₦airaland Forum

Janosky:

Wetin Musa no go see for gate?
Chai !!!!!!!

Oga,Is this the sermon you are teaching folks from the pulpit?

Are you insinuating that google is more authoritative than spirit inspired holy scriptures saying Yahweh is the Most High God?

No.
I say that he should challenge the status who by showing the world the proof that they are wrong just like I did when Google reported that polygamy and slavery is permitted by the bible and I raised a thread proving that it is not True.

So, since he disagrees with them, then he has a duty to give us the valid Truth.

He is wrong and over reacting. Is he not the same person who always said "why are you giving me this? Can I not buy it? Don't worry."

Or is it that he needed something and the children did not give him?
He should go and sit down in one place.

FreeSpirited:
You made an infamous blasphemous claim by calling the name of the Almighty a deity from Cannan.

Now instead of you proving that Yahweh is not a Canaanite god as proven by Google and co, you are now trying to shift post to accuse me of blasphemy.

Whereas you are the one guilty of blasphemy for history and records show that Yahweh is a Canaanite god.

And instead of you to give the proof that Yahweh is not a Canaanite god before you accuse me, you are are rather dodging by accusing me.

All these just proves that you have NO THING and that you are the one blaspheming God by attaching a Canaanite god to Him.

Man, if you cannot prove that Google's info is not True, then you are guilty of blasphemy.

FreeSpirited:
I told you to prove your claim, you say it's from Google, then I ask you to bring the source and research so we can analyse their claim, u are telling me the burden of proof is on me.

Citing Google and its A.I overview thing is enough source, especially as you yourself have Google in your phone.

So the burden is on you to answer both Google and me that you Google is wrong for saying that Yahweh is a Canaanite god.

And I have been asking you to prove it but, you have NO THING, rather you keep trying to dodge it, which rather proves that you have nothing at all.

So give the proof you have, if you have it at all!!!!

FreeSpirited:
... I have no proof to establish that Yahweh is a Canaan God, that's a satanic blasphemy...

See another sly dodging by trying to change post!

You mischievously did not put the "not" in the "Yahweh is NOT a Canaanite god."

No one asked you to prove that Yahweh is a Canaanite god.

What you are asked to prove is your disagreement with Google and its affiliates which said by proofs that Yahweh is a Canaanite god.

So, since you disagree with them, then you have the burden and duty of showing the world the valid evidence and proof you have, which shows that Yahweh is not a Canaanite god would even submit it in on Google, so that the whole world would not be misled like me, if you can prove your disagreement lawfully.

So are you going to give us the proof that Google and its affiliates are wrong are you are going to keep dodging and dodging since clearly you have No Thing?

And as I said earlier, more than 250 people have come and yet not 1 person has come to join you to say that Google is lying.

FreeSpirited:
Your claim came as ridiculous actually. And it seems you don't even realize that Google is just a dumping ground for all manner of web pages that anyone can write out of different motivation and bias.
Imagine for instance telling me that a satanist who writes a book to critique the bible or Christian doctrine will be fair, of course your first intellectual honest mind will definitely consider a good chance of conflict of interest and bias.
.
So back to your ludicrous claim, who are these researchers, and what is there authority to claim Yahweh started as a Canaanite God. Lol. Very ridiculous. Please provide your source and let's validate and analyse their research.

Then, since you dispute that that Google's reports on Yahweh being a Canaanite god is not True, then the burden is on you to supply the valid evidence and proof in rebuttal to me and Google if you have it. But I know you don't have any hence all these antics of placing burden of proof even when it is your turn to prove your denial but you cannot because you never knew that Yahweh that people scream all over the place is a Canaanite god

FreeSpirited:
Why should I believe you or your source that Canaanite had a god called Yahweh, which was never alluded in the scripture.

What's the authority of your source?
And how historically accurate is your source?
How do you proof that the first supreme Being named Yahweh isn't that of God of Israel. The burden of proof is on you, because anti-Christians sentiments are known to play around with unpopular historical claims they can't proof. As I said the burden of proof is on you, it's not about just saying Jesus is a native of Kaduna, you have to proof such claims beyond doubt. And the historical authority of your source must be superior to Bible

Is Google not on your phone again for easy and quick research and check of facts?

This is the height and depth of denial.

So my proof is discharged for it is clearly stated that Isreal went to Canaan and took up the gods the Canaanites worshipped in solid and consistent rejection of The God of their father Abraham.

And history via Google clearly states that one of the Canaanites god is called Yahweh.

So, if you dispute this facts as provided by Google and its several sources, it is you who has the burden of rebutting their evidence and claim.

And already you see none of the 64 viewers which included people who are learned in both the bible and history have come to say that I am lying. So this is a matter that is just between you and your denial

FreeSpirited:
Israel's love for strange gods started before their journey to Canaan. It's understandable cos they knew no other gods except the gods and religion of Egypt which was polythiestic, until Moses came to tell and teach them of the way of Yahweh demonstrated by unrivalled power and miracles.

Please avoid raising excuses for Isreal's blatant rejection of God. Especially as if you are not deceiving yourself you would know that a rebellion means a rejection.

FreeSpirited:
Conflating Yahweh with Canaanite God is quite disingenuous if I must say. In the scripture, gods like Baal, Astoreth, Micolm, were common gods associated with Israel's rebellion, and it's apt that Yahwehs first and greatest law is that you should love only your God who is Yahweh and served no other gods which was the debacle of the Israelite.
..
So which Canaanite god perse are you conflating with Yahweh, ? I must say u are blaspheming, calling Yahweh a Canaanite deity

The bible clearly stated Isreal worshipped Canaanite gods. And here we have a name ascribed to a Canaanite murderfilled god being attached to Holy God.

And you do not find that suspicious?

You would be the one blaspheming by attaching a Canaanite god unto the Holy One!

FreeSpirited:
Meanwhile, I want to be sure you know the etymology of the word YAHWEH, I hope I wasn't assuming you knew.
Because it's disingenuous to conflate YAHWEH a holy name of God that came from Tetrgrammatom of jewish letter in an attempt to give the name of God a sound YHWH. which is like breath.... You need to present how YHWH became or was a Canaanite god

yp

We do not need to go into the DNA of small pox and all the grammar to identify small pox.

Without going into DNA of words and etymology the history shows the fact that Canaan has a god called Yahweh.

Isreal went to Canaan and took up those same gods in solid and consistent rejection of The God of their father Abraham.

Now we have a name, the only name out of all the other Holy Names ascribed to The Holy God of Abraham which have no blemish.

But here we have this ONE blemished word called Yahweh, a name attached to a murder filled corrupt Canaanite god and you do not find that questionable and suspicious as you accept all those contorted shii..s trying to connect an unholy thing to a Holy God?

It does not add up man.

Kemetian:
This post is a sad testament on the state of education in Nigeria.

The writers of the New Testament are ANONYMOUS.

You can actually go on ChatGPT AI now and confirm.

It will tell you nobody knows who wrote the New Testament.

It will also tell you that “Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John” are fake names, and that the Church doesn’t dispute this.

Now the question is, Why are you Nigerians worshiping a British-imposed book of unknown origin and authorship?

Incidentally, one which has your simple minds bowing to them as your “lord and saviour”?

You accuse people of being ill educated yet, here you are showing your miss education.

I am certain that you have read books whose front pages bearing the authors name are torn off. And you have also read wise sayings which bear the words "anonymous". Yet, here you are making an issue about a book written by an unknown author. Man, you people need to go in for check up

FreeSpirited:
This is not a biblical statement, and I have to question the authority from whence your statement or assertion came. This is what the Bible says when God speaking to Moses clarified his real name when trying to introduce himself to Moses before he was sent to lead Isreal out of Egypt.

Exodus 6:2-3
[2]And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD: (NB: 'LORD' here was transliterated from the word Yahweh in the Hebrew manuscript)
[3]And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.


So obviously this is God telling Moses his real name.... God appeared to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as El shaddai.... Which means Almighty God.... But revealed himself to Moses as Yahweh/Jehovah according to this verse

See, you just accused others of holding on to their biased yet here you are holding unreasonably to your own.

You say LORD' was translated from the word Yahweh. If so, did you not see that in the bible shows that Isreal rejected God, even from Egypt and they sought to replace and substitute Him with the gods of Canaan as evidenced by the golden calf affair?

And funny, this Yahweh word is the only word which shares meaning and connection with Canaanite god, how come?

Does this not make it very suspicious especially as all the other Names ascribed to God are Independent, Pure and Holy in line with God's Nature except this word Yahweh which is corrupted by being the same name of the gods of Canaan whom we see the Israelites loved and adopted to be their god?

Steep:
Isaiah 44:6 described yahweh as the only God. There are no two Gods but only one.

So Jesus cannot be another God from yahweh...

Yahweh is not in the bible.

Did you not read that the Israelites worshipped the gods of Canaan? And now Yahweh is said to be a Canaanite god

Does that not tell you that The LORD Who Spoke to Abraham before his seed japad to Canaan is not Yahweh?

AI Overview
+6
Yes, Yahweh was likely a Canaanite deity who was eventually integrated into the Israelite religion,

FreeSpirited:
Yahweh exists in the scripture, though he's distinct from Jesus. It was translation to English that changed Yahweh and Jehovah which are both same transliteration, to LORD . ANYWHERE YOU SEE IN THE SCRIPTURE WHERE capital letter is used to write LORD OR GOD.... the real word there is Jehovah or Yahweh

There is no place in the bible where Yahweh is mentioned.

Further did you not read that the Israelites worshipped the gods of Canaan? And now Yahweh is said to be a Canaanite god

Does that not tell you that The LORD Who Spoke to Abraham before his seed japad to Canaan is not Yahweh?

AI Overview
+6
Yes, Yahweh was likely a Canaanite deity who was eventually integrated into the Israelite religion,

FreeSpirited:
Of course he's a god that has jurisdiction in Nigerians business/private sector. That's doesn't make him the President.
So Jesus is God in relation to the universe, the creation, and the destiny of the universe, yet that doesn't make him Jehovah. Jesus defers to Jehovah and Jehovah makes him heir of everything

Yahweh is not in the bible especially as it is even said to be Canaanite god. And the Bible records that Isreal worshipped the Canaanite gods too.

"Ancient Deity: Yahweh was once considered a Canaanite deity of weather and war before becoming the national god of Israel and Judah"

So, you cannot join Jesus to Yahweh

Remove the bot. Let us be free to yab and fire ourselves hot hot 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Many people like me came here because of the hot hot firing that used to take place between commenters. NOW IT'S VERY VERY DRY

kingxsamz:
Wetin do the case of people wey dem kee inside church? ??

Off Point

FreeSpirited:
Well, that might be a theory you have to critically prove biblically, especially to show that the rich getting into heaven is only so difficult by just one point from the poor.

It is proven already. When you mention the Word "God", you will see the rich jump or react in silent anger. (I just did it to my neighbour at the gas station as recent as yesterday)

With the poor, it is mostly prayers that follows

YeyeGbami:
No be lie, valid reason for cheating indeed.

Cheating men even tell their women that they will cheat and the woman still married them. And this is the case 95% of the time

arsenal33:
Why do men cheat on good women?

No good woman will marry a cheat.

MEGA4BILLION:
Women don't actually know what they want

You are still swimming in 1980 Lie? You better jump out oo

YeyeGbami:
Same reason wey make man cheat on his good wifey.

As a married person, you need to guard your feelings when out there. For you and your partners sake.

Things get complicated quickly, before you know you don dey sleep outside. Otilor!

It's not the same. Many men have different valid reasons for cheating and if the wife was truly good, she would never have married a potential cheat.

FreeSpirited:
You don't have to judge the value that poverty sometimes I still in religious people by using Nigerian religious poor people as case study. See Nigerian society is in a deep mess. Both cultural, social, political and religious society is a cankerworm.
Christ can't be mistaken to have made that statement of difficult level for rich, for us to now try to disprove it that it's ratio 9:10 .... That can't be true

The Nigerian society is the same everywhere in the world, the rich and the poor are the same.

And I like testing and tasting to see that Word of The Lord is Accurate and True, hence why I prove that The Lord's Word is very accurate, even though the measurement was very very close and some impatient person may conclude that they are the same but they would be wrong.

The poor only have it better than the rich by 1 Mark

saintopus:
Till tomorrow no one can answer this question. You see relationships are complex things.

The answer is there na and you all see it.

It is clearly because she did not think that the man would be faithful, so she found that she is trapped and if she continues, God will hammer her. So she cheats to break up from him so that God will not visit her.

That's why!

kingxsamz:
Lmao, which case be that? The ones wey dIe inside church, why Jesus no help them?

See am na. You don dey prove say atheists dey blind as you no see the case for the beginning of the thread wey start this talk.

FreeSpirited:
And I disagree vehemently that it's far easier to be righteous and holy as a poor person than as a rich person...

Bros, neither of them are easy ooo

When I measured it, I think the poor only have it easier by 1 mark that is

Poor 9: Rich 10.

The 2 are very very difficult for the people in them

Truvelisback:
You didn't say it but point made it obvious. To understand my point, go and read about what the Bible say about the poor. Read the Book of Proverbs about the rich and the poor. The person who wrote this was rich.

Your point is null because the bible clearly shows that God always blessed those who followed Him. Even the person who wrote the Proverbs on the poor was increased and prospered by God. Which means he was first poor.

And this is more so that it was clearly written that if you cannot pass when you are poor you cannot pass when you are rich, yet you have not learnt.

Well, your journey loooooooooooooooooooong. E go tay before you rich unless you go juju and na dia you go see why rich people can never ever make it

kingxsamz:
You swallow am first na. 😂
Make we see if that your Jesus truly get power.

This case for up don already prove am and dat na why na una turn to do una own, yet see all the dodgy dodgy and tory una dey blow. Abeg enter dusbin

Truvelisback:
So, being poor pleases God than being rich, right? Now, who is deceiving who?

No where did I say that. So , it's clear it is you who is deceiving yourself.

Truvelisback:
Going to heaven isn't about how wealthy or poor you are rather it's about how you lived your life either in Christ or out Christ. Christianity is deeper than being rich or being poor. If Maxinthehouse was poor, he wouldn't have been able to afford the expensive phone he is using to reply me.

No contention on this. I was only giving examples of the poor who we know lost it

Truvelisback:
I know you will choose not to be honest to yourself. It's fine.

It is you who is still deceiving yourself in being blinded and fuelled by your wishes.

Everyone has seen how very bad and ill behaved poor men got when they got rich. And they all said, exactly what you said when they were poor.

So you are the one deceiving yourself and you have still not learnt that you cannot deceive God.

Truvelisback:
Jesus isn't against the rich. Being rich doesn't disqualify you from entering into the kingdom of God or being poor. You can be poor and still not enter.

Judas, the man who Jesus forewarned to behave himself lest a worse come, the people who were bribed to condemn Jesus were all poor

Truvelisback:
Let me be honest here, if I get rich, I mean clean wealth, I shall be holier and more righteous than I am now. Poverty is very terrible, and you know it. The disadvantages of being poor cannot be compared to the disadvantages of being rich. Even the Bible said "Money 💰 answereth all things". With this few points of mine, I hope I'm able to convince you and not to confuse that living a righteous life as a poor christian is tougher than living a righteous life as a rich christian.

No you won't!

If you can't make it in poorverty, riches will obliterate you.

If you think poorverty is hard, then God has been good in ensuring that you remain poor.