₦airaland Forum

^Honestly, this isuue of greeting "Juma'ah Mubarak" is none issue at all. Where did rosul reported to have said it's haram or bid'ah to wish your fellow muslims "Juma'ah mubarak"?. Please get over this. The word BID'AH is now being used too loosely. Haba

^As for my comment on statues, I think Albaqir should put the whole thing in context. My intention at the time was, building snowwomen is a practical joke, a mere child play. It was like non-issue.

But ayesha's comment embeded with religious undertone. She portrayed it like adorable image. I had no choice but to make earlier comment. Building snowwomen (which is a mere play) was probably equivalent to Aisha(ra) playing with dolls. No reilgious thing attached.

Ayesha01ad:
He must have said this because statues are Haram in Islam, you people should not just start calling people names, this is not what Islam teaches. If it was nonsense do you think someone would ask? The person asked the sheik cos he knows there must be something with regards to it

Thanks. But for record, if a muslim asked such question, such a "muslim" must be dump. It's a common knowledge statue is haram. Even baby knows that.

Tashahud:

Salaam alaika ayua an-nabiy

peace upon you o prophet

You remember how tashahud came about?

shirk?....seriously? something wrong with you

^Yes, let's just leave it since you dont understand. Let me quickly remind you. So far, in your theory, you claimed to translate verse 33:56 by letter. But throughout your intellectual interpretation, you skipped two letters that do not support your argument.

"Support" or "reach out for" as you want us to believe does not fit in this verse.

"......o you believers, support the prophet OR ....o believers, reach out for the prophet..."

The above^ is your translation of what "sallu" means. Therefore, you are saying that the verse goes like this, "God and His Angels reach out for the prophet or support the prophet. O believers, reach out for the prophet and regard him". Correct? congratulations

The problem though, is, in the arabic context, it goes like this "God and His Angels sollu ala prophet. O believers sollu alaiy prophet with teslim"

So why did you throw away ala (as in) ain (ع‎) and lam(ل‎) which are used 2x in the verse. You used "support for", reach out for". These silly translation of your doesnt fit in here. "Ala" means "on or upon". In the second sentence, we see alaiy that's, 'on him or upon him'. Why did you skip that?

Ofcourse I am aware of some verses are specifically applied to prophet only. What's your point. It's because your gave the verse new meaning thats why you lost in thought.

Note, i welcome correction

So is this polytheism...?

[size=15pt]Salah Allahu alaiy wasalam[/size]

Allah's peace and blessings be upon him

Allah's blessing be upon him

Blessings and peace of God be upon him

Above are shirk? seriously ?

usermane:
That 's it, the Prophet is dead, we can't can't support him in the context of these verses any more. There are several verses of this chapter which is no longer applicable today. That 's my understanding.

Wrong! Qur'an revolves eternally. You chose "support" whatever that means is your choice. The ayah is valid until Qur'an is no more.

And like I said earlier, there is nothing to talk about on this subject. Therefore your case is dismissed. But if you think usermane is the only true muslim and all other 1 point whatever millions are heretic, then you got serious problems and that's your cup of coffee. Anyways, you are my brother. Take a chill pill, smiles and get over it.

Put smiles on your face...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Qjdy3sK98

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsA4iLRiOTs

joseph1832:
Am sure so many moslems don't follow the Hadith like they follow the Qu'ran!. I am not moslem, but I want to know if such verse is in the Qu'ran?.

You dey mind them . They are people satan whispered to. They basically twisting and frustrating religious text in islam while ignoring madness in their own book, churches and in their own selves.

Jazakumu lahu khyran. Excellent

I so much love this ayah. It's pregnant. Fussilat 30

Alhamdulilah

I support maclatunji 100% on this. I also reason with op, too. A way in between is the way to go.

pupsyd , they keep repeating themselves and creating nuisance online. Their answered here.Deal with it

PastorKun:
I am not lying, you know very well that there is no where in the bible that Jesus is said to be the same person as God. Trinity is a catholic invention.

Where did Bishop get his theory of Divinity of Jesus from?. Sounds like he has another bible different from yours.

To save you time, kindly watch this clip from 16:00-18:00mins.Listen to Bishop

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFabFXg-x0w
So, are muslims wrong or mocking when they say this is blasphemy?.

80% Christians in the world today believe what bishop believes

PastorKun:
I am not lying, you know very well that there is no where in the bible that Jesus is said to be the same person as God. Trinity is a catholic invention.

House devided
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We3fhAf17Gc