₦airaland Forum

dopeJemi:
even CheLsea sef carry L

dopeJemi:
a bench warmer sold is called what?

chuckdee4:
Bros isn't relegation better than this annual circus
This man has all Arsenal fans (Millions of people by the way) by the balls, im be Jesus Christ?

I say lose every game till he bleeps off, imagine making a bogus bid on deadline day, how foolish do these people think we are?

nateevs:
In isolated cases, yes. Consistently, NO!

nateevs:
This whole post is a lie. Let me break it down.


1. Fundamental mistake. There will be, in this hypothetical debate, 11 Hazards on the pitch; meaning one player in each position for a team of 11. This is not to be confused with the hypothetical "Hazard" who doesn't run back. Unless you are telling me that for some reason, you think all 11 Hazards will be on the left wing, with cigars in their hands, refusing to go back to their positions. You can see where this is going.
On the other hand, you cannot teach 11 Willians to score and assist in high numbers; no matter what hypothesis we throw in the mix. Whereas, given that there will be a Hazard in every position, they can be taught to defend.



2. You saw the long epistles because there were 10 runners and 1 Hazard. The epistle was not to stop Hazard from running, but running all the way to the back to defend alongside the left back. Why? Well, because Hazard has the potential to score 20 goals in his best season but Willian cannot score more than 4. So it's just wise to let Willian run and let Hazard off some running; let him be a danger and let him score and assist.


3. You cannot use isolated instances of a team of runners to show that they can consistently out-performance a team of skillful players. Pick one team, a team of all consistent runners and no prolific players. Then show me where they have consistently performed and consistently outperformed a team of prolific players with less runners and you get £100. There's none. Instead, what you will find, are isolated cases and I don't consider that as ample empirical evidence to support this point.


4. This point is nearly fraudulent. Liverpool players are runners but they are not Willians. Firminio, Coutinhos, Manes, Sturidges, might be runners, but it doesn't prove your point. They were able to destroy Arsenal because they are prolific. Again, they are not Willians. To stress again. Willians run about without anything to show for it. 11 Willians don't win games but 11 Willians work hard. In fact, they find themselves in interesting positions but they cannot make anything of it. So they lose the game in the dying minute to the creativity of a better player. Firminio was not even a consistent runner before joining Liverpool. Coutinho was nearly a waste-man in Italy. Klopp has turned him into a player who now knows how to defend "from the front" by way of pressing; whilst still remaining extremely prolific. Can Klopp teach Willian to assist and score? Simple.


5. Of course no one of us is looking for an entire 11 filled with strictly either Hazards or Willians; it's supposed to be intelliegent debate describing how each party's ability could enable them to win a game.

nonsoroyalty:
You posted this the first time we ignored. This is the second time and we still insist, you won't get those likes.

dopeJemi:
everybody wan dey bet in dollars like say na USA demands dey, even the ones wey dey mushin sef dey call dollars

Funlordjnr:
Ah! Sailorxy don't let me down.....lets take their Russian roubles no matter how little it may seem since swansea arsenal Juve and everton refused to! I am even adding N1k extra for sailor!

chuckdee4:
The only way out of this mess is for mutiny in that dressing room (Chelsea style).
Wenger obviously wanted to sell/loan Mustafi because he voiced his frustration after the Liverpool match. Any player who rocks this boat (The Wenger show) gets the boot, no questions asked.
A lot of decisions made in this club make no damn sense.

These players need to get together and make Wenger's position untenable, that man gets away with murder, its time him and that board get a taste of their own medicine. I say the team intentionally lose games until they SACK Wenger

Segadem:
willing Willian willing to �run

raumdeuter:
chelseafan1

Xlpacks:
Yes.. I'm ready to stake

Xlpacks:
$100. Chelsea Wins.. Are u Game?

nateevs:
Firstly, there is no need to eject the specificity of the debate. It is a straight Hazard/Willian one.

On the topic, bearing in mind the qualities of just those two players, what is wrong with the statement is that it is made on the assumption that that a team of Hazard cannot/will not defend. And that's not true.

Secondly, I always lean on the side of technical flexibility. A team of Hazards can be taught how to defend tactically because they have a high technical ceiling. And then there's no use over flogging the potency of their attack. Whereas a team of Willians will keep running around looking like they are doing a lot, when in actual fact there are average defenders and very poor attackers. Unfortunately they cannot be taught how to attack. Their technical ability is limited.


So No; It's not what I want to see. It's debate of technical ability and flexibility.

airmark:
Who will be your starting front three in the image below?

Nihilist:
For what it's worth, I also believe a team of Willians beats a team of Hazards, purely because Willian is more of a generalist player, while Hazard is a specialist

Lana1:
Ko si problem. We go equalize soon enough. Una go soon come buy Smalling and Ashley Young

Segadem:
Willian and Hazard were the case subject and he said he will choose 11 Willian over hazard

diggz:
I guess everyone chooses to see whatever they want to see in that statement.

FBS is simply trying to say he will pick 11 players who will give everything for the team like willian ahead of 11 flashy players(I am deliberately not using hazard as an example here) who are not ready to do the dirty work when needed.

Lana1:
Now that u ve signed Drinkwater, and we re all been childish, it is safe to say Chelsea signed our reject

Segadem:
would you pick Willian over Hazard?

nateevs:
Hehehe. A lot!

Skimpledawg:
This Emenalo Niqqa eeh ...


The Thanda that will fire you next time you give us sleepless nights will chase you back to your village in Umuololo community

Greatihex:
hmm. If you cn type d bolded, then there is no need going further wt the issue. Let us leave it.

Goodnuel:
They did horribly... The worst transfer window ever, to me.

hensben:
Yeah Mahrez but his inclusion would've affected Willian and Pedro which will now cause unrest in the dressing room.

Emaprince:
I remember when we signed caudrado. Smh.

This life sef.

Thecassanova:
Last I heard he's back, injury stalked his loan move though

Skimpledawg:
... Na our legend in the making Henry dey do that one for?


Happy New month Airmark.. ..na force

Nihilist:
That's why that guy never fulfilled his potential...

But he's rich af anyway...so i guess hes ok with that...

airmark:
Don't greet me.

[img]https:///media/9-01-2017/bSDNCY.gif[/img]

Thecassanova:
Decent, we can say we have the depth to some extent.

Thecassanova:
Decent, we can say we have the depth to some extent.

Nihilist:
Rooney arrested for drink driving....