₦airaland Forum

GanagiBitrus:
Man City will play Newcastle by 4pm today.

There is a possibility that Haaland will suffer a painful tackle in the match. Maybe it actually happens & there a pix of Haaland in pains.

I go to the stadium with Haaland's doll & be pricking it with needle. Camera films me doing this.

A Blogger puts up my video on Social Media along with the picture of Haaland pains.

[b]Your Conclusion:[/b]h My pricking Haaland with Needle caused him pains or injury.

Bare in mind that even if Haaland did not suffer injury today, if I keep performing the needle pricking act in every match, there must be a match it will happen.

Invalid argument!

Now you are resorting to "your case, my case' argument.

Whereas all you have been called to do is to explain this case.

Secondly, no where where did I give my opinion on the matter, so you do not have "my conclusion" on this matter and neither are you called to explain my conclusion.

So as you cannot explain it, then stay silent. We do understand.

LordReed:
LMAO! Patrick Mahomes was injured BEFORE the game. He was playing with a major injury already on file so how is it remarkable that during a CONTACT sport an already existing injury would be exacerbated?

You people and superstitious nonsense.

Your report says "ankle injury" meanwhile it was reported

GistMedia0:
"Adding to the mystery, Patrick Mahomes, an offensive captain for the Kansas City Chiefs, reportedly suffered from random back pain—the same jersey number he wears was on the voodoo doll she was pricking with a pin. shocked."

GanagiBitrus:
You want me to explain how A GIRL PRICKING NEEDLE ON A DOLL CAUSED INJURY TO A PLAYER ON THE FIELD?

But there is no proof that her action caused the injury. That has to be established first.

Now you are resorting to pretence in pretending you did not understand the question the op posed and changing it.

The case is clear and it is clear you cannot validly address it, so you have been doing everything to dodge it.

As I said earlier, if you cannot explain it, then stay silent.

RealityKings1:
You are unintelligent

Clearly describing yourself as shown by your response.

GanagiBitrus:
The Claim here was that the girl pricking needle on a doll was responsible for the injury to the player on the field.

That is not the claim, it is the event caught on camera that is up for examination and explanation.

So it is either you can explain it or you cannot. It is as simple as that

Judybash93:
That's completely asinine.

Exactly what you are doing

Uchesis:
I thought married people already have permanent vals

Exactly!

Oakenshield:
she is married

It does not matter. Plus we remember she just got married some months back.

Tjra:
Your 3rd leg is controlling your brain and fingers.

Keep typing rubbish

When fathers and daughters are fvcking everyone can see it. And you cover up just made it worse

Pawa100:


Some people from a Particular Region will Read , and put Abomination meaning into this

That means you sef dey see the abomination.

GanagiBitrus:
1. If you come up with a Claim or Theory, the onus is on you to provide Proof or Evidence, not on me...

There is no claim made here. A case caught on camera was presented here for you to explain.

So it is either you can explain it or you cannot. It is as simple as that

Judybash93:
How did you know that? I asked a question. If you don't have an answer, that's fine. You don't know my thought.

Please, stop making foolish arguments. We all can see the Why you asked the question.

Fisiryorh:
You lack common sense.....🤦🏾‍♂️

See person wey dey fvck hin daughter and hin daughter dey fvck am dey complain.

GOFRONT:
Imagine the fvckery between being a Father and a premadonna daughter..

I was about to ask does anyone see this is suspicious?

Judybash93:
It wasn't an argument. It was a question.

Posed for the purposes of making an argument.

Thoth02:
Enjoy your ignorance and continue worshipping your loving God.

I can't stoop so low to be debating an ignorant fool.

You have no reasonable or valid thing to debate with.

2cribz:
Hello guys,nothing is wrong with my battery. I found the culprit. The car door lock back-light is the cause. I drove out early in the morning by 6am,I met the car back-light icon permanently on,tried disconnecting the fuses and all,but the light stays on. So I softly removed the battery heads and will find the switch controlling it.ao if the car is left idle for a whole day,the car lock back-light will drain all the energy inside the battery.

Ok. That is true. But that would also mean that the battery is not strong for my kids once left the back light on all night after we returned from a trip or so but my car still started the next day.

Whois:
Na real ride shock . I was told the cells of the Battery I bought September 2023 is dead, the battery is just a year 6 months old o I tried charging it myself but it was a waste of time. A neighbor give me his second battery (that's very old and showing pink) to try and charge if it will work, luckily his battery started working again while mine that is still showing green indicator refused to work.

That is exactly what happened to me. The battery was still green yet it did not crank. Battery charger took it charged it for even 3days and brought it back. It started but the very next day it died. And that became the pattern of every battery after that

Judybash93:
If there's no way to prove it, then why on earth do you believe it?

Fallacy of "if you can't prove therefore I can't prove". Invalid argument.

SeraphicWind:
If according to the first poster that everything is connected, what then do you call those who use the connectivity to manipulate and injure others?

What else defines witch craft at the base level?

This does not refute the fact that there are PRINCIPALITIES, DOMINIONS AND POWERS OF DARKNESS.

100% REAL. I don't need to proove this because there is no physical or scientific way of prooving it. Same way we don't see wind but we see "windy effects", it is same principle.

Don't follow the poster. His answer was already off point as he needs to prove that everything is connected.

And this is a distraction and deviation from post.

Judybash93:
Patrick Mahomes plays American football. The probability of getting injured in a game is pretty high especially for someone like him who plays in the quarterback position where they usually sustain injuries to the shoulders and also other parts of the body mainly through contact with the opposing players.
The girl doing whatever she's doing doesn't mean it worked on him. If by any chance, it was a coincidence. The player in question has a history of injuries ranging from mild to severe over the course of his career.
If you can prove that this works, I'd like for us to try it on Tinubu at least he'd feel our pain.

If he was injured you would have pointed it out when he was injured before this witchcraft.

But now you are hiding under "general probability" whereas you are asked a specific certainty.

That means you have nothing

The Bold: And please, atheists stop committing the fallacy of reversing the burden of proof. If you cannot explain it then leave it

GanagiBitrus:
How do you prove it's her action that caused the player's injury?
Several players get injured in sports. So it is someone somewhere pricking needle on them that is responsible? That's a very myopic reasoning devoid of logic...

1) You are committing the fallacy of reversing the burden of proof.

2) You are also creating your own questions. There is no several players getting injured in the case only one player.

So if you cannot explain it, then stay silent.

gofigurena:
Sounds like you have a good car maintenance culture. I laughed about the crude oil part, though. Nawa for people o.

That crude oil car just made me go berserk and understood that Nigerians don't take care of the vehicles.

I see people buy vehicles and by the end of the year I start hearing their engines from the car park, something I never heard before. And then 3 years later the car sounds and looks old and the next thing they have sold it.

I did not want that for my self especially as I like travelling and so I need them ready to travel even without notice p

bukatyne:
1. Rape I.e. sex without consent cannot happen in a marriage as the estate confers automatic consent to both parties.

2. Some instances actually allows for refusal to have sex with a spouse. It is always unfair.

3. Sometimes, a partner is not willing to have sex. However, they are obligated to discuss their concerns with their partners. Are there times when a spouse is been unreasonable/unfair and wants to force the other party? Then it is assault/battery/bodily harm depending on what was done. It is however not rape because both parties have automatic consent to the other party.

You are saying this because no wife really wants to prosecute her husband for raping her.

There is nothing like "automatic consent"

The consent that is in marriage is "Presumed Consent" which is why no one expects to hear that a husband raped his wife because marriage means that both parties have given their consents to each other to have sex.

But consent is personal which is why we see that when a spouse does not want they have to say "no" or 'not now" Which means withdrawal of consent.

And where no withdrawal, sex is little similar to rape as it is direct with no questions asked. However, the parties have already fore consented, which is why it is not rape neither is anyone complaining about rape.

As different from fornication where one has to demand sex in seeking and obtaining the consent of the other party who may grant or refuse consent.

Thus "presumed consent" means that it is rebuttable. And once there is evidence to show that a spouse withdraw consent, even if temporarily, rape occurs if the husband does not yield to her withdrawal.

He is free to act like a rejected boyfriend or lover and throw her out of his house BUT HE HAS NO RIGHT TO RAPE HER, EVEN IF SHE IS HIS WIFE!

JovialJune:
Firstly, you do not speak for all Christians, take note of that

Secondly, state where it is specifically written in the bible that "forceful sex is automatically allowed because husbands and wives automatically owns each other's body"

Take note of my bolded quote and refer exactly as it is!!!

Thank God you are a woman telling your fellow woman that she is wrong.

The bible even said on the sex issue that husbands should love their wives, so how can love be rape?

correctyourself:
Bitter heart, i can't help you with your problem, find away to hell yourself.

Says the one supporting rape. Just say you never had any reasonable thing to say.

SmartyPants:
One honestly wonders. This is the simplest job for any lawyer but he prefers to to come here and waste his time.

You can say it again.

correctyourself:
When wife family submits bride price list can it be rejected or turned down because the man is not in the mood?

If you know you belong to such class of ladies you better stay in your father's house and marry your family.

Sure! Neither did they handcuff you and tie you down to give them your ATM (rape) for them to take the bride price.

See a man who turned it down and rejected it.
https://www.nairaland.com/7697133/man-rejects-wife-to-be-three-days#123269730

Padipadi:
Rubbish dey ya head. See blasphemy wey you dey quote. Allah suppose slap you

Allah no fit slap me. E no get right. And dat one no still change the fact say God dey punish women with plenty plenty suffering

sonmvayina:
I spoke too soon.
He is still out there.....please see a psychiatrist.it will help you and those around you too.

See it Mad man, everyone is saying you can continue being Mad on your own. Fool.

opezy:
Well by Law in Nigeria,

THERE IS NOTHING LIKE MARITAL RAPE... THE CONSTITUTION SEES MARRIED COUPLE AS ONE AND ONE CANNOT RAPE HIMSELF OR HERSELF

2 PORTION OF RICE @timiagbaje

The Law Rape covers every kind of rape whether in the street or in marriage, so there is no need for it to say marital rape or office rape or school rape. Rape is rape.

Secondly, the Law also sees the directors and shareholders as one, yet it separates them and punishes them when one of them have done a wrong.

So your argument does not stand

correctyourself:
The money the man spent marrying the wife, is it not stress to the man?

When the wife's relatives visit, they eat in the man's house, is it not financial and mental stress to the man?

When the woman sends money to her parents/relatives without approval by husband should we now say that the woman is stealing?

Una go explain tire!

Is it not with your consent that all these things happened? Did anyone rape force you?

So you are talking rubbish