₦airaland Forum

chieveboy:
I have included your original assertion. If you view my view point on incarnation as lies, perhaps you will do better by pointing us to the person Jesus said will not taste death till he returns.

You will also tell us how we will identify John whom the Bible tells us will return to earth in the last days.

helinues:
Again, you are wrong.

There is a story about a cockroach buzzing around in a restaurant, it fell on 2 customers which caused some drama, but when it fell on the waiter, the waiter was calm, monitor the cockroach and picked it then threw it away.

Same situation but different reaction. Would you compare someone with slowpoke with someone with no disorder?

AngelicBeing:
Hahaha, Wikes Grace but going to Elrufais house, hahaha, Una go kill person with laugh for nairaland Hahahaha 😂

helinues:
All brains are not functioning same remember Your definition of good or bad depends on how your brain would translate the meaning to you

OnuChuks:
How? Please explain, so Jesus won't Forgive her because of the Video came online or what.

The guy who was banished from the church in 1 Corinthians for Adultery was restored to the church in 2 Corinthians,
why is her case different?

Repent o

helinues:
Your last paragraph contradict the first one. Someone destined to do something mean the person has no choice than to obey.

Someone destined to be hired killer shouldn't be judged as he was destined to be so

MaxInDHouse:
There is nothing like destiny God never destined anyone it's Adam and Eve that brought trouble into the world ..

helinues:
Destiny can't be real because if they do, then we don't need to question the criminals who are destined to commit crime

AngelicBeing:
, ,

If you are not a Catholic, they won't allow you to take their communion , nawao

chieveboy:
Your point on me not having seen these characters hence not having existed is like you saying since I have not my father's father, then he did not exist. How elementary could that reasoning be?

It gets more alarming when you include people like Napoleon and Hitler in the list who existed in the era of cameras. It does things to our sense of 'nawa o'.

btoks:
Chai see the height of taken events for granted!!
Jesus commanded his disciples to go into all the world. And they did.

btoks:
As you don't know, Eusebius of Caesarea was a real historical figure known as the Father of Church History(260 to 339AD) and was Bishop of Caesarea
His most famous work(Ecclesiastical History) was written around 311AD and specifically mentions Peter’s martyrdom in Rome.
If you're saying Eusebius "does not exist," then I seriously question the integrity of your so-called investigation.

btoks:
As you don't know, Eusebius of Caesarea was a real historical figure known as the Father of Church History(260 to 339AD) and was Bishop of Caesarea
His most famous work(Ecclesiastical History) was written around 311AD and specifically mentions Peter’s martyrdom in Rome.
If you're saying Eusebius "does not exist," then I seriously question the integrity of your so-called investigation.

btoks:
I laugh cheesy cheesy because what you just called hearsay is exactly what historians call primary and early secondary source material.

btoks:
May your gloating not lead you into deeper error. Taking the Body of Christ unworthily is not a light matter, it’s something scripture directly warns against in 1 Cor 11:27–29:

Mocking or dismissing it doesn’t erase the gravity of the act .

chieveboy:
I am not sure you have your information intact on these characters sir.

We learn everyday...

AngelicBeing:
l concur with you, for instance, l can Walk into any Pentecostal or Charismatic church and receive HOLY COMMUNION but I won't be allowed to receive Holy communion in Catholic Church except l am a Catholic, like seriously,

btoks:
I do hope you'll keep an open mind and research deeply with solid responses, as the "common sense" argument or resorting to modern comparison with APC or saying "bad bad hearsay......" holds absolutely no water against historical fact.
I've given you evidence for why Peter was in Rome, you instead say common sense says he wasn't there. I stated to you that you will find no early church proof of your claim. A strong evidence would be early christians or any groups at the time stating that Peter wasn't in Rome. Even the Eastern Orthodox knows Peter was in Rome.
You've also given a very weak argument as to why you believe the bible books at all!!! I'll just repeat, this book didn't fall out of the sky. Research and find out information.

btoks:
A strong evidence would be early christians or any groups at the time stating that Peter wasn't in Rome.

AngelicBeing:
Hian, LoL at Judas Iscariot got married to an igbo girl and Lazarous Muoka leaves Nigeria to be the Head of Pentecostal churches in Afghanistan, Hehehehe, una go kill person with laugh for nairaland Hahahaha 😂🤣

chieveboy:
Also "not being qualified" is a corner the deceiver have pushed a lot of people so as to generate fear.

Advanced information tells you that the ultimate God cannot regret making man and cannot be angry.

The earth is designed to experience calamities and troubles like the apocalypse, but remains the best school for Souls to learn the qualities of divine love and move in to his rightfully place as a manifested Son of God.

So even if the earth is turned upside down, it will always house Souls who dare to incarnate on earth.
Eternity means perpetuity.

btoks:
Your analogy is very weak here and continues to reveal a very limited understanding of how things worked in early Christianity.and the fact that Peter met our Lord Jesus.

If you insist on “solid proof” for everything, then you’re opening a can of worms that cuts through the very heart of the Christian faith. For example, where’s your “solid proof” that:

Jesus turned water into wine?
Peter walked on water?
Lazarus was raised from the dead?pl
The resurrection happened?
The Holy Spirit descended like tongues of fire?

These are all accepted as truth by faith and supported by historical witness and Church tradition not by modern courtroom style evidence...

AngelicBeing:
let me buzz into this discussion, they said that Apostle Peter was the First Catholic Pope, Apostle Peter was married, but how come all the other subsequent Popes that came after Peter till date, were not married, abi na fabricated story, and there's no scriptural backing, to suggest that Apostle Peter was the First Pope, abi this are all man made church doctrine, and again we have just the 5 Fold Ministry, nothing like Cardinal, ArcBishop or Pope etc

btoks:
you want to discard church father evidence!! ?

btoks:
How exactly do you believe in the bible books?

btoks:
This is where Sola Scriptura falls short. Bible doesn’t claim to give us every single detail historical detail

btoks:
I'll urge you to keep researching with an open mind and you'll find that Christian history is much deeper and richer than Sola Scriptura allows.

btoks:
Nothing like common sense to refute a historical fact almost 2000 years after the event!!
There are many quotes of church fathers closer to the time that talk about Peter's matrydom in Rome...

Note that no ancient source claims Peter was buried in Judea or Israel

btoks:
My age doesn't matter. People have questions everywhere, even in the holy land!
Oddly enough, I remember reading that eaxct thread back in 2013 and just laughing off the ignorance. You're relying on a NL post to determine the supposed lies the Catholic church has told!! All those rejoinders have been debunked over centuries and even here on NL. Do some research and understand catholic teaching not rely on hear say. Common sense doesn't explain a lot about the details of Christian history. Research- Research- Research!!!

shinaola21:
🌺

Fear this gender my brother

Samantha125:
It's this type of girls that settle down real quick... While their mates would still be in tertiary furthering their education, they'd be getting married to well established men... I had four classmates who were like this back in high school and by the time some of us graduated from tertiary, three of them were already married.

chieveboy:
Its a long butt ride right into the rabbit hole. At the end of the video, I am not sure what a lot of you would think.

We can talk about it here.

btoks:
Where, according to you, was Peter buried?

btoks:
Where in history do we have someone say the catholic church is lying. Please be specific, is it the protestant reformers in the 16th centuries that broke away from the church. Was it orthodox in the the 1054AD Great Schism, the last 100 with evangelicals and pentecostals ?please clarify .