₦airaland Forum

Torolondo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woolly_hair

" Woolly hair is a difficult to brush hair, usually present since birth and typically most severe in childhood.[1] It has extreme curls and kinks and occurs in non-black people and is distinct from afro-textured hair.[3] "

Try be rational. Just because they aren't white doesn't mean they can't look like these. ( It's really exhausting explaining to people who still don't get it). This would isn't just black and white people.

Woolen hair is simply like a sheep /Lamb woolen hair! That's an African hair! Not a curly hair.

Torolondo:
I know what you mean but it won't work that way. Jesus is Middle Eastern origin and Buddha was South Indian. Where is the description saying Jews looked like Egyptians?

1st picture the earliest Buddha statue. 2nd picture later East Asian depiction of Buddha. 3rd picture is South Indian man. 4th picture are Middle easterners. Can you really say Buddha was African and not like that South Indian? Can you be 100% sure those ancient semetic slaves and Jesus had 0% chance looking like those Middle easterners?

It's like you don't know the difference between curly and woolen hair? Didn't you see the terracotta head of the Jews for example? That's a black man! Don't forget that the Jews were Egyptian looking. The ancient Egyptians were blacks!

Well, he deserves it.

On a general note, I'm mulling a suggestion which is to allow the governors have a little share in every industrial investment project they build in their state. Such as 5% share of it. That could be a form of gratuity while the remaining shares of the industry goes to the state revenue. A governor who didn't invest wouldn't have a share in his predecesor's industrial project except in a situation where he was the one who completed the project. So instead of looting, every governor will be eager to invest industrial projects in their state.

This will help to boost the economy of the state while also checkmating corruption because the governor will rather invest in industrial projects instead of hiding looted money like some useless criminal idiots do. Take For example, most governors should be investing in large scale mechanized farming combined with agro industrialization (for the end products) which will boost the economy of their state the more as a matter of fact. It will improve the revenue of their state thus helping the more. This should be their priority, as well as the security of their states against useless criminal terrorists should also be their priority.

However, I don't know if the governor having 5% share of the investment project will be a good suggestion or not because some may start to abuse the use of it. Point is no governor need to be reminded to improve the affairs of the state he governs because as a matter of fact, the the governor was elected to improve the affairs and economy of the state which is his state to begin with but since some are useless criminal fools who always think about looting rather than invest in projects to boost the economy of their states hence the reason why I suggested the "5% share of any investment project". As a matter of fact, any governor looting instead of boosting the economy of his state is quite pathetic and useless and must be dealt with!

That said, the state governments need to start getting involved in these private sectors where selfish individuals are all about fleecing the people or harming the people hence the reason why the state governments should get involved by having the state's own industries to checkmate the selfish useless criminals out there. For example investment in agricultural projects such as, large scale mechanized farming, agro industries and ranches. Also investing in production industries for the mineral resources..

Torolondo:
I keep saying this.... if we don't want to look stupid....we need to look rational. Claiming Jesus was black is one of things that make every non-black person including even most black people discredit people's believe's even further that Egyptian were not black. WHY? Egyptian is African history, but because of the lunacy of some black people claiming everything based on superficial similarities. You have people who now be " Yeah yeah... the first people who went to moon were black, muhammad was black, croatians were originally black duh duh duh". Even today we can't convince non-black people mainstream people that ancient Egyptians were black and yet we want to claim Jesus was black?

Jesus description (OMG.... is like you people don't even read the full sentence. )

The hairs of his head, it says, "were white as white wool, white as snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, his feet were like burnished bronze,

Hair white like wool, white as snow......because if his was white like wool it is also white like snow. Have you seen the Palestinians? Many of them fit the burnished bronze description, even some of them have complexion almost like any black person except they are not black. Based on that description, Jesus could easily have looked like these examples. If they mentioned he looked ethiopian than he was black enough even if ethiopian didn't look black but just claiming he was black based on the description there is way we could say he was black. Besides historians would have described him as a black man. Romans described people nubians as black, why wouldn't they do the same to Jesus who they crucified?

I guess if there were no overwhelming evidence showcasing that the Egyptians were blacks, some fools would still be arguing about it. Funnily, I don't know why anyone would be arguing if African continent was black or not.

Now that you know that the Egyptians were blacks, also note that the Jews were described as Egyptian looking in appearances after staying in Egypt for several centuries to birth multiple thousands of Egyptian looking Africans. And yes, Jesus was described as a black man. Burnished bronze coloured arms and feet with woolen hair is African feature. Below were the ancient Jews. They were blacks! Before their dispersal into Europe.

Empiree:
how does it concerned Europeans claiming it?

Because you didn't know the Jews were dispersed into Europe before returning back? The whole middle east, including Saudi belong to Africans to begin with because Jews and Arabs history started with Abraham who came to an African land. While Abraham grandchild, Jacob and his descendents went to live in the ancient black Egypt for several centuries to become several multiple thousands of Africans who left Egypt. So the middle east neither belonged to the Arab nor the Jews to begin with. Point is if the Arabs are allowed to stay in Saudi which is an African land, then the Jews should be allowed to stay in Judea. Not the Arabs also claiming it as theirs whereas Judea is no Arabic name.

The Arabs have got Saudi, why also claim Judea which is no Arab name? As a matter of fact, the criminal Arabs have stolen a lot and even stole Egypt. Judea is no Arab name!

EmperorCaesar:
Egyptians could be black or pink, thats irrelevant here. Jesus wasnt an Egyptian

Abraham arrived in Tehran as a man with a distinct racial identity to the native people of that region, I really dont know what color they were but as for Abraham, he wasnt black
That he arrived there, absorbed into their culture and all, It doesnt change the fact that he himself is of a different identity entirely

Its never documented at anytime point in time in history that the Blacks once owned and dominated Saudi. People migrated to a particular region as a means to survive their environmental condition in relative to their skin color and this same reason is why Arabians dress the way they do with their use of turbans, long jalabia and co....Its a response to their environment and not for aesthetics.

its somehow to even assume that an African would have lived in that region at any point in time, going by the way we've always dressed since the ancient times(usually without clothes on as our weather here is usually hot or so)



That aside, I wasnt even talking about the Europeanism of Jews, Jesus and early Jewish werent even native Europeans(they instead migrated from the middle East to Europe) the lands they lived are currently in modern day Turkey,Iran and Saudi, so Jesus wasnt part of those Europeans that migrated from Europe to Asia...He's always being an Asian, lived his life in the middle East like Abraham.


Show me A Link to any historical book that identified Jews as black and I will drop links of books written by historians in Jesus times who proved his ancestral origins(And yea, these books are pure historical books and not even the Bible this time)

No, the fact is the Egyptians were blacks! Sink that into your brain to begin with. The ancient Greeks stated the same and the DNA of the ancient Ramses Pharaohs proved they were blacks! it's even stupid arguing if an African continent was black to begin with.

Now back to the Jews, the Jews were described as Egyptian looking after staying in Egypt for several centuries to become multiple thousands of African black Egyptians who left Egypt. Aside the fact that it was always emphasized that the Jews were Egyptian looking in the bible, Jesus was described as a Black man in the bible..

As for Arabs, the story of the Arabs in the middle east began with Abraham, just like the Jews in the middle east. The middle east was not their Land. It was an African land. Hence why I stated that if Arabs are allowed to stay in Saudi, the Jews should also be allowed to stay in Judea. Not Arabs also claiming Judea as theirs!

akingangan:
From kneeling, bowing, and prostrating to greet elders
to wearing Iro and buba and Agabda
To similar words and intonation... there are several mysterious similarities between Yoruba and Japan
When a king loses a war in both Japanese and Yoruba cultures according to their tradition they are required to kill themselves

I know Yoruba language is similar to several languages, including the Asians etc.

So while Yoruba languages is similar to several languages, I wouldn't say Yoruba's Oyo empire = Japan empire for example. As a matter of fact, I don't know how the language of Yoruba matching with several foreign languages came about or the similar culture. Lol.

EmperorCaesar:
Jesus isnt Egyptian, so RamsesII could have been brown and i wouldnt care

Where in the bible did the description paint Jesus as being black

Man was a middle Eastern guy and could have been brown and thats why archeologists opined that he'd have shared same racial identity as those Iranian-Jewish

If we are to consider the earliest texts by both Roman and Jewish historians and the exact areas they claimed Jesus spents all his lives, sir, at no point in time in the history of mankind has the black people ever lived and dominated that area...I mean, Judeah, Galilee and his environs and these places were under the Roman territory, the native inhabitant were never black

It went over your heads when I stated that the Jews were described as Egyptian looking in the bible. The ancient Egyptians were Blacks! That's a fact!

Meanwhile, the middle East was occupied by the Blacks before Abraham came there. That was until his grandchild, Jacob and his descendants went to stay in Egypt for several centuries to become multiple of thousands Egyptian looking Africans returning to the middle East.

As a matter of fact, the Jews and Arabs history started with Abraham. It's one reason I opined that if the Arabs are allowed to stay in Saudi which is also an African land📌, then the African Jews should be allowed to stay in Judea, even though the Jews have been Europeanised. But aren't the Arabs also white? Point is the Arabs has no business claiming Judea as theirs, after claiming Saudi. Judea is no Arabic and belongs to the Jews!📌

EmperorCaesar:
Its stupid bro
Some even claim Jesus was black. Like, how can a middle Eastern man who'd have been a citizen of modern day Iran be black?

Considering the territories under the Roman rule around 1CE upward, theres no way the habitants of those places would have been black. In fact, aside Ahasuerus and a few world leaders, none ever crossed Egypt down to the other side of Africa, let alone knowing about Black Jesus and even including him in those early texts

Flavius Josephus a contemporary of Jesus and a custodian of Jewish law/Roman history, his writings alone(dated as far back as the first century about the Jew vs Roman wars) invalidated this silly claims

Jesus was described as black because it was his description in the bible. What was written in the Bible was simply stated.

Aside the fact that the Jews were described as Egyptian looking in the bible, it is stated that Jesus has burnished bronze coloured feet and arms with woolen hair as described in the bible. That's an African look. Btw, it's ascertained that the ancient Egyptians were black. The old articles from the ancient Greeks stated that the Egyptians were blacks. The DNA of the Ramses Pharaohs are sub saharan. So what's with the nonsense argument to begin with? I mean it's even stupid to be arguing if an African continent was black to begin with.

While I wouldn't know if the Asians were black or not but someone with a brain would know black is the original and dominant gene while white is the recessive gene thus the black gene predates the white gene, let alone someone arguing an African continent which is the continent of the Blacks. It's common sense! 📌 That said, I wouldn't say Benin empire of Edo = Edo Period of Japan. It wasn't happening at the same period 😅Japan had theirs while Benin had theirs. It was even the Yoruba who named the Benin, Ado Bini.

Just imagine.

Empiree:
Awaiting Israel to accept the deal

Have the Jewish hostages been released?

Meanwhile, There's nothing like Palestine which is a Greek word given to Judea. All these has nothing to do with the Arab claiming the place to begin with. Personally, I don't see how all these concern the Arab claiming it if not criminality.

absoluteSuccess:
Okay, I understand now.

Yeah, I simply emphasized how the Jews were Africans, in relative to the ancient Black Egyptians since the Jews were Egyptian looking in nature. There was even some old articles where the Europeans were referring to the Yoruba as the Jews residing in Africa during the early colonization. So whether Yorubas are Jews or not, the Europeans always knew the Jews were Blacks to begin with before they were dispersed into Europe📌📌

Speaking of the Eurasian admixture, the Eurasian admixture of the East Africans (Ethiopian for example) is the second oldest after the Yoruba while that of the North Africans is the least oldest 📌📌

That was why I came up with the two theories. Either the Yoruba parted early from the Jews in the old BC timeline or the Yoruba could also be ancient people doing their things like I theorised. I mean the Yoruba have got ancient African gene, including the ghost DNA.

babasolution:
You are irritating, the typical irritating African,my point is if Zanzibar revolution could occur,why do you think your so called north Africans could not send out the Arabs who you say were murdering them and enslaving them.

There was nothing like Arabs enslaving Africans, they simply purchased SLAVES.

You don't even realise that there were also many blacks from Senegal particularly who were hired mercenaries working for the Arab armies that invaded Spain.

There were many blacks among those ranks.

Arabs only acquired slaves they cudnt enslave Africans ,infact they were only able to enslave whites.

Arab perception of blacks was good up until they started purchasing black slaves from irritating Africans who sold their neighbours to SLAVERY

You're quite stupid. The North Africans simply acted like you and that was why they were wiped out. They acted stupidly by replacing their superior culture with the backward retrogressive foreign Arab culture while killing themselves over foreign Arab allah stone hence the reason why they were wiped out by the criminal Arabs. Simple as ABC.

My main business is Africans are not Arabs! And I repeat, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill the indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Benin Republic brothers no wan gree for us.

Boniface should have started as the striker since Osimhen wasn't available. Maybe Boniface wasn't also fit to play full minutes.

Where's Aina btw ? One of Nigeria best players at the afcon. He was integral at the Afcon and even made the caf team of the tournament. Apart from being defensively solid, he's flexible, agile and technical. Maybe he's injured.

The midfield is still something I'm looking at. Of course Iwobi plays the no 10 role. The forward area isn't an issue if got right but the central midfield is where some issue lie. Onyedika looks technical but not defensively solid nor agile. Ndidi who's supposed to be defensively solid isn't technical enough. Meanwhile, I didn't even know who was playing the holding midfield role between the two.

I think the technical Aribo should be brought into the midfield fold. Because Aribo has dominated several good midfield opposition teams, even when he was partnering with Iwobi (who's a no 10) in a 2-man midfield against Ecuador, not to mention how he also dominated the Brazilian midfield & Egyptian midfield. However, it should be noted that irrespective of the defensively attributes (tackling & awareness) of Aribo, he's not a holding midfielder but a box to box midfielder (offensive box to box) hence a good holding midfielder has to hold it down in the midfield. So, Onyedika would have to really operate as a holding midfielder. I think apart from Onyedika, there's no other holding midfielder in the squad. Most of the midfielders are box to box, including Ndidi.

absoluteSuccess:
Alright, now I understand your position, you are still on a journey of discovery. I believe this is just the early stage of making your findings and from there you will eventually make a conclusive deduction either to make a final leap here or there. Its all good boss, its almost about the same way I started out too. Just don't be too religious about it, it would mislead you.

Leave God, Ela and the virgin woman out of it or else you wont go far trying to factor them in every time you want to say something. Deal with one item, move to the next, don't dwell on your favourite-piece of "discovery" forever. You can't be repeating the same story over and over and not get your readers eternally bored. May God enable you more enlightenment sir.

I'm simply bringing out every visible facts to the table. The coincidence of the ancient Eurasian admixture and the similar several names for God (Oluwa, Olorun, Olodumare, Eriwoyah📍) as the Jewish several names is a mystery. So either the Yoruba parted early from the Jews or are ancient people doing their thing.

We know the Isrealites spent several centuries in Egypt and mixed with the Egyptians because they were described as Egyptians looking. The Israelites were few to begin with at the time they arrived in Egypt but became several multiple thousands Africans who looked like the Egyptians before leaving Egypt. And we know the Egyptians were blacks. Ramses Pharaoh of Egypt for example has mostly subsaharan gene. Thus meaning the Egyptians were blacks. Not like it was ever in doubt because all the ancient books stated the same about the Egyptians.

So the Jews were just like the Egyptians before leaving for Judea. Jesus was described as a black man too. Well, since it was stated that he was representing the first man, he had to be black man in the first place because the first man was a Black man📌 I mean Black gene is the dominant gene while Eurasian is the recessive gene. I mean this is simple for someone using his brain. Black is the original and dominant gene while Eurasian is the recessive gene. Hence my conclusion is either the Yoruba parted early from the Jews, considering the several similar names for God or they're just ancient people doing their own thing.

absoluteSuccess:
Alright, now I understand your position, you are still on a journey of discovery. I believe this is just the early stage of making your findings and from there you will eventually make a conclusive deduction either to make a final leap here or there. Its all good boss, its almost about the same way I started out too. Just don't be too religious about it, it would mislead you.

Leave God, Ela and the virgin woman out of it or else you wont go far trying to factor them in every time you want to say something. Deal with one item, move to the next, don't dwell on your favourite-piece of "discovery" forever. You can't be repeating the same story over and over and not get your readers eternally bored. May God enable you more enlightenment sir.

I'm simply bringing out every visible facts to the table. The coincidence of the ancient Eurasian admixture and the similar several names for God as the Jewish several names is a mystery. So either the Yoruba parted early from the Jews or are ancient people doing their thing.

absoluteSuccess:
Baba, good efforts, but you have a choice to make: research the Yoruba history from the best perspective you supposed with the deductible inference from the materials at your disposal.

You can't be the one making progress with what have you and the same person cancelling your own findings. Otherwise, you are making what you wish the evidence of your myriad claims.

Wetin man go do na 😂

Tbh, I have always felt the Jews should be in the Ethiopa and areas surrounding Ethiopia which should be their hotspot apart from Europe. I didn't even think Yoruba could ever be Jews but then there's the ancient Eurasian admixture, plus the similar names for God as the Jewish.

Tbh, I don't know at this point. Either the Yoruba parted early from the Jews or they are ancient people doing their thing. It's a mystery tbh. Lol.

I mean Yoruba have got ancient African ancient gene but with ancient Eurasian admixture. Funnily, Yoruba have got the oldest Eurasian admixture in Africa thus meaning it's not something recent. It's funny at this point. Quite a mystery. Lol.

If I'm to look at it according to the history sequence in the bible, I would say Abraham and Sarah were probably picked because Abraham and Sarah probably had ancient Eurasian gene. The purpose was for them to birth a son who would mix with the ancient African thereby completing the mixture of the ancient African gene with the ancient Eurasian gene of Abraham & Sarah. Could that be the reason why Jacob's 12 children were in Egypt for several Centuries to ensure several multiple thousands of African generations that later returned to Judea? 😂 This is just me thinking out loud 😂

Pharaoh Ramses of Egypt who was around the time the Isrealites were in and out of Egypt has mostly subsaharan gene📌 which buttress the point of the ancient Greeks who emphatically stated that the ancient Egyptians were Black. Not like it was ever in doubt because every old books, including the bible described the Egyptians as blacks. As a matter of fact, if Jesus was representing the first man as it was stated, there was no way Jesus would come in white skin, even as Jesus was described as a black man in the bible and as we know already, black skin is the original dominant gene while white skin is the mutant recessive gene which came out of black gene.

The first man who was a black man had a dominant Black gene and a recessive Eurasian gene📌 and if Jesus was representing the first man, he had to be black, even as Jesus was described as black in the bible however since Jesus was said to be representing everyone, Eurasian gene which came out of the black gene had to also be in the picture, thus the ancient Eurasian gene of Abraham and Sarah which combined with the ancient African gene before Jesus was born. This is just me thinking loud 😂 I mean this is the only thing I can come up with if Yoruba are Jews. Lol 😂..

So basically, Yoruba having ancient African gene but also with ancient Eurasian admixture made me come up with the two theories which was Yoruba either parted from the early Jews in the Old BC timeline, considering Yoruba have got similar names for God as the Jewish, coupled with the messiah born of a virgin woman also sent to the Yoruba OR the Yoruba are just ancient people doing their own thing and birthed the Eurasians.

System202:
I have read all ur comment regarding this topic, and I can conclude that u are just plain stupid, rude, hungry and angry dumbass, who allowed emotion's to becloud his judgement. People like FreeStuffs, mynnd,helinus have shared there opinions Professionally without emotional attachment or bias against orthers. Just come out openly and say u hate Fulani that is all, not resorting to all sorts of abuse and throwing tantrums in a faceless forum which is childish and act of cowardice. If u know much why can't u contest for senator or president and go there to enact laws that ban grazing? Its foolishness to put ur attention on some Nigerians while ur non backward parents are killing ur brothers bcs of eating last potion of food, ur people are so much hungry. Ipob has ransack ur people 2by2 shops, ur sisters cannot go and write waec and all this are not ur concerne u the indegineous Nigerians.

See tears and wailing just because backward retrogressive retarded criminals are asked to stop their criminality, be civilized and also respect their host.

It's like you're mad!

As I stated already, no pig farmer is disturbing others with his pig farming for example which is a private business. Livestock farming is a private business hence anyone going into it must ranch his animal. Simple as ABC! It's not by force to go into Livestock farming if you can't do it in the right civilized way. Stop inconveniencing and harming others with your backward nonsense because all that barbaric nonsense isn't livestock farming but criminal activity.

Dsimmer:
Yoruba predates a lot of things because Yoruba have got an ancient African gene with an ancient Eurasian admixture thus it means the Yoruba are ancient people.

It's either the ancient Yoruba went out to birth others before returning back to Africa or the Yoruba were part of the early Jews but parted early, considering the Jews were in and out of Africa in the Old BC timeline.

Of course Yoruba language has got a mix of old Jewish language with African language just as their ancient gene shows an ancient African gene with an ancient Eurasian admixture. The Yoruba language itself is a mix of African (which includes the old Coptic), Semitic, Asiatic etc. maybe some Greek/Euro considering some Greeks words such as Apata - Peter which means "Rock" or Lara, Adelaide etc.. Lol.

Funnily, there was a talk of people with strange language below the Ethiopia river where two rivers divides a land in Isaiah 18:2-3? Isn't that Lokoja, a Yoruba named town which is the home of the Yoruba westwards? As a matter of fact, Yoruba calls God the same several names as the Jewish several names for God. For example, Oluwa (Eloah), Olorun (Elohim), El 'mareh (Eledumare/Olodumare), Ìyè/Eriwoyah (Yahweh).

To add to the description btw, apart from IFA calling the Yoruba Omoluabi, Ifa also calls the Yoruba "Adulawo". Now the question is, are the Yoruba the dispersed ones below the Ethiopia river often talked for example in Isaiah 18:1-3 and also in Zeph 3:10 or they're just ancient people doing their thing? 😅 Yahweh did say his people shall bear his name. Yoruba ended up bearing Yoruba name given by Oranmiyan/Sango. Not to mention the fact that a messiah born of a virgin woman was also sent to the Yoruba.

On the other hand, Yoruba could also be ancient people just doing their thing. Besides, the dispersed ones should be in Ethiopa and Europe na..

It's strange how Yoruba have got similar several names for God as the Jewish names..

Either ways, Yoruba are quite mysterious ..

Anyways, Yoruba religion which is Ifa is all about intelligence, creativity and civilization.

Let me add that In some version, especially in the KJV version, the Isaiah 18:2-3 says the river spoiled their land (not divides the land). So if the passage was talking about how some people's land was spoilt by river, it can't be Lokoja/Yorubaland na. Lol 😂😂

Meanwhile, the ancient Eurasian admixture gene and language stuff made me have two theories which is either the Yoruba are ancient people doing their thing📌 or some early Jews in the old BC timeline (considering the fact that the Yoruba have got similar names for God as the Jewish and were also sent a messiah born of a virgin woman).. Or as I stated, they could be ancient people doing their thing.

Either ways...

oyatz:
If the Billions used by Akwa-Ib to build Church Catheral and the Billions used by Aregbesola to build a non-existent Airport were invested on Cattle ranches in Akwaand Osun States for THEIR PEOPLES,
11) It woul have generated jobs for thousands of youths in these States
2) Hunger and poverty would have reduced in these States
3) It would served as role models which can inspire other States.

If the 17 Southern States have massive ranches in their States, they would be competing with Fulani Herdsmen, who by now will have no option than modernize their own cattle business model from traditional open grazing to modernized ranching system.

More reason why state governments need to go into farming.

Personally, I don't see why each state government don't have its own state farm and agro industries. Food crops such as cassava, Palm etc with their agro processing factories/industries to produce the end products. And cash crops such as cocoa, coffee etc with their agro industries.

Then livestock ranches which can start with goats for example. The wastes from the food agro industries can be used to feed the livestock.

As for the private sector, it's their own private business hence they should ranch their own animal. Either ranch your animal or forget it. It's not by force to rear animal. No one is disturbing others with his pig farming for example. The pigs are ranched by their owners and they're not disturbing others with their pigs.

As a matter of fact, Nigeria is an ethnography country. Hence, no criminal should come to another region to inconvenient the aborigine with his backward retarded criminal practice. Simple as ABC.

Exactly!

raskymonojendor:
Ranchers or cow boys are what we call cow farmers irrespective of methods used in raising the cattles.
The natives lives on reserves land. My locations where I work on power substations are not native reserve lands.

Open grazing may not be practiced in Europe maybe due to lack of lands or just their laws are stricter. I don't know, but you probably know best since you live in Europe.

I am not sure Fulanis would agree to be called migrants in Nigeria. Are you saying Buhari is a migrant 😂.

Texas was a countryside for example. The point is we've agreed on the fact that open grazing is a backward practice hence why civilized country, including America put limitation on it. Thus the existence of ranching. Modern ranching exist because open grazing is barbaric and backward. A civilized country don't tolerate such harmful barbaric in their civilised society. Open grazing isn't practised in Europe. Point is anyone who wants to go into animal farming, either pig, goat, cow etc should ranch it. Simple as ABC. This is 21st century. It's not by force to rear animal📌

Meanwhile, Fulani are immigrants in Nigeria. They're not indigenous to any place in Nigeria. They came from Sahara & Northern Morocco before settling in the border between Senegal & Mauritania. The Hausa were the ones who allowed them in their land and even let them change the name of some of their territories in the North until Nigeria territories got mapped out under the Europeans, hence, the Hausa should carry their own cross. Point is the Hausa have got it in their hand to either remain dormant while they're trampled upon and murdered by backward criminal ingrates who can't assimilate and respect their host or the Hausa chase the criminal ingrates out of their land.

However, such useless criminal acts won't be tolerated in the Southern Nigeria and Middle belt.

raskymonojendor:
While I agree with majority of your post. I disagree with the bolded.

1. I have lived in North America both USA and Canada for 15 years. I have never met a first Nation or native American rancher. They are all white as in caucasian.

2. Some of the locations are not remote like that. They could just be 30 minutes drive from town.

Now you mention ranchers, not open grazers.

That was the point to begin with. Ranching, not backward archaic open grazing. As a matter of fact, open grazing isn't practised in Europe.

In America, the natives in the country side were given some privileges, regarding open grazing however modern law enacted has brought limitation to such backward practice because even the natives were inconveniencing their fellow natives with the backward unproductive practice.

One fact to note though, is no useless immigrant has any right to be causing havoc to the native of a place/region, let alone, bringing useless retarded harmful backward practice to disturb the natives of the place. That's the case we have in Nigeria.

raskymonojendor:
Check my last paragraph in the post you quoted. If the government don't make laws, how can you limit the movement of cows to a certain region or location?

Ps: North America too are sane societies.

So why the cry from criminal barbarians when laws are being implemented to ensure a civilized sane Nigeria in the 21st century?

Meanwhile, I knew why I mentioned Europe, not America because America is different from Europe. First and foremost, the real American natives are in the remote countryside. These American natives in the midst of several immigrants are bound to be given some leeway to begin with. Besides, they are in the remote countryside areas. Despite all these, modern law was still enacted to limit such backward open grazing practice by them.

This is different from useless criminal immigrants from other places wanting to cause havoc in a country 🙄

raskymonojendor:
Not entirely true. I do alot of field work and I have seen open grazing here in the USA and Canada. Sometimes I have to stop for the cows to cross some roads.

It's not uncommon to see cow boys on horses or ATVs herding cows in rural America.

Not supporting open grazing as the environment are different. It would be hard for a Nigerian farmer to fence his/her property all around due to cost to prevent cattles invading their farms, and the menace of Fulani herdsmen commiting crimes.

That's why the discussion in the national assembly is more than just cows like OP is trying to make it seem like.

I wasn't talking about America but Europe to begin with.

Secondly, can you see "modern time limitations" culled from the same wiki place you brought your article.

Just like I already stated, open grazing is an archaic backward unproductive practice. This is 21st century for crying out loud.

Mynd44:
There are open pasture in the western countries. The only thing is that where the open pasture is are defined and you can't turn there.

I asked you to show an example. People ranch their animals in Europe. They don't roam around like uncivilised retards. Open grazing is highly unproductive to start with. Not to mention such retarded person disturbing the society with his useless retarded barbaric ways. This is 21st century for crying out loud.

Mynd44:
Do you know in the UK, Scotland, Norway, Belgium, Germany etc a large amount of their animals are raised based on open grazing?

It is called open pasture. Even in Canada.

This is because ranching is expensive and the government wants the cost of food to be low so they provide these lands where your animals can graze without hindrance.

That's a lie. Show an example where the Europeans were roaming around with cows like uncivilised retards.

In fact, it's high time the people in Nigeria are enlightened on the fact that Open grazing is even unproductive even to the uncivilised barbaric practiser, apart from their caustic effect on the society.

Ranching is more productive.

Mynd44:
They are not debating cow, they are debating the beef and dairy industry which is a multi-billion industry and affects the lives of millions it also employs thousands of people.

You can't just over-simpkify it to be cow

Open grazing is an unproductive useless barbaric practice. In a sane civilized society like Europe, such retarded useless people would be shot dead in the first place.

Anyone who wants to go into animal farming, either pig, goat, cow etc should ranch it. Simple as ABC. This is 21st century. It's not by force to rear animal.

Olu317:
Interestingly I strongly believe certain groups of Yoruba are Hebrews-Canaan in origin , Arabs,Europeans, African-Nubians in origin .

Yoruba predates a lot of things because Yoruba have got an ancient African gene with an ancient Eurasian admixture thus it means the Yoruba are ancient people.

It's either the ancient Yoruba went out to birth others before returning back to Africa or the Yoruba were part of the early Jews but parted early, considering the Jews were in and out of Africa in the Old BC timeline.

Of course Yoruba language has got a mix of old Jewish language with African language just as their ancient gene shows an ancient African gene with an ancient Eurasian admixture. The Yoruba language itself is a mix of African (which includes the old Coptic), Semitic, Asiatic etc. maybe some Greek/Euro considering some Greeks words such as Apata - Peter which means "Rock" or Lara, Adelaide etc.. Lol.

Funnily, there was a talk of people with strange language below the Ethiopia river where two rivers divides a land in Isaiah 18:2-3? Isn't that Lokoja, a Yoruba named town which is the home of the Yoruba westwards? As a matter of fact, Yoruba calls God the same several names as the Jewish several names for God. For example, Oluwa (Eloah), Olorun (Elohim), El 'mareh (Eledumare/Olodumare), Ìyè/Eriwoyah (Yahweh).

To add to the description btw, apart from IFA calling the Yoruba Omoluabi, Ifa also calls the Yoruba "Adulawo". Now the question is, are the Yoruba the dispersed ones below the Ethiopia river often talked for example in Isaiah 18:1-3 and also in Zeph 3:10 or they're just ancient people doing their thing? 😅 Yahweh did say his people shall bear his name. Yoruba ended up bearing Yoruba name given by Oranmiyan/Sango. Not to mention the fact that a messiah born of a virgin woman was also sent to the Yoruba.

On the other hand, Yoruba could also be ancient people just doing their thing. Besides, the dispersed ones should be in Ethiopa and Europe na..

It's strange how Yoruba have got similar several names for God as the Jewish names..

Either ways, Yoruba are quite mysterious ..

Anyways, Yoruba religion which is Ifa is all about intelligence, creativity and civilization.

...

Bakrabas:
[size=8pt][/size]


Try to consult your thinking faculty before you conclude on a topic.

Tope Alabi and other gospel singers that regarded God as "Alagbada Ina" are Muslims right?

Continue to exercise your foolishness and ignorance.

If I didn't reply you again just know that I've resulted into the best answer for the fool which is....

How do your useless brain process anything to begin with?

What part of your brain doesn't understand that Alagbada Ina is Sango who is an attribute of Olodumare? All the primordial Orishas are all attributes of Olodumare who were all revealed to the Yoruba btw📌 However his fullness lies in his only begotten child, Ela who was also later revealed through a virgin woman (Oyigi) to the Yoruba as promised by Olodumare to the Yoruba. Meanwhile, Ifa also says Jewesun = Ela. Hence, Ela is same as Jewesun. That is, Jesus is Lord! There you have it.

Anyway, the main basic of religion should be intelligence, civilization and creativity to develop the society. Any religion which lack such should be binned sef. Let alone a camel urine drinking foreign Arab Pedophile religion which doesn't even know that light was created before the earth.

That said, no useless idiot has any right to kill anyone over any religion, let alone kill any indigenous people in their ancestral home over a foreign religion! Let everyone sink this into their brain because I know the useless ulterior motives of some useless people murdering others in a bid to steal their ancestral territory.

Just imagine. They brought in the Palestine terrorists na. Meanwhile, the hypocritical Maldives should open its borders to take in the Palestine terrorists na.

Maldives itself has no use apart from getting their money from tourism. So it's their loss if isreal tourists leave. The Maldives can as well bring in the Palestinian terrorists if they're not hypocrites. There's nothing like Palestine btw. It's a Greek word which has nothing to do with the Arabs claiming it as their land in the first place! 🙄