₦airaland Forum

codedguy1:
Rooney is a disgrace! Lvg is a dolt!

Martial needs another pacy attacker to complement him.

Disgrace is an understatement, use something heavier.... we need mane like seriously, we lack pace in that attack, mane is just what we need with martial upfront.... goals will be pouring in

I'm fncking irritated

We lack goals, we lack goals, why won't we lack goals when a fat bastard is leading our attack... stupeed fool

Rooney is a bastard... it shall not be well with you

sinizia:
Ladies and Gentlemen of the house....

I'm sure you can see the beuatiful plates of you created by Dr Airmark...Thats what a Phd in Eba Construction can get you.

Dopejemioya wear your monkey jacet. You are on waiter duty today. Please deliver this plate to Mourinholic.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/3010261_amala3_jpglarge_jpegf45100abdf7d6fd17a8105a31028a621

And for God's sake wash your dirty hands.

Sorry sir, I don chop the food already, abeg bring another plate

Chelseafan1:
But how did Mou win the league with this set of players sef?

They are worn out imo

[size=28pt]who be the DJ na... play me patoranking make am and Ycee jagaban [/size]

Somebody play me patoranking make am na... add Ycee jagaban

AdeLaNa1:
Tired?? Ma nigga am just starting....

No seriously i'm tired, it's like mocking the less privileged

Na wa oh

Nihilist, raumdeuter, leyqute, anybody, please play me patoranking make am

Chelshit go fit make am

Goooooooaaaaaaaaaaaalllllll

I really feel bad for chelsea... i'm tired of trolling you guys

Goooooooaaaaaaaaaaaalllllll

Mourinho should field players who are ready and willing not some big headed buffoons... why not try something new

Them remove hazard

I am still happy for you guys

Gooooooooaaaaaaaaalllllllllllll

pamcode:
Dopejemi am happy ,you are happy for us

Lose and find out how happy I really am

I'm happy for you guys

Ibime:
There is only one definition of the term belle face. . . which every monkey post player in Nigeria knows.

Alright mate

Ibime:
Belle face is a style of play used to describe ninjas who can only play football in one direction. If you really played football, you would not be yarning about "when through on goal". When you are through on goal, your belle is already facing the goal!

Belle face is used to describe those whose general play is not up to scratch. Those who cannot play with back to opponent and will be running with the ball in the direction of their belle, whether or not it is the best action to take. A belle face player runs in straight line through 3 players and gets dispossessed when a simple control and layoff of the ball to his teammate is needed. A player who is great at hold-up play can never be described as belle face.




How can a belle face play no10? Did you ever play football and understand the meaning of the term "belle face"?

It seems we both have different definitions to the term "belle face"

You said he holds up play, combines well with his team mates and all, that's why I said he should play the number 10 role


How many times have we seen messi and ronaldo place the ball in a different direction when facing the post.. I could be through on goal with the keeper just to beat, and do a belle face straight at the keeper and he pins it or parries it away... like I said, we both have different definitions to the term "belle face" so need for back and forth

Mourinholic:
Chamakh at crystal palace?? Lmao!!!
Abeg forget ...don't say it outside Nairaland ooo

Did you watch Chamakh in his latter days at Crystal palace?

Ibime:
Kane is highly intelligent, combines perfectly with his team mates and plays his best football with back to goal. The main thing he's lacking is pace.

Then he should play the numer 10 role

Anyone who calls him belle face (given that hold up play is one of his best attributes) cannot know football, and does not understand what he is watching.

Hold up play is not chances created or attempts on goal, is it? Who gives a rat asss about his hold up play? I'm talking about his belle face when through on goal not when he's "holding up play". Like I said, he should play the numer 10 role

I think it's fear of spending £50m on a ninja with only one season track record that is making ninjas to yarn opata like 'belle face'. If you call Kane belle face, your brain cannot process what you are watching clearly.

I, personally wanted us to sign lacazette who also has a one season track record for whatever amount he may cost, kane will disappear quicker than a fart in te wind, bookmark this if you wish

Javier Hernandez is belle face
Theo Walcott is belle face
Van Wolfswinkel is belle face

Kane has all the attributes of a modern striker, except pace.

No comment

Chicharito is belle face? well, like that guy said, you just described Giroud... EOD

patrickmuf:
You definitely know your football, Kane isn't even better than Welbeck to be honest...He's just benefiting from his youthfulness, so much energy to run and a bit of upper body strength but no brain which is the prerequisite for a proper baller

Exactly... there was one tottenham game I watched, can't remember who their opponent was but the game ended in a stalemate, kane was through on goal with just the keeper to beat, the ret.ard just kicked the ball with the hope that it will be a goal, na there I tey confirm say kane na very dull player, most england players are dull football wise

Mourinholic:
Dope na....which levels?
Kane to Chamakh

Kane hasn't done anything spectacular for me to rate him ahead of Chamakh, remember Chamakh at crystal palace and bordeaux? Kane isn't intelligent, na anywhere belle face kind of striker

airmark:
I need him at chelsea

Na you and coogar get that argument

Kane is not better than Chamakh, england players are not smart at all, kane is very average

I don't want kane anywhere near old trafford or Carrington

airmark:
You asked a question and you answered.
Do you also agree robben was as bad as memphis when he played his first 6 matches for chelsea?

That, I don't agree with.. though robben wasn't all that then but he wasn't as bad as this idiot that wears our number 7

airmark:
I thought you were a religious person that once advised me to do praying and fasting for my team. I had given him condition to name a non-english 21 year old or younger player that was named in epl team of the year with 18 or lesser matches. No need to stretch the argument further. Failure to do so no more reply from me to him. Robben was chelsea hero in 2004/2005 season, only a fool will deny it.

Did you say "at 20, Robben won the epl" or not?

Liar

coogar:
ronaldo lost possession more than any attacking player in england, see how it turned out. there's nothing wrong with depay!

a player primed to take risks would always lose possession cos he will not score from every effort. LVG's shackled football is the problem, not depay!!!

LVG gave up rafael & retained valencia, that should tell you he favours players who take little or no risks & pass the ball back to the goalie. depay isn't cut for such!

Blaming LVG'S philosophy for depay's stupidity on the field is atrocious... depay attempts more take ons than any of his team mates and he never succeeds... no matter how "shackled" LVG'S football might be, it's not the reason for depay's horrible displays, you can't tell me it's because of LVG'S philosophy depay can't do the simplest things in football like picking out a man when he's free... he can't even do it on Fifa, pathetic


Depay is useless abeg, leave matter for martyrs

Ibime:
I said it back in May when you guys signed Depay that he is an "as the spirit leads" kind of player and I'm not concerned about his signing. I don't know why ninjas are surprised how he loses possession. He has never been an intelligent team player. .

Very very true... his moment of brilliance is synonymous with the 29th day of February

I don't even know how to explain it