

In the Chambers Thesaurus, it does though. You use the Thesaurus to check for synonyms. Not the dictionary.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 1:23pm On Mar 22, 2015

Patchesagain:
Yes they are.
You know they are, we know they are, he knows he is.

And his most famous word - obsolete - showing up in all the wrong places. Of course, this is Agauby.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 11:13pm On Mar 21, 2015

rka1:
Still a professional f00l.

Still a professional baboon.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 10:14pm On Mar 21, 2015

agaugust:
Same story I posted and same facts.

Ganboru is a border town close to Cameroon, in military warfare there is what we call AOR....Area Of Responsibility, Nigerian army HQ has told Chad to stay only at border towns on a few locations and block cross border Boko Haram escapees. Gamboru has been given to Chad as AOR, Nigeria does NOT need to deploy troops there when Chad is mandated to hold that border town as MJNTF rules require. Chad left it's AOR.....foolish army of rag tag rebels with no helmet, clothed in caravan traders headgear !
ONLY A FOOLISH ARMY LIBERATES A TOWN AND LEAVES WITHOUT MAINTAINING A GARRISON FORCE LEFT BEHIND TO HOLD THE TOWN.....battlefield rules of invasion number I
Those Chadian troops are rag tag rebels who did not attend military academy, so they lost what they got initially. Why did they go back after realizing their mistake? They did so to avoid embarrassment because the world will say Chad won a town in February and lost the same town to Boko Haram in March
That proves to you that Chad will do 5 % and nothing more, with 2,500 troops and ZERO air force, you can NEVER win a war on a land mass the size of Scotland with that tiny rag tag army.
Nigeria army liberated 40 towns, show me one that Boko Haram has dared to go back and attack after Nigeria beat them blue black, show me one !
Chadian army is a fluke, a flash in the pan.....all na wash
Nigerian army wins 40 towns and places garrison to hold all 40 towns.....masters of military strategy ! Israel is saluting us !
.

The facts being that Chad captured the town for you. You failed to keep it secure. They had to go back to recapture it. Simple.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 9:19pm On Mar 21, 2015

agaugust:
[size=16pt][/size]

According to SIPRI military experts, South Africa got an ordinary Surveillance satellite like other countries like Nigeria did before you, the only problem is that yours is an inferior MONKEY MODEL that produces BABOON IMAGES tongue tongue

Transfers of major conventional weapons: sorted by supplier. Deals with deliveries or orders made for year range 2014 to 2014 can be found at URL <http://www.sipri.org/contents/armstrad/at_data.html>.

Source: SIPRI Arms Transfers Database
Information generated: 21 March 2015

Supplier/ Year Year(s) No.
recipient (R) No. Weapon Weapon of order/ of delivered/
or licenser (L) ordered designation description licence deliveries produced Comments

Supplier/ Year Year(s) No.
recipient (R) No. Weapon Weapon of order/ of delivered/
or licenser (L) ordered designation description licence deliveries produced Comments

France
R: Morocco 2 Helios-2 Recce satellite 2013 EUR500-585m deal; designation uncertain (reported as 'observation satellites'); delivery 2017-2018

Peru 1 Astrosat-300 Surveillance satellite 2014 PEN597 m ($203 m) deal (offsets incl technology transfers); delivery 2016

Taiwan (ROC) 1 ROCSAT-2 Recce satellite 1999 2005 1 $70 m deal;

UAE 2 Helios-2 Recce satellite (2013) EUR700 m deal; Pleiades version

Israel
R: Italy 1 Ofeq Recce satellite 2012 $182 m deal; OPTSAT-3000 version; delivery 2015

Italy
L: Turkey 1 Göktürk Recce satellite 2009 EUR250 m 'Reconnaissance Satellite System Project'; delivery 2015

Russia
R: South Africa 1 Kondor-E Surveillance satellite 2006 ZAR1.2 b 'Project Consolidated Flute' deal; delivery 2015

SOURCE : http://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php

================================================================================

Surveillance NOT Spy satellite.... MONKEY MODEL inferior surveillance satellite for poor Soweto

One question -

WHY DID YOU POST AN AMERICAN SATELLITE IMAGE AND CLAIM IT WAS NIGERIAN?

You are desperate, seeing as you do not have h:

1. high-resolution images to display.; or

2. Specs to discuss. lipsrsealed

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 9:16pm On Mar 21, 2015

agaugust:
Chad's 5% effort. Anyway, Boko Haram hit Gamborou this week while the incompetent Chadian army move elsewhere to hunt for new glory, after the town was said to be 'totally liberated.'

So what is the benefit of Chad's effort? Now we see how 2,500 troops cannot do more than 5% of the war effort, when they move away leaving no garrison behind to protect, Nigerian army liberated and held control of 40 towns, Chad cannot liberate and keep control of 3 towns, now we know who is fighting 90 % of this war !

Boko Haram returns Chadian army of 2,500 troops were dribbled around like Ronaldo

http://news.yahoo.com/boko-haram-attacks-nigeria-town-gamboru-kills-11-165025844.html

Your mercenary story of old men has been demolished so you now return to Chad. Desperado ! LOL
.

Look what has happened -

Chad has saved you guys in Gamboru. But Nigeria failed to keep the town secure after Chad had liberated it.

So, Chad has had to come back...

Shame on you!!!

Chad Recapture Nigerian Town Seized By Boko Haram
Manuel Ndimele, 2 hours ago

READ MORE: http://www.naij.com/405983-chad-recapture-nigerian-town-seized-by-boko-haram.html

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 6:02pm On Mar 21, 2015

agaugust:
Financial Fraud ! ANC government over-inflated the cost of the South African satellite ! When whistle blowers called for investigation into the money, the ANC government said no, there cannot be any audit because it is a secret satellite for spying, that was how the spy satellite language came in, the Russians designed it as a mere surveillance satellite NOT spy.
So ANC avoided public investigation for fraud with the false claim of a secret spy satellite, BUT IS IT SECRET NOW? THE INFORMATION IS PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ON SIPRI and even ordinary @Patches on nairaland is quoting the satelite's full capacity specifications, so where is the secret? The real secret is that the cost was inflated by South African politicians in a fraudulent deal, they purchased an ordinary survellance satellite at much over the normal price, swallowed the excess cash and said....hush hush....it is a secret !
The two Nigeria observation satellites cost £70 total price, the 3rd satellite is superior cloud penetrating and cost is NOT disclosed, it is more expensive and superior to our 1st and 2nd satellites and ours are top quality British satellites not monkey model Russian satellites like yours.
South Africa paid £ 55 million over-inflated price for a MONKEY MODEL RUSSIAN SATELLITE....fraud scandal news below....
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Scandal-looms-over-missing-spy-satellite-20140119
Took you 7 years because South Africa could not make full payment in time, and also delayed because Russia refused to give South Africa technical control over your own satellite , SA government stopped paying cash balance, Russia did not care about your nagging like a frustrated housewife, delay continued until your South African nation bowed to Putin's command, the Russians rule over you and your satellite forever.
Nigerian engineers built one of our satellites and we have 100% control over all our satellites.
Citation needed, where did you get specs and capabilities of Nigeria's 3 satellites ? The 3rd one is even most classified.
The specs and capabilities of your Kondor satellite are avilable on free public internet ! Wow ! Then it's not a secret spy satellite, all it's YANSH & SHIIT is already published for free public knowledge on internet !
Nigeria's satellite is military grade confirmed :
"The two satellites - the NigeriaSat-2 and NigeriaSat-X - were launched on a Russian Dnepr rocket from Yasny, which is located in southern Russia. The space crafts were built at SSTL in Guildford, United Kingdom, but under the Nigerian National Space Research Development Agency (NASRDA). 26 Nigerian engineers worked at the SSTL, assembling NigeriaSat-X, which weighs around 100 kilograms (220 pounds). According to the government, the two satellites can be used for forestry, mapping, disaster monitoring, military applications and security , among other functions. "I congratulate our nation for this new chapter in our transformational efforts as we strive for self-reliance," President Goodluck Jonathan said. "Let me congratulate the resourceful Nigerians who made this history possible." According to Jonathan, NigeriaSat-X was designed and built by Nigerian engineers and scientists , while NigeriaSat-2 was built in collaboration with Surrey Satellite Technology Limited in Britain."
www.africanoutlookonline.com/index.php/component/content/article?id=2604:nigeria-launches-spy-satellites-into-orbit
It has been repeated on this forum more than 20 times since last year with sources....You CANNOT delete the proof, Nigeria has a radar cloud penetrating day/night all weather high image resolution military grade high power detection surveillance satellite that can detect a small boat on the big ocean.....
"The satellite platforms have made policing the Nigerian waters and some parts of the Gulf of Guinea (GoG) quite easier as ship movements are better monitored. NIMASA, with approval of relevant federal government agencies, established a fully digitalised Satellite Surveillance Centre (SSC) with sophisticated cloud penetrating radars.
NIMASA’s MoU with the Nigerian Navy and the Nigerian Air Force to enhance water patrol and aerial surveillance of Nigeria’s maritime domain has been very successful".
http://www.maritimesecurityafrica.com/Pages/Detail/16041
Meanwhile, y.our Kondor -E means E for Export, and export version different from the original top quality Russian Kondor, South Africa got what you have always talked about on this forum....
Russian made export versions of equipment for 3rd world countries, INFERIOR MONKEY MODELS.....it will give you low quality Baboon images and photographs, South Africa has been R.aped by Russia

TOP QUALITY IMAGE BY NIGERIAN MILITARY USE SATELLITE SHOWING AIRPORT, ALL AIRCRAFT CLEARLY VISIBLE
https://content.satimagingcorp.com/static/galleryimages/high-resolution-satellite-image-lagos-nigeria.jpg
.

[size=17pt]Bwahahahahahaha!!!![/size]

Your image says clearly at the bottom:

Satellite Imaging Corporation

Meadow Greek Court

Magnoloa, Texas, USA
grin

THIS IS A PICTURE OF NIGERIA BUT IT WAS NOT CAPTURED BY NIGERIANS.

You are a joke bro!

4 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 3:34pm On Mar 21, 2015

Chad at it again...

Troops from Niger and Chad discovered a mass grave with more than 90 decomposed bodies near a northern Nigerian town recently retaken from the Islamic militant group Boko Haram, security sources from both countries said Friday.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/20/africa/nigeria-mass-grave/

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 8:17pm On Mar 20, 2015

rka1:
It doesn't matter how many articles you post recycling the same thing. You and the Western press will have to Get used to a resurgent Nigerian Army. #NeverAgain, #ArmedToTheTeeth.

It doesn't matter how many times you post the same denials, recycling the same thing. You will get used to the South African mercenaries that are helping out in Nigeria. Armed to the teeth - with South African weapons and men.

1 Like

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 5:46pm On Mar 20, 2015

Why Nigeria is turning to South African mercenaries.

http://theconversation.com/why-nigeria-is-turning-to-south-african-mercenaries-to-help-fight-boko-haram-38948

former members of the South African Air Force have been operating gunships mostly based out of Maiduguri, and have flown “a huge number of sorties, including nocturnal operations, with great success”. The mercenaries appear to have adopted a rather low profile, attacking usually at night and pulling out in the morning for the Nigerian government to claim credit. This suggests a deliberate desire to maintain a low profile and shows that the contractors are working closely with the Nigerian armed forces throughout this process.

2 Likes

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 2:19pm On Mar 20, 2015

stillchris:
My self-portrait.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 2:17pm On Mar 20, 2015

stillchris:
@Dievlut never proves anything. just snorts all over the place. bloody troll

@Stillchris never proves anything. Just vomits his butthurt all over the place. Bloody baboon.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 2:07pm On Mar 20, 2015

stillchris:
My self-portrait...

Foreign Affairs › Re: Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa? by DieVluit: 2:06pm On Mar 20, 2015

stillchris:
I am exhausted already

'course you are.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 87 pages)