₦airaland Forum

MaxIntheHouse2:
[b]“These things I command you, that you love one another. ..

If you truly loved your neighbour, you won't be inviting him to join your evil cult

It is definitely worser today unlike the past where girls and boys who were not virgins and who were seen fornicaying were treated like abominations and catarrh.

But today, if you are a virgin, people get very angry and then the next thing they do is to set you up with hot temptations and threats. Very evil generation indeed.

Daniel058:
Sometimes I'm confused. Is the bible Telling us the truth about who God truly is?


Is God truly all knowing God ,Does knw the future, is it true that he's omniscient God?


If He is Why did he created Lucifer who is going to disobey/offend him?
jesusjnr2020

Did you not know that your child will grow up and be an armed robber who shall abuse and call you a stupid useless father?

Yet you still went ahead and poured your sperm

MaxIntheHouse2:
Another thought provoking question!

Regarding this group please read what a prophet said in the Bible:

“You are the light of the world. A city cannot be hid when located on a mountain. People light a lamp and set it, not under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it shines on all those in the house. Likewise, let your light shine before men, so that they may see your fine works and give glory to your Father who is in the heavens" Matthew 5:14-16

"By their fruits you will recognize them. Never do people gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles, do they?  Likewise, every good tree produces fine fruit, but every rotten tree produces worthless fruit. A good tree cannot bear worthless fruit, nor can a rotten tree produce fine fruit." Matthew 7:16-18

Now read what Nairalanders like you have observed:

Here you are talking about one the biggest perverters of the bible who teach Lies.

And the world does see your fruits.

But of course Liars will find Liars attractive

emmy512:
also, a prophecy being fulfilled might show the Bible has value and insight but itt doesn’t cancel the fact that it’s been filtered through centuries of human influence.

Is it the bible that was filtered or the statements which people said and pointed to the bible claiming the bible said it?

When you say "still accurate" it means it was accurate before.

And if it was accurate before then therefore it can be accurate now and be accurate tomorrow

NEWBIN:
A married woman claims to be in love with me and desperately yearns to sleep with me. I am equally married and cannot sleep with this married woman. I know I will never get to sleep with her because I fear God.

Now, she is fond of sending me money and gifts. Have I sinned if I accept these gifts knowing her intentions?

What's your most Christian opinion on this situation?

Satan don mark you for destruction and you dey play with the assassin wey hin don send

You never still learn from your ancestors.

Previous don open thread because of you

https://www.nairaland.com/8416177/segzual-temptation#135232621

Don’t you hear the Scripture? It says, “The adulterous is looking for the precious

Everyman knows and already does it.

So was David and his household so punished!

Satan's children will always resemble each other

MightySparrow:
Islam claims to be only approved religion on earth and that Muslims have been commissioned to exterminate all religions other than Islam.

Jehovah's Witnesses claim they are the only organization representing God on the earth today and the Governing Body is the only group that can understand the Bible.

Islamic Jesus is coming to kill Christians, break the cross and kill pigs.

At Armageddon all human races would be wiped out and Jehovah Witnesses will remain to enjoy all pigs left behind after Armageddon.


Islamists are killing and maiming people is real time while Jehovah's witnesses kill people in their wishes.

You mean kill people using their Wishes and Dreams and Hopes!

michlins:
for this same religion Jesus worshipped and prayed with?

All in the name of painting Catholic Church evil, you called the same religion Jesus worshipped from birth to death pagan worshippers. Same people who you call their God (God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob)

Same God is what you call paganism

The thread shows that I have already drawn the distinction between Christianity and Catholicism. A distinction which the whole world sees and have also pointed out.

And this threads clearly shows that Christianity had no lawful connection with Romans who are known to be pagans as is clearly shown in their own duplication and depiction of Christianity via their paganous Catholicism.

Exactly how someone has just done a church that is both Christian and Islamic.

If you do not have time to read history, this thread has covered it for you.

michlins:
all those times,it was still an off wing of Judaism even though Jewish people didn't accept them. It wasn't until Romans needed the sect for conquest did they formally adapt it to a standalone religious group

1) Read your bible. Judahism is idol worship. So Christianity is not an off shoot of it. It is separate and distinct from them. And that is why they conspired to murder Christ.

2) Then go read your history again. The Romans had already conquered whatever land they held first but Christianity was already there.

And if you read you would see that the Romans were losing power and control over those territories because of their evil governance. And because of their use Christian Power and principles, they set up what we now know as the Roman Catholic church who had set up schools and hospitals in those territories which catered to the people before the Roman collapse.

And when the Roman power collapsed the Power shifted to the priests in control of those areas. And the Romans funded them and used them to continue controlling and exploiting those areas.

And Christianity is not interested in acquiring Power nor controlling people nor exploiting people.

The Romans are Pagans which is why you see that their church called Catholic, is pagany, idolatric and full of idols

So you see, Catholicism is not Christianity

michlins:
all those times,it was still an off wing of Judaism even though Jewish people didn't accept them. It wasn't until Romans needed the sect for conquest did they formally adapt it to a standalone religious group

1) Read your bible. Judahism is idol worship. So Christianity is not an off shoot of it. It is separate and distinct from them. And that is why they conspired to murder Christ.

2) Then go read your history again. The Romans had already conquered whatever land they held first but Christianity was already there.

And if you read you would see that the Romans were losing power and control over those territories because of their evil governance. And because of their use Christian Power and principles, they set up what we now know as the Roman Catholic church who had set up schools and hospitals in those territories which catered to the people before the Roman collapse.

And when the Roman power collapsed the Power shifted to the priests in control of those areas. And the Romans funded them and used them to continue controlling and exploiting those areas.

And Christianity is not interested in acquiring Power nor controlling people nor exploiting people.

The Romans are Pagans which is why you see that their church called Catholic, is pagany.

So you see, Catholicism is not Christianity

https://www.nairaland.com/8347687/it-roman-catholics-pagans-ruled#134228523

michlins:
there was no formal religion called Christianity prior to the council. Everything and everyone who heard about Christ were gathering and doing their own thing. Some were following Paul and others were following Peter and other apostles.

It wasn't until the council that everything was ratified as a religious sect

No religious sect was formal when they started.

And Christianity had already spread to Ethiopia and all the banks of East and northern Africa even before the nicea convention was put together.

advanceDNA:
Jokes should be posted in jokes section....

The torture of waiting for certain punishment, is punishment itself.

michlins:
council of nicea was where Christianity started

You are just changing post up and down and moving from one issue to another.

The Council of nicea is a religion based organ formed by the Roman rulers for the Roman rulers aims and purposes.

Meanwhile Christianity was a minute Jewish sect. So the Romans have no business with it.

If anything the Romans arrested and hotly prosecuted them. So, they have no right to claim what is not theirs and that which they even despised and sought to silence.

Meanwhile, Christianity was already formed and spreading even before the Roman rulers formed their nicea convention.

So, you see the Romans are thieves and interlopers.

michlins:
all religions on earth are founded by men including Christianity. Christ came and showed humans his way but didn't found any religion.

If Christ wanted to start a relationship or "found" one, he wouldn't be going to synagogue to teach and pray but start it distinctively

Firstly, Christ is not a man.

Secondly, since there are people who dutifully followed The Way Christ had showed and directed, then, Christ has founded a religion.

Then, everyone knows that the synagogue is a representative of the place of the Ark of the Covenant and Temple of God which Solomon first built. All of which belong to Christ. So going there is Him going to His "Office".

BlackyOne:
That one na your business

Na all our business make person no dey Lie to us.

advanceDNA:
Let's play small devil's advocate here........ Do you know many authors of the books in the bible are not known?? Will you say that invalidates the accounts written there in??

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying your suggestion is false ......I'm just saying what you want to use to invalidate the guy and his testimony has a bit of fallacy mixed with it....

Well........Catholics are full of propaganda quite all right.....but fabricating the death of Peter as a form of illegal connection to Christianity isn't all that plausible to me..

I mean, those Mary worshippers are the ones that single handedly made a religion out of the followership of Jesus .......they might be full of shiit but u gotta give them some credit for blowing the trumpet of Jesus/christinaity loud enough before the Islamic caliphate came with their crusades....,

Like I said...peter is dead....& he isn't Jesus..so his death has no significance to Christianity

No!

The difference is, look at their reports. You would see that has any reasonable reason to query their reports nor do we really have any reasonable cause to question (cross examine) them.

Then, another peculiar fact we also see about the other writers in the bible is that we can see other people (witnesses), even elsewhere and at a different time make independent reference (corroboration) to them and their reports.

And even other events contemporaneously following the bases of those events reported.

So the Bible forms a chain with even a kind of set pattern.

Unlike, this guy's report. Everyone is first hit with the fact that there is something wrong with it and that the report does not add up aka make sense.

We will can feel that there is no way Peter would die like that. We all can feel it.

And so we all have some questions we wish to put to the witness.

And now, I have gone looking for this witness and the records say that he is missing and that he kind of does not exist with his mystery full birth and death and unfounded identity.

And that he is even Roman Greek, which leads to the question when and how did he become a Christ Follower that he could even get close to Peter?

And neither does he give us the report of when and where Peter was arrested, before whom (court) was he tried and found guilty of death; and who and who was there when all these was happening.

And in fact how he got to be there and saw all these things he claims he saw.

There is no independent report anywhere else of anyone corroborating any of these things.

How come he is the only one who said he saw these things?

And the reports do not say that he is the hangman/execution nor that his house was used as the execution grounds, where he could have had a "private viewing".

But people are always there in an execution, yet this not-identifiable guy is the only one who saw it all.

C'mon. This is clearly a Fabrication.

alpharoyalty:
It depicts the crucifixion of Peter, the first leader of the church

Certainly not Catholic church

michlins:
Christ didn't start any church from the time he lived and to die.

I said "founded Christianity".

Uchesis:
But I didn't see any answer to respond to naa

It is not my fault that you are blind.

Rexymania:
They are honoring Apostle Peter, he died on an inverted cross. Peter was considered as the first Pope

Funny!

A Pope they did not Pope nor was he even a Roman.

Clearly a Lie.

It is just the same as the Nairaland moniker called MrPresident claiming Trump is his president.

Uchesis:
When you can't answer a simple question what do you expect me to say to you?

When people cannot respond to an answer supplied, the next thing they do is to attack the answerer (fallacy of ad hominem)

Even in school if an answer supplied was wrong the teacher was happy to point it out in enjoyment of the power of superiority.

But when right, good teachers say "clap for him" whilst bad teachers fire "big head" or "I T.K"

advanceDNA:
Is it how Peter died that you don't like or the person who said he died that way??

Btw....Peter isn't the Lord Jesus.. so what's the significance of how he died?? Weda he died at home or elsewhere..peter is dead either way

A combination of all.

However, the first point of call is to check the witness who gave such a report.

And lo, this witness has no solid identity.

His place of birth is fictitious; his birth is fictitious; his death is fictitious.

Clearly he does not want to be identified.

And this means that he either does not exist (most likely) or he is not who he says he is.

Therefore, his testimony is great suspect and cannot be relied upon nor believed.

And with this, it can be seen that the upside down sheet, is just a Catholic propaganda and the making of an illegal connection to Christianity.

Uchesis:
Is this how you answered questions in WAEC and Jamb?

Clearly they loved it and that is why I am where I am and why you cannot counter, hence your resorts to silly responses.

This guy's testimonies cannot be believed.

He is clearly a bad and unreliable witness.

A good witness is not shrouded in Mystery and we all know Catholics hide and place things they do not want to explain in the word "Mystery" which is Darkness and Concealing

Whereas, God is about Light and Revealations!

First they said his name is Jerome (/dʒəˈroʊm/; Latin: Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus;

Clearly, he is a Greek and not a Jew not to talk of being a Christ Follower.

Secondly, he is claimed to have been born in Stridon.

But..

A.I overview
Stridon was a Roman town in Dalmatia, best known as the birthplace of Saint Jerome. The exact location is unknown, but it is thought to be near the Roman towns of Emona (modern Ljubljana) and Aquilea. Stridon was destroyed by the Goths in 379. Additionally, Stridon is also the name of the Slovene

See, the guy is already wrapped in MYSTERY and Darkness


Then Jewish Encyclopaedia declared that
"The dates of his birth and death are not definitely known;" but he is generally assumed to have lived from 337 to 420. Born in Stridon,

BlackyOne:
That was how the Apostle Peter was crucified, and Catholic claim their line of authority through Peter...

It is a Lie!

michlins:
Ok

I don't know what you have been told but the Catholic Church founded Christianity in its entirety. Whatever doctrine or creed you hold dear was invented by the church. From Trinity, Sunday worship and the rest including the Mary you so much despise are all Catholic doctrine.

But then, you can cherry pick the one that suits you and cast aspersions on the rest

The Catholic church did not found Christianity. It is Christ Who did.

All the Romans did was that they caused it's exportation from Isreal to other territories via their arrest and prosecution of the new religious sect called Christians.

So, as it is wrong to say Obinna who imported iPhones to West Africa is the founder of iPhone, so is it wrong to say that the Romans founded Christianity. So please scrap that Lie and stop promoting it.