Dottore's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dottore's Profile › Dottore's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 (of 198 pages)
If it were Nigerian lawyers they'd deceive the girl and assure her that she has a case with good chances of winning then they'd milk her and even be moving countless motions of adjournment in order to continue milking her. Stupid Gold digger. If you don't have sense in Nigeria the system will give you sense by force after suckling your blood. |
[size=8pt][/size] omojesu202:Get a Kola, white fowl and spirit and take to your village. Tell them that you are not fighting that you are a small boy that they should please give you a break small. If they accept it then you are lucky if they don't add other things and continue the negotiation till they agree. Thank me later |
The topic could have been "beautiful little girl poses with over painted adult bride'a maids" ... well what's my business |
Chinese telecom giant Huawei has purchased the intellectual property rights to facial recognition systems designed by a Russian developer and manufacturer of high-tech security technology. Some employees of Moscow-based Vokord will also be transferred to Huawei as part of the $50-million agreement, according to sources close to the deal, as quoted by Vedomosti. Tit-for-tat: Beijing to draft ‘blacklist’ of foreign companies harming interests of Chinese firms Huawei’s Russian subsidiary, along with Hong Kong-based Huawei Digital Technologies, will reportedly become the owners of the intellectual property rights for Vokord’s patents on face ID technology and equipment. The newly formed firm will reportedly be called Igl Softlab. The Russian unit of the enterprise is expected to own 99.99999 percent of the newly formed company. Founded in 1999, Vokord designs software and programming solutions based on computer vision and intelligent video processing algorithms. The company focuses on facial recognition, Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR), video analytics and pattern recognition, video processing, and video enhancement. As of 2017, the company’s revenue totaled 113.2 million rubles (US$1.75 million). The market for intelligent recognition systems has recently become a highly attractive sphere for investments, mergers, and takeovers. Earlier this year, London-based retail execution monitoring service BeMyEye announced plans to acquire Russian crowdsourcing and image recognition provider Streetbee. In April, Russian state-run Sberbank agreed to acquire a 51-percent stake in Speech Technology Center (STC) from Gazprom Bank. https://www.rt.com/business/460945-huawei-purchase-russia-face-id/amp/ I personally think it's a move to further strengthen their own OS or what do you think?
|
Oh gawd why has thine church degenerated this thus |
hdoddhdh:Blogger I ain't clicking your link if u won't post the video here. There are countless pussy lessons at xvideos, xnxxx pornhub, porn tube etc |
Famousbabe:People should ignore this poster that lays his way to front page with links to his useless blogs where he purports to have videos of the topics he's posting only for u to see 3 seconds clips. Hes just using Nairaland to attract traffic like everyother lazy blogger. |
That particular can only be forcefully removed by panel beater using their welding equipment at the rate of about 500 to 1k per wheel depending on the negotiation then you can buw a new set of 5 with their key if u wish to continue using it. Good luck |
Every rubbish makes a thread the funny thing is that whoever uploaded the video is soliciting for people to subscribe. Mtchrw |
MPEG- Motion Picture Expert Group |
The US government will spend an additional $16 billion to help farmers hurt by the US-China trade war, Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced Thursday. US farmers have been among the hardest hit by the escalating trade war between the two countries, and both sides are bracing for additional pain resulting from the latest volley of tariffs announced earlier this month. Perdue said President Donald Trump approved the farmer aid to undermine China's efforts to retaliate against US tariffs. "Well, President Trump feels what they're trying to do is really outlast him and that's not gonna work. Their economy has hurt a lot more than our agricultural economy and that's why President Trump has authorized a $16 billion facilitation program," Perdue said Thursday morning on Fox Business. Related Article: Fact-checking (yet again) Donald Trump on China tariffs Perdue said that the farmer aid will be paid for by an equivalent amount the US expects to pull in through tariffs. But Perdue also claimed that "China's gonna pay for these" -- a false assertion made repeatedly by Trump. The tariffs will instead be paid for by companies importing goods into the US and are often passed on to US consumers in the form of price hikes, a reality acknowledged by Trump's own top White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow. Trump last year already promised farmers a $12 billion aid package to help mitigate the first wave of Chinese retaliatory measures after Trump slapped tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump is expected to address the new farmer aid package in remarks Thursday afternoon at the White House. Talks between the US and China broke down earlier this month after US officials said China reneged on key parts of an agreement that was close to completion. Chinese President Xi Jinping has in recent days indicated he is readying his country for a prolonged trade war, calling for his people to prepare for a "new Long March" -- a reference to a difficult period in China's history. Trump has already warned that he is prepared to impose additional tariffs on the remainder of Chinese exports to the US, a move that would hit consumer goods like toys and electronics that were spared in the first round. The two leaders are expected to meet face to face on the sidelines of the G20 late next month, and US and Chinese officials have both indicted that the trade war can only be resolved by Trump and Xi. https://edition-m.cnn.com/2019/05/23/politics/farmer-aid-trump-china-tariffs/index.html |
President Donald Trump's trade wars may be something he believes in, but it doesn't seem to be a political winner. Unlike many issues on which Trump has seesawed on over the years, Trump has been generally consistent in his protectionist stance on trade. He seemed to use that to his advantage in the 2016 election, during which he went after Democrat Hillary Clinton, who tended to have more of a free trade record. Polling during his presidency suggests, however, that most Americans don't really care about trade policy and have turned against Trump's argument for a protectionist trade policy. Trump, of course, is hoping to get his job approval rating up. It's generally been stuck in the high 30s to low 40s. The problem for Trump is that Americans typically regard trade as one of the least important issues. Just 31% of Americans told Gallup late last year that it was an extremely important issue for the President and Congress to take up in 2019. That was tied for the lowest of any issue. The Pew Research Center found that only 39% said global trade was a top policy for them in 2019. That was the lowest of any issue polled. A miniscule 1% said trade was their most important issue for 2020 in a CNN open-ended question taken in March. Not surprisingly, Trump's trade wars have not moved his numbers at all. Trump started initiating tariffs of all sorts during the first half of 2018. This notably included a tariff on aluminum and steel, which was just lifted from Canada and Mexico. Before he ordered tariffs on aluminum and steel on most countries in March 2018, his approval rating in the FiveThirtyEight aggregate among voters was 43%. Six months later, it was 42% -- where Trump's approval rating also stands today. Related Article: Farmers get impatient with Trump's trade war: 'This can't go on' But while Trump's trade wars haven't really moved his overall numbers, they do seem to have shifted views about him on trade and the larger conversation about trade policy in the United States. After the 2016 election, Americans had a lot of hope about what Trump could do for trade policy. According to a December 2016 Fox News poll, 62% said Trump would "truly revise trade deals" with other countries to make them better for America. A minority (31%) disagreed. By December 2018, after renegotiating NAFTA, withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and adding a number of tariffs, only 40% said Trump had negotiated better trade deals. A plurality (47%) said he had not. In other words, Americans don't trust like they once did on trade. Americans are also far less likely to view Trump favorably in Quinnipiac University polling released last week when it comes to how he's handling relations with China. That may have to do with his recent ramping up of a trade war with China. His net approval (approval - disapproval) on how he deals with China has dropped from +8 points in April 2017 to -10 points now. Notably, this is still a better net approval than Quinnipiac University has generally shown for the President overall. Indeed, Trump's approval ratings on trade continue to somewhat better than his overall approval rating. Still, his ratings on trade-related issues have turned clearly negative. Elections, though, are won and lost in the electoral college. Trump won in 2016 thanks to strength in the Midwest, where his protectionist tone seemed to provide him an electoral boost. But now, we see Trump's ratings on trade are not any better in the Midwest. In concert with this movement on American opinions of Trump and trade related policy, far more Americans now view free trade as a good thing than a bad thing. A Monmouth University poll taken this month found that 51% of Americans (and 53% of voters) say that free trade agreements are generally a good thing; just 14% say they are generally bad. Pew Research Center polling from 2018 generally showed the same thing with 56% saying free trade agreements with other countries have generally been a good thing, while only 30% say they have generally been a bad thing. (Monmouth has a higher percentage of "not sure" because it specifically offers that option.) Related Article: Trump sends $16 billion to bailout farmers hurt by China trade war This recent polling is a dramatic turnaround from polling on the same questions taken during the 2016 campaign. Back in November 2015, 24% of Americans told Monmouth that free trade agreements were a good thing. A slightly larger 26% said it was a bad thing. Just before the 2016 election, Pew pegged the breakdown at 45% good thing and 43% bad thing. In other words, both pollsters indicate that positive opinion of free trade has jumped recently and negative opinion has fallen. For those not convinced that Trump is moving these numbers, let's take a closer look at the trendlines. Trump only started ramping up the trade wars in 2018. That lines up with Pew's polling showing that the percentage of Americans thinking free trade was bad dropping a little during 2017 with the majority of movement coming in 2018. Monmouth, which didn't poll on free trade in 2017, showed that opinion on free trade moved dramatically from 2016 to 2018, but hasn't moved greatly since then. The bottom line is this: This isn't 2016 or even 2017 anymore. Americans don't believe Trump has the magic touch on trade and have moved against his worldview on trade. His trade policies don't look like they're going to pull him to re-election. By Harry Enten, CNN https://edition-m.cnn.com/2019/05/30/politics/trump-trade-analysis/index.html |
Hmmm |
Like seriously. Who are the terrorists other than the countries of the people he is addressing. He should be more concerned about enlisting Nigeria into economically viable world organisation's, signing trade treaties and visa agreements with reasonable countries. Whats the capital of Pakistan again...? It's Islamabad |
Ok |
Ok |
Ok |
Chai |
This is a welcome development but there should be a supervising body to monitor the way and manner the LG chairmen make use of the funds because majority of them are touts and reckless squandermaniacs who were compensated with that position because of their services to a god father. Most have never owned a business or worked in a place where they handled legit responsibilities let alone having a vague idea of management. I keep wondering if it's possible to redeem this country and how. |
Ok |
... meanwhile politicians are happy and having a field day because younger generations have a trailer load of distractions to bother about the future. There are more than enough gists about Regina Daniels and Ned Nwoko, Tiwa, Naira Marley, Zlantan, Gbe body, Zanku, Tonto Dike etc and very soon BBnaija will take the Centre stage, Who cares even Nairaland and bloggers love the trend as such stories attract traffic. More stupid are bloggers like this Op than extract 3seconda clip from Instagram and copy to his blog, create a thread in Nairaland and pay his way to front page with links to his useless blog. All na hustle Una well done ooooooo |
Why are they not arraigning the snake. They should leave the innocent woman alone |
Ok |
Daddywonder:You dey vex o. See as you reposted it several times so that they will see. Even the blind can't deny seeing this one. |
His juju strong. Someone just survived the lethal grip of Tiger Claws. A rare feat. This type will never near any drug market again let alone trying it in Asian country. Who no go no know |
Atiku79:No more Atikulated the new vibe is Jesus is coming sorry Atiku is coming. To me I don't see the difference between 2 northerners, 2 moslems, 2 Fulani men and 2 people that teamed up to defeat a common Southern enemy in 2015 then one of them joined another party to start positioning himself for another 8 years when the 8 years of APC has elapsed. Are south south and south east so stupid not to understand that these two are of the same kind. So there's no other person in the whole of South that can be brought to the forefront and supported with all we have got. Well let them keed dancing shaku shaku in our destiny while we keep dancing Zanku Zanku in support of their antics. Nonsense |
sweetgala:Really? so 2m won't be a problem? If he has it why then did he venture into a financial crime. |
One difficult thing is to get bail, more difficult is to get an achievable bail condition then the most difficult part is to get people that can effect the bail condition. Crime does not pay. |
He must have priced his brothers' market somehow. His lucky his treachery didn't result to execution. Say no to cultism! |
Ok |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 (of 198 pages)