₦airaland Forum

Harmskion:
you are madd

Dscop:
Shouldn't you be on your fellow Muslims threads? Why are you hyperventilating over something someone else believes. What is missing in your life that what someone else believes is making you foam in the moutht?

Lemme guess, seun did not make you confess Jesus before posting. There you have it.

baretalk:
ote author=Empiree post=113569930]Abi o... Their pastors and bishops realized they are losing faith as a result of recent attack in Owo, they quickly mobilized them to chant Jesus name everywhere instead of mobilizing them for better governance. Pastors and churches are scam
How can so many educated people be so dumb at same time?

This is a practical issue, exactly what do they want Jesus to do?

The terrorists and bandits will be laughing.

kristen12:
Hold the government responsible and accountable for their decisions, they vowed to protect all of you and have failed. You voted them in, hold them responsible.

Jesus didn't vote and doesn't make decisions for humans.

Stop blaming Jesus and the church for human and government failure.

BadRadio:
https://www.facebook.com/87046278487/posts/10160752175313488/

baretalk:
te author=muykem post=113569555] The name of Jesus is not meaningless. Don't defend your mistakes.
In this case, it has no effect, the terrorists will be laughing...what christians need to do is mobilize and protest, force the government to do something...this is laughable...even Jesus will be disappointed.

DSC7:
JESUS is the only Name ABOVE every other names....

kristen12:
Jesus has been trending all over social media platforms since 12:00pm and this is why.

Started from Twitter to WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram.

Don't forget to raise your banner and call the name above all names over the country today.

And also get your PVC.

movado19:
Can one blame those prior scholars who were vehemently against it?
I recently read on what Shaikh Ibn Al Arabi had to say about some of them...
It can be a slippery slope, as we see with SIH and others.

Na'am!!!

ALL of them would always go for the ayas that are most likey to cause schism!
That's how one came and said to me that he would PROVE to me that RasulAllah (S.A.W.) bowed to the superiority, might and power of ISA (A.S.)!!
I said to him: In this Quran?! Please, show it to me and IF you do, then I will become a christian as you have always wanted!
I brought the Quran forward and asked him to SHOW me where the bowing took place.
He then began to dribble with words - while refusing to engage with the Quran cheesy cheesy
I asked him to tell me the chapter and verse so I can HELP him view it in the Quran.
He then started telling me that he is seasoned because he went to a Theologic school...
I told him congrats on that but I NEED you to SHOW me where this bowing to prophet ISA (A.S.) superiority, might, and power is!
When he felt cornered, he called on another christian brother of his - for reinforcement - and after he told that one of how STUBBORN I was, that one began to say that my issue could be a strong case of possession grin

Anyway, yes, that's how they are. They'll pinpoint verses that may seen ambigous in order to flaw those who aren't prepared.

SIH wants to favour the Chrisitans at all cost and the end game is for Muslims to SUBMIT to be RULED by them!
He has said this but I don't think that people are really listening to what he's saying.

Truly, calling him a Kafir is a bit too much in my view, but what he has done and still doing is a clear pointer in that direction!
There's a level of recklessness in his speech that is becoming alarmingly dangerous and I pray that Allah blesses and guides his heart aright, Amin.

He has mentioned that the BOOK which ASIF got the knowledge from is NOT the Quran or any other divine book, but it was a book on THERMODYNAMICS!!!! shocked
How he arrived at this conclusion is a mystery which he isn't willing to share.
Any further questions directed at him to explain will cause series of explos!ons from him!

Marsh104:
ANAMBRA MASSACRE:

Analysis on How a murder that occurred four years ago in South Africa led to the massacre in Ozubulu.

Ginika, an Mbaise native, grew up in Ozubulu, and was taken to South Africa by Aloysious a.k.a Bishop, to start a "joint venture". It was reported that the "Joint Venture" became a boom, and Bishop opted to pay off Ginika, and Ginika refused thus ensued a quarrel.

Ginika,raised in Ozubulu, but of Mbaise parentage, took the matter to Mbaise Kin in South Africa and accused Bishop of plotting to kill him. Sometimes later, Ginika was assassinated in South Africa, with accusing fingers pointed towards Bishop, who denied the killing.

This event set of retaliatory killings, with many of Bishop's associates murdered in South Africa and Nigeria. It was said that Bishop escaped several attempts to kill him, and have always come out unscathed during each attack.

But back home in Ozubulu, Bishop is well loved. He placed elderly women on monthly cash transfers, built churches and granted scholarships. Two months ago, Governor Obiano commissioned a 12km road built by Bishop and held him up as a role model for others to emulate.

Back in South Africa, Bishop was being sought after by rivals from Mbaise clan, including his some of his own Ozubulu Kin, who despised him.

This case has been allegedly adjudicated by traditional rulers/elders in Ozubulu and Mbaise since 2013 who sued for peace, to no avail. Assailants trailed Bishop to Ozubulu, and made attempt to kill at the St Philips Church, a church he had built and donated to the Catholics. However, Bishop was not at the 6am mass, leaving the Assasin to kill his father and other worshippers.

This case is still very much open,because there are fears the associates of Bishop may carry out a reprisal elsewhere either in SA or Mbaise

-- Nnamdi Anekwe-Chive

parisbookaddict:
Uploading all manner of pics from the internet has always been your go to. No zeal or intellect to make ur own critical analysis or defend your own arguments.

I am not surprised. That's what religion especially Islam does. Regurgitation. No critical analysis.

Continue wasting your time defending a prophet that evidently was suffered from mental illness and ocd

parisbookaddict:
The answer is very simple
They are not killing in the name of any God or dirty fake prophet-but because you are a religious bigot you won't see it.

In your mind an American is automatically a Christian. Many Americans are irreligious or agonistic. Show me one who is killing in the name of Christ while quoting passages in the bible commanding him to slay infidels

parisbookaddict:
The answer is very simple
They are not killing in the name of any God or dirty fake prophet-but because you are a religious bigot you won't see it.

In your mind an American is automatically a Christian. Many Americans are irreligious or agonistic. Show me one who is killing in the name of Christ while quoting passages in the bible commanding him to slay infidels

parisbookaddict:
The answer is very simple
They are not killing in the name of any God or dirty fake prophet-but because you are a religious bigot you won't see it.

In your mind an American is automatically a Christian. Many Americans are irreligious or agonistic. Show me one who is killing in the name of Christ while quoting passages in the bible commanding him to slay infidels

parisbookaddict:
The answer is very simple
They are not killing in the name of any God or dirty fake prophet-but because you are a religious bigot you won't see it.

In your mind an American is automatically a Christian. Many Americans are irreligious or agonistic. Show me one who is killing in the name of Christ while quoting passages in the bible commanding him to slay infidels

movado19:
His mind should have asked the following questions:
- who were the blasphemers and how did they blaspheme?
- what accusations did they levy against ISA (A.S.) that Allah himself will clear up?
Surah Al-Maeda Q05:116-119 had/has the answers in readiness had he contemplated and researched for the correct explanation.

Having reached the above answer, the pastor could then have known who the accusers/blasphemers are and what they said.
He would have known that they were not the party who followed ISA (A.S.), then his next question should/could have been:

- what set the followers of ISA (A.S.) apart from the accusers/blasphemers that Allah promised to make them superior to those who reject faith?
This he would have found had he researched what ISA (A.S.) preached to his people regarding faith and belief in Allah...

Instead, the pastor jumped and concluded that what it meant was those who follow christ as today's christians do!
He most probably had christians around him who had been pressuring him to convert and since he could not substantiate his faith as a Muslim, it became a case of whoever can prove his/her case wins, hence his belief in what his son put forward....

I'll say it again, the Quran is not a story book or medieval trivia that one opens in order to while away time or gain some form of amusement.
It requires full engagement of the mind, heart and soul, with the intention to be guided to the absolute - NOT relative - Truth!

The lady as well as others are busy trying to explain what SIH means by what he said, but the Shaykh in his talks keeps saying what he's always said and he maintains that he's 100 percent right.
I wish that they's stop this apologist way of tackling things and realize that others can see, hear and think!
They are now trying to argue in favour of SIH by saying that Ibn Abbass (R.A.) was NO ORDINARY COMPANION!
While that is true, are they then insinuating that the other companions could not hold a candle to him in any way?
The fact remains that Ibn Abbass recited in one of the approved ways but it was not popular and by concensus, the most popular recital became the defacto.
This doesn't stop anyone from reciting in the other approved ways but to denounce one as an infiltration of dajjal /satan is on another level entirely!

movado19:
Salam Alaikum to Everyone.

I have a few questions for @ Shaikh Empiree and to others who are into the study of Islamic Eschatology;

1. What is your view/take on the statement made by Shaikh Imran Hosein about Surah Zukhruf Q43:61; regarding the Tashkeel - Diacritics (kasra) INSTEAD of (fatha), so La'alamun and NOT La'ilmun, according to him?

spencekat:
No iota of similarity bro.