EazyMoh's Posts
Nairaland Forum › EazyMoh's Profile › EazyMoh's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (of 128 pages)
Gida Gida ![]() |
idowuswap:Wetin carry you go Ikoyi prison? ![]() |
Emu4life:You seriously think commissioning a phantom drone command center is what will solve the insecurity in the state? |
Let him address insecurity in the state abeg. |
Racoon:Where's your brother Salamrushdie? I hope he has not committed suicide. |
Investbrooker:I am hoping the same thing o. Honestly I kinda miss him. His last post was on February 17. |
freemanbubble:
|
Let those lazy youths continue to leave Nigeria via the Sahara all in the name of escaping their mental slavery. You life is what you make of it. Not everyone has the previllege of being born in a first world country or born with a sliver spoon. All the best bro.. |
Mitsurugi:Of course that's what I am saying. INEC promised to make the SCR more effective in such a way that at least majority of voters would be successfully verified using their fingerprint thereby eliminating the need for Incidence forms. NASS then used that INEC initial promise to remove the clause that allowed the use of Incidence forms in case of unsuccessful fingerprint scan. INEC never gave the SCR any significant technical upgrade, and the president at the end didn't sign the electoral amendment bill. In the end INEC (and every other Nigerian) has to follow the electoral guidelines as they were prior to 2015 elections. Among which Incidence forms are part and parcel of. Mind you according 2015 election analysis the SCR was able to successfully scan the fingerprint of less than 30% of eligible voters. So there's no way 70% could be disenfranchised by not using the Incidence forms. |
Tambuwal, possibly Ganduje too. |
Amitez:You think the court judgment wouldn't be challenged? Does these people look like those that work with facts? |
Mitsurugi:That's a big fat lie! The amendment tried to abolish it but the president never signed it. So card reader is part and parcel of the electoral process. |
As you can see from the above data sheet of 2015 elections Rivers has a ridiculous 71% voter turnout followed by Delta 66, Akwa Ibom 65 and Bayelsa 64 while the national average was 43%. The Bauchi state you mentioned had 53% So for you to claim more than 90% votes cast which will in turn indicate 90% voter turnout is a big fat lie! |
SimplePlan34:It's unfortunate the result is no longer available on INEC website, but you can find it all over the internet. http://www.iri.org/2015%20Nigeria%20Election%20Observation%20Report/1/assets/basic-html/page17.html
|
Next Lagos State governor. |
SimplePlan34:Hehehehe you dey fear? Na information age we dey now. Even your so called PU I can find it. Just tell us the local government let's start from there. |
Mitsurugi:I am telling you how it is supposed to be done according to the electoral guideline. As the self acclaimed educated southerners that you are supposed to be you shall know this better than I. |
Amitez:So whose fault is the disparity in voter turnout? Have you ever wondered whether people in the north just take going out to vote more seriously than those in the south whom find satisfaction in retweets, shares and likes? Have you ever thought whether the "war torn" Borno are more concerned with a leader than can guarantee the improvement in their security situation that they had to do whatever it takes to make sure they made it to the POLLING UNITS and cast their votes? All your emotional outbursts lack any tangible proof. |
[quote author=nnamdismart25 post=76344013][/quote]They told you to go home you can not vote because the SCR failed to recognize any of your fingers? Or for some other reason pls clarify. |
SimplePlan34:Ok can you tell us the local government Sir, let's check whether they recorded 90% voter turnout as you claimed. |
Amitez:I never said MOST, I said SOME voters forget their polling unit. I brought that up because is the ONLY reason that a prospective voter would be categorically denied voting! And I witnessed those cases when I was the presiding officer. You will never be allowed to vote at the wrong PU, no matter how far it is you have to go there if you really want to vote. Bring proof where votes cast are more than accredited votes and the result of such PU was never cancelled. Also bring proof that votes cast in a PU ward, LG senatorial zone or whereever were different between sum of votes of all the parties and void votes for presidential l, Senate and/or house of Representatives.You can start by posting this result from your zone and how they are different. Most of you are just lazy and just concluded the election was rigged without any proof. |
SimplePlan34:You giving your experience in ONE polling unit to generalize a whole region. Ask yourself are you really objective? |
Mitsurugi:Am asking those denied to speak out. This is because I am very conversant with the electoral process. Once your none of your fingers could be verified by the SCR the electoral guideline requires the official fills an Incidence form for the Voter and issue ballot papers to him/her to go ahead and vote. The Incidence forms filled would afterwards be reviewed for a lasting solution. |
SimplePlan34:What you are trying to tell us are. 1. Your PU had over 90% voter turnout while the national average was 56.3% You may say you were threatened to participate in the malpractice but it's wrong to say that's how every is in the north. I participated as the Adhoc staff too and ONlY casted votes were counted and unused ballots were VOIDED by myself so no one could use them. And I participated in my state Jigawa state. At the boldened, you have no proof whatsoever to show us that voters presented a valid PVC and we're denied the chance to cast their votes (which is what disenfranchisement means) because the SCR failed to scan their fingerprints. Nowhere that happened! You can't ascribe low voter turnout to your phantom SCR disenfranchisement. |
seniorkachion:It doesn't matter how many attempts you made, you could try the 10 fingers, that's 10 attempts. Even if all of them failed you must still vote! I want to know who was turned back and not permitted to o cast his/her vote at all due to fingerprint scan failure. |
The SCR records and sends the Total number of accredited voters; both those whose fingerprint have been successfully verified and those whose verification failed. Total number of votes cast shall never exceed Total number of accredited voters (i.e those that passed fingerprint scan + those that failed). In any situation where the total number of votes cast is greater than total accredited voters that particular PU results is automatically cancelled! |
Please I am at loss regarding the now popular claim that the INEC Smart Card Reader was used to Disenfranchise voters in the just concluded presidential and national assembly elections. As a veteran INEC Adhoc staff, I have fist hand knowledge of the card reader, it's functions and purpose, but in no way does it disenfranchise genuine voters that truly belong to that particular poling unit. Let me explain how it works. Each card reader is configured to carry out the following functions in successive order: 1. Scan the PVC tendered by the voter to determine it's authenticity. (This stage has been passed by all card readers at 99.999% times?). This means all authentic INEC issued PVCs are identified by the SCR. The hardcopy voters Register is also checked and the voters profile marked appropriately. 2. After passing (1) above, the SCR determine whether the PVC holder is supposed to vote at that particular PU. Some voters forget where they initially register and show up at the wrong PU to vote. In this case they are directed to the appropriate PU by kindly reminding them where they initially registered. The information of the actual registration unit is written on the PVC and also displayed on the SCR once the card is scanned. 3. After assurance that the PVC is authentic and that it belongs to that particular PU; then the process of verifying that the bearer is actually the owner of the PVC. Now NOTE this stage in most countries even US what is required is for the official to look at the face on the PVC to make sure it matches the bearer's. 3-a. Since the SCR has a biometric scanner and the voters ten (10) were captured during registration, but due to many errors this is where the SCR scored less than 30% success. Due to error during registration as all the 10 fingers may not have successfully captured, disfigurement of the fingers and above all the quality of the fingerprint scanner it self as it looks cheap, these and many more factors makes it a daunting task to successfully authenticate the voter. 7 out of 10 fail this stage. 3-b. Having the above problem in mind, INEC provided Incidence Forms that are meant to be filled for the voter and then cleared to vote if the Official is satisfied that the voter's face matches the picture in the Voter Register. Whether the SCR has authenticated the fingerprint of the voter successfully or not, he/she must be allowed to vote! Only condition is that the Incidence form be filled. Ironically the much talked about Electoral Amendment Bill the president refused to sign tried to abolish the use of the Incidence forms since INEC promised to make sure the fingerprint scan doesn't fail. But we all know that is not reliable, and the Incidence form use still remains part of the process. So I wonder HOW the election is claimed to have been rigged. Has any voter reported to their poling unit with their PVC and they are denied to cast their vote because the SCR failed to successfully verify their fingerprint? |
Guyman02:Who told you that? |
Lies about this Card Reader shall be stopped! Has anybody EVER been stopped from voting just because the card reader failed to recognize his/her finger print? |
He supposed get a yellow card ![]() |
2023 it's TINUBU to beat. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 (of 128 pages)
