Empiree's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Empiree's Profile › Empiree's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 (of 775 pages)
....... ![]()
|
MadamVanessa:similar to what Deborah allegedly did. One thing is to preach, it is another thing entirely to desecrate house of worship, religious figures or shrines. And do not insult those they invoke other than God , lest they insult God in enmity without knowledge. Thus We have made pleasing to every community their deeds. Then to their Lord is their return, and He will inform them about what they used to do. - Qur'an |
New Murkaz Agege Invention & Progress May Allah continue to shower His Peace and Blessings Upon Sheikh Adam Abdullah Al-ilory (rohimohullah) Murkaz Agege University https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=409838181006461&id=100044530565345 https://fb.watch/drCQrOUjJ-/
|
Alhajiemeritus:walaikun salaam... they are irrelevant. Mudir'murkaz was not the first to say this. I know that whist growing up, 99.99% of all of us believe in the return of Isa (as) but there is no problem if we do more research for educational purposes. There were minor salafi scholars that rejected his return as well. I forgot his name. I heard his name from Sheikh AbdulHamid Shorinola Aduangba months ago. Similarly, Dr. Alamo Muhammad Iqbal did not believe it. So it shouldn't be issue at all bcuz if you read Quran again and again you see that Quran already accomplished what Hadith says Jesus is coming to do. But then, if he will come, he's very much welcome. If he doesn't, no problem. His return has nothing to do with us. We Muslims are not his followers but believers in him. We are not the ummah of Jesus. Plus, the way our Muslim brothers in Yorubaland carry it for head is disgraceful. They keep saying Jesus will come over and over as if he's our saviour and Christians are seeing this as validation of their faith lol |
Tomek09: ![]() |
Tomek09: ebuka440:you two clowns realized that at least Deborah has family and at least she was accused of allegation that could not be proven. But a whole family with pregnant mother was obliterated by Christian terrorists IPOB. Why are you clowns so hypocritical?. All lives matter. Harirah's death and her children are more worse than Deborah. So when are you going to leave religion out of these disasters?
|
ANTIlSLAM:Thank God I don't understand. What I don't understand doesn't bother me ![]() |
ANTIlSLAM:I don't even understand what you just said |
Shaikh Empi.ree, wallah those people who are in this category as the pastor above, if you dig deeper, you will most likely find the following:Absolutely you are right. Very true. Christianity was a later development.one clear example that Christians were never in Medina was a seerah. It is also famous Hadith. It was in the masjid where Nabi Muhammad, his companions and Nassara were in the masjid. They were having what I called "meeting". Then it was time of salat for Nassara. It was in the afternoon which means they wanted to offer their zuhr Salah. So they wanted to step out of masjid to go to their own masjid. Nabi Muhammad told them to pray inside masjid right there and they did. Question is, if Nassara prayed salat in the afternoon, which Salat Christians prayed then and now?. This is one of the evidences that Christianity/Christians were never in Medina. Is he going to say that he is not aware of Allah's vehemence against trinity in the Quran?I told him this too. It was a long message I sent him on YouTube. His reply to this was, "Orthodox Christianity doesn't believe in Trinity and that they believe Father is greater than son. And since father is greater than son, they have affirmed superiority of Allah. So by definition of Islam, they are Muslims in the sight of Allāh". This is exactly how he put it. I wasted no time. I googled Orthodox Christianity on Trinity. It shows they believe in Trinity. I sent him my findings but he never replied till now. This was over 2 years now. |
I have just got time to watch the video. Pretty much not new from what he has been saying in recent years. I asked him a question about solitary Hadith. The Hadith is very known so I won't quote it but I will paraphrase it. The Hadith says the Jews and the Christians took the graves of their prophets as places of worship. Question is, who was the Prophet of Nassara?. I threw this question to sheikh over 2 years ago but he never replied to this specific question. Speaking of tashreek, Sheikh said if Ibn Abass(ra) could recite the Ayah La alam then we can not fault him. My observation is, it is character of Sheikh to reject or doubt solitary Hadith. So why now sheikh accepted this solitary Hadith over entire ummah?. As we all know, Quran was reviewed with Nabi Muhammad few times before his demise. So, is Sheikh telling us that only Ibn Abass was right in the exact pronunciation and the rest were wrong?. He also contradicted himself when he said it was the later ummah that applied tashkeel wrongly on la ilm instead la alam. If that's the case, why was tashkeels not the problem for the entire ummah in the time of Sahaba?. Why only verse 61 singled out?. movado19:This was done years ago. I used to see some muslims and even a translated QUR'AN placed Ibrahim in parentheses. I had to correct them. SIH has become what some could term the PR machine for the orthodox christians - I have seen several times his mild and overtly friendly manner towards them and his harshness towards the muslims. This he doesn't hide.I commented about this issue with him years ago. I told him that he's now doing what he condemned Harun Yahya of over 15 years ago. The video should be on YouTube still. He accused Harun Yahya of promoting fraternal relationship btw Islam and CHRISTIANITY as one religion and warned his students to be cautious of him. That, because of Harun Yahya's approach, western world promoted him as Islamic scholar. He's now doing the same. |
Empiree:check this out. Not sure. I'm still searching https://www.facebook.com/100066690938924/videos/659556152003454/ Modified https://www.facebook.com/100066690938924/videos/1163124934486796/ movado19 |
movado19:while I respect his opinion, I believe he's entitled to it because sometimes, ummah didn't get it right until someone later calls our attention to certain errors. For instance, Rajm. Rajam was truly a ruling of Allah but that was in the old Laws not QUR'AN. But for some reason, the ummah of Nabi Muhammad SAW believe the ruling still exist in the Quran but the Ayah has been removed. This is what the ummah believe. This is very incorrect. The Hudud in the Quran is now flogging not stoning. So sheikh Imran is right on this but doesn't mean he's right as the time. In all honesty, he says that but then doesn't leave room for others to ask him questions that seem challenging. When this happens, he gets into a fit which is not okay for anyone, how much more a scholar.exactly... This shows that you really you his lectures. He get upset. This isn't cool. Does he think only salafis are against him. Correct. The tashkeels are the ruh which power each letter consonant; as without them, they are just potentials. They cannot be divorced from the letters orally or in written form, therefore, when reciting the Quran, one will hear their presence and also when written, one will see their presence.Absolutely... So, as far as I am concerned, لَعِلْمٌۭ is correct. The Ayah is similar to Sura Hajj vs 78 "It is He Who has named you Muslims both before and in this (the Qur'an),..." Some interpreted He in that verse to Nabi Ibrahim (as). If that's the case, who named Muslims before Ibrahim (as)?. Similarly, Ayah 61 of sura Zhukhruf refers to Allah's knowledge of the Hour not Jesus because I'm Christian bible in the book of Matthew 24:36 Jesus reported to have said: "But about that Day or Hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Honestly, I thought I did not hear him right all this while until he explicitly made it clear once more in this video on his stance about the Ummah of Rasul Allah S.A.W. to be ruled by those whom Allah has expressedly said DO NOT BELEIVE!You see now...gross error indeed. You should ask him why he was so much concerned about Khilifa?. Why did he ignore other verses where Allah repeatedly said Islam will triumph?. It is because of his interpretation of Al-Imran 55 and his consistently saying Orthodox Christianity will rule over muslims that I now reject the return of Jesus. Mudir'murkaz, Ustaz Jamiu Adegunwa etc are right. And if dajjal will arrive, Allah Himself will get rid of him. He doesn't need Jesus to come and deal with dajjal. If Allah will obliterate yajuj wa majuj, how can He not destroy Dajjal?. This is why those aHadith that speak on return of Isa (as) seem to promote Christianity in my view. They portray Jesus as savior of Muslims. Pastors have use those Hadith to convert Muslims. Also sheik Imran Hussein interpretation of Al-Imran 55 is error. A pastor in Nigeria whose name is Pastor Shonibare converted to Christianity because of this Ayah. His son called his attention to the verse and he said, "wow I have been reading this Ayah for long but I didn't know that the Ayah is calling me to Christianity... So if the Ayah says followers of Jesus will be superior why don't I simply join Christianity?". That's how he gone since then. He narrated his own story on stage. So Sheikh Imran Hussein is supporting such view as well. I have told him three times about the danger of his view . The Ayah is talking about yahud and Nassara at the time. And the believers in Jesus were later made superior to those who rejected him. Believers at the time were not Christians. When I told SIH this, he said it does6 matter whether Nassara are Christians or not. He said they believe in Jesus that's all that matters. Hence, the Ayah refers to them. But he ignored where Allah plainly said they have disbelieve those who say Trinity or call Jesus God etc. My conclusion is, Sheikh is blind by current world affairs. |
movado19:I have requested for short lecture on the verse explained by Sheikh Mubarak. Hopefully I get it soon. |
movado19:walaikun salaam, I saw rebuttal by Sheikh Hassan who in recent time has been criticizing Sheikh Imran Hussein. He called him kafir on this issue you raised for his utterances. I was once hardcore fan of Sheikh Imran Hussein but as years go by I find myself rejecting/disagreeing with him especially from the way he understands Sura Al-Imran verse 55 which he repeated by proxy in this video you posted. One thing I like about him is that he always said that no one should agree or accept his view unless and until we are convinced he's right. I am now of the opinion that Ayah 61 sura zhukhruf refers to knowledge of the Hour i:e Allah, Quran not Jesus. It doesn't indicate return of Isa (as). It is true that tashkeels were not revealed with Quran. But this doesn't change the pronunciation and the meaning. All I can say for now is that sheikh Imran Hussein should be careful not to be carried away because of his so called "love and affection" for the Orthodox Christians. The Ayah he quoted in Al-Imran 55, I have argued with him on this Ayah 3 times but unfortunately he refused to reply properly. His interpretation is that the Ayah is talking about Christians who "follow" Jesus. Christians were never followers of Jesus. What Qur'an mentions is "Nassara". Nassara doesn't mean Christians. Christians existed in the time of Nabi Muhammad SAW but they were never in Medina contrary to popular opinion that Christians were in Medina. They were in Rome at the time. So sheikh is saying that Ayah 55 means Orthodox Christianity will triumph and rule the world over western Christianity and Muslims. This is gross error.. Muslims have been praying Salat for over 1400 years. If keferi will triumph and rule over Muslims till Qiyyama, why are we still praying Salat then?. Why don't we just be Orthodox Christians instead of wasting our time 5 times a day, fast in Ramadan, go to Hajj etc. Allah is just. So sura Al-Imran 55 is referring to the people that lived at the time of Jesus. Jesus true followers were superior to those who disbelieved in him. And besides, both Qur'an and Bible confirm that Jesus was sent only to his own people. This is why I begin to doubt those aHadith that speak about his second coming. They contradict Quran and they contradict themselves. I used to translate Q43:61 as appearance of Jesus is the Sign of the Hour. I now put this view side. Allah himself took Jesus soul and he's dead... Not coming back |
Halo22:smh... It is like saying BH denied killings going on in the North. Makes sense? |
Idiko1:Don't shift goalpost. IPOB is a Christian terrorist organization. |
SATANICALLY:
|
SecretAgent7706:Christian Association Of Nigeria liar. Don't believe in their so called "condemnation". Read their 1994 manifesto against Islam and Muslims. Read their Bible. IPOB is a Christian terrorist group that is marauding under Biafra nation. Please read the Bible. Kill everyone in the town if they worship other gods Deuteronomy 13:12-19 If you hear it said about one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you to live in that wicked men have arisen among you and have led the people of their town astray, saying, “Let us go and worship other gods” (gods you have not known), then you must inquire, probe and investigate it thoroughly. And if it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done among you, you must certainly put to the sword all who live in that town. Destroy it completely, both its people and its livestock. Gather all the plunder of the town into the middle of the public square and completely burn the town and all its plunder as a whole burnt offering to the LORD your God. It is to remain a ruin forever, never to be rebuilt. None of those condemned things shall be found in your hands, so that the LORD will turn from his fierce anger; he will show you mercy, have compassion on you, and increase your numbers, as he promised on oath to your forefathers, because you obey the LORD your God, keeping all his commands that I am giving you today and doing what is right in his eyes." IPOB is following Bible verse fundamentally. So CAN should stop pretending. In order to prove me right, you all have watched bishop Oyedepo said Allah is not God and is anyone begs him in the name of Allah he would snub them. Now read attached from IPOB and read Christian manifesto
|
All these killers are called "gunmen" yet they all had Christian background. Why not Christian terrorists?
|
Maryloveth:Your brothers in faith have been killing people for years in America..omo ale
|
|
|
caracas:keep deceiving yourself. Meanwhile, one of your brothers just killed 21 people in Texas yesterday. 19 children and 2 teachers.. Media called him "gunman" but he's actually a Christian terrorist |
mcquin:You didn't need to. I know exactly what you talking about. Meanwhile, pastor Akintaro is still sitting his butt in jail for insulting the noble prophet Muhammad, the best of mankind ![]() |
mcquin:law what?. Charge and bail lawyer? . Lawyer my foot. Let police lock you up for 3 days and after you come out, tell people that you were in detention and see their reaction. They would tell you that your were jailed. Don't start using irrelevant technical legal terms here. Jail is jail.Pastor Akintaro is still locked up and it is more than 3 days ![]() |
IME1:you have just talked but I can not pick any point from your epistle. I quoted your Bible. Not one, not two but 3 verses that Jesus could not have died for your sin and your are telling me about holy spirit. Be like say you have no idea of your Bible. You better come to Muslims to learn about your Bible. We are the Muslim scholars of the Bible. You hear me? |
caracas:see rubbish this one is saying. What's the difference here?. Are Deborah killers not criminals?. You people are hypocrites. What's this rubbish about religious killing is different from "normal killing"?. Death is death. What difference does it make to the victims?. IPOB are Christians. So please stop this rubbish. They just killed Muslims for being Muslims, period. |
Why is everybody silent on killing of these innocent Muslims.... Where is CAN and where are muslims and Alfas that came out for Debora?. Why are Nigerians so hypocritical? Where are half baked muslims that are quick to "leave Islam" because some lunatic kill people?.
|
J3susFr3ak:Jesus did what?. Be like say you dey read Bible backward or you are reading different Bible. This is what your Bible says Galatians 6:5 "For every man shall abear his own burden" Ezekiel 18:20 "The soul that sin, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him." Deuteronomy 24:16 "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his down sin." Quran 35:18 "No one can bear another's burden." So tell me, don't you think you are being unjust by having a man to die for you for sin he didn't commit?. That's injustice. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 (of 775 pages)



