Dpsychologist's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dpsychologist's Profile › Dpsychologist's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 112 pages)
Bamijoko2:If it was a girl, will you confidently say this? |
kingthreat:Now turn this word boy into a girl and repeat that question. |
Let it be known that, Alot of men are the ones praising him in the comments section on where such things are posted. When a girl child is being abused, we speak up the best way we can. When it reached our turn on our own gender, suddenly many men are hailing his handling skills. We are not even in shock that at 16 he is already doing that, this means he has been exposed to this far earlier than that age. And you want society to take us serious ? |
When a teenage girl is abused, society rallies in outrage. Yet when a teenage boy is exploited by an older woman, the narrative shifts suddenly it’s “impressive,” “a flex,” or even “something to be praised.” This is not empowerment. It is abuse. This is not maturity. It is exploitation. This is not consent. It is predation. At 16, a boy is still a minor. His “enjoyment” or perceived skill does not erase the fact that he is being taken advantage of by an adult. The double standard is glaring: we condemn abuse when it happens to girls, but trivialize it when it happens to boys. That hypocrisy silences male victims, normalizes abuse, and perpetuates a culture where men’s mental health and advocacy are dismissed. Until we recognize that boys can be victims too, and that predators can be women as well as men, we will continue to fail half of our children. This is not about gender wars. This is about justice, protection, and humanity. Female teacher in trouble over affair with a male studenthttps://www.facebook.com/share/1D1gh8ftkc/
|
Sonnobax15:As it should be |
A woman with three PhDs proudly declared: “My husband is the provider. I only support. My money is for whatever I like.” What she didn’t realize is that this single statement exposes the very mindset that held the girl-child back for generations. Because this is how the cycle was justified for centuries: Why invest in her education… Why sponsor her ambitions… Why empower her financially… If, in the end, she’s expected to depend on a man anyway? This is the paradox: Educated, but not accountable. Earning, but not contributing. Her money is personal; his money is the family’s. And when this thinking resurfaces even at the highest levels of academic achievement, it signals a deeper structural problem. If a woman isn't required to contribute when she works then what is the essence of empowering women in the first. Why be educated in the first place and then earn income. For every job a woman has who doesn't contribute anything to the family is a job lost to a man who will have taken care of his family. In a world competing on innovation, productivity, and shared leadership, financial dependence by choice is not empowerment; it is regression. Society doesn’t move forward when one gender is conditioned to carry the full financial load while the other carries selective responsibility. Let’s be clear: If a man had 3 PhDs, nobody would clap if he said, “My wife handles everything; I keep my money for myself.” We would call it immaturity. We would call it irresponsibility. We would call it misalignment. True empowerment is not the luxury of opting out. It is the discipline of showing up. It is contribution, collaboration, and co-ownership. The future of families and the workforce is not built on outdated gender economics. It’s built on partnership. Shared value. Shared accountability. Shared ambition. To every woman contributing, building, co-investing, and reshaping what partnership looks like in the modern world, you’re rewriting the narrative with impact. And that is the kind of mindset that scales families, strengthens communities, and fuels the next generation. Cc nlfpmod Dominique seun
|
dominique: it's the news o |
A disturbing incident surfaced from Gboko this week not just a relationship scandal, but a masterclass in the catastrophic cost of broken trust. A young man hustling in Lagos had been funding his girlfriend consistently: – Support money – Money for their planned December 2025 wedding – Additional capital she was meant to hold so he could return home, start a business, and build stability for their family. In his mind, he was investing in a future. In her mind, she was securing an exit strategy. When he returned to begin marriage rites, everything unraveled: ❌ She refused introduction. ❌ The “saved money” had disappeared. ❌ After pressure, he discovered she had used all the funds to buy land and build a house in her own name secretly. The man snapped. He went and burnt down the house. This is not just a relationship gone wrong. This is a case study in asymmetric expectations, broken alignment, and financial betrayal. THE REAL LESSON: TRUST IS THE MOST EXPENSIVE CURRENCY IN ANY PARTNERSHIP Corporate leaders know this. Founders know this. Investors know this. Yet many relationships fail because individuals underestimate how deeply trust anchors everything. This Gboko story exposes three hard truths: 1️⃣ Money without Transparency Is a Time Bomb Whether in business or relationships, once accountability disappears, loyalty collapses. 2️⃣ Misaligned Objectives Create Silent Competitors, Not Partners He was planning a marriage. She was planning an exit. Two people. Two visions. Zero alignment. No partnership survives that. 3️⃣ Emotional investment without Risk Management is a Liability Sending money is not the issue. The absence of checks, boundaries, and clear agreements is. Even love requires governance. THE STRATEGIC TAKEAWAY FOR MEN AND WOMEN This isn't about gender. It’s about pattern recognition and due diligence the same principles that run high-stakes deals. Before you merge lives: ✔️ Align goals ✔️ Align values ✔️ Align expectations ✔️ Set financial boundaries ✔️ Stress-test trust ✔️ Observe character under pressure Because when intentions are mismatched, betrayal isn’t a possibility, it’s an inevitability. Now : A house was burnt. A relationship was destroyed. Two futures derailed. Not because of poverty. Not because of Lagos hustle. But because one person was building a partnership while the other was building a contingency plan. Trust is not a feeling. Trust is an asset. And once it’s mismanaged, the fallout is always expensive. Cc nlfpmod Dominique seun
|
lonelydora:Don't mind him. Nigerians can be careless. |
An anonymous message recently came my way, one I can’t ignore, especially today: “Esty i hv lived with HIV for 5 years now. My boyfriend doesn't know abt it. Bt recently he hs been falling sick bt i cnt tell him i am HIV positive. I'm scared of loosing him. Shld i tell him?” This isn’t just one person’s dilemma. it’s a mirror reflecting a widespread, painful reality: the fear, shame, and isolation that still surround HIV. But today, let’s speak plainly: Hiding your HIV status from a partner isn’t just a secret it’s a risk to their health, your integrity, and the trust your relationship is built on. 🔍 The hard truths we must face: ✅ Undetectable = Untransmittable (U=U). With consistent treatment, a person living with HIV can achieve an undetectable viral load meaning they cannot transmit HIV sexually. This is scientifically proven. Knowledge is power for you and your partner. ✅ Silence perpetuates stigma. Every time someone hides their status out of fear, it reinforces the idea that HIV is something to be ashamed of. It’s not. It’s a manageable health condition. ✅ Your partner has a right to know. Informed consent is non-negotiable in any intimate relationship whether it’s about HIV, sexual health, or emotional boundaries. Keeping this from someone you love robs them of the choice to care for their own health. ✅ Legal and ethical responsibility matters. In many places, nondisclosure can have serious legal consequences. But beyond the law there’s humanity. There’s care. There’s love. 💡 This World AIDS Day, let’s commit to: · Educating, not stigmatizing · Supporting, not shaming · Encouraging disclosure, not fear · Promoting testing, treatment, and transparency If you’re living with HIV and struggling with disclosure: You are not alone. Reach out to support groups, healthcare providers, or counselors. There are people ready to help you have that conversation with care and confidence. If you’re in a relationship where status hasn’t been discussed: Start the conversation. Normalize asking. Normalize sharing. Make sexual health a regular, respectful part of your connection.
|
Bfatolu16:I am starting to see changes in perspective on the e-sims. When i created this thread in 2020 people cared less and were less enthusiastic. |
nymphomaniac:Well the post for specifically towards the female gender. |
Omalicious1:Yea. Its the reality. |
Apcshit:I have 2 questions for you: 1. Why should i talk about business in a romance section? 2. Why are you in romance section if u are as business oriented as you claimed? You folks are something else. |
bende7t:Lol Kobo will be here whether it reaches front page or not ![]() She has always done that to my many posts. ![]() |
In today’s relationship landscape, too many people argue about “body count” like it’s a moral scoreboard. Wrong metric. Wrong debate. Wrong focus. The real issue is pattern count, the behavioral blueprint that explains why someone accumulated that body count in the first place. Let’s be clear and data-driven: A high body count in a woman is rarely an accident. It’s a pattern of decisions, and patterns reveal more than confessions ever will. It signals: 1. A history of low sexual discipline Multiple partners over a short timeline shows one thing, judgment compromised by her impulse. A woman who says “it just happened” twelve times isn’t unlucky. She’s undisciplined. 2. A track record of emotional volatility Jumping from one man to another is often a coping mechanism. Breakup → rebound → situationship → reset → repeat. That’s not romance. That’s instability disguised as “experiences.” 3. A pattern of allowing easy access You can’t accumulate a long list of men without being easily available. Availability is a decision, not destiny. 4. A long-term problem with accountability Most high-count women blame “toxic exes,” “bad choices,” or “not knowing better.” But the common denominator in every story is the storyteller. 5. A consistent inability to say no If a woman cannot say no to men, impulses, attention, or temporary validation, she will struggle to say yes to discipline, loyalty, and partnership. See the pattern? A high body count isn’t just a number. It’s evidence, a trend line which shows consistent patter.. And in business, leadership, and relationships, trends predict outcomes. You don’t evaluate a candidate by one mistake. You evaluate them by their pattern of decisions. Relationships are no different. Men must start thinking with strategy, not sentiment. Numbers don’t lie. Patterns don’t lie. History doesn’t lie. If a woman has a consistent pattern of saying yes to multiple men, multiple situationships, multiple impulses… You’re not the “one.” You’re simply the next. Choose wisely. Not based on what she says now but based on what her pattern already proved.
|
Let’s call it what it is: A lot of ladies today carry an inflated sense of demand that doesn’t match their actual market value, social media has made the illusion even worse. Many have 300–500 unread DMs from guys they have zero interest in… Yet the one guy they genuinely want? He’s not even checking for them. He doesn't see them in his league. He’s not replying. He’s not chasing. He’s not moved. And suddenly the same silence they give others becomes unbearable when served back to them. The irony? They are only tasting a tiny drop of what they freely dish out daily. This is the cycle: They ignore the men who genuinely like them. They chase the man who sees them as a non-factor. He uses them to catch cruise, dusts his shoes, and moves on. And somehow… the victim narrative begins. Let’s be honest: Most of the men they snub actually match their level. But they want to skip the queue and shoot for a man who has options, discipline, and direction. And that’s where the heartbreak begins. Because the men at the top are no longer emotionally desperate. They’re no longer subsidizing entitlement. They’re no longer handing out validation like pure water. They’ve watched too many men get drained, used, and discarded. So now, these men choose carefully. Meanwhile, the same women who insult, ignore, and ghost dozens of decent guys are suddenly shocked when their own target returns the favor. This is not even karma. This is market correction.
|
LIVINGICONREBOR: just came across some Facebook shananigans whivh inspired me tto create these threads. |
APOPTOSIS:That first quote says alot. |
Imagine Using Money to Prove Love Then You Stop Spending, Just Wave the Relationship Goodbye Let’s not lie in today’s dating world, too many relationships are powered by deposits, not devotion. A guy meets a woman and instead of building connection, he starts running a mini–CBN branch. “Baby take,” “Baby I’ve sent it,” “Baby check your alert.” For the first few months, everything is rosy. She’s sweet, available, affectionate, love dey sweet when alert dey drop. But the day you stop pressing money, she’ll start pressing your neck. Let’s call it what it is: If your relationship depends on how much you spend, you’re not in love, you’re in a subscription plan. And just like Netflix, once payment stops, service goes off. ![]() The irony? The same people shouting “I want real love” are the same ones equating love with allowance. You’ll hear, “He’s broke, I can’t deal”, but won’t ask if he has vision, discipline, or ambition. Meanwhile, that same man you’re overlooking might be the one who’ll make it big later — but by then, you’ll be too busy chasing alerts instead of purpose. Here’s the truth: Money should support love, not define it. Because when your wallet becomes your love language, heartbreak is only one “insufficient balance” away. ![]() So guys, invest wisely, emotionally and financially. If she only loves you when you’re pressing money, don’t stress just press “unfollow.” ![]() |
SpencerForbes:You hit the nail in the head. I like how you think and the way you put down the info. |
The Silent Tragedy of Modern Masculinity In a world obsessed with validation, too many men are trading their dignity for attention. And every time a man does that, every time he chases what should naturally flow toward him, he bleeds a little more of his power away. You see, desperation is not just a feeling; it’s an energy. It’s the silent broadcast that says, “I don’t believe I’m enough.” And when a man radiates that, the world especially women respond accordingly. Not with love. Not with respect. But with tolerance at best, and contempt at worst. Let’s break it down. 1. The Double-Text Dilemma: When Confidence Turns to Clinginess A man who double texts for attention doesn’t understand his value. Every extra “Hey” he sends without a reply is not just another message, it’s a confession of emotional scarcity. A masculine man doesn’t chase conversation; he commands it. His energy makes people want to respond. Because he’s too focused on his purpose to notice who’s ignoring him. 2. Buying Affection: The Poverty of Emotional Begging Money can buy attention, but never affection. A desperate man tries to compensate with his wallet what he lacks in self-worth. He mistakes giving for bonding, and generosity for connection. But what he doesn’t realize is this, once you pay for love, you’ll forever have to keep paying to keep it. True masculinity invests in self-respect, not manipulation through gifts. Because the moment you buy affection, you’ve sold your value. 3. Apologizing When You’re Not Wrong: The Death of Self-Respect A man who constantly says “sorry” just to keep the peace is not kind, he’s weak. And weakness never earns respect. Women respect clarity, not compliance. When a man can’t hold his ground, he becomes forgettable because leadership without conviction is noise. You don’t build peace by bowing. You build it by standing tall with calm confidence, knowing your worth doesn’t require approval. 4. Begging a Woman to Stay: The Illusion of Love Begging someone to stay is emotional slavery disguised as romance. When a man pleads for love, he’s no longer a partner, he’s a prisoner. Love that requires begging is not love. It’s dependency. A high-value man doesn’t chase someone walking away; he values himself enough to walk in the opposite direction. Because no relationship should cost your self-respect. 5. Tolerating Disrespect: The Silent Killer of Masculinity Every time a man tolerates disrespect, he tells the world he has no boundaries. And boundaries are what separate men from boys. The boy wants to be liked; the man demands to be respected. If she mocks your dreams, belittles your ambitions, or weaponizes your emotions that’s not love, it’s manipulation. You can’t save someone who enjoys watching you sink. 6. Sacrificing Peace to Please Her: The Costliest Mistake Peace is a man’s greatest currency. Lose it, and you lose everything. A desperate man will sacrifice sleep, focus, and self-worth to please a woman who thrives on his submission. But understand this: a man who cannot protect his peace cannot lead his life. Love should complement peace, not compete with it. If being with her drains you, she’s not your soulmate, she’s your assignment. And you’re failing it. 7. Saying “Yes” When You Want to Say “No”: The Final Surrender Every “yes” against your will is a betrayal of self. Men who fear rejection end up living like employees in their own relationships always available, never respected. Your “no” is not aggression. It’s authority. It’s self-control. It’s the word that builds your backbone. The Core Truth: Desperation Is a Symptom of Disconnection A desperate man isn’t just chasing women he’s running from himself. Because when you don’t know your worth, you’ll try to earn it through others. But here’s the paradox: the moment you stop chasing, you start attracting. The moment you withdraw your attention from the undeserving, your energy rises. You regain your power. The Shift Every Man Must Make Stop seeking validation. Build value. Stop chasing love. Attract loyalty. Stop explaining yourself. Embody purpose. Stop proving your worth. Live it. The world doesn’t respect desperate men. It respects men who are rooted — men who move with clarity, speak with conviction, and love with strength. So, brother, guard your energy. Not everyone deserves access to your focus, time, or heart. Because the moment you realize your attention is currency, you’ll stop spending it on things that don’t pay you back. Final Word: A desperate man is like a lion begging the gazelle for approval. You were built to hunt, not to plead. Operate from purpose, not scarcity. Because when a man moves from abundance, the world rearranges itself to meet him halfway. DO NOT BE THAT MAN. Be the man who knows his worth and never discounts it for love. You will lose some women but it's better to do that not from desperation but of your true worth. |
Let’s stop pretending women suddenly woke up one morning and invented reckless modern billing. Men built this system with their own hands through one fatal weakness: blind ego. It starts the same way every time… A guy wants to “prove” he’s worthy or outcompete other men , so he opens his wallet: – Expensive gifts – Endless treats – Random transfers – Overspending to impress And the lady? She runs the data and concludes one thing: “This guy is not strategic. He is not of value so He leads with money, so money is the currency he understands.” From that moment, she keeps requesting because it works. Simple psychology. But here’s where the crash happens: He becomes emotionally invested. He becomes financially invested. But she has ZERO romantic interest. He sees the signs like cold responses, selective communication, transactional vibes but the sunk cost fallacy holds him hostage. He has spent too much to walk away, so he keeps doubling down, hoping to “recover his investment.” Then when he finally asks her out, she declines. Suddenly he’s on Nairaland typing epistles: “Why doesn’t she like me?” “Why do women bill too much?” “Are there still good girls out there?” My brother… you funded a transaction and expected love in return. That’s not romance. That’s poor risk management. If you drive past a big red ⚠️ sign on the road and refuse to slow down, who do you blame after the accident? The road? The sign? The government? Or your own stubbornness? Ladies didn’t force anybody. They are simply maximizing the opportunity men created. A woman can only bill a man who created a billing environment. Remove the supply, and the demand collapses. At the end of the day: Men aren’t victims. They’re architects. |
TenQ:Exactly |
Many men end up chasing a Girl Just to pay her bills Imagine chasing a girl not because she inspires you, not because she adds value to your life, not because she pushes you to be better but just so you can pay her bills. Logically, this doesn't make sense but unfortunately that's what happens. Some of you men have turned relationships into charity foundations. You’re out here doing giveaways in the name of love. Monthly subscriptions of emotional foolishness. Data, rent, hair, nails, Uber, feeding allowance and for what? A woman that doesn’t even respect you? Let’s be real, too many men today mistake financial performance for romantic connection. You think being her ATM will make her love you. It won’t. It’ll only make her see you as a walking wallet with emotions attached. The truth is, when money is your only strategy, you lose your dignity before the relationship even starts. You’re not courting her you’re buying her attention on credit. And when the credit runs out, she’ll “suddenly fall out of love.” Bro, you’re supposed to lead with value, not with transfer receipts. If the only reason she answers your calls is because she’s expecting alerts, you’re not dating you’re funding a lifestyle that excludes you emotionally. Understand this: respect is earned through confidence, not cash. When a man has purpose, vision, and discipline, women feel it. They gravitate toward it naturally. But when all you have to offer is money, they’ll use you until you run out of it, then they vanish like your balance. So stop overdoing. You’re not her father. You’re not her sponsor. You’re not a humanitarian organization. Love isn’t proven by how fast you press “send.” It’s shown through presence, protection, and purpose. Let your money work for you not for someone who’s only around because of it. |
drLammy:Not necessarily. I am just showing how a high number of women get proposals and opportunities but turn it down. But then the only thing we will be hearing is that it's cos they were not lucky or its men's fault that they are not married in their 30s. |
ManknowThyself:Thank you sir. It's comment like this that inspire me to do more. |
Basicend:Criticisms, criticisms, criticisms. Said someone who hasn't even created a topic of their own here. Spewing stuff when you know nothing about me, not even my name. |
Here’s a universal truth: People do to you only what they are actually capable of and what you allow them to. In every interaction whether personal, professional, or romantic, boundaries define respect. In relationships, most of what happens to us isn’t random; it’s permitted. The choices you make, the standards you set, and the limits you enforce determine the treatment you receive. Case in point: if your partner knows your desires, your expectations, or your value, what she can withhold or grant is always within your framework of allowance. If you compromise too much or fail to communicate boundaries, you’re effectively authorizing behavior that may not serve your best interests. Key takeaway: Respect, boundaries, and accountability aren’t just buzzwords—they’re your defense and your power. What you allow becomes the reality you live with. |
kiddaz:That is left to the mods. |
Hhh4444:Exactly. Some men will see this as joke just as a said it in the beginning of the post. |
chariisGRACE:Yes, heartbreak is real. Some women in their 30s were misled, lied to, or abandoned by men. No one is denying that it hurts, and it leaves scars. But here’s the truth no one wants to say: being a victim of a man does not explain why so many women hit 30 single. Not every 30+ woman is single because a man “left her for a younger girl.” That’s an excuse. Patterns show it’s usually choices, mindset, and strategy that determine relationship outcomes. Emotional tourism in the 20s? Chasing experiences over long-term partnership? Ignoring red flags? That catches up. Waiting for men to behave perfectly instead of taking control of your own life? That’s a trap. Believing attention equals commitment? That’s brutal reality checking. Some men do leave for younger women. Some heartbreaks happen. But the majority of women single past 30 are there because they didn’t play the game right not because every man they loved was “wicked.” Victimhood explains a few cases. Strategy explains the rest. Wake up. Own your choices. Learn. Adapt. Stop blaming men for your timing and mindset. |
The boy practically knows what he's doing and he doesn't seems its his first time abeg, so stop been emotional on lies and camouflage.
it's the news o

